Search posterous

Search all posts and users. Type a name, type a favorite song title, whatever! See what comes up.
  

More posterous blogs











More recommended blogs »

Here are posterous posts filed under windowsxp...

tuyenvo says...

We just bought some new PCs at Best Buy for some incoming employees and I've been getting nice and cozy with Windows 7. It's not the train wreck that Vista was but it's far from good. I'll be "downgrading" these PCs to Windows XP pretty soon, which by the way, was a superb OS. Why can't Microsoft just make an OS with the good UI elements of XP minus all the underlying crap that made it unsecure and unstable? Or maybe Microsoft should just build a theme in Windows 7 for us XP fans...

Filed under: windows xp

Victor says...

I stumbled across this site (http://bit.ly/11TYGa) this morning. It's a designer that have designed calculators that looks almost exactly like those in Windows XP and Mac OS X. They look really cool, maybe should order one, if it was possible.

Filed under: Windows XP

markk says...

CNet News has reported that Windows 7 enjoyed strong initial sales. It has outperformed Vista.

However, the report says the pre-sales were all pretty much focused on Home Premium.

Based on an NPD Group research released Thursday, Microsoft had sold 234 percent more boxed editions of Windows 7 than it did Vista in the initial releases of both products.

NPD's numbers include both the initial sales of Windows 7 following its release on October 22 and pre-sales data from the discount program that Microsoft launched in July.

Another web statistics firm, Net Applications, also found early adoption of Windows 7 to be more popular than Vista.

However, it was reported that sales of PC hardware running the new OS didn't fare quite as well.

> Is Windows 7 The New Cool That Vista Isn't?

Filed under: Windows XP

joe says...

"Windows 7 is not gonna have any of the problems Windows Vista had...! Trust me!"

I guess we will find out if he's right at one of those not at all weird "Windows 7 Launch Parties" that everone is having. Right? RIGHT...?!?! ;-)

Filed under: windows xp

jpblanko says...

Mojopac permite virtualizar un sistema operativo Windows XP en un disco portátil, de manera que podamos llevar nuestro sistema operativo completamente configurado a cualquier ordenador.


Filed under: windows xp

mid0 says...

This funny video on How the Matrix was run via Windows XP. It's old but found it today.

Filed under: Windows XP

Microsoft Security Essentials, Microsoft'un ücretsiz güvenlik yazılımı. Yasal Windows XP, Windows Vista ve Windows 7'nin 32 ve 64 bit sürümlerine sahip olanlar için ücretsiz. 

Hızlı bit taramada tarayıcı, sistem işlemcisinin %50'sini kullanıyor. Sade ve kolay anlaşılır arayüz ile beraber tarama sırasındaki bellek kullanım miktarı 150MB. Eş zamanlı tarayıcı ise hissedilmiyor bile.

Daha detaylı bilgiyi bu adreste bulabilirsiniz : http://www.microsoft.com/Security_Essentials

Download:
Windows Vista ve Windows 7 için (64-Bit)
Windows Vista ve Windows 7 için (32-Bit)
Windows XP

Filed under: windows xp

You can use the default Windows XP tool but again, for something different, the guys over at PCMech recommend the open source tool TruCrypt.

This is a very cool tool and we are currently testing it here in the office on a few of our laptops - check it out here: http://www.truecrypt.org

 

 

Filed under: Windows XP

This is pretty coolImage by Diana Lili M via Flickr

Let me first point out that I am a recent convert to Linux. I, like many others, was a die-hard fan of Windows, which I believe is due to shear laziness (Linux requires a little love, now and then to get it to do some of the things you want it to). Anyway, last year I was having problems with my laptop -- mostly due to my ignorance of computer operating systems -- and I was getting tired of getting my computer fixed. Also, I did not want to switch from Windows XP over to Vista, because of all the negative reviews I had been hearing. So I decided to be daring and switch to Linux.

At the time, I was working in a book store so I had access to literally dozens of books on computers: operating systems, hardware configurations, databases, programming languages, et. al. Also, there were a plethora of computer nerds working there, and just about every one of them doted on Linux. So, after perusing several 10-pound books, I took a leap of faith and bought one on Fedora Core 6 (which, coincedently, had a disk with the operating system in the back).

