Search posterous

Search all posts and users. Type a name, type a favorite song title, whatever! See what comes up.
  

More posterous blogs











More recommended blogs »

Here are posterous posts filed under todayshow...

From sports drinks to action figures, Tiger was once an industry unto himself. The Tiger Woods economy may have crashed, but in its place we now have the Tiger's woodies economy, repackaging and selling the women who turned him on.

The Law of Conservation of Celebrity explains that celebrity can neither be created nor destroyed, but is instead transferred and transformed. In the case of sex scandal, fame transforms to infamy and disperses among participants. Now that Playboy and Vivid Entertainment have entered the Tigers' woodies-wooing field, each Tiger lover is poised to become a Tiger spin-off brand of her own. Let's see how the notables are doing, and where the Tiger's fame and fortune diaspora is headed next:

Rachel Uchitel As mistress #1 and Tiger's right-hand woman, fixer, and madam, Uchitel is poised to siphon the greatest portion of Tiger's expended celebrity and fortune. Extra reports she's currently negotiating a photo spread with Playboy, and "wants a lot of money," while earlier reports had Tiger paying her $1M to keep her yap shut. She denied boning him in her OK magazine exclusive (which, by the way, she probably also received money for, if only "for the photo shoot") which means she might figured out a way to take Tiger's money and the tabs'.

Jaimee Grubbs Mistress #2 took the easy money and ran, with early sales of text messages and her infamous voicemail. An aspiring fameball and former reality show contestant, now she's happily rubbing shoulders with real stars. Jaimee probably parlay her Tiger fame back into reality television, but failing that, she'd be a candidate for laddie mags and skin flicks, if the price and PR are right.


Holly Sampson Mistresses already working in the sex and porn industries have a leg up on cashing in. Sampson appears to have a foot in each industry: TMZ and HuffPo say that, in addition to her bondage/fetish/erotica/porn career, Sampson moonlighted as a call girl. In both industries, her asking price is poised to go up. She's also a prime candidate for Vivid Entertainment's standing offer of $1M for any mistress willing to show the world what they did with Tiger, on film—Sampson is already the star of two Vivid titles, although it was in a web extra for Naughty America (seen here) where she first admitted to hitting it with Tiger.


Jamie Jungers The cocktail waitress and rumored Tiger-financed lipo recipient is another alleged call girl, which means she's been making money off rich guy's libidos for years. She'll be embracing her status as a Tiger mistress on today's Today Show, where she'll probably signal whether her next step is reality television, adult entertainment, or increasingly pathetic interviews until the well runs dry.


Joslyn James (née Veronica Siwik-Daniels) is one to watch. So far, Tiger's rumored "real" girlfriend has kept mostly silent. She does, however, have a wide-ranging career in the adult entertainment industry (Big Breasted Nurses and M.I.A.: MILFs In Action, tally-ho!), so she may take Vivid up on the $1M offer. On the other hand, her silence may suggest actual loyalty to Tiger—or that his money got to her before Vivid's could.


Kalika Moquin has so far kept quiet. Described as "all business" in the high-end hostess biz, she'll probably invest her piece of the Tiger pie back into her business. By staying silent she'll proved her discretion, sharpening her reputation as a reliable nightlife liaison.

Porn Industry In addition to the inevitable mistress-starring skin flick Vivid will make, a thousand Tiger-themed fantasy movies are about to hit the wankosphere, including Tiger's Wood, the saga's first "porn parody," featuring Kayden Kross as "porn-Elin" (according to a tweet) and Tyler Knight as "Tiger Woods, bitches" (according to his blog).

Elin Nordegren How Tiger's long-suffering wife deals with the fiasco is anyone's guess. My hope: Divorce, big fat alimony, tell-all memoir, live like a queen, perhaps in Sweden. One carefully thought-out "I've still got it" photo shoot a few months from now, and it'd be a slam dunk.

http://bit.ly/5gcwhQ

Filed under: todayshow

Watch Starlight's live weather crosses (links below) from the Starlight Express Room with Steven Jacobs from the Today Show.  Joining him were Britney Spears dancers, Jason Dundas and Kelly Landry from Getaway and Captain Starlight!

