Explore Posterous

Who is the enemy?

Many reading this will say "why ask such a silly question? It's the terrorists!" and maybe, just maybe they're right. Though I cannot say I am certain of that and hence ask the pertinent question, who is the enemy or who is the terrorist?

I'm not trying to undermine the government or world's governments but do want to gain a better understanding of what is happening in the world and who the enemy is, if there is in fact an enemy.

Is there an enemy? I believe so, however I don't believe we know our enemies name or face yet. That is, I don't think the majority know. There might be groups out there whom know or at least have it on good authority who the enemy is. These people can be easily turned into conspiracy nuts by the media, so why come forward?

The possible enemies:

These are possibilities and I am in no way saying any one or all are in fact our enemies, it might be a different group altogether, this small list (yes there's more I know of but for the sake of brevity I will only address the more popular or known elements out there.

1. IslamoExtremists - It's easy to blame the IslamoExtremists; convenient even. This is not to say that the statements about these extremists out there are wrong. Though it seems so easy for mud to stick. If you publicly label someone a racist, sexist, paedophile, thief or rapist or anything like that, it almost seems that little to no evidence is needed. Even if the accused takes action and wins there's always that air about them relating to how they have been labeled. This is similar to how quick we blame the Islamic Community and they soon become generalised as IslamoExtremists. Remember that after 9/11 the US military were already ready to attack Afghanistan. Think about it.

2. The Illuminati - If they still do exist, then yes they're well hidden considering the group potentially ended in Bavaria in 1784 by Duke Charles Theodore of Bavaria. Many say it went underground after that point. It's hard to say if this is true, obviously.

3. The Zionists - I really can't claim to know a great deal on the Zionists except that they have a belief that they are the true children of God and the chosen ones. Lots of people and groups have thought this too. Most who have, have also been considered very dangerous. Much like the aforementioned Illuminati, the Zionists are said to have deeply rooted themselves into the power groups of high society. There is conspiracy theories out there that claim the Zionists were to blame for 9/11. I guess it is possible, but would need more evidence than I saw in the series of videos on youtube.

4. The Empire of the City - The three city empire, the city of Columbia (Washington D.C.), the city of London and the city of Vatican is another theory out there. It is said that the Vatican has been infiltrated by the elite in order to vanquish religion in the way that we know it and become the one religion of a one world government, Washington D.C. the Government and Military leader and London the Money power. There is a great deal more about this and is also discussed in the series of youtube videos mentioned above. It even goes into great detail to include the Crown which is the monarch of the British Isle as actually being the ruler of this three city empire as the Crown is geographically located inside the city of London.

Is it possible that all these theories are at play together, whether they're working together or not? Is it possible that none or one are? Yes, yes and yes. Is it even possible that the formation of a one world government is really a good thing and not something to be feared? I also think yes. One thought I have had over the recent years is that a one nation government in Australia could be a good thing. The people would vote for positions in government and not for parties. That is, people are elected into portfolios based on the number of votes each person gets in that area and the number of votes also dictates who is the leader of that particular area and who is second in charge, etcetera.

While I appreciate the benefits on a national level, I still wonder if this is a good thing on a global level. My ideas, as mentioned, were more for a nation and not the rest of the world. No more party politics at a national level, members still accountable for their work in a given field and politicians being promoted or demoted based on their performance. It would be more like a business and less like a charade which it currently seems to be. This style of government would also in my opinion give the people more power to select the people they wish to run all the different areas of government instead of electing a party and then letting them sort it out.

So as you can see I'm not entirely against the idea of a singular government, but over the globe there are many more differences in culture and status than there would be in any given nation. This is not to say there is no difference at a national level but it would be significantly less than what we see at the global level. Which means this kind of government when applied to the world could give great power to few and rule over many.

I am not saying "WATCH OUT! THE NWO IS COMING!!! THE END IS NIGH!!!" neither am I suggesting that a one world government is necessarily bad or that these conspiracies are true or false. I am saying that things do seem to be happening, there seems to be something in the shadows, be it good or bad and not many people seem to give much credence to what could happen in the not too distant future.

Think, read and discuss. I doubt I even get a single person read this article, which worries me somewhat, but if one person reads this and it leads them to further research or at least gets them thinking about our future as a people, then I have won, albeit a small victory, a victory nonetheless.

