Search posterous

Search all posts and users. Type a name, type a favorite song title, whatever! See what comes up.
  

More posterous blogs











More recommended blogs »

Here are posterous posts filed under wsj...

jimduncan says...

One website publisher approached by Microsoft said that the plan “puts enormous value on content if search engines are prepared to pay us to index with them”.
via ft.com

Two thoughts -

1 - Good/quality/valuable Information doesn't have to be free.
2 - Didn't the Wall Street Journal have subscribers BG? (Before Google)

Filed under: wsj

Nik says...

is unacceptable as a concept. Anymore.

Its taken me a while to pen this after Murdoch came out against content aggregators. I am posting a thirty seven minute interview of the media baron with David Sheer on Sky news here.

Murdoch obviously seems to be caught in his decade old dogmas. As Michael Woolf described a few days ago on Newser, the technologically impaired Murdoch is not a big fan of the development of the web and Google in particular. But we don't want to get personal here. 

I firmly believe you cant put a money value to information in today's age. The other day i was discussing with an acquaintance as to why journalists do not detail out the factors of correlation between the Crude oil prices and the weakening of the dollar, he , very correctly pointed it out that the journalists are plainly giving us news. If we wish to delve deeper into the micro and macro economic factors going on in the background to build this inference, we should lay our hands on the relevant research papers - essentially premium content even today. 

When can Rupert's proposal (money attached to news ingestion) work?

  • When all Original Content Providers join together to form a cartel supporting his proposition.
  • In case of a cartel not being formed, NewsCorp should provide content of an excellent and unique nature.
  • Content ingested from the WSJ website by a premium member cannot be shared anywhere else (on his/her personal blog etc)
  • Advertisers are willing to pay WSJ on a model differing from a PPC/Clickthrough model
  • Benefits of being a premium member far exceed just getting access to content. 
Why won't Rupert's proposal work?
  • I focus on my third point above. Imagine a situation wherein I am a premium member of WSJ. I get access to premium content and I lift this content and shift it to my blog. 
  • Effectively I am paying to the tune of $1000 a year. If I stand to establish credibility, then I stand to get a lot of ad-revenue onto my own blog with which I can easily pay-off my premium membership fees. 
  • If Newscorp is saying, it will patrol the web for such aberrations, then they are effectively saying they will incur pointless operating costs which will eat into their revenue (flowing through the premium memberships). And if they tend to increase their premium-membership fees to meet this OPEX, they are effectively sending a model based on Economies of Scale for a toss. 
What I assume will happen if Rupert's proposal is implemented?
Murdoch has basically spoken about putting pay-walls around his news content. While he does explicitly refer to Google, the statistics show that it effectively boils down to that.

Microsoft Bing and Yahoo Search have already tied up. Wolfram Alpha (the computational engine) is tying its search results to Bing. Effectively, we might encounter a time when NewsCorp ties up with one of these search engines. Imagine a situation where Bing+Yahoo project news from newscorp as 'We have something that Google does not'. Hell, do we care?

Good luck to Bloomberg and WSJ if they are going to make their entire content base premium. Events like these just make me feel that we are going backward in time. 

I just shudder to imagine my feed-demon asking me for my credit card details before fetching feeds from these sites.

A big thumbs down to paid news. 

Cheers. 

 

Filed under: WSJ

ktoddstorch says...

I am having a hard time parting with $52 to read the Wall Street Journal through my iPhone app.  I totally understand them wanting to monetize their digital efforts and stem the decreases of their print publication.

I have been a @wsj subscriber since my college days in the late 80's.  The $99 a "student rate" really sucked me in for a long term relationship.  But, this year I called to cancel my print subscription and only keep the online version...until they gave me both for $99.  Sold.  But, that will come to an end and I'll pony up the $139 or whatever it is for the online version.