Weather cross #1. http://www.youtube.com/starlightaus#p/u/3/lUBzECLAO4Y

Weather cross #2. http://www.youtube.com/starlightaus#p/u/2/GhMHYcFVb2c

Weather cross #3. http://www.youtube.com/starlightaus#p/u/1/OSEESVPucgA

Weather cross #4. http://www.youtube.com/starlightaus#p/u/0/3ZJDHQhd6dU

 

Filed under: Today show

Unfortunately, it is the truth. The pain seen on my mom's face (see picture below) - and the fact that she has never smoked a day in her life and has Stage IV lung cancer is the best "gift" the lung cancer community could possible have. Of course, she is not the only one that makes for a good story angle. That's the whole point here, folks. According to the Lung Cancer Alliance, over 60% of new lung cancer cases are never smokers or former smokers, many of whom quit decades ago.

Since I have started my "WTF" (Where's the Funding) for Lung Cancer? campaign, I have had a tremendous response from lung cancer patients, lung cancer organizations/foundations and the news media. I am on a mission to increase awareness and funding for lung cancer --all of those with lung cancer: smokers, former smokers, never smokers. I am telling my mom's story, and providing a forum and center of connectedness for all those with lung cancer to share their stories as well, in order to accomplish these goals.

I have also received some anticipated backlash from some in the lung cancer community that I am focusing too much on the fact that my mom never smoked. I am told I need to stop labeling those with lung cancer as never smokers, smokers and former smokers, as this is only perpetuating the stigma that looms over lung cancer's head. I honestly do appreciate the feedback and passion from everyone I hear from, whether it's positive or negative. So, please keep the comments coming. This is not easy stuff. I thought it may help to explain the rationale behind my campaign.

Once again, this is a personal campaign I am waging. I am telling my mom's story to make a difference. My mom is a never smoker. My mom has inoperable, incurable lung cancer. I won't stop mentioning the fact that she has never smoked - ever. And, this should actually be viewed as a very positive move. Here's why.  My mom's story (and all those other 60%-ers) is the "best" thing to happen to lung cancer. Her story is the best, and only (in my opinion) vehicle to start the long process of removing that stigma and getting people to take action. And, on a positive note, this strategy is actually working.

As you see here, Senator Ben Nelson (D-NE) from Nebraska (where I live) joined as a co-sponsor of the Lung Cancer Mortality Reduction Act.  You also see the sub-head to that press release says, "Visit by Lung Cancer Alliance Advocate, Kevin Atkinson, Spurs Action." Kevin Atkinson is the brother of John Atkinson who recently died of lung cancer. John was 40 years-old and also a never-smoker. John was also a friend of mine. We spent a lot of time together while working at Omaha's CBS affiliate, KMTV. I was a reporter. He was a photojournalist. He was an amazing person and an incredible advocate for lung cancer awareness. John also knew that the key to making any strides in lung cancer awareness was to tell his story. A 40 year-old husband and father of three who had never smoked had lung cancer. This is news.

John's tenacity and message resulted in him winning the Golf Digest challenge to play at Torrey Pines with Matt Lauer, Justin Timberlake and Tony Romo ahead of the US Open. The Lung Cancer Alliance Survivors Community and his many friends and family members rallied around this contest and helped him to win it by a landslide. John was able to bring awareness to lung cancer by his participation in the tournament, and subsequent interviews on the Today Show and other major news and radio shows. You can see Matt Lauer's story on John's death and the "state of lung cancer" here. We miss you John, terribly.

So, what does all of this have to do with Senator Nelson?  Everything. As a former reporter turned PR practitioner - with some experience in the political arena - here is the bottom line: Had John been a smoker or former smoker, no senator would have given Kevin Atkinson the time of day to talk about his brother. The news media wouldn't have latched onto his story.  Again, I am not bashing smokers or former smokers. I am simply keeping it real.

I have interviewed Senator Nelson several times and personally like him, but lung cancer is a totally different beast. You know, that damn stigma. Politics is also a totally different beast. And, what politician wants to associate himself with that stigma?  Senator Nelson now has a logical and statistical reason (or an additional one) to support the Lung Cancer Mortality Reduction Act. He understands it's not just a smoker's disease. He understands that by co-sponsoring this act, he may get a little flack, but not enough to make him lose re-election or tarnish his reputation. Now, have I completely perpetuated the negative stereotype of politicians? Perhaps. I am more than happy to hear from Senator Nelson to better understand his decision. I am willing to bet he would even admit the difficulty of being a politician in favor of change for lung cancer legislation. For that, I thank him.

