Search posterous

Search all posts and users. Type a name, type a favorite song title, whatever! See what comes up.
  

More posterous blogs











More recommended blogs »

Here are posterous posts filed under terrorism...

HyperActiveX says...

It has become fashionable to ask, critically and in the tone of angry righteous rhetoric, about what (or how much) has changed in the last one year. Just as it was fashionable, in the wake of the attacks on this day exactly one year ago, to ask in much the same tone, as to who was responsible for the lapses that allowed such an outrageous assault to take place, and what was being done about it.

As a Mumbaikar, as an Indian, and as a global citizen, all that I've done in the last one year (other than blogging about it a few days later) boils down to: (a) casting my vote diligently when elections were held, and (b) speaking to the local MLA once (at a meeting he had requested for, with members of the housing complex that I live in), about security in the post 26/11 world, and other issues that were specific to our neighbourhood and local community.

I have no moral right to criticize those who haven't done 'enough', and I have only words of appreciation and gratitude for those who've actually done something constructive about it, whatever that may be.

Of course, I continue to hope and pray for a world that chooses to eschew hatred and embrace love, eschew anger and embrace compassion. And in my own small humble sort of way, I spread soft and gentle messages of peace and harmony, where and when needed.

You do what you have to. 

Filed under: Terrorism

23narchy says...

Police judged unwise for not taking legal advice before 'combat-style' arrests of 11 men

Intercept evidence should not be allowed into British terror trials, the government's terrorism reviewer said today.

In a report into Operation Pathway, an anti-terror swoop on 11 men in north-west England, Lord Carlile said he had considered whether the admissibility of such evidence could have led to any of the men being charged.

Previously open to allowing intercept evidence, he said: "I have yet to see material to justify the conclusion that the permitting of such evidence in terrorism cases would do more good than harm.

"I believe that this debate should now be drawn to a conclusion, against the introduction of intercept evidence in terrorism cases."

Carlile criticised Greater Manchester police as unwise for failing to take legal advice before arresting the suspects in Liverpool and Manchester on 8 April this year. After 13 days all the men had been released without charge after Crown Prosecution Service lawyers told police they had no evidence on which to hold them. Carlile said he was surprised the police did not realise they would have to give an evidential basis to extend the period of detention.

The men were arrested in daytime raids in a counter-terrorist operation based on intelligence which police believed suggested an attack was imminent. The arrests were brought forward by several hours after the Metropolitan police assistant commissioner for counter-terrorism, Bob Quick, walked into Downing Street carrying secret papers about the operation which were visible.

Carlile said CPS lawyers were only contacted the day before the arrests, not by the senior investigating officer but by an unnamed source concerned that lawyers should be consulted.

There was evidence to justify arresting some of the men, Carlile found. An email published in his report caused officers serious concern. It referred to a wedding and stated: "They said you should be ready between these dates." The dates were 15 and 20 April, raising police concerns an attack was imminent.

The email was sent from a cafe in Manchester that had been under police surveillance and was frequented by the suspected ringleader and other men suspected of involvement in a plot.

Carlile said the security breach by Quick impacted on community tensions by forcing police to bring forward the arrests to daytime and carry them out in "combat style".

Dave Thompson, the assistant chief constable of Greater Manchester, rejected the criticisms. Carlile had stated "we were justified in making arrests and that there was a compelling case for those arrests to be made. We would always have needed to arrest all the individuals that we did in April. We did speak to the Crown Prosecution Service ahead of arrests being made and will continue to work with them. However, none of the conversations would have changed our decision to make arrests or the number of people arrested."

 

Filed under: terrorism

matthewr says...

Hasan's contacts with extremist imam Anwar al-Aulaqi began as religious queries but took on a more specific and concrete tone before he moved to Texas, where he allegedly unleashed the Nov. 5 attack that killed 13 people and wounded nearly three dozen, said the sources who were briefed on the e-mails, speaking on the condition of anonymity because the case is sensitive and unfolding. One of those sources said the two discussed in "cryptic and coded exchanges" the transfer of money overseas in ways that would not attract law enforcement attention.

"He [Hasan] clearly became more radicalized toward the end, and was having discussions related to the transfer of money and finances . . .," said the source, who spoke at length in part because he was concerned the public accounting of the events has been incomplete. "It became very clear toward the end of those e-mails he was interested in taking action."

Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl M. Levin (D-Mich.) said Friday that he would investigate the handling of the e-mails -- 18 or 19 in all -- and why military officials were not aware of them before the deadly attack. Levin told reporters after a briefing from Pentagon staff members that "there are some who are reluctant to call it terrorism, but there is significant evidence that it is."

If this turns out to be true, will Chris Matthews and Geraldo Rivera apologize for their vehement denial of Hasan's radical views as a possible motivating factor in the attack? If you think they will, do yourself a favor and don't hold your breath.

Filed under: Terrorism

Alpha says...

He is a national hero because he saved the life of many girls," said Shahbaz Bhatti, minister of minorities in the Pakistani government. "As a Christian, a person of minority, he stood in front of the Taliban to protect the university.

Was it worth it? I don't think he considered that question.

I think he just did what a man had to do in that situation.

A moving story that will bring on the tears.

Some find martyrdom while trying to kill innocents. Some find martyrdom while trying to save innocents.

Filed under: terrorism

According to NY Times "Pakistani pop musicians are propelling anti-American messages. The lyrics reflect widespread views among their young educated fans who say Pakistan's problem is the West, not the Taliban"

Filed under: Terrorism

maharishi says...

Punjab Newsline

Maj. Gen. Kulwant Singh and Dr. David Leffler   
Wednesday, 11 November 2009

Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh said: "We need a neighbourhood where peace, progress and stability are ensured. We are worried at the rising terrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan."  This is clearly an important goal. But how can it be achieved in today's hate-filled, high-tension political climate?

Diplomacy and economic sanctions likewise have not been sufficient to resolve the crisis-which is driven by human behavioral dynamics that cannot be controlled by such methods alone. 

War and conflict are human problems requiring human solutions. The underlying cause of conflict is accumulated social stress. Today the military of India has an opportunity to address this fundamental cause of war by deploying a new, scientifically verified technology of defence.

A New Solution 

This new technology of defence is based upon the latest discoveries in the fields of physics, neuroscience, and physiology. Ultimately, it is based on the discovery of the unified field of all the laws of nature-the most fundamental and powerful level of nature's dynamics. Technologies based upon this unified field of natural law have such concentrated power that they can render obsolete and irrelevant every previous objective technology and destructive means of defence.

Modern science has probed deeper levels of nature's functioning, from the macroscopic world of classical physics to the underlying atomic, nuclear, and subnuclear levels, culminating in the discovery of the unified field, the unified source of the diversified laws of nature governing the universe. Because this unified field is vastly more powerful than any other level of nature's dynamics, a technology of defence based upon the unified field is of historic importance. It is already changing the whole science and technology of defence.

Accessing the Unified Field Within

Since the unified field is the source of the objective world, its power cannot be harnessed through objective technologies.  A new approach is needed-one that draws upon the world's subjective traditions of meditation. Properly understood and property practiced, meditation throughout the ages has been a systematic technology to turn human awareness within to experience finer levels of thought, deeper levels of human intelligence that correspond to deeper levels of intelligence in nature. This inward exploration culminates in direct experience of the deepest level of consciousness-the simplest, silent, settled state of human awareness, sometimes called the state of pure consciousness-in which the human mind identifies with the unified field. By turning the attention systematically within, human awareness explores deeper levels of nature's functioning and ultimately experiences the unified field at the source of thought-the field of unity at the basis of mind and matter. 

The Vedic tradition of knowledge from India is the most complete and highly developed tradition of meditation in the world, yet this ancient approach of gaining knowledge and experience of the unified field has become the focus of intense scientific research over the past 50 years. The late Maharishi Mahesh Yogi revived, from the ancient Vedic science of consciousness, systematic technologies for experiencing the unified field, including the Transcendental Meditation program and its advanced techniques. These meditation practices are known as Invincible Defence Technology (IDT) in military circles and have been successfully applied by members of many faiths to eliminate conflict in the recent past. If the military of India were to apply this human resource-based technology, which is non-lethal and non-destructive, it could reduce the collective societal stress that is fueling the rising tensions between India and Pakistan.

