Search posterous

Search all posts and users. Type a name, type a favorite song title, whatever! See what comes up.
  

More posterous blogs











More recommended blogs »

Here are posterous posts filed under rejection...

Milly says...

 

I am the youngest of three sisters. Ann was born first, in 1974, two years after my parents had married. Two years later Amy was born, completing the family. Or so my parents thought. In 1978, little Emily was born - their ‘little accident’. 

 

For the first 10 years I have mostly happy memories. My parents were loving. My sisters were - well, they were what sisters are! Wonderful, fun companions who were also total pains in the bum! We got along and argued in spurts. 

 

But while I was loved and secure, I was also intensely shy and fearful. I didn’t believe anyone really liked me. I was very quiet, especially in school, where I felt on the outside of everything, and completely alone. At the time I would not have been able to put it into words, nor even know that there was anything unusual in the way I felt. 

 

I have struggled with a fear of rejection for most my adult life. In the past few years God has revealed to me that it’s source is in that innocent little phrase of my parents. Though I never doubted they loved me, when they told me I was an accident, somewhere in my childish brain it registered as I wasn’t meant to be there, and if I wanted to stay I had better behave. Over time I came to believe that no-one really wanted me, and any mistake, and imperfection on my part would lead to immediate rejection. I was so afraid of getting it wrong - anything wrong - that at any moment my family or friends would realise that they really didn’t want me around - that I stayed quiet and self contained. That way I could reduce the risk of making a mistake. If I didn’t speak - I couldn’t say the wrong thing. If I didn’t join in the games, I couldn’t make a mistake by winning or getting the rules wrong. 

 

Of course, kids don’t realise these types of things. Instead of making me safer, the quieter I was, the more I became a target for bullies. And their apparent dislike of me just confirmed in me that I wasn’t likeable - that there was nothing remotely loveable about me, and that if I only existed by accident, I was tolerated only on sufferance.

 

My parents were not Christians, but both had had Christian teaching in their childhood, and had, for reasons I’ve never fully understood, decided to send their three girls to Sunday School. So each week we were sent off to the local Gospel Hall where we were taught Bible stories and sung songs of worship. It was fun and I never questioned why we went without them. 

 

When I was ten my world changed. 

 

I began having really bad dreams. Perhaps you would call them nightmares. Mostly they centered around a fear of dying. I was suddenly aware of mortality. But the dreams were also about rejection. I remember one dream vividly - in it my mum had had another baby, but my parents were split up, divorcing. I could see my dad, with Ann and Amy, walking up the street towards our house; on the otherside of the road, with my mum and a pram with the new baby, I walked away from him and our house. The sense of separation was severe and painful, and I woke up crying. 

 

After that dream I remembered what they had told us in Sunday school - that if we believed in Jesus we would never die. I was afraid of dying, and the dream of my parents had upset me alot; so I figured if Jesus could save me so that I would never die then it was worth giving it a go. I told Jesus I believed in him and wanted him to save me. 

 

Immediately my bad dreams stopped, and while my fears of rejection didn’t disappear, I did find a security. I knew that Jesus loved me. Not only that, but Jesus knew absolutely everything about me - therefore he couldn’t suddenly discover that actually I was an accident and not meant to be here! He already knew, and he still loved me! He wouldn’t be shocked to discover the times I was naughty or made mistakes - he knew about them too and still he loved me! Here finally was one person I could totally trust, to never reject me, never stop loving me. Here, in Jesus, I learnt security and unconditional love. I trusted him completely, as I had never trusted anyone. And I knew his love for me in a deep way, a way I can’t put into words. None of this was rational thought - it was simply a deep knowing in my centre, of love and security. Only years later would I understand what Jesus had done for me. 

 

It seems, as I look back, that that summer of my 10th birthday was the last moment of peace in our family. After that, the days went dark. I didn’t tell anyone I was a Christian for another 5 years. Not many months after my decision to follow Jesus  my  mother suffered her second mental-breakdown (her first having taken place just after her marriage); we moved house to get away from abusive neighbours; I changed schools, starting high school, which was not a good experience for me; my sisters were growing up, going through teenage years of transformation, and relationships were strained. Later there was complete relationship breakdown between my mum and Ann, while Amy became increasingly angry with the world.

