Thinking about reality and the universe some more


Look again at that dot. That's here. That's home. That's us. On it everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives. The aggregate of our joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every "superstar," every "supreme leader," every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there-on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.
The Earth is a very small stage in a vast cosmic arena. Think of the rivers of blood spilled by all those generals and emperors so that, in glory and triumph, they could become the momentary masters of a fraction of a dot. Think of the endless cruelties visited by the inhabitants of one corner of this pixel on the scarcely distinguishable inhabitants of some other corner, how frequent their misunderstandings, how eager they are to kill one another, how fervent their hatreds.
Our posturings, our imagined self-importance, the delusion that we have some privileged position in the Universe, are challenged by this point of pale light. Our planet is a lonely speck in the great enveloping cosmic dark. In our obscurity, in all this vastness, there is no hint that help will come from elsewhere to save us from ourselves.
The Earth is the only world known so far to harbor life. There is nowhere else, at least in the near future, to which our species could migrate. Visit, yes. Settle, not yet. Like it or not, for the moment the Earth is where we make our stand.
It has been said that astronomy is a humbling and character-building experience. There is perhaps no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image of our tiny world. To me, it underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly with one another, and to preserve and cherish the pale blue dot, the only home we've ever known.
Carl Sagan, Pale Blue Dot, Random House, 1994 (copyright © The Estate of Carl Sagan)
I was having a discussion with a friend about whether or not a company can be truly open. She feels as information become more and more accessible, openness becomes the best strategic advantage, allowing you to form the most strategic partnership: with the universe. By sharing ideas/thoughts openly, you allow the universe to do the work while you make the decisions.
I've been thinking a lot lately about what to do with my life. I have plenty of ideas, but a core question I have to answer is: How do I want to impact the world around me? I usually turn this question into: Is there a problem that I am really passionate about solving or helping solve? And then, I reach: What is the most important problem to solve (as far as I, or maybe all of humanity, is concerned)?
|
Dr. Mercola's Comments:"I find it quite exciting that science and spirituality are now coming together.
|
"It is beginning to look like the ancient humans were right about how the universe works—it just took science a while to catch up.
"What Vladimir Poponin proved in his experiments is that your DNA can and does directly affect your physical world. This is what the Law of Attraction proponents have been saying for more than a century. "In the above video, Gregg Braden discusses the first of three experiments about the newly “discovered” web of energy that surrounds and occupies us all. The two other experiments he mentioned are even more compelling and should draw the attention of even the most skeptical minds.
“Find something to be happy about every day, and every hour if possible, moment to moment, even if only for a few minutes. This is the easiest and best protection we can have.”--Gregg Braden
"To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe."
- Carl Sagan
The conversation with Shawn was about the question of whether or not our universe is determinate. (I think) A determinate universe would mean that if we knew the location and velocity of every particle everywhere and all laws of physics, we could theoretically model the entire universe and predict the future. There would only be one way for things to happen, and we could map it out.
http://io9.com/5380647/is-the-large-hadron-collider-being-sabotaged-from-the-futureI'm not going to lie, my knowledge of time travel theory has slightly
more substance from Lost and Back To The Future than it does from my
knowledge of theoretical physics. That said, I find the ideas outlined
in that link somewhat alluring. Just the whole notion that the future
could prevent something catastrophic from happening... que
interesante.Correct me if I'm wrong, but there are a few leading theories on time
travel paradoxes:1) Everything is on an static timeline, and there are no alternate
realities (Biff can't start winning at the horse races). You can't
change the course of history - Fate isn't the right word, but it's the
first that comes to mind. And the reason we don't have time travelers
stopping by for lunch is because we haven't invented time machines
yet.2) The course of history can be altered, creating tangential realities
(Biff wins at the horse races, bangs Marty's mom).3) For every possible outcome, there exists an alternate universe.
There are a shit-ton of universes. Also, your cat is dead. But it's
alive too, so don't worry.So... are all these God Particles sticking to Theory #1 and preventing
something catastrophic?Also, MORE IMPORTANTLY, you should all go rent/download the movie
Primer. Filmed for like $7k and winner of a shit-ton of film awards,
it's probably the best movie on time travel I've ever seen.
http://www.facebook.com/l/0a70e;en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principleThis is what we were talking about earlier. I think the question you were asking was, "Does the fact that we can't know both the momentum and position entail that the phenomenon itself is indeterminate, or does it just entail that our knowledge of the phenomenon is indeterminate? The article says that the indeterminacy is a fact about the system itself, not just a claim about what we can know. However, you might doubt this claim, depending on what your views are of the relation between theory and reality. (I don't know a whole lot about these different views.)What I mostly hear people say about the nature of reality is that "what is true of reality is whatever the complete physical theory of the future says is true." Now, whether or not there ever is a complete future theory is somewhat irrelevant. The main point here is that the models really do match up with the world, and that they really do explain it.I would say that the most rational view to take on the issue of indeterminacy is to say that because our best physical theories say the universe is indeterminate, we should believe it's indeterminate. Of course, we may one day find out that there is deeper determinacy that actually explains what seems indeterminate right now, but to believe this without any evidence is unjustified.

* Newly discovered ring is so large it would take 1 billion Earths to fill it
* Ring is made up of ice and dust particles that are so far apart it's hard to see
* Ring material may come from comet, meteor collisions with moon Phoebe
(CNN) -- Scientists at NASA have discovered a nearly invisible ring around Saturn -- one so large that it would take 1 billion Earths to fill it.
The ring's orbit is tilted 27 degrees from the planet's main ring plane. The bulk of it starts about 3.7 million miles (6 million km) away from the planet and extends outward another 7.4 million miles (12 million km).
Its diameter is equivalent to 300 Saturns lined up side to side. And its entire volume can hold one billion Earths, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory said late Tuesday.
(I'm starting to think NASA has used it's funding to hire a computer geek that is good at Photoshop.)