The Prevention Wing

A Prevention Wing of the Military would be the ideal way to achieve this goal. Less than 1% of the military of India would participate in this wing. The remaining personnel would carry out their normal military duties. The Prevention Wing would be trained in the primary components of IDT. They would practice these technologies in large groups, morning and evening.

The Maharishi Effect

Over 50 research studies confirm that when the required threshold of IDT experts is crossed-approximately the square root of 1% of the size of a given population-crime goes down in the affected population, quality of life indices go up, and war and terrorism abate. Scientists have named this phenomenon the Maharishi Effect in honor of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, who first predicted it. The causal mechanism appears to be a field effect of consciousness-a spillover effect on the level of the unified field from the peace-creating group into the larger population.

For instance, in 1993, a two-month Maharishi Effect intervention was implemented and studied in Washington, DC. Predictions of specific drops in crime and other indices were lodged in advance with government leaders and newspapers. The research protocol was approved by an independent Project Review Board. The findings showed that crime fell 23.3 percent below the predicted level when the peace-creating group reached its maximum size. Temperature, weekend effects, or previous trends in the data failed to account for changes. This research was published in the peer-reviewed Social Indicators Research (1999, vol. 47, 153-201). 

The Maharishi Effect was documented on a global scale in a study using Rand Corporation data and published in the Journal of Offender Rehabilitation (2003, vol. 36, 283-302). When assemblies of IDT experts exceeded the Maharishi Effect threshold for the world (about 7,000 at that time) during the years 1983-1985, terrorism globally decreased 72%, international conflict decreased 32%, and violence in nations was reduced without intrusion by other governments.

The Opportunity for Permanent Peace

The military of India is charged with the constitutional responsibility to defend the country. It can now succeed in this mission simply by creating a Prevention Wing of the Military - a coherence-creating group of IDT experts exceeding the square root of 1% of the population of India - approximately 3,415 soldiers.

As part of its responsibility to protect the nation, India's military is obligated to thoroughly examine realistic, scientifically proven methods for preventing war and terrorism. IDT is such a method. Moreover, since the military and military personnel are funded by the government, a Prevention Wing of the Military would not be subject to the fluctuations in size that often affect civilian IDT groups, where participation may be influenced by finances, job demands, graduations, and optional activities. 

All areas of society will be simultaneously enriched by this holistically life-supporting, life-benefiting technology. It is enormously effective and cost-effective, and the results are immediate. All that is necessary is to provide the proper training for a group of military personnel-or indeed, any large group within the country. India has the opportunity today through IDT to create national security, invincibility, and peace. But the time for Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh to act is now.

About the Authors:

Major General (R) Kulwant Singh, UYSM., PhD, leads an international group of generals and defence experts that advocates Invincible Defence Technology.

David Leffler, PhD, a US Air Force veteran, is the executive director at the Center for Advanced Military Science (CAMS). http://www.StrongMilitary.org

Filed under: terrorism

1st Cavalary Division Patch

Don't let anyone tell you otherwise. Noah Schachtman at Wired found this today:

Before he allegedly killed a dozen and wounded 31 more at Ft. Hood, Maj. Nidal Hasan may have gone online to praise suicide bombers.

If one suicide bomber can kill 100 enemy soldiers because they were caught off guard that would be considered a strategic victory,” a commenter named “NidalHasan” wrote on this Scribd.com document about “Martydom in Islam.”

The comments — and others like them — drew the interest of federal law enforcement authorities, they tell the Associated Press’ Lara Jakes. An official investigation was never opened. But they did begin to pay attention to Hasan, an Army psychiatrist who was about to be deployed to Iraq.

The full comment at Scribd is as follows:

NidalHasanscribbled: There was a grenade thrown amongs a group of American soldiers. One of the soldiers, feeling that it was to late for everyone to flee jumped on the grave with the intention of saving his comrades. Indeed he saved them. He inentionally took his life (suicide) for a noble cause i.e. saving the lives of his soldier. To say that this soldier committed suicide is inappropriate. Its more appropriate to say he is a brave hero that sacrificed his life for a more noble cause. Scholars have paralled this to suicide bombers whose intention, by sacrificing their lives, is to help save Muslims by killing enemy soldiers. If one suicide bomber can kill 100 enemy soldiers because they were caught off guard that would be considered a strategic victory. Their intention is not to die because of some despair. The same can be said for the Kamikazees in Japan. They died (via crashing their planes into ships) to kill the enemies for the homeland. You can call them crazy i you want but their act was not one of suicide that is despised by Islam. So the scholars main point is that "IT SEEMS AS THOUGH YOUR INTENTION IS THE MAIN ISSUE" and Allah (SWT) knows best.

