Search posterous

Search all posts and users. Type a name, type a favorite song title, whatever! See what comes up.
  

More posterous blogs











More recommended blogs »

Here are posterous posts filed under reviews...

Josema says...

strikerstill1-1

It’s finally here! I had a chance to play with my new Blackberry Stratus (9100) AKA Striker AKA Pearl 2 and I have to tell you that is fantastic. It might be a little too tiny, but the phone is very (and when I say very I really mean it) pretty, slick, sexy, and it says “Business” all over it.

The overall feel of the phone in your hand is almost the same as holding an iPod Nano. I just can’t imagine of a better Blackberry to put in your pocket for hours, it’s just the perfect size. The trackpad is a great addition to the looks of the phone, making the lines of it that much slicker than any other Blackberry on the market. The back of the phone is extremely similar to the second generation Blackberry Storm, which is a pretty good looking phone itself, but everything in a smaller package. Another addition to the hardware is the “Media Buttons”, which immediately makes me think that this device will be directed to a younger crowd of Blackberry users. The phone is very light but at the same time it feels solid in your hand. Texting is as easy as it gets (as long as you are used to the Pearl Suretype Keyboard or even the Storm’s reduced keyboard, and the new/higher resolution screen is just gorgeous (not as good as the one on the Storm/Tour/Bold, but definitely a nice upgrade from the “already old” Pearl. Another nice addition to this second generation Pearl is the 3.2 MP Camera with flash.

The software I’m running on the phone is at a very early stage (v5.0.0.350), but is running very smoothly already. The only problems I have with it is the camera app, which doesn’t work yet, but the video camera is running perfectly. Because the OS Platform is 6.0 I can’t download any apps yet, but the closer we get to its release the more compatible the apps will be. The phone works great on 3G, even though its running on “AT&T’s Full of Apps Network”, so that is a great sign.

My guess for its release would be around April, 2010. That is just a guess and as soon as I hear something more solid I will let you know immediately. Because of the 3G bands in the phone I can tell for a fact that this phone will be out for AT&T and Rogers, but sadly I haven’t heard of a CDMA version yet or even a GSM version for T-Mobile here in the US.

Overall I love the phone, and to all of you that love their Pearls you are going to absolutely fall in love with this one. If you want to discuss or have any more questions about this beauty don’t forget to visit the Blackberry 9100 Forum.

Salomondrin vuelve a la carga con una review en vídeo de la nueva BB Pearl. Menudo dispositivo para movilidad extrema.

Filed under: Reviews

http://www.tripadvisor.com/Hotel_Review-g580113-d1392274-Reviews-Casa_Silas_B_B-Granada.html

Filed under: Reviews

THE GOLD STANDARD

Reeder is without doubt the best RSS reader for use with Google Reader. In fact, Reeder is simply the Gold Standard in apps of this genre. I've tried many premium readers, and as another reviewer commented, other apps either tend to be top-heavy on features or top-heavy on aesthetics. Until now, no app developer has managed to combine the two effectively. Reeder is fast, sleek, beautifully designed, unclutteted and does what you need well. Twitter integration coming in the next update (I'm a beta tester) works seamlessly as do the other share options. Even sharing an article by email creates a simple but elegant email with clickable headings. In short, it's just a beautful, simple app to use, and takes pride of place on my iPhone homescreen springboard.

I would argue that Tweetie 2 is the gold-standard of Twitter apps. By this virtue, Reeder is well on the way to being THE best reader app; the gold-standard of apps in it's class. I would like to see more features available, such as the ability to add feeds from within the app, and to be able to manage existing subscriptions, again within the app. But for now, I'm one happy Reeder!

Here's the link to the Reeder Site:

http://reederapp.com/

Or just get it from the app store. You could also follow @reederapp on twitter for advance preview betas

Filed under: reviews

ghostcrabby says...