I've had the iPhone app since it was released and I love it.  The portability is fantastic, but I do admit, as an online subscriber, I feel like I've already paid for the content.  I wouldn't mind paying for the app...$4.99 "feels" like the max I'd pay.  I don't think I'd pay $52 dollars a year for the app though.

However, this "content vs. distribution" argument/revenue model is just beginning.  We all pay additional to watch cable in different rooms with a monthly charge for separate set top boxes...but at least that is a physical piece of electronics that had to be manufactured.  The app doesn't have to be manufactured everytime someone wants one.  The fixed costs are there and of course, there's some variable costs associated with keeping the software updated or built out for additional mobile platforms (Symbian/Android/etc).

I guess at the end of the day this will come down to supply and demand.  There is demand for the content that @wsj provides, and if the mobile browser isn't a good platform for reading (thus, limiting the supply of the content), this can work.

Are you going to pay for the mobile app content?

Filed under: @wsj

By Jeffrey A. Trachtenberg

Gary Vaynerchuk’s new self-help book “Crush It!” is a national best-seller, with 95,000 copies in print after seven printings.

HarperStudio
Gary Vaynerchuk

The book, which explains how to transform personal passion into a successful business using the free tools of the Internet, is No. 5 on the Wall Street Journal business best-seller list.

And yes, he practices what he preaches. Mr. Vaynerchuk has 851,000 followers on Twitter and 33,000 fans on Facebook. “Crush It!” is published by HarperStudio, an imprint of News Corp.’s HarperCollins Publishers. News Corp. also publishes The Wall Street Journal.

Gary V’s Five Commandments of Social Networking

1. Treat it like a cocktail party.

You have to get involved in different conversations. We don’t start selling the minute we meet people. It’s not a coupon outlet. It’s a real opportunity to connect with consumers.

HarperCollins

2. Don’t draw lines in the sand.

Way too many business people say Twitter is stupid. Any product like Facebook is something you need to pay attention to in the business world. Some people don’t like to change. Instead, they feel they’re right, and say something is silly. Also, there are people who have vested interests in having these platforms fail because their understudies understand it so much better than they do. They are afraid they’ll be pushed out the door.

3. Humanize yourself or your brand.

It is OK to say, going to a soccer game. Or, having a hot dog. Humanization is quite powerful in this space. To be successful, this is the kind of thing you say 2% of the time.

4. Understand the authenticity.

Each consumer’s voice is dramatically more powerful today. This is word of mouth on steroids. The individual consumer has much more weight with corporate America. Most corporate brands will be wrapping their heads around the power of the individual consumer next year.

5. Interacting with potential clients and becoming part of the community is a real job.

You can’t spend ten minutes a day on this and think the social genie will save you. Most of all, you have to care. And you have to listen. That’s my overall arching thesis on this entire space. People think it’s about talking. What you say is irrelevant. The friend that listens is better than the friend who talks.

Filed under: WSJ

By NICK TIMIRAOS

New data suggest that foreclosures are rising in more expensive housing markets.

About 30% of foreclosures in June involved homes in the top third of local housing values, up from 16% when the foreclosure crisis began three years ago, according to new data from real-estate Web site Zillow.com. The bottom one-third of housing markets, by home value, now account for 35% of foreclosures, down from 55% in 2006.

The report shows that foreclosures, after declining earlier this year, began to accelerate in the late spring and that more expensive homes have more recently accounted for a growing share of all foreclosures. "The slope of that curve in recent months is much sharper than it was recently," said Stan Humphries, chief economist for Zillow. Rising foreclosures among more-expensive homes could create added pressure for a housing market that has shown signs of stabilizing in recent months as sales of lower-priced homes pick up.

The Zillow research compared homes against the median values for their local market and broke each market into three tiers by value. Zillow then looked at the share of monthly foreclosures in each tier over the past decade.

