Search posterous

Search all posts and users. Type a name, type a favorite song title, whatever! See what comes up.
  

More posterous blogs











More recommended blogs »

Here are posterous posts filed under society...

lostmoya says...

Friends! Fellow Members of the Human Race! We are gathered here for a purpose. Let us look together at Mankind. What do we see? We see Mastery. What wonders Mankind can perform. He can cross the oceans and continents today, as easily as our grandfathers crossed the street. Tomorrow he will as easily cross the vast territories of space. He can make deserts FERTILE and plant cabbages on the Moon. And what does man CHOOSE? Alone among the creatures of this world, the Human Race CHOOSES to ANNIHILATE itself. Since the last world conflict ended, there has not been one day in which Human Beings have not been SLAUGHTERING or wounding one another, in 230 different wars.

And man BREEDS as recklessly as he lays waste. By the end of the century, the population of the world will have TRIPLED. 2/3rds of our plant species will have been DESTROYED. 55% of the Animal Kingdom. and 70% of our mineral resources. Out of every hundred Human Beings now living, 80 will DIE without ever KNOWING what it FEELS like to be fully nourished... While a tiny minority INDULGE themselves in ABSURD and EXTRAVAGANT luxuries. A motion picture entertainer of North America will receive as much money in a MONTH as would feed a starving South American tribe for a hundred YEARS! We WASTE! We DESTROY! AND, we cling like SAVAGES to our SUPERSTITIONS. We give POWER to LEADERS of State and Church as prejudiced and small-minded as ourselves, who SQUANDER our resources on instruments of destruction... While Millions continue to SUFFER and go hungry, condemned FOREVER to lives of IGNORANCE and DEPRIVATION.

I first became aware of this speech through Orbital's sampling of it on their excellent 1994 album, Snivilisation. It took me until last year to find that the source was a 1982 film by Lindsay Anderson, Britannia Hospital. I've never seen the film (which is hit-and-miss by all accounts) but this bit speaks for itself, I think.

Filed under: society

Filed under: society

Her super multicultural background could not be hidden.

Sometimes her "Spanish self coming out" when she spots images of veils in tree barks...

Vertical Search: Social Interactivity
LinkedinFacebookFriendfeedTwitterdel.icio.usStumbleuponBlog RSSMySpace

Filed under: society

latinscribe says...

 

Every nation has hoards of full-on soccer fans. Germany, Italy, Poland, Korea all worship their sports stars.

In Mexico City, if the Mexican national team or even the a local team wins a big game, thousands of revelers celebrate around the Angel of Independence with such fervor that people are often stamped to death.

After a Pumas-Ámerica match, fanatics hurl flags and beep horns until after 5 a.m. in nearly every central neighborhood.

But not just in sports. When it comes to anything involving spectacles and crowds - e.g., music, theater, fiestas, parades - Mexicans seem to behave in a strangely intense way.

Who would have guessed that in a conservative, Catholic nation, over 18,000 people would remove their clothes in a photo-shoot in the capital's main square? Spencer Tunick, the photographer, said he was shocked.

It was the largest nude spectacle ever recorded - not because Mexicans are avid nudists (on the contrary) but because they have a knack for transforming spectator-ness to spectacle.

So I took notice when posters went up several weeks ago soliciting "dance volunteers" to show up at Revolution Plaza to honor Michael Jackson. The organizer's goal was to break the world record.

That’s when I started thinking about why being a spectator seemed so important to Mexicans.

When I slept that night, I dreamed of warriors preparing for battle while crowds of admiring, frightened people watched.

Suddenly I found myself seated at a stone amphitheater in front of young men running barefoot with shocking intensity. I sensed their ferocity and could nearly smell their fear but  - strangely - what I remember most was how privileged I felt to be watching a win-or-die ball game.

That was when I thought about the Aztecs, about their beliefs and the thousands of people chosen to climb atop pyramids to be slain in the name of their gods.

As they marched to their deaths, the common people peered up toward the bloody altars.

All of them were spectators.

In fact, this seemed to be perhaps the Aztec's greatest weapon: control people’s minds in a way that fixed them with their own vision.

Through spectacle more than war, they conquered.*

On Saturday, Aug 29, the gathering at Revolution monument took place to honor the so-called king of pop.

The Guinness Book of World Records later reported that 50,000 people had gathered, and nearly 12,000 had danced to Thriller.

This handily broke the record for the World's biggest ever Michael Jackson dance.

As a Mexican friend of mine said the next day: "What a show!"

 

* Until they themselves were conquered by the spectacle of a Spaniard posing as a feathered God.

 

Filed under: society

I don't need to go into the fact that Jesus and Christmas have never met and have no reason to go together.

Christmas is the Son God festival, not the Son of God festival. Anyway the thing about Christmas is this - why should anyone be made to feel inadequate because they are financially worse of than anyone else?