Now, I would grant the possibility that this was a mentally ill person, and his actions no doubt prove he is deranged. Was he a radical, bent on killing for some purpose, such as, making a political statement? There is evidence that Hasan did not want to go to Iraq. That may have triggered a reaction to resign his commission or try to get out of the military. Virtually any officer can simply leave the military. It ruins the person to do so, professionally, but they cando it. If Hasan did not want to go to Iraq, then he had more channels open to him to not go than an enlisted soldier. Anyone who wants to get out of the military can do so, provided they are willing to accept the consequences of doing so. If your choices are getting out dishonorably or Iraq, and you're willing to take that hit, then you take that hit. I don't buy the notion that he had to go. He seems to have figured that he had to act to stop others from going.

Hasan wanted to make a political statement, and so he did. There are numerous shopping centers around Fort Hood. There are numerous places where he, as a Major, could have gone. He decided to go for maximum infliction of casualties against Americans serving at Fort Hood, both as members of the military and as civilians working for the Department of Defense.

You can look at this:

Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas, said military officials told her that the gunman was upset about his impending deployment.

It was unclear where Hasan was to be deployed. Hutchison said it was to be to Iraq, but retired Army Col. Terry Lee, who said he worked with Hasan, told Fox News that Hasan tried hard to prevent his pending deployment to Afghanistan.

Lee said Hasan had hoped President Barack Obama would pull troops out of Afghanistan and Iraq, and that he got into frequent arguments with others in the military who supported the wars.

That, to me, supports the idea that this was terrorism--he was not only radicalized but was also openly defiant with his beliefs and speaking out about them. If anyone tries to spin it otherwise, remember--sympathy can sometimes count as much as being organized. While he may not have belonged to an organization, he did believe in a political philosophy at odds with the uniform that he wore. He was radicalized and believed himself "justified" for attacking the institution that was going to send him to Iraq.

For further evidence, there is this tidbit:

Hasan attended prayers regularly when he lived outside Washington, often in his Army uniform, said Faizul Khan, a former imam at a mosque Hasan attended in Silver Spring, Md. He said Hasan was a lifelong Muslim.

"I got the impression that he was a committed soldier," Khan said. He spoke often with Hasan about Hasan's desire for a wife.

On a form filled out by those seeking spouses through a program at the mosque, Hasan listed his birthplace as Arlington, Va., but his nationality as Palestinian, Khan said.

"I don't know why he listed Palestinian," Khan said, "He was not born in Palestine."

Why would he self-identify as a Palestinian if he wasn't one? You have a situation here where he has attacked and killed a great number of people; he has a history of saying that he supports a form of martyrdom; he is known to have wanted to avoid going to Iraq; and now he is self-identifying as someone he is not.

Mentally ill, certainly. And a terrorist to boot.

Filed under: Terrorism

23narchy says...

Relatives of British victims of 1988 Lockerbie bombing told of new lines of inquiry and possible new investigation

Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi, who is serving a life sentence for the 1988 Lockerbie bombing

Abdelbaset al-Megrahi was jailed for the 1988 Lockerbie bombing. He was released in August. Photograph: PA

Relatives of people killed in the Lockerbie bombing have welcomed news that there could be a fresh investigation into the atrocity.

Families of British victims have been advised that police are following several new lines of inquiry, including a review of forensic evidence into the bombing.

A total of 270 people were killed when Pan Am Flight 103 exploded over the town of Lockerbie on 21 December 1988.

It is understood that the Crown Office in Scotland has contacted relatives via email informing them of the plans for a new investigation.

The Sunday Telegraph has reported that Lindsey Miller, a senior procurator fiscal who was involved in preparing evidence for Abdelbaset al-Megrahi's trial, has written: "Throughout the investigation we have, at various times, taken stock of the evidence as a whole with a view to identifying further lines of inquiry that can be pursued.