The stigma that looms over lung cancer has dropped a level, thanks to John and his family.  No doubt, others have helped contribute as well. All I can say is keep it up.  I know I am going to. That's the whole point of "WTF" (Where's the Funding) for Lung Cancer?  Simple. Politically incorrect. Straight-to-the-point.  There is no time for "spin" when it comes to lung cancer. While PR people may have the reputation as "spinsters," I am so NOT one.

So, dare I say, thank goodness my mom has lung cancer?  Well, yes...and Hell no!  But, educating and convincing those in power that people like John and my mom have lung cancer is really the only "in" we have to work with right now. It's the only way to open the door to even present an opportunity for a rational dialogue about lung cancer and that ignoring it is no longer an option - regardless of how people get it. 

According to the American Cancer Society's most recent lung cancer statistics, in 2009, an estimated 116,900 U.S. men and 103,350 women will be diagnosed with lung cancer and an estimated 88,900 men and 70,490 women will die from lung cancer. Again, 60% of those are never smokers or former smokers. This is my mom. This is her story. It's the angle I am running with - for ALL lung cancer victims. I hope you run with me.

Sincerely, Jen

   
Click here to download:
Yay_My_Mom_Has_Lung_Cancer._Wh.zip (78 KB)

Filed under: Today Show

lukelucas says...

one of the annual highlights of the Today Show is the day of or before Halloween when they all dress up. this year was AWESOME.

well done.

 

[be sure to click through for more pictures]

Filed under: today show

Bryan says...

My boy Rick Younger telling these womenfolk how men think.

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

Filed under: today show

Rich says...

Good coverage by the Today show on this sensitive, but all-too-common concern. Meri-K Appy of the Home Safety Council is the credible source in this story. She has devoted her career to teaching home safety. I first met her in Oklahoma in the early 1990s when we attended the fire and life safety educator conference held there each year.

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

 

Filed under: Today show

Thanx to @LouRamirez from KJ97 for the tix.


So I won these tickets for front row seats to the Today Show taping in San Antonio on Twitter.  BTW---I heart Twitter.  Got instructions for the passes and was told to be there no later than 4:45AM.  I ask 4:45AM???? Yup, we had to be there that early to check in and we were the only ones there to view the taping of the bull riding segment.  Pretty cool.


Impressions:  Hoda is really tall and very, very friendly. 
Kathy Lee Gifford loves the babies. 
NBC runs this show like a swiss watch. 
Campanas de America are not so controversial after all. 
And if you are going to have a minor heat stroke sitting behind us, get up and leave. 


My pix album is here. Enjoy.

Filed under: today show

Ahead of the Galaxy's Thursday game with the Red Bulls, David Beckham visited the Today Show and spoke with Matt Lauer. Becks reiterated his commitment to the Galaxy and soccer in the US. They also discussed FAO Schwartz, Bruno, his Armani underwear campaign with Victoria, family life and possible 'after soccer' activities.

He still seems like a class act. I hope he helps the Galaxy push into the playoffs, and he remains committed for the rest of his contract. Only time will tell.

Filed under: Today Show

Trish says...

This is really irritating me... I caught wind of this story the other day and wrote about my take over at GirlScoutGuide.com: a young girl in North Carolina, obviously with the help of her father, created a video promoting her sales of Girl Scout Cookies and put together an online ordering system for the purchase of the cookies.  Since this does not follow the policies of the Girl Scouts, they were asked to remove the website and video from YouTube.  For some reason a lot of online marketers and tech chic people are painting the Girl Scouts in a bad light because they're not embracing social media and technology and allowing girls to sell cookies online. 

This has been covered on the Wall Street Journal's website, which was of course picked up by the tech-set crowd at Silicon Alley Insider, and there was coverage on the story on the Today show.  All these outlets seem to be preying on the "but she's just a little girl!" emotion card and making it out to be that the Girl Scouts are luddite monsters who are just too afraid to embrace new technology and social media and modern marketing.  Anyone actually familiar with the girl scouts knows that's not the case - I earned several badges related to technology and the internet myself as a scout in the mid to late 90's.  The reason is fairness and safety - they want to make the selling environment that these 5-18 year old girls engage in as safe and as fair as possible.  Since when are the basic principals of safety and fairness something you'd rather toss out the window to teach you daughter about breaking rules?

