AOL führt neues Logo ein
Im Zuge der Abspaltung von der Muttergesellschaft Time Warner und des bevorstehenden Börsengangs gönnt sich AOL eine neue Markenidentität. Der Schriftzug wurde verändert und ist künftig von verschiedenen Motiven eingerahmt (siehe Abb.). Am 10. Dezember, am der Tag des Börsengangs, will das Unternehmen das neue Logo vostellen.
Entwickelt hat das Logo die Agentur Wolff Olins. Außerden haben Künstler wie Universal Everything, GHAVA und Dylan Griffin am neuen Design mitgewirkt.
Karl Heiselmann, CEO von Wolff Olins, sagt: "Früher waren Logos monumental und kontrollierend, nicht mehr als der Unternehmensname auf Produkten. AOL ist ein Medienunternehmen des 21. Jahrhunderts mit einer ambitionierten Vision für die Zukunft und einem neuen Fokus auf Kreativität und Ausdruck. Das neue Logo sollte deshalb offen und einladend sein, Unterhaltung und Zusammenarbeit fördern sowie glaubhaft und inspirierend sein."

Comcast-owned ThePlatform is arguably the top Online Video Platform (OVP) provider, and almost certainly is within the TV industry. They unseated encumbent Brightcove over the last year by launching Hulu.com, CBS.com, TV.com, and a slew of other broadcast and cable TV networks. They announced even more TV programmer customers today (most of whom are owned by Comcast) as well as Rogers, Canada's largest cable operator. ThePlatform also powers online video for Comcast's largest competitors: Time Warner Cable, Cox, and CableVision.
Today, thePlatform made a major announcement that brings TV Everywhere a HUGE step closer to reality.
ThePlatform is launching a cable Authentication & Authorization component to its white-label video publishing product that will enable programmer web sites (HBO.com, Showtime.com, NBC.com, etc) to publish their premium TV shows on their sites, requiring the user to authenticate himself as a cable subscriber with access to that channel (ie, you can only watch HBO shows online if you pay for HBO through your cable provider). Enforcing this authentication ensures everyone in the media supply chain gets credit for that view, and money is transferred accordingly. To that end: an integration with Nielsen to directly track views would be a killer strategic move by thePlatform!
This solution also has the following compelling side benefits for the MSO's and TV Programmers:
Here's a nice diagram of how this new component works:
ThePlatform is initially providing this technology only to TV Programmers for their sites (broadcast networks and cable channels). That's a great first step, though I believe the killer app will be making this capability available to any web site, not just NBC.com or HBO.com, etc. I wrote about this just yesterday.
Regarding the rest of thePlatform's competition in the OVP space... DigitalSmiths, despite its strong TV Everywhere positioning campaign last month, hasn't released any technology yet that addresses the initiative's largest challenges: authentication and authoriziation. Meanwhile, Ooyala and Brightcove appear to be sitting on the TV Everywhere sidelines.
One step at a time, I understand. But I believe it's critical that TV Everywhere becomes an "open" premium video distribution platform available for any web publisher, on any web site.
Consumers will demand the freedom to watch Entourage in their preferred environment, be it Hulu.com, Facebook, Boxee, etc... not just on Fancast.com or HBO.com. That is the promise of TV Everywhere. Universal authentication will make this a technical possibility. It is ultimately the right thing to do and will benefit the entire media ecosystem, starting with the paying customer.
Clearly Comcast, Time Warner, and the other MSO's need to weigh the benefit of providing their subscribers a good experience (in the form of choice) versus the economic benefit of locking their users to their own sites (or programmer sites, such as HBO.com, CBS.com, Showtime.com, etc).
The MSO's have a reputation for opting for the economic benefit over the user experience benefit, which has really hurt their brand image.
Creating a "win" for the user should be the top priority for Comcast and Time Warner. Remember, TV Everywhere was born out of a defensive move to stem cable cord cutting.
I understand that we are just in the first inning of TV Everywhere, and these are the necessary first steps. However, I would like to hear Comcast and Time Warner talk about the longer-term vision for where this is all going.
Here is Comcast's Amy Banse articulating their near-term TV Everywhere (OnDemand On Line) rollout:
I am very happy to announce we have signed our first partnership with a CE company. At this point we can not say more about the partner or the specs of the device, but we can tell you we are working closely with them to make sure we deliver a great Boxee experience on it.
Boxee gets an official box. This is actually a pretty big deal. I've used Boxee for a while now on my notebook and I love it. If they can get this box down to $99, then they've really got something that come in and trounce everything else. It would be great to see something like Boxee actually enter the marketplace and eliminate the need for a traditional cable box. It's going to be pretty interesting to see how Boxee's recommendation engine develops and what kind of business model they develop. It seems to me like Boxee has the potential to provide a really compelling recommendation engine. They know what you like, what your favorite shows are (across networks), who your friends are, what they like, etc.. If they worked with Amazon in a creative way they could make a fortune on referrals alone.
I also wonder what companies like Comcast and Time Warner think about Boxee. I wonder if they are genuinely worried about a legion of Boxee-enabled devices entering the marketplace and destroying theri business model, or if they just completely dismiss it. Once major sports networks start creating models for distributing live content through the web, it's prety much game over for the cable box. And really, it's only a matter of time.
With over 300M consumer accounts and adding 5M new accounts EACH DAY, Facebook will likely reach the 1 BILLION in 2010. It is therefore safe to assume that the vast majority of Comcast, Time Warner, DirecTV, and Dish subscribers will have a Facebook account.