[Moving Up chart]

Foreclosures are rising in more expensive markets as home values in those areas fall, leaving more homeowners with mortgages that exceed the value of their properties. Prime loans accounted for 58% of foreclosure starts in the second quarter, up from 44% last year, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association. Subprime mortgages accounted for one-third of foreclosure starts, down from one-half last year.

The prime category includes so-called exotic mortgages that were increasingly used to buy more expensive homes, including interest-only mortgages that allowed borrowers to defer principal payments during an initial period. Borrowers often aren't able to refinance out of these products because the drop in home values has left them with little equity in their homes.

Default rates are particularly high and expected to rise on option adjustable-rate mortgages, which allow borrowers to make minimum payments that may not cover the interest due. Monthly payments can increase to sharply higher levels after five years or when the outstanding balance reaches a certain level. A study by Fitch Ratings found that 46% of option ARMs were 30 days past due last month, even though just 12% of such loans have reset to higher monthly payments.

Zillow estimated that nearly one in four homes with mortgages was worth less than the value of the property at the end of June. Mr. Humphries said he didn't expect to see foreclosure volumes level off until later in 2010.

Write to Nick Timiraos at nick.timiraos@wsj.com

Printed in The Wall Street Journal, page A2

Filed under: WSJ

By PHIL IZZO

The worst recession since the Great Depression has left a scorched landscape that will weigh on the labor market and the broader economy for years to come, according to economists in the latest Wall Street Journal forecasting survey.

The 48 surveyed economists expect the economy to bounce back from four quarters of contraction with 3.1% growth in gross domestic product at a seasonally adjusted annual rate in the just-ended third quarter.

Charts and Full Results

Economists expect a full jobs recovery may take years. Phil Izzo talks with Kelsey Hubbard and Simon Constable in the News Hub.

Expansion is seen continuing through the first half of 2010, though at a slower rate. But the massive downturn means the labor market will take years to heal. On average, the economists don't expect unemployment to fall below 6% until 2013; unemployment hit 9.8% in September.

"Never before has business shed so many workers so fast, so many people failed to find work who are looking for work, and so many dropped out of the labor force as in the current circumstance," said Allen Sinai at Decision Economics.

The labor market's tough road was underscored by Thursday's report on weekly applications for unemployment insurance. The Labor Department reported that initial claims fell 33,000 to 521,000 in the week ended Oct. 3. The number of people collecting unemployment insurance also fell, but remained above six million.

About the Survey

The Wall Street Journal surveys a group of 52 economists throughout the year. Broad surveys on more than 10 major economic indicators are conducted every month. Once a year, economists are ranked on how well their forecasts have fared. For prior installments of the surveys, see: WSJ.com/Economist .

Some economists worry the economy will turn down again over the next 12 months, leading to a so-called double-dip recession.

[Long Road Back chart]
—Conor Dougherty contributed to this article.

Write to Phil Izzo at philip.izzo@wsj.com

Printed in The Wall Street Journal, page A3

 

Filed under: WSJ

alksndra says...

Figures released from Editor & Publisher report that the Miami Herald's website traffic for August increased 89%, compared to last August.

The article featured the top 30 newspaper sites in August, and coupled them to their relative social standing one year ago.

2/3 of the top 30 newspaper websites reported gains over the past year.

Below is a portion of the list (Please note that several factors including news events can cause swings in traffic)

  • MiamiHerald.com -- 2,502,000 -- 89%
  • NYTimes.com -- 17,183,000 -- (-13%)
  • Washington Post -- 11,681,000 -- 4%
  • Wall Street Journal Online -- 10,867,000 -- 42%
  • USATODAY.com -- 9,787,000 -- (-6%)
  • LA Times -- 9,245,000 -- 3%
  • New York Post -- 4,843,000 -- 46%
  • Chicago Tribune -- 3,910,000 -- (-17%)
  • The News & Observer -- 1,892,000 -- 110%
  • Sun-Sentinel -- 1,771,000 -- 6%

 

 

 

Filed under: WSJ

The real dividend, he says, is diversity: In an era of industrial agriculture, where millions of acres are planted with the same variety of corn and millions of pigs are bred to be genetically similar, small local farms are the ultimate hedge fund. They preserve heirloom seeds and quirky breeds; strengthen the soil with organic nutrients; create local markets that connect producer directly to consumer.