What would you expect from a Thai movie? Horror films or Martial arts films.
So Ranging Phoenix is the type of martial art with a special spike of b-boy/break-dance/hip-hop! (not sure whats the diff) With its high content on fighting scenes, the plot would be paper-like. But what's there to complain with the cool and interesting fight scenes they have. The plot will slowly get known through scenes of fighting and fighting. Well, the plot is kinda weird, it's about obtaining an extracts of pheromones from woman and selling it to sex addicts. "Jeeja" the main actress with her gang is there to rescue those woman from the Jaguar gang.

What I like about this movie is that the fighting technique they uses. "Meyraiyuth" is a skill known as "Drunken Thai Boxing". But, they combines it with hip-hop steps! This makes it more happening to watch with the up-beat background music they have. Plus their costume matches well too. Always love the scene where noobs are trained to be a pro. The training setting is at an abandoned seaside where there's this worn out building with hanging colorful bottles of booze.

The bad about the movie is that, it is too draggy at times...The plot is one, the fighting is another. And the ending is not that great as well. It's hard to grasp the climax too. Therefore my rating for this will be 3/5.

P.S. the girl is cute at times =p gonna catch her previous movie "Chocolate".

Filed under: reviews

Alan Kelon says...

(download)

Glass, R. L. 1999. Practical programmer: inspections—some surprising findings. Commun. ACM 42, 4 (Apr. 1999), 17-19. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/299157.299161

Filed under: reviews

Alan Kelon says...

(download)

Ciolkowski, M., Laitenberger, O., and Biffl, S. 2003. Software Reviews: The State of the Practice. IEEE Softw. 20, 6 (Nov. 2003), 46-51. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MS.2003.1241366

ABSTRACT

This article presents the results of a 2002 survey on industry adoption of software review technologies. The study offers two important insights. First, many responding companies take advantage of reviews for various purposes, including early defect detection, monitoring and controlling quality, and better communication within the development team. Second, many companies use reviews unsystematically, with a mismatch between the expected outcome and the review implementation. So, although review ideas have reached software practitioners, their full potential is seldom exploited.

Filed under: reviews

Alan Kelon says...

(download)

Ayewah, N., Hovemeyer, D., Morgenthaler, J. D., Penix, J., and Pugh, W. 2008. Using Static Analysis to Find Bugs. IEEE Softw. 25, 5 (Sep. 2008), 22-29. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MS.2008.130

ABSTRACT

Static analysis examines code in the absence of input data and without running the code. It can detect potential security violations (SQL injection), runtime errors (dereferencing a null pointer) and logical inconsistencies (a conditional test that can't possibly be true). Although a rich body of literature exists on algorithms and analytical frameworks used by such tools, reports describing experiences in industry are much harder to come by. The authors describe FindBugs, an open source static-analysis tool for Java, and experiences using it in production settings. FindBugs evaluates what kinds of defects can be effectively detected with relatively simple techniques and helps developers understand how to incorporate such tools into software development.

Filed under: reviews

Alan Kelon says...

(download)

Rombach, D., Ciolkowski, M., Jeffery, R., Laitenberger, O., McGarry, F., and Shull, F. 2008. Impact of research on practice in the field of inspections, reviews and walkthroughs: learning from successful industrial uses. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 33, 6 (Oct. 2008), 26-35. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1449603.1449609

ABSTRACT

Software inspections, reviews, and walkthroughs have become a standard process component in many software development domains. Maturity level 3 of the CMM-I requires establishment of peer reviews [12] and substantial sustained improvements in quality and productivity have been reported as a result of using reviews ([16], [21], [22], [27]). The NSF Impact project identifies the degree to which these industrial success cases have been instigated and improved by research in software engineering.

This research identifies that there is widespread adoption of inspections, reviews or walkthroughs but that companies do not generally exploit their full potential. However there exist sustained industrial success cases with respect to the wide-spread and measurably successful application of them. It also identifies research in software engineering that can be credibly documented as having influenced the industrial success cases. Credible documentation may exist in the form of publications or documented reports by witnesses. Due to the semi-formal nature of inspections, reviews, and walkthroughs, a specific focus is given to empirical research results as motivators for adoption. Through the examination of one detailed case study, it is shown that software engineering research has had a significant impact on practice and that the impact can be traced in this case from research to that practice. The case study chosen provides evidence of both success and failure regarding sustained application in practice.