Migrating to Fedora Core 6 6 was a challenge, to say the least (lots of configuration screens to go through). However, even though I knew not what I was doing, I managed it quite successfully. I enjoyed using the GNOME GUI for a while. Then, for reasons I don't recall, I reinstalled FC6 using KDE. I liked that GUI much better, because it had better games on it, and we all know that you can't have a computer without some kick ass games to play. And since I was to stupid to figure out how to install an application like Wine, I had to make do with whatever came with the chosen GUI. Also -- any of you readers who are familiar with Linux can testify to this -- both desktop environments have their own set of applications, most of which are native only to one interface. Therefore, being totally ignorant of my new OS, I again reinstalled the software in order to play ther other games -- see a pattern here?

Now, going back to my educated decision on which operating system to choose, I neglected to pay attention to the fact that, being open source, all Linux distros are either continually being updated, or they are only being updated for a set period of time. (Do you see where I'm going here?) Well, a few weeks ago I tried numerous times -- in vain -- to run updates. Finally, remembering an old acquaintances suggestion -- which I had previously ignored -- I downloaded Ubuntu 8.04. The reason for going with 8.04 instead of 9.04 was because it is being maintained longer.

So. After about 30 minutes of jacking with my CD drive I finally downloaded and copied Ubuntu. After reading through everything on the website, to say I was thrilled would be an understatement. But, being Mr. Murphy's favorite plaything, luck was not on my side -- I couldn't validate or install my download. Never fear, though, because I was desperate I requested a "free" CD. Now the first thing I will brag on Ubuntu about is the fact that it took about a week to get my copy (the website says 6 to 8 weeks).

Being the impatient, ADD-afflicted freak I am, I immediately turned on my laptop and popped in the disk -- installation was as easy as one, two, three. Now I can check my Twitter account every ten seconds, email and my Facebook profile every ten minutes, and watch my FriendFeed updates constantly update in the lower right-hand corner of my screen continuously.

However, all this took some tweaking to accomplish, but being so user-friendly, Ubuntu makes it easy. If I have a question about how to install a new app, or a plug-in -- which I always do -- help is only a few keystrokes away. Also, I am easily able to update at any time.

Related articles by Zemanta
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Filed under: windows xp

Dopo aver provato ed innegiato a Google Chrome (http://caponericcardo.posterous.com/gogle-chrome-che-spettacolo) i problemi sono subito venuti fuori.
L'apparente velocità che mi aveva fatto pensare ad un Browser eccellente, non è poi così vera. In realtà spesso Ghrome si blocca e rende così impossibile lavorare.
Nei giorni scorsi ho deciso di provere Safari 4, il browser di casa Apple, per Windows. Bellissimo esteticamente ed eccellente sia nella fruibilità che nella funzionalità. Veloce, facile da usare. Insomma una vera scoperta. (Lo avevo gia visto pr Mac, ma mai per Win). Molto meglio di Google Chrome.
Ma come era capitato per Chrome, anche Safari 4 continua a bloccari ripetutamente (cosa che non capita solo a me ma anche ad altri amici ed amiche che lo hanno provato su Pc). Così tutto il tempo che si recupera con la velocità di navigazione, lo si perde con le tante volte in cui si è costretti a chiudere tutto e ricominciare da capo (senza aggiungere le imprecazioni che ovviamente esplodono ad ogni perdita del lavoro fatto).
Così, considerando Expolrer un vero e proprio "bidone" di Microsoft, mi sono visto costretto a tornare ad usare il buon vecchio Firefox nella sua ultima versione.

Ora però mi sorge un dubbio.
Continuo a provare browser su browser per trovare quello che più si addice alle mie esigenze. Ma ad ogni tentativo mi ritrovo costretto a tornare indietro. Che Google Chrome sia un buon browser, ma che abbia ancora parecchi limiti, lo posso anche accettare. Ma che Safari di Apple non vada non posso accettarlo. Ho provato Safari per Mac è non presenta nessun problema. Ergo, il problema non sono i Browser ma il mio Pc. Per essere più precisi non il mio Pc, ma il sistema operativo che utilizzo.
Qualche tempo fa infatti, ho provato Linux sul mio Pc ed ho visto, come mi era stato preventivato da un amico, che i problemi di lentezza, cattiva accesibilità, virus, scompaiono totalmente. Ma non avendo una buona conoscenza di Linux, ed avendo assolutamente bisogno di internet per questioni di studio e lavoro, sono stato costretto a tornare a Windows. Con il ritorno ad Xp, di Vista non ne voglio nemmeno sentir parlare, sono tornati ovviamente anche i problemi di cui sopra.

In ultima analisi, invitando come sempre i tecnici ad intervenire, ho concluso che le uniche soluzioni sono due:
mettermi sotto ed imparare Linux;
comprare un Mac, magari il nuovo MacBook Pro.

Attendo consigli...

Filed under: windows xp