 

What perfect timing from God, that I should understand his love for me, just as the world got a little bit more crazy. I am so grateful for his amazing love! 

 

My idea that I was unloveable hadn’t gone away, and over time grew worse till I really disliked myself intensely. I still had few friends and continued to be bullied. I know that throughout the next ten years it was God holding me close, protecting me, that prevented me from going down blacker paths. Whenever I reached such low points I would hold on to him, as the anchor in the storm. No matter what the rest of the world thought of me, or how I perceived it - he was always there. 

 

I finally told my family I was a Christian when I was 15 and in hospital, recently diagnosed with cancer. After that point I started going to a local church, having Christian fellowship for the first time and getting regular teaching. I began to grow and mature as a Christian at last, beginning to understand what before had been mere instinct and response to Jesus. Over the years since then he has continued to love me and to lead me into deeper relationship with him. And lovingly, gently, he has whispered to me that the thoughts that I am unloveable, only a moment away from rejection at any time, are lies. These lies have controlled me for 30 years now. But I am confident that Christ has one the victory in my life, and in him I can be free from the lies, eventually. His love has brought me this far. He has given me identity, purpose and security. I know that  soon I will also be completely free. 

 

Filed under: rejection

appsfire says...

Not sure who made the decision: whether the publisher or Apple, but the App with the Nazi sign is out of the App store. At least we can't see it in the collection of ebooks of the app publisher 

The count down worked

Filed under: rejection

appsfire says...

t-24h

Filed under: rejection

thetrudz says...

In the last few weeks, I have read a few blog posts about friendship, social media and rejection. One blogger mentioned how she couldn't wait to become a parent in order to have friends (other parents) as it would force her into friendships. Force? From what I have seen, parenthood often leaves people with little time to build friendships although they may chat with other parents about each other's kids. Friendships need more than small talk to survive. Knowing other people in similar roles does not automatically generate a friendship. As with any other real connection, it takes work. 

Another blogger referenced the CNN article "Defriending Can Bruise Your 'Digital Ego'" and asked people how do they cope with rejection. The article states that people can be more hurt by online rejection than in person since people are usually polite in person. It is true that some people are ruder online; one look at the comments on a YouTube video or CNN's political ticker confirms this. However, online comments with insults are much different than someone clicking "remove from friends." I would agree that tons of insults fired at a person online could hurt their feelings. However, all online activity isn't the same. It seems as if the article is comparing the general nastiness online to removal from a friends list/denial of a friend request. That comparison is unbalanced. 

In the article, a person with more than 500 connections on LinkedIn felt rejected and disappointed over 1 person declining her request. She already had more than 500 connections on LinkedIn, but apparently that is not enough.  Perhaps since LinkedIn is for business, the more connections the better, but quality connections matter as well. Aren't the recommendations and referrals one of the major points of this site? Isn't a person more likely to get positive referrals from people who actually want to interact with them? People I know who use LinkedIn use it for business and have no extreme personal expectations when seeking a new connection. I would reach to say that this would be the same for Twitter as it is acceptable that strangers follow and unfollow each other as well as chat with each other about shared interests. I can't imagine the personal expectations that exist for Facebook would extend to LinkedIn or Twitter, but for some, apparently it does. 

Another guy mentioned in the article had 1200 friends on Facebook and did not know 400 of them. He stated that he is a people person and likes when people like him. He seemed to perceive a friend request as the same thing as being liked and needed more to validate his likeableness. One of the first things that I have to remind myself (often daily) is that the word friend is used in many ways and has a variety of meanings for people. For some, the word friend clearly means the word enemy. For some, the word friend means someone that he/she has not been intimately involved with.  For some, the word friend means any other human being with a beating heart that accepts a friend request on a site so that as many friends as possible are on the list. I understand that the term is used casually and with different meanings. Facebook may have chosen to use that word because of its positive connotations. However, expecting a real connection and relationship with someone because a website calls them that word is another story.  A friendship is not achieved by adding someone to a list on a website, period. The problem is that friendships are viewed as disposable lists instead of real relationships.  