Thus the analysis of historic impact chains of research reveals a clear impact of software engineering research on sustained industrial success for inspections, reviews and walkthroughs. More importantly, in impact chains where the empirical results have not been established, we conclude that success has not been achieved or has not been sustained.

The paper closes with (1) lessons learned for creating the sustained use and impact of semi-formal software engineering processes, (2) a request for researchers and practitioners to further consider how their work can improve the effectiveness of research and practice, and (3) a request to contribute additional success cases and impact factors to the authors database for future enhancements of this paper.

Filed under: reviews

Jay says...

So I finally got Google Chrome installed on my netbook. It was a fairly painless operation that took no more than 20 minutes with the download and boot configuration. It took a minute to get a root password to login. The entire OS works off of an Internet connection so I ran into a snag when I was trying to login with my Google information. Without the net there was no way to verify it so once I finally hunted down the root info I was ready to roll.

All in all the OS is quick and peppy, however there isn't much to it. Think of it as a web browser that has some icons that link to specific websites. That is really all it is! Chrome OS is the Chrome browser with a few added features. Everything is a web app. There are no executable files or anything of that nature. All Chrome OS does is take web app (websites) like Twitter and Facebook and link them on a panel that has a nice little icon.

I guess the beauty of the OS is the fact it will be free. Netbook providers can now offer cheaper products because they don't need to pay Microsoft a fortune to OEM Windows. For what it does it works well. It provides you with a portal to the Internet while making all of Google's toys easy to access and always available. I am sure as time goes on there will be a ton of extensions however as it stands right now there isn't really anything I need this for.

All in all if you have a netbook and use it strictly for Internet use then you can't go wrong with this. However if you use your netbook to chat on AIM or listen to some mp3's via Winamp, sync your iPod or sort through some Digicam photos, this isn't the right OS for you. This isn't really an OS, it's a web OS.

         

Filed under: reviews

Mikay says...

I'm starting to get into the habit or writing reviews about movies I go watch. It is kinda fun. So recently I got to go see "The Blind Side," which was an amazing movie! It was one of the best I've seen in a long time. So here's my review...

The movie "The Blind Side," is probably one of the best movies I have seen in a long time. Not lacking plot, humor, or feeling, which sadly is common and repeated in many films today. It did not leave me wanting anything more, or thinking, "Hey I think I would have changed this." I would not want to change anything. The movie really shows the relationship between the family and the mom played by Sandra Bullock, which added much interest. Sandra Bullock played the type of mom who could be really nice if she wanted to, but one you wouldn't want to talk bad to (quite the backbone). She always had me laughing when she made a sarcastic comment, or when she made some tough guy shiver. However she wasn't the only talented cast member that appealed to me. Her son S.J., played by Jae Head, was the cutest thing EVER! He was just like his mom in the movie, always making a cute comment or something, and whatever he did/said, it was cute! Just an amazing kid... Ok now those are the two people I had to go on about because they kept me from not laughing, I had to laugh, they were great. Now about the main character, Michael Oher, played by Quinton Aaron. First, let me say he is not the only person that they casted perfectly in this movie, he is such a talented actor, emotionally portraying the real Michael Oher, he had me in the movie to where I forgot I was at a movie. Now the plot was really what got me. You would never think this was a true story. It was brilliant. So touching and it seemed so fictional, but it's amazing to think this really happened in real life, and didn't come from a book.

So in brief, this was probably one of the best movies I have ever seen, maybe the best. It was the best $8 I've spent in a long time, and I would definitely see it again.
Touching and emotional, funny and witty, compelling and suspenseful, it had it all. Please go see it. 

Filed under: reviews