Here's some stuff sermonfire has liked. To find more cool stuff, check out Explore »

Gary says...

A Case For More Apologetic Teaching in Today's Church

Let me be clear, I believe that the Bible is to be the ultimate authority in a Christian's life, and EVERY WORD is accurate and inspired by God. Because the Bible says so should be enough for a Christian, but sadly it is not.

The Barna Group has an article out today titled New Research Explores How Different Generations View and Use the Bible. It is at the same time interesting and very sad. It really highlights a problem that I have recently come to see a the root of a lot of the problems we are currently seeing in the modern Church, specifically, a low view of scripture. The Authority of scripture is not emphasized, and Apologetics is rarely taught, if at all.

The survey sited in the article defined four generations. 
  • Mosaic generation - ages 18 to 25
  • Busters are those ages 26 to 44
  • Boomers are 45 to 63
  • Elders are 64-plus.
Researchers found three similarities amoung all four groups.
  1. Over 50% of all four age groups consider the Bible a sacred book.
  2. Right at 25% of all four groups have the “highest” view of the Bible – that it is “the actual word of God and should be taken literally, word for word.” (Mosaics: 27%, Busters: 27%, Boomers: 23%, and one-third of Elders 34%)
  3. 20-25% of all four groups have the "lowest view" of scripture - that "the Bible is not inspired by God." (Mosaics: 25%, Busters: 19%, Boomers: 22%, and Elders: 22%).
The differences between the four groups are more interesting, and show a bad trend towards a lack of belief in the authority of scripture. This is illustrated by the following six areas of belief, or lack of belief.
  • Bible as Sacred: 
    "9 out of 10 Boomers and Elders described the Bible as sacred, which compares to 8 out of 10 Busters (81%) and just 2 out of 3 Mosaics (67%)"
  • Accuracy of the Bible:
    "Just 30% of Mosaics and 39% of Busters firmly believe that the Bible is totally accurate in all of the principles it teaches, compared with 46% of Boomers and 58% of Elders."
  • Acceptance of Universalism:
    "Among Mosaics, a majority (56%) believes the Bible teaches the same spiritual truths as other sacred texts, which compares with 4 out of 10 Busters and Boomers, and one-third of Elders."
  • Skepticism of Origins of Manuscripts:
    "Young adults are more likely to express skepticism about the original manuscripts of the Bible than is true of older adults."
  • Less engagement with the Bible:
    "Busters and Mosaics are less likely than average to have spent time alone in the last week praying and reading the Bible for at least 15 minutes. Interestingly, none of the four generations were particularly likely to say they aspired to read the Bible more as a means of improving their spiritual lives."
  • Biblical Appetite:
    "Despite the generational decline in many Bible metrics, one departure from the typical pattern is the fact that younger adults, especially Mosaics (19%), express a slightly above-average interest in gaining additional Bible knowledge. This compares with 12% of Boomers and 9% of Elders."

This study gives us a picture of American society that is about 50% accepting of the Bible as sacred, but 30-50% accept universalism and only 30-40% believe in the Bible's complete accuracy.

We live in an age were the average person has more information at their fingertips than ever before, and the younger generations are consuming that information as fast as they can get it, but most of what they hear and read concerning the Bible either negative, or completely false. But if you look at the last point in the study, 19% of our youngest adults "express a slightly above-average interest in gaining additional Bible knowledge." I would bet that if we fed the curiosity of that 19%, a good portion of the rest would then become interested.

We (the Church) are doing a horrible job of teaching the historicity and factual accuracy of the Bible, let alone the spiritual truth of the Bible. We need to equip ourselves and fellow Christians with the knowledge, skill and desire to defend the Bible and all that it teaches to the world. Our young people need to know how to defend what they believe. If they can't even defend the provable history and facts in the Bible, how do we expect them to be willing to share their faith to an increasingly skeptical peer group? Heck, how many of us can defend what we believe to our own kids when the come home from high school and college with their heads filled with all of differing beliefs and philosophies taught by their teachers and professors?

"Because the Bible says so" is no longer good enough. 

Filed under: bible study, christianity, church, culture & society, theology

Below is the complete email conversation that Adelaide man David Thorne claims he had with a utility company chasing payment of an overdue bill.