If the practice of Christmas makes someone feel that who they are isn't enough, that being themselves and sharing their very life with people isn't gift enough, then something is very wrong.

And it IS very wrong.

Everyone knows someone at Christmas who feels inadequate because they can't afford it - if you don't you're either blind, or well, blind. Some of us will say to those people "it's ok if you don't have anything" but then WE continue to spend - which just highlights the financial injustice even more, adding more stress to these poor people.

Unfortunately, there is only one way to remove the stress and social awkwardness (if not damn right depression) from those 'less fortunate' (a disgusting phrase in itself) - those who are able to spend for christmas need to stop spending anything. This will prove to those without cash that it really isn't about the money, and it IS about "spending time together".

Season of goodwill? Then HAVE some goodwill - prove to people that finance and their ability to buy you stuff ('spoil you') doesn't add to their value as a human being. 'Treating' people (giving them a treat) is about giving them your emotions, your love. And don't save it just for Xmas. People are amazing.

Filed under: society

MJR says...

"The main reason education often is not educating is because it finds it difficult to give meaning to human experience. Time and again, curriculum specialists inform us that because we live in a world of rapid change, the conventions and practices of the past have become outmoded, outdated or irrelevant. Present educational fads are based on the premise that because we live in a new, digitally driven society, the intellectual legacy of the past and the experience of grown-ups have little significance for the schooling of children.  [...]
 
The discussion of the relationship between education and change is frequently overwhelmed by the fad of the moment and with the relatively superficial symptoms of new developments. It is often distracted from acknowledging the fact the fundamental educational needs of students do not alter every time a new technology influences people’s lives. And certainly the questions raised by Greek philosophy, Renaissance poetry, Enlightenment science or the novels of George Eliot continue to be relevant for students in our time and not just to the period that preceded the digital age.  [...]

The idea that we live in a qualitatively different world serves as a premise for the claim that the knowledge and insights of the past have only minor historical significance. In education it is claimed that old ways of teaching are outdated precisely because they are old. Knowledge itself is called into question because in a world of constant flux it must be continually overtaken by events. Policy has become so focused on keeping up with change that it has become distracted from the task of giving meaning to education.

The fetishisation of change is symptomatic of a mood of intellectual malaise, where notions of truth, knowledge and meaning have acquired a provisional character. Perversely, the transformation of change into a metaphysical force haunting humanity actually desensitises society from distinguishing between a passing novelty and qualitative change. That is why lessons learned through the experience of the past are so important for helping society face the future. When change is objectified, it turns into spectacle that distracts society from valuing the truths and insights it has acquired throughout the best moments of human history. Yet these are truths that have emerged through attempts to find answers to the deepest and most durable questions facing us, and the more the world changes the more we need to draw on our cultural and intellectual inheritance."  -Frank Furedi

This dinosaur, perhaps.

Filed under: society

MJR says...

"The authors view just about everything through a network lens, including religion. “God can actually be seen as a part of the social network,” they write. Since God is presumably connected with everyone, believing in him would literally allow you to feel connected to the rest of humankind with just one degree of separation: “through God everyone is a ‘friend of a friend’” (even if he doesn’t yet appear to be on Facebook)."  -Laura Vanderkam

Filed under: society

MJR says...

The Electronic Book Burning, by Alan Kaufman

Filed under: society

HikiCulture says...

In Japan, there are generally two terms that are used to describe someone who's a hikikomori: ひきこもり and 引き籠もり.

Filed under: Society

domin8 says...

You ever been wrong? Then you know why. If you have ever been wrong then you can be wrong again and you know what happens then, right? You fuck shit up. No, in order to get anything down right you can't just trust your own instincts and judgment, you need to have people around you sign off on your ideas. How many truly original thinkers do you know who have actually been successful? None, that's because original ideas aren't ever very good. They are like Kool-Aid in the packet, they need watering down or they taste horrible.

The problem is that everybody is flawed, we all have a blind-spot. Your original concept has a problem that anybody else but you can see and if you never actually share it with other people you won't ever find out. You have to let people dilute it to where it is palatable.

Had Timothy McVeigh run his idea by a bunch of other people his idea might have been diluted to some kind of Glenn Beck/Teabagger type of protest, instead he went ahead with the full-strength product and got his ass executed. The same thing went with Son of Sam and Ted Bundy. Success is about conformism. If McDonald's decided to put forth original, healthy, flavorful food they would be bankrupt in a couple of weeks. The ideas in your head have to be blanded out, have to be made into something with less flavor, less of your thinking and more everybody else's. They have to be dumbed down, simplified.  

Ordinariness is your salvation
Anything else is to suppose humanity to be smarter and better than they ever are. "Success" and popularity are always the same thing whatever people tell you. In the end only the completely gray and common will win.

Filed under: society