Original Photo Shoot, Runner's World Magazine
I don't know where I stand on this issue. On the one hand, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin posed for this shot, and she posed for it for Runner's World magazine. The context of the photo essay, and the accompanying interview, was to allow her to talk about why she is a runner. Now, Newsweek has appropriated one of the more eye-catching photos and has run it as their cover--changing the context slightly from a photo about physical fitness to one about politics and news.
Sarah Palin's image is everywhere as she launches a highly-anticipated book tour this week, but the former Alaska governor is unhappy with at least one media organization's depiction of her.
Palin took aim at Newsweek's eye-catching cover this week that shows the former vice presidential candidate in her running outfit - an image that was apparently lifted from a Runner's World photo shoot months ago. Writing on her Facebook page Monday night, Palin said the depiction is flat out "sexist, and oh-so-expected."
"The choice of photo for the cover of this week's Newsweek is unfortunate. When it comes to Sarah Palin, this 'news' magazine has relished focusing on the irrelevant rather than the relevant," Palin wrote. "The out-of-context Newsweek approach is sexist, and oh-so-expected by now."
"If anyone can learn anything from it: it shows why you shouldn't judge a book by its cover, gender, or color of skin. The media will do anything to draw attention – even if out of context," Palin also said.
The photo is accompanied by text that states "How Do You Solve A Problem Like Sarah? She's bad news for the GOP - and for everybody else too."
Would it be fair to take something that someone did for a magazine that covers health and fitness issues--containing a light, almost vapid question and answer about only those topics--and try to apply that context to some other more serious publication? If you'll notice, the running shoes that Palin posed with are conveniently cropped out of the Newsweek cover. [Correction: CNN arbitrarily cropped the cover. I have just seen the Newsweek cover, and her running shoes are NOT cropped out. As the kids say, my bad. ]
The running shoes are what provides much of the context for the photo that you see above. This pose is similar, but the context is still the same--this is about a runner, and her running attire is depicted along with the shoes:

I think there's a case that could be made that the context of the publication matters. Many musicians and comedians have been interviewed for Hustler magazine. Do you suppose that the context of that interview could be one thing, and then trying to run the same interview in Teen Style would make it something frightening and offensive? Would it be fair to take something someone said for one audience and then try to reprint that for another audience?
I learned two things from the Palin interview in Runner's World. One, she has run a marathon in less than four hours, which is pretty impressive. Two, John McCain's sole means of getting exercise is to go wading in a creek.

Now, do you want to know what is really sexist? What is really sexist is to now compare how Palin has been depicted to how Dede Scozzafava has been depicted.
Do you really think that Scozzafava's moderate and mainstream views were the real reason for her rejection? Why would the Republican Party run from a woman who could win a seat in Congresss? Was it because she was some sort of liberal insurgent? Or was some of it driven by her image, which is more of a career woman--more of a real woman--than the image projected by Palin, who is also a career woman, but one who began her career in television and with a beauty pageant. Who's more real to you? I know a lot of people who look more like Scozzafava than Palin, but that doesn't mean there's anything wrong with either one of them. Our prejudice is towards beauty, in most cases.
What Sarah Palin should take from this incident is this, and this is ultimately how I come down on this issue--you can't pose for photos and not expect the media to change the context, crop out things, and turn them into something that fits their narrative. She should never have expected that her book tour wouldn't be met with some serious pushback.
That’s right. Are you pissed off, over it, fed up, incensed? Well, we want to know about it. PeaceKeeper Cause-Metics, the first cosmetics company to give donations to urgent human rights issues LOVES RIGHTEOUS ANGER…yes, we do. Righteous anger is what has transformed all sorts of despicable things throughout human history.
So, we want to know what you are pissed off about, what you are doing about it, and what ideas you have on how to transform it. Send us a short-ish video using speech, song, poetry, drum-beating, plate smashing and/or any other creative methods your emotions can conjure and tell us what you are mad as hell about that will inspire others to get angry and DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT with you. Of course it would help if you included our company’s name, PEACEKEEPER, in the video. After all, we aren’t going to wait for the next generation to call B***-S*** by its real name. OUR time has come right now!
The winner of the best “PeaceKeepers Rant” video will win $1,000 and “We’re Over It” bragging rights! Two other winners will receive a gift basket of PeaceKeeper products valued at $300. So Speak up. Use Your Voice. HEAL THE WORLD. E-mail us your video today.
DEADLINE is January 31, 2009. Send your video to info@iamapeacekeeper.com.
PeaceKeeper reserves the rights to use any and/or all videos submitted at any time, and by submitting your video you are agreeing to waive any request for fiscal remuneration.
The winner of the video contest will be asked for one interview and photo session. No cursing outright, if you don’t mind! Modified cursing is always encouraged!
People who say that [women are not ready] are those who seek to protect their own positions by typecasting women... Do male ministers perform better than female? How many female corruptors are there in the country compared to male corruptors?
Sri Wiyanti Eddyono, a commissioner from the National Commission on Violence against Women, takes a swipe at sexist statements by deputy leader of the Demokrats, Achmad Mubarok to the effect that women are 'not ready' to take on strategic roles in government.
The funny thing is that of the entire 2004-2009 cabinet only the women ministers really achieved anything.
One of the most important criteria for a female minister is that she is able to become a pillar of the nation
So says deputy chairman Achmad Mubarok. I have a question for Pak Mubarok. Which male members of the 2004-2009 cabinet does he consider capable of becoming "pillars of the nation"?
Pak Mubarok went on to say that women should not be given strategic ministries such as defence and law. I wonder why he doesn't think Finance and Trade are "strategic"? Could it be because he's an idiot?!
Actual penguin fact: you can't tell the gender of a penguin (for sure) by looking.[1] You have to do a DNA test. 