I want to shake the hand of a commenter at the WSJ's article going by "Mom & Leader" for her clear defence of the Girl Scouts.  Here are some highlights of what she says:

"I personally believe Girl Scouts officials made the rules they do first and foremost for the SAFETY of EVERY GIRL. This seems obvious to me, doesn’t seem like it should require defending."

Some would say that the instances of internet predators have calmed down since the mainstream adoption of the internet, others would say they've gone up.  This girl's dad was obviously monitoring what was going on, but that wouldn't be the case generally speaking if the GSUSA opened up the rules to internet selling.  There's a substantial potential, unfortunately, for unsupervised girls to make arrangements with suspicious characters to buy cookies and fall prey to pedophiles, kidnappers, you name it.  Putting that aside, since the girl is only eight it's obvious that while she may have been able to post a video to YouTube (should she know is a different arguement), I can guarantee her dad set up the online ordering process, so really that's unfair in that it's him selling the cookies, not her doing her best to do it.

"Secondly, the rules are in place to ensure fairness to ALL girls.  This was violated from what I understood - and I could have misinterpreted the article - by the intended “pre-orders” the video was soliciting. There are set timeframes so that cookies are sold by everyone at the same time and therefore the playing field is level. If they were taking orders before the start date then that calls into question the fairness issue. As the rules are currently you are welcome to send e-mails letting those out-of-town relatives know that its time to place those all important orders. Nobody said Grandma has to order from the neighbor girl."

Allowing girls to sell on the internet  gives them a broader reach over the girls in other areas.  And believe it or not techy douchebags, there are still families who don't have internet.  So allowing some girls who have the advantage of an internet connection to out-sell girls without an internet connection in a different region or neighborhood isn't fair.  And I agree with Mom&Leader - I read it to think they were selling outside the designated time for orders as well.

"The “Official” rules don’t address the other issue I found with this fathers decision(s), but the GS Promise and Law do. Namely “Respect authority” In this case the GSUSA is that authority in that they have made a rule in an arena which you have chosen to participate in. I feel as a parent setting an example is a major key in teaching our children - even when by doing the right thing it could mean not reaching a much-desired goal. (12,000 boxes? whoa!) Admittedly he chose to ignore a rule he was aware of."

I added the emphasis on that last line.  Back to my previous point about teaching girls to break rules ahead of teaching them about fairness and safety.  The world isn't perfect, to be sure, but the Girl Scouts are doing nothing but attempting to instill good code prinicipals and beliefes in it's members.  Knowingly breaking a rule is a terrible example to show your child; explaining to them why it's fairer and safer to not sell online is a much better lesson for a child, regardless of gender.  I'm all for the technological upbringing of children, but think about the core principals in what you're doing because that will ultimately stick with the child longer than being able to make a YouTube video to sell cookies.

My main issue, personally, is the issue of fairness.  Inherently, some troops already have a huge advantage over other troops in cookie sales based on their location.  A troop in an affluent suburb is likely to make more sales than a troop in a economically depressed inner city.  That's just the reality of business in general, whether you're discussing fundraising like this or opening up a retail store - that much is common sense.  The Girl Scouts are just trying to keep the field as level as possible knowing that things like region, economic conditions, availability of parents to volunteer, etc. is out of their control.  But allowing sales on the internet IS under their control, so they're doing what they can to give every girl the opportunity to do their best and reach their cookie goals.

Another commenter there, GS Leader, said it best: "When you have internet sales by one troop, you are actually “stealing” sales that may have supported another troop. I know it is not like that in the real world, where everyone is out for themselves, but while selling Girl Scout cookies teaches entrepreneurial skills it also teaches morals of honesty and fairness."

So I'm sorry but all the people who are giving the Girl Scouts attitude for standing strong on their policy of not allowing use of the Internet to sell should chill out and realize WHY the rule is there in the first place.

Filed under: Today Show

411 says...

Fats Domino in New York in support of upcoming album Goin' Home: A Tribute to Fats Domino

Following a great tribute to Fats Domino which included NYC Mayor Bloomberg presenting the Key To The City, this morning the New Orleans legendary musician, one of the original inductees into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, performed “Blueberry Hill” in the Today Show studio.


click for VIDEO: Fats Domino sings on TODAY


RELATED VIDEO: The making of the album (windows media)

RELATED ALBUM:


Goin' Home: A Tribute to Fats Domino

Filed under: today show