Before I leave you to think about this some more, consider this. We invade countries suspected of housing terrorists, is it also possible that we are the terrorists? Not wanting to go into a full Star Wars analogy, but could our forces be akin to the Imperial Stormtroopers in Star Wars and the Taliban or those classed as the IslamoExtremists be the Jedi? I'm not saying I believe this, it's more of an allegory. I mean is it possible that those in power could create enemies for the masses to hate and create world events that continue to mould the Westernised people into believing one set of truths that they're being told while the whole time it's a complete sham?

I understand that this all relates to labeling. We label one group as our enemy and if people with influence suggest who our enemies are we the people will believe it. Why should we consider the possibility of deception of the masses? You'd have to be a paranoid conspiracy nut yeah?

Then maybe the world is still flat like we were originally told and while we're at it, perhaps we're really at the centre of the universe too!

Like I said, think, read, discuss. I would love to hear your responses.

You win! I ROCK!
Good night Seattle.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comment (0) »

Muttahida Quami Movement (M.Q.M.) : Part of Zionism or similar to them ?

Usually, political parties in Pakistan don't follow much from the example of other political parties of the outside world. If that would be the case, some traces of democracy can be found in the internal organization of any of these parties today. But, surprisingly, a relatively smaller party, thanks to the dictator, which is not that small anymore especially in the term of number of seats in the national assembly, acted completely different in this manner.They tried to follow the strategy of so far the most successful movement of zionists in the world. Zionists created the impression that they suffered tremendously under the hands of the fascist regime of hitler. They blew the event of holocaust out of proportion. Though, history has many doubts over the reality of that event but they never allowed anyone to raise those doubts at a larger scale. Ahmedinejad, president of Iran, tried unsuccessfully to insitigate the students of a university in America in his talk to them to start research on these doubts. Still as a consequence, Ahmedinejad becomes persona-non-grata for international conventions and organizations. And Even if he finds his way to any of the world conferences, his speech is bycotted by many participants over there. An example of that we noticed in our very recent past, in the world conference against racism. Zionists, then make the world believe that they are oppressed & innocent, and therefore cannot harm anyone as they themselves have the history of horrendous sufferings. For this, they used variety of tools but Media proved to be the most effective one in fooling the masses of the world in general, and the west in particular. This helped them in getting the license of killing anyone anywhere. So far their most favourite target are innocent poor Palestinians. Lebanese are second on the list. These are the direct sufferings. There is also a list of indirect sufferings from them on the rest of the world. Their aggression goes unchecked in the media, no one dares questioning them about their actions. If some quarters of media, without fearing the backlash, gathers some courage to ask them easy questions, they cry foul at what was being doing with them in the past, and everything settles in their favour.

 MQM also, adopted the same strategy in the political arena of Pakistan. They are basically bunch of goons, spreading terror in the main city of Pakistan, Karachi. But, they are so disciplined and organized that one can rightly call them a C-company (read crime company) . The command of this company is in the hands of the DON Altaf Hussain, living in a political asylum in Britain. He remains successful in operating this company remotely, by managing to strike fear in the hearts of the members of the company through the stories circulating among them of the horrible examples he made of those who dared to challenge his authority. Although, MQM likes to call itself a political party but their acts are more criminal than political. They have killed hundreds of innocent youngsters, political workers just because they voiced their opinions different of them.

For quite some years, people of Pakistan are experiencing a strange situation. MQM raises alarm bells on some not so popular issues, if no one bothers or pay attention, Karachi starts burning. Poor citizens of Karachi are being killed in dozens in the riots so far. Except that someone influential dont pay heed to the MQM's point of view, one cant be able to understand any other reasons for these riots. If anyone asks them the question about these riots, they started crying that their innocent workers are being killed as a result of these riots, exactly following the footsteps of their ideals i.e. Zionists. Unlike others, They go for the ballet and the bullet both. They turned the ballet in their favour through bullet. So, in this decade, they remained in the government of the city for most of the time. Yet, one cannot be able to comprehend why they cannot arrest the culprits involved in these riots, if their "innocent" workers are being killed in it. This further enhances the validity of thinking of one's mind about them being similar to the zionists.

However, if one closely analyses the statements they are issuing, and the postions they are taking in different issues, he would be confused -- If Maulana Sufi Muhammad points out the hypocrisy in the character of the constitution of Pakistan, with it being Islamic overtly and un-Islamic covertly. MQM calls this mutiny against the state, and put pressure on the government to crush them militarily through "bloody riots" in the industrial city of Pakistan. But, if Baloch rebels openly declare the mutiny against the state, MQM staged a rally in support of them. -- He would be confused whether the MQM is part of zionism or just acting similar to their strategy?   

Loading mentions Retweet

Comment (1) »