[1]at least, for African penguins and their close cousins, Magellanic and Humboldt. Not sure about the others and too lazy to do the research right now :-)
Splash NewsJohn Belushi, Horatio Sanz, Chris Farley ... the funny fat guy has always been a successful stock character on “Saturday Night Live.” But is there a chick over a size six in the cast? Well, there used to be. More than a handful of hotness, Casey Wilson, was just fired after two seasons.
Some critics argue it was because she failed to create a memorable, one-of-a-kind persona, but then how do you explain Tim Meadows being given almost a decade to come up with “The Ladies Man”? There’s a bigger answer here and E! News went all Nancy Drew to find out why Casey got the pink slip. What they uncovered is pretty hard to swallow.
According to a “show insider,” the real reason totally normal-sized Wilson got the axe is a weighty issue. Supposedly, the producers insisted she was a fatty and needed to lose 30 pounds over the summer break or else. Needless to say, Casey was only interested in losing one thing— the haters.
Casey is obvs a total babe. And really, how could she even lose 30 pounds—from where? If this is what fat looks like, then we should all be going for that healthy kinda look. Ugh! It’s no wonder eating disorders are so commonplace in the face of this kind of job discrimination.
Well, at least Casey has a sense of humor about the crazy criticism. She made a hilarious Funny Or Die video about internet comments that touched on her “body issues” and laughed it off. Then she returned to “SNL” from the hiatus, and she hasn’t budged an inch since. So the producers booted her from the lineup to make room for two new—talented, sure—skinnier women, Jenny Slate and Nasim Pedrad. Sexist, no?
While Casey hasn’t publicly weighed in on getting let go, clearly “SNL” has some explainin’ to do. Meanwhile, Casey, if you wanna hug it out, you just give us Frisky gals a call!
--------
Here is the Funny or Die Video:
FROM: http://www.thefrisky.com/post/246-woman-dies-crash-dieting-for-her-wedding/#When:21:10:03Z?eref=RSS
iStockphotoThis is more proof that you buy the dress to fit the bride—you don’t try to fit the bride to the dress. Samantha Clowe, a 34-year-old woman in England, was always overweight, and was determined not to be a “fat bride” at her wedding. So she tried a diet program called LighterLife, which had her eating specially prepared soups, snacks, and shakes everyday for a total of only 530 calories a day for 11 weeks. She did lose a lot of weight. But then her fiancé found her collapsed at the top of the stairs in their house. He called an ambulance, but she was pronounced dead soon after from heart failure. So, so sad. And a cautionary tale. [Daily Mail]