Filed under: wsj

Ammadz says...

Re: that article in the Wall Street Journal this morning about me being a tyrant and a dictator and driving everyone around me nuts -- well, yes, I did send them an email saying that "much of your information is incorrect," but that's only because they didn't have any of the good stuff. I mean, all they had was that some people "familiar with the situation" say that I'm focusing a lot of attention on the tablet, and that I'm "managing the smallest details." Money quote:
Mr. Jobs's focus on the tablet has been jarring for some Apple employees, who had grown accustomed to a level of freedom over strategy and products while the CEO was on leave, said a person familiar with the matter. "People have had to readjust" to Mr. Jobs being back, this person said.
Any guesses as to who grew accustomed to a level of freedom, and now is all pissed off, boohoo? Any thoughts on why the story has no specific examples of me being a monster? I'll tell you why. It's because when Tim Cook goes running to his pals at the Journal to whine about me taking away all his power, he doesn't have the balls to tell them any specific stories, because he knows then he'll be busted. But guess what, Tim? You're busted anyway. I know you're the person "familiar with the matter." Just like I know it was you who leaked the stuff about my transplant. And now, since you've pissed me off, I'm gonna share some of the specifics. Like the fact that when I made you take down your pants for a spanking last week, you were wearing a thong. Okay? You want more? Keep leaking, and I'm a fucking treasure trove, bitch.

As for all the rest of you, listen up. I'm back in charge, and I'm not going to ship this tablet unless it's perfect. Remember when I told you to make me a phone with only one button, and you said it couldn't be done? But then we did it. Sure, you all complained about me being a dick about the user interface, and making you redo the buttons and reshape the back and make the corners a tiny bit smoother. But in case you hadn't noticed, that product has done pretty well out there in the marketplace.

So listen up. The tablet, as it stands today, is a piece of shit. It's got Tim Cook's stink all over it. Tim's a great supply chain guy, I'll give him that. But when I was away he kind of went crazy and started wearing a beret and holding design meetings in his office. Jonny Ive would complain to me about it, but I was like, Jonny, dude, I'm lying here with a bunch of machines like from the Matrix all hooked up inside my guts, okay? Just deal with it till I get back.

So Jonny dealt with it the way designers deal with these things -- he stalled. He delayed. He took Tim's stupid ideas and used them to make one bad prototype after another. He was like, Steve, please, I'm begging you, you have to get back here, soon, okay?

Well, I came back and I'm like, Okay, what do the ads look like? Tim says they don't have any ads yet, they're still working on the product itself. I'm like, Dude, have you not read the memo about how things get done around here? Now stop all the work on the product and start working on the ad campaign. I want mock-ups by tomorrow morning. I want cute songs. Pastel colors. Ethnic-looking people. Get on it, asshats!

I didn't bother looking at Tim's prototypes. I just tossed them all out. Tim threw one of his little Tim snits and stopped talking to me. Fine by me, since I could clear him out of my consciousness and apply myself to some serious non-thinking. I started with the big questions. What is a tablet? Who will use it? And for what? If the tablet were a tree, what kind of tree would it be? And what of the word tablet itself? Ta is a Sanskrit root, for "gift." Blet is Proto-Indo-European meaning "to be perfect while lacking usefulness." Will you write on a tablet, or just read from it? Or will you just buy it and put it on your desk and look at it a lot and never use it at all? Or will you maybe carry it around and put on the table in restaurants to show the other humanoids in your tribe that you are more advanced and wealthy than they are, and they should fear you because you have powerful magic that they do not understand? You see what I mean? What is the anthropology here? And what about the ergonomics? Can you mount it on a wall? Will it have a shiny surface so that Macolytes can adore themselves as they use it in public? (Yes. It must.) The tablet must look and feel not like something that was made by man -- it must feel otherworldly, as if God himself made it and handed it to you.