From: Jane Gilles
Date: Wednesday 8 Oct 2008 12.19pm
To: David Thorne
Subject: Overdue account

Dear David,
Our records indicate that your account is overdue by the amount of $233.95. If you have already made this payment please contact us within the next 7 days to confirm payment has been applied to your account and is no longer outstanding.

Yours sincerely, Jane Gilles


From: David Thorne
Date: Wednesday 8 Oct 2008 12.37pm
To: Jane Gilles
Subject: Re: Overdue account

Dear Jane,
I do not have any money so am sending you this drawing I did of a spider instead. I value the drawing at $233.95 so trust that this settles the matter.

Regards, David.



From: Jane Gilles
Date: Thursday 9 Oct 2008 10.07am
To: David Thorne
Subject: Overdue account

Dear David,
Thankyou for contacting us. Unfortunately we are unable to accept drawings as payment and your account remains in arrears of $233.95. Please contact us within the next 7 days to confirm payment has been applied to your account and is no longer outstanding.

Yours sincerely, Jane Gilles


From: David Thorne
Date: Thursday 9 Oct 2008 10.32am
To: Jane Gilles
Subject: Re: Overdue account

Dear Jane,
Can I have my drawing of a spider back then please.

Regards, David.


From: Jane Gilles
Date: Thursday 9 Oct 2008 11.42am
To: David Thorne
Subject: Re: Re: Overdue account

Dear David,
You emailed the drawing to me. Do you want me to email it back to you?

Yours sincerely, Jane Gilles


From: David Thorne
Date: Thursday 9 Oct 2008 11.56am
To: Jane Gilles
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Overdue account

Dear Jane,

Yes please.

Regards, David.


From: Jane Gilles
Date: Thursday 9 Oct 2008 12.14pm
To: David Thorne
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Overdue account

Attached



From: David Thorne
Date: Friday 10 Oct 2008 09.22am
To: Jane Gilles
Subject: Whose spider is that?

Dear Jane, Are you sure this drawing of a spider is the one I sent you? This spider only has seven legs and I do not feel I would have made such an elementary mistake when I drew it.

Regards, David.


From: Jane Gilles
Date: Friday 10 Oct 2008 11.03am
To: David Thorne
Subject: Re: Whose spider is that?

Dear David, Yes it is the same drawing. I copied and pasted it from the email you sent me on the 8th. David your account is still overdue by the amount of $233.95. Please make this payment as soon as possible.

Yours sincerely, Jane Gilles


From: David Thorne
Date: Friday 10 Oct 2008 11.05am
To: Jane Gilles
Subject: Automated Out of Office Response

Thankyou for contacting me. I am currently away on leave, traveling through time and will be returning last week.

Regards, David.


From: David Thorne
Date: Friday 10 Oct 2008 11.08am
To: Jane Gilles
Subject: Re: Re: Whose spider is that?

Hello, I am back and have read through your emails and accept that despite missing a leg, that drawing of a spider may indeed be the one I sent you. I realise with hindsight that it is possible you rejected the drawing of a spider due to this obvious limb ommission but did not point it out in an effort to avoid hurting my feelings. As such, I am sending you a revised drawing with the correct number of legs as full payment for any amount outstanding. I trust this will bring the matter to a conclusion.

Regards, David.



From: Jane Gilles
Date: Monday 13 Oct 2008 2.51pm
To: David Thorne
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Whose spider is that?

Dear David, As I have stated, we do not accept drawings in lei of money for accounts outstanding. We accept cheque, bank cheque, money order or cash. Please make a payment this week to avoid incurring any additional fees.

Yours sincerely, Jane Gilles


From: David Thorne
Date: Monday 13 Oct 2008 3.17pm
To: Jane Gilles
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Whose spider is that?

I understand and will definately make a payment this week if I remember. As you have not accepted my second drawing as payment, please return the drawing to me as soon as possible. It was silly of me to assume I could provide you with something of completely no value whatsoever, waste your time and then attach such a large amount to it.

Regards, David.


From: Jane Gilles
Date: Tuesday 14 Oct 2008 11.18am
To: David Thorne
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Whose spider is that?

Attached