"Now that the appeal proceedings are at an end a further review of the case is under way and several potential lines of inquiry, both through a 'desktop' (paper) exercise and consultation with forensic science colleagues are being considered.

"You will of course appreciate that it would not be appropriate for me to elaborate on these lines but please be assured that this is not simply paying lip service to the idea of an 'open case'."

Pamela Dix, who lost her brother Peter in the 1988 bombing, said: "As far as we understand it there are avenues which are being pursued, and I think that should be interpreted as a good thing.

"Expectations around Megrahi's appeal were really quite high but hopes were profoundly dashed when the appeal was abandoned.

"The situation is unresolved and it is unfinished business."

Dr Jim Swire, who has long been a campaigner for a full inquiry into the bombing, said: "I think that if they are really going to have a meaningful investigation then that is all well and good and long overdue. I would be all for it.

"But if it is just a dodge to prevent an investigation into why the lives of those killed were not protected then I would be livid."

Megrahi, the only man to be convicted of the bombing, was released on compassionate grounds from Greenock Prison in August.

The release of Megrahi, who has terminal cancer, led to protests from American relatives of Lockerbie victims.

The decision to free him and allow him to return home to Libya was taken by Kenny MacAskill, the justice secretary in the minority SNP administration in Edinburgh.

The Sunday Telegraph reported that Detective Chief Inspector Michael Dalgleish, who was part of the original team that brought the case against Megrahi, is heading the investigation.

Four detectives from Dumfries and Galloway police are understood to be working on the case full-time.

Megrahi, 57, a former Libyan intelligence officer, has always maintained that he had nothing to do with the bombing of Flight 103 from Heathrow to New York.

After being declared one of the two chief suspects behind the bombing by the British government in 1991, Megrahi spent nearly 10 years on the FBI's most wanted list.

He finally handed himself in to the United Nations in April 1999, saying he was willing to stand trial in a neutral country.

He was convicted of the mass murder in 2001 before a panel of Scottish judges at Camp Zeist in the Netherlands and told he would spend a minimum of 27 years in prison before being considered for parole.

He twice appealed against his conviction, arguing that the guilty verdict had been a miscarriage of justice – finally dropping his second appeal.

He was linked to the bombing by fragments of clothing that were found wrapped around the remnants of the Lockerbie bomb.

But his decision to drop his appeal left British families, many of whom are sceptical about his guilt, fearing that new information that should have been made public would remain secret.

News of a fresh inquiry comes as relatives' group UK Families Flight 103 delivered a letter to the prime minister, Gordon Brown, asking him to instigate a full independent inquiry into the Lockerbie bombing under the auspices of the Inquiries Act 2005.

Members of the group have also requested a meeting with him.

A spokeswoman for the group said: "Since 1989 senior political figures from successive governments have agreed in principle to an inquiry but have qualified their comments by saying that it could not take place while the criminal investigation was ongoing.

"With the abandonment of Megrahi's appeal against his conviction, there has been no resolution to any aspect of responsibility for the bombing.

"During the trial and subsequently, we heard of 'significant information' from a foreign power. On repeated occasions, Her Majesty's government has sought to prevent or obstruct access to documents, some viewed by the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission, for reasons of 'national security'. We seek access to documents previously the subject of Public Interest Immunity Certificates.

"Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights demands that an inquiry into the circumstances of a death conform to certain minimum standards where it has occurred at the hands of a state or at the hands of agents of a state.

"As host nation, the state – ie the UK – had responsibility for the security of the aircraft, as confirmed in the findings of the Lockerbie fatal accident inquiry and for the safety of its country's airports, as well as for the proficient use of intelligence that might have prevented the disaster.

"We maintain that there has been no investigation compliant with the Article 2 rights of the families.

"We have waited patiently for almost 21 years to learn the full truth of what happened. Now we await Gordon Brown's response to our renewed calls for a full inquiry into all the circumstances of the bombing."

 

Filed under: terrorism

Nick Uva says...

The Acting U.S Attorney in Boston, Michael Loukes, announces the arrest of terror suspect Tarek Mehanna (inset), in connection with alleged planned terror attacks, including a plot to fire upon shoppers and emergency personnel in malls.

Let's give thanks for whatever might have been avoided here and keep praying for the uncovering and failure of all such plans.

Filed under: terrorism