Search posterous

Search all posts and users. Type a name, type a favorite song title, whatever! See what comes up.
  

More posterous blogs











More recommended blogs »

Here are posterous posts filed under science...

Mark says...

** Please note that this does contain spoilers but it's necessary to encourage you not to pay to see this movie **

My wife and I saw 2012 last weekend. I was really looking forward to seeing this film after I saw the trailer because I am a huge fan of end of the world and apocalyptic films. I'm not sure why. Maybe it's how I was raised to believe the rapture was going to happen in the late 80s or maybe the early 90s and then the world would end right after the tribulation before the year 2000. I found that a majority of Christians like spending their time thinking about when and how the world will end.

I have to admit that these disaster flicks are fun to watch but I wouldn't consider them great movies. You have to be prepared to accept a high level of bad dialog, acting, and story lines. Movies like Deep Impact, Armageddon, and Day After Tomorrow are good examples of this. However, 2012 puts them all to shame.

One of the things that I was most disappointed about was the lack of historical and scientific background of the premise of the film: The world was ending in 2012 because the sun changed and the Mayan calendar predicted it.

First, why was the world ending? In the movie, the sun started to emit neutrinos that for some reason started to heat the earth's core and destory the earth's mantle.  What caused these neutrinos? The movie didn't say. I am assuming that this was caused by a particular alignment in our galaxy which the Mayan calendar predicted would happen in 2012.  That's a big assumption on my part because the movie doesn't give me much to work with. 

This leads me to my second disappointment. There was no background given on the Mayans and their culture, technology, and how their calendar works.  The movie had one 15 second clip of a news report of a group of believers who killed themselves around a Mayan temple because they thought the world was ending.

The Mayans were a pretty advanced civilization for their time.  They had their own writing and mathematical systems. They were also very advanced in architecture and engineering.  They might have been the first astronomers. They demonstrated this by creating a calender that was based on their observations of the visible galaxy.

My last disappointment was at the end of the film where it turns out that the movie is just the story of Noah's Ark 2.  In the trailer you see people walking into huge ships that look like space ships.  When I first saw that I was excited by the idea because I thought the film would totally destroy the earth by ripping it apart and then the space ships would float out into space in search of a new home.  That's not how it turned out. Instead, the end of the world was brought about by a series of huge earthquakes around the planet that caused tidal waves which swept over the continents and covered the earth in water just like in Noah's flood. So the ships were used as arks to keep everyone safe until the waters receded.  They even called them arks in the film.

So enough of the disappointment that was 2012. The world is not ending in 2012. The Mayan calendar actually doesn't end at 2012. 2012 just starts a new calendar cycle. Instead how about some real science to answer the question of when the world will end.

The Andromeda Galaxy is our closet known galaxy to our galaxy.  Scientist have confirmed that it is slowly approaching and is on a collision course for our galaxy.  Astronomers have seen this type of event occur in other galaxies and the result is the galaxies are merged or one takes over another.  When this happens you can assume that the earth will be ripped apart. 

Don't worry this won't happen anytime soon.  Scientist estimate that it won't happen for another 5 billion years.  Who knows, the human race probably won't be around by then.  Either we will have depleted the earth's resources and had to leave the planet, another giant asteroid similar to the one that exterminated the dinosaurs could hit earth again, or a virus could overtake the earth and kill everyone.

It's not all doom and gloom though. The philosopher Daniel Dennett put it nicely when he said "The planet has grown its own nervous system: us".   So if a huge earth ending event happens in the future then hopefully we will have the technology and the means to stop it.

Filed under: science

honato11 says...

Physicists at the National Institute of Standards and Technology have demonstrated the first "universal" programmable quantum information processor able to run any program allowed by quantum mechanics -- the rules governing the submicroscopic world -- using two quantum bits (qubits) of information. The processor could be a module in a future quantum computer, which theoretically could solve some important problems that are intractable today.

Filed under: science

sighnpen says...

バカはなおせる 脳を鍛える習慣、悪くする習慣 楽天ブックス

 

Filed under: science

Rick says...

 

Filed under: Science

Rick says...

 

Filed under: Science

matthewr says...

In one e-mail exchange, a scientist writes of using a statistical “trick” in a chart illustrating a recent sharp warming trend. In another, a scientist refers to climate skeptics as “idiots.”

Some skeptics asserted Friday that the correspondence revealed an effort to withhold scientific information. “This is not a smoking gun; this is a mushroom cloud,” said Patrick J. Michaels, a climatologist who has long faulted evidence pointing to human-driven warming and is criticized in the documents.

Some of the correspondence portrays the scientists as feeling under siege by the skeptics’ camp and worried that any stray comment or data glitch could be turned against them.

The evidence pointing to a growing human contribution to global warming is so widely accepted that the hacked material is unlikely to erode the overall argument. However, the documents will undoubtedly raise questions about the quality of research on some specific questions and the actions of some scientists.

Reread that last paragraph. Editorialize much NY Times? There is SO MUCH evidence! The article gos on to read,
-Dr. Mann, a professor at Pennsylvania State University, confirmed in an interview that the e-mail message was real. He said the choice of words by his colleague was poor but noted that scientists often used the word “trick” to refer to a good way to solve a problem, “and not something secret.”

Really? Really? "No no, it's just scientist speak so we don't expect you to understand. When we say lie, that's just how scientists say creative interpretation."

Filed under: Science

Riley Dog says...

In many respects, the activation hypothesis serves to elaborate what many of us already know about descended scrotal testicles: that they serve as a sort of “ cold storage” and production unit for sperm, which keep best at lower body temperatures. But it goes much further than this fact, too. It turns out that human testicles display some rather elaborate yet subtle temperature-regulating features that have gone largely unnoticed by doctors, researchers and laymen alike. The main tenet of the activation hypothesis is that the heat of a woman's vagina radically jumpstarts sperm that have been hibernating in the cool, airy scrotal sack. Yet it explains many other things too, including why one testicle is usually slightly lower than the other, why the skin of the scrotum becomes more taut and the testicles retract during sexual arousal, and even why testicular injuries--compared to other types of bodily assault--are so excruciatingly painful to men.

The opening line of Gallup's new article helps readers to appreciate the oddity of the scrotum:

 

It is almost unthinkable to ask why ovaries do not descend during embryological development and emerge outside the female’s body cavity in a thin, unprotected sack…

 

After you’ve finished exorcising that unsettling image from your mind, consider that the dangling gonads of many male animals (including humans) are no less puzzling. After all, why in all of evolution would nature have designed a body part with such obviously enormous reproductive importance to hang off the body so defenseless and vulnerable? Although we tend to become accustomed to our body parts and it often fails to occur to us to even ask why they are the way they are, some of the biggest evolutionary mysteries are also the most mundane aspects of our lives.

 

Filed under: science

Victor says...

Filed under: Science

jon says...

« The European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) says it expects to restart the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) by this weekend after more than a year of repairs. The 27 km (17 mi) particle accelerator was launched last year, but suffered a failure from a faulty electrical connection, damaging 53 of the smasher's 9,300 superconducting magnets. Repairs are now completed, and the plan is to begin injecting protons into the LHC this weekend, on the path to search for particles such as predicted-yet-unobserved Higgs Boson. Collected below are some photographs of the repairs, and of the LHC and some of its experiments in various stages of construction. (30 photos total) »

Voir aussi chez En quête de sciences ou sur le site du CERN dédié au Grand collisionneur de hadrons.

Filed under: science

sighnpen says...

ユニークなクモ10選:画像ギャラリー | WIRED VISION

ユニークなクモ10選:画像ギャラリー | WIRED VISION

Filed under: science