Well, we got the ads worked out, and they're amazing. We've also got the tutorial videos and how-tos, and what's really cool is they show the Internet running at like a hundred times faster than in real life. The engineer dudes are like, Steve, you realize we can't actually make a computer that goes this fast, right? Nonsense, I told them. You can and you will. They said, No, like, there are laws of physics involved here. So I sat there for a minute. I waited. They looked at me. Then I said, Okay, fine. You're fired. So is your boss. They're like, Our boss isn't even here. I said, I don't care, you're all fired, now go back and fill out your paperwork and tell Papermaster to hire some engineers who can make my vision a reality.

We'll get there, friends. Might not be ready in September. But we'll get there. Peace.

This is a hilarious piece from FAKE Steve!! I do agree that WSJ guys should learn to keep their mouth shut.. LOL

Filed under: WSJ

 

Today in the Wall Street Journal there was an interesting article written about Wal-Mart and their expansion across the globe.  The article was titled "After Early Errors, Wal-Mart Thinks Locally to act Globally" and the piece was written by Miguel Bustillo.  Wal-Mart, as we know it, is the massive corporation that has made headlines in the past for their remarkable deals, local business take overs, and a sometimes spotty record of poor treatment of employees.  However, this well written article by Mr. Bustillo explains Wal-Mart's push to establish themselves in international markets while upholding the cultural practices in foreign countries.  Wal-Mart has learned that crashing into new markets and disrupting the flow of commerce that has already been established is not proven to work.  Even with the global name of Wal-Mart, the Company is taking a new approach to their foreign constituents.  As Mr. Busitllo reports, Wal-Mart has been looking for new formats in which they can deliver their goods and services to these countries.  These new formats implemented by Wal-Mart is a look and feel that is closer to the individual culture in which they are immersed in.  Wal-Mart has acquired many small discount markets but kept the names of these store fronts in efforts to blend in with the cultural surroundings.  This has proved to be a difficult task for Wal-Mart as many of the established market places in these countries have the upper hand with strong ties with the local suppliers.  Other ways in which Wal-Mart is finding success is through what Mr. Bustillo calls "cross pollination."  This "cross pollination" is explained as Wal-Mart lending ideas that have worked in other markets across the world in order to grow business.  In India, Wal-Mart and its local affiliates studied a formula that had success in Brazil and simply incorporated into their business.  This tactic has been paying off for Wal-Mart.  By realizing that some of their best ideas are sprouting in other countries, Wal-Mart is capitalizing on their growth.  These methods are even beginning to migrate back into the United States.  Wal-Mart supermarkets are now turning into Supermercado de Wal-mart in which is capitalizing on the increasing Latino market.  It seems Wal-Mart is taking a global approach and applying it locally.  A breath of fresh air has swept through the headquarters at Bentonville, Arkansas.  As Wal-Mart is making its way around the world they are also dropping off pieces of social responsibility along the way.  In Sao Paulo, Brazil Wal-Mart is adding community centers which include internet cafes and even micro-lending services.  Free computer classes are also offered to lower income children of the local area.  The bad press that has engulfed Wal-Mart in the past may appear to be turning.  Wal-Mart is establishing themselves around the world.  While the giant blue sign with white bold lettering may not be there, Wal-Mart is again recapturing the world's attention. 

To Read the Full Article written by Miguel Bustillo pick up today's (August 14, 2009) copy of the Wall Street Journal, or visit www.wsj.com 

Source:
Bustillo, Miguel. "After Early Errors, Wal-Mart Thinks Locally to act Globally."  The Wall Street Journal 14 Aug. 2009: A1
Picture from Google Images

Filed under: wsj