Without any doubt, Facebook has now become the "identity gatekeeper" of the web. Facebook is the defacto openID provider. As such, there ought to be an easy way to leverage Facebook to solve TV Everywhere's authentication challenge. Imagine if we could link our cable / satellite accounts to our Facebook accounts. A couple clicks using Facebook Connect on the cable provider's web site is all it would take. Once a link is established between DirecTV and Facebook, for example, DirecTV could provide Facebook with that user's content access rights (such as: user has rights to HBO content but not Showtime). Here's a back-of-the-napkin use case of how it might play out:My guest post published on ReadWriteWeb.com...
Comcast sees the writing on the wall: cable-based TV will not survive the next decade. Its value is fast eroding because it can't compete with on-demand, Internet-delivered TV across all screens. Unlike their music counterparts, TV executives have pulled their heads out of the sand in time and are working hard to survive this monumental shift. To do so, however, they need to choose the right battles to fight.
Comcast CEO Brian Roberts spoke at the Web 2.0 conference in San Francisco yesterday afternoon. He was interviewed by Federated Media CEO John Battelle.
I discerned three important nuggets from Roberts:
- Comcast will continue to invest in higher-bandwidth connections into homes.
- Comcast will invest in content more aggressively.
- Comcast will officially launch Hulu-competing Fancast.com by the year's end.
The first two points make a ton a sense. The third point is... well, miscalculated.
I am convinced Brian Roberts understands the challenges ahead. This is why Comcast and Time Warner (which also clearly "gets" it) have been aggressively pursuing a "TV Everywhere" model, which promises to give their subscribers exactly what they want: anytime, anywhere access to any TV content. They have to do this to keep their customer bases.
But in a TV Everywhere world, the role of the multi-system operator is diminished. Your cable or satellite TV provider will no longer be your only (legal) means of watching the current episode of HBO's Entourage. In a TV Everywhere world, Entourage will be available on literally thousands of websites and mobile apps, as long as you can authenticate yourself as a paying cable or satellite subscriber with the HBO package.
In this world, the value of Comcast as a content distributor is eroded. Comcast risks becoming a "dumb pipe," providing little more than bandwidth. To avoid that fate, Comcast recognizes that it needs to move upstream and own or control the content itself. This is why it will buy NBC in the next few months.
Moving upstream and investing in content is a smart move for Comcast.
Moving downstream and competing with Hulu via Fancast.com is a bad move. Here's why:
- Hulu already has a huge lead, having aggressively grown its audience for more than a year now.
- Hulu would be the ideal launching pad for TV Everywhere, because of its mega-loyal and passionate audience.
- Comcast is about to own a third of Hulu. Ad revenue from Hulu will ultimately end up back in Comcast's coffers.
- In a TV Everywhere world, thousands of websites will likely present the same TV content as Fancast.com. It will be a terribly crowded space, with a ton of noise. The sites that perform best will be the ones that create the best user experience for viewing TV content.
- Comcast has a poor track record with UI and user experience design. Need I compare more than Comcast DVR's UI to TiVo's UI?
- Strong consumer brands drive website traffic. Comcast has a horrendous consumer brand. Comcast users generally do not like being Comcast users.
- Comcast's interest is in the broadest distribution of TV content, not exclusive distribution. Locking up certain content for Fancast.com alone would be a mistake. Consumers would see it as a violation of their rights, akin to the Net Neutrality debate.
Comcast can survive (and perhaps prosper) through the death of cable-based TV, if it makes smart strategic decisions. That means focusing on where it provides the most value in the TV supply chain: Internet connectivity and content investment. Creating a content website that competes with its distributors is not a smart move.
Comcast should pull the plug on Fancast.com or simply use it as a TV Everywhere authentication testing site.
Guest author: Mike Berkley served as CEO of SplashCast Media from 2006 to 2009, pioneering the concept of social TV in partnership with Hulu. Berkley is currently involved in the TV Everywhere initiative, consults on product strategy for online media companies, and maintains the TV News Stream blog covering all things related to online premium video.

"TV Everywhere" is the future of TV.
But it's being driven by consumers, not by cable companies. The cable companies are reacting, not leading. And that's a good thing.
I've tried to isolate what consumers are demanding from TV, in a tidy package called "The Four C's": Convenience, Control, Choice, and Cost.
These 4 C's encapsulate the vision of "TV Everywhere".
90% of all American households already subscribe to an MSO (cable, satellite, broadband, or broadband wireless). That's an unbelievable stat. And as such, I believe MSO's are naturally best-positioned to fulfil this consumer demand. That does not mean they will get it right, however. MSO execs are smart and realize that getting it right and winning the hearts & minds of consumers is critical. This time around, the MSO's can't rely on monopolistic positioning to strong-arm consumers. MSO's now face competition for audience from many directions: Hulu, Boxee, Netflix, piracy, etc... each of which have very loyal and passionate audiences! As I have argued, horrendous consumer brand-image is the MSO's achilles heal.
MSO's can't afford to screw this up. If they do, they risk losing their customer base. Not only will they need to coordinate amongst themselves, they also need buy-in from the TV programmers (NBC, Fox, ABC, CBS, HBO, ESPN, etc) and the distributors (web site publishers and app developers).
It's the web publishers and app developers who know and understand the consumer the best. They must be included in this process to ensure the MSO's and TV programmers "get it right" with consumers.
NBC and Fox were very smart to get a consumer-focused web entrepreneur (Jason Kilar) to design and run Hulu. Comcast and TimeWarner need to do the same.
This video is about 3 months old, just before Comcast's 5,000 household TV Everywhere trial this past summer. Note that Brian Roberts (Comcast) acknowledges that TV Everywhere will create more distribution competition for Comcast, as it will enable other web sites to compete with Comcast's video portal, Fancast.com, using the same premium video inventory.
My hope is that TV Everywhere authentication and video inventory will be open available to tens of thousands of web publishers via easy-to-integrate OpenID-like login and API-driven content search and playback.