People do have genuine friendships (a redundant term since a friendship can only be real; anything else is something else) that cross over to the web.  If one my friends removed me from their friends list, I would want to know why since our histories and relationships are sufficient enough for me to desire an explanation. Again, I am not using the word friend with the meaning of any other human being that is not me. The correct term for that is people. I am not using it with the meaning of anyone that appears on any list on profiles that I have. I am using the word friends as in the people that I share values, experiences, ideals and hearty conversation with as we travel the road of life together. We have histories and experiences that have shaped and defined our relationships. Only then would I feel rejection if they removed me from their friends list. However, it would have more to do with the symbolism of that action in relation to our real relationships than a decreased number of people on my friends list or social media itself.  

Unlike those referred to in the article, I do not need email explanations from those who do not accept my friend requests and definitely not from those who decide to remove me from their friends list. The quality of the relationship itself will warrant if further contact is needed. If adults have self-esteem issues over rejection in relation to being denied friend requests or being removed from friends lists by faint acquaintances or strangers, social media or the person who rejected them is not the real issue at hand--they are.

I have not experienced rejection issues or a bruised digital ego in regards to social media sites. I am concerned about preserving the relationships with people (whom incidentally may or may not utilize social media) that really matter matter to me. Because I genuinely value relationships when the computer and phones are off, I have had very few instances where someone that really matters to me removed me from their friends list. I haven't felt phased by an acquaintance's decision to remove me from their friends list or deny a friend request. Social media is not to blame though; it is the vast differences in the definition of a friend and friendship and the range in thoughts of the value of friendships that existed long before the social media explosion.

"Knowledge is to know the path to choose, courage is to travel that path, but wisdom is to choose to travel the path in the company of friends." 

Link: Defriending Can Bruise Your 'Digital Ego'

Related Blog Posts: the secret to female friendships, the constitution of the united users of facebook, let's be friends, or else

Filed under: rejection

Jan says...

The accepted wisdom is that reps do not like to cold call for fear of rejection. That's strange, because most reps have a "closing to initial meeting" ratio that is very much in line with their "contact to appointment" ratio. Both are generally around one in four or five.

Yet you never hear reps say they are afraid to engage with prospects or submit proposals because they may get rejected.

- Tibor Shanto (via: SalesMarks.com)

Filed under: rejection

After a little more than 3 weeks of waiting, Apple has finally rejected the new version of TiltSnake Lite. I figure I am becoming quite the expert at getting my apps rejected, because it seems to be basically one of two submissions that gets rejected.

 But what is new is the reason : inappropriate keywords ! This is the first time I heard about Apple checking the keywords. I must say that here I understand a little the rejection because I did "cheat" a little, because of lot of other application developers were cheating in their keywords. I guess that Apple is really committed to improving the quality of searches in the App Store and therefore I understand that they start validating keywords. The problem is that there are already quite a few apps out there with invalid keywords, and so on updates it is quite possible that developers will get rejections for this new reason while it was acceptable before.

 For the details, here is a extract of the rejection email :

 "Thank you for submitting TiltSnake 1.3 to the App Store. We've reviewed TiltSnake 1.3 and determined that we cannot post this version of your iPhone application to the App Store at this time because of inappropriate 'Keywords' used to identify your application. We cannot post applications that contain irrelevant keywords in their search criteria. Keywords must be applicable to the application content. It would be appropriate to remove the word sexy from your 'Keywords'. "

Filed under: rejection

23narchy says...

Aug 31, 02:16 AM

After 26 days of waiting, SimplyTweet 2.2 has been rejected.

The reason? - "We will not post applications that reference other applications in their search criteria." The keyword? "Tweeter".

(Keywords are a recently added field that let developers specify keywords that are associated with their apps so they can be found when users search for those keywords)

It's not like I am trying to do an SEO by dumping the whole list of Twitter apps there. I honestly think many people refers to people who use Twitter as tweeters. And what is most frustrating? It took 26 days to tell me this.

For existing users of SimplyTweet, I'm awfully sorry. You'll have to wait some more for the new features and bug fixes in SimplyTweet 2.2 to be available. I'm almost finishing work on 2.3 and can't wait to make it available. That, unfortunately can only be done after 2.2 is approved.

Apple, if you need to know how to improve your process so that it benefits our common users, developers and yourself, please read: Joe Hewitt's Innocent Until Proven Guilty and Craig Hockenberry's Year two.

Wake up Apple.

This really is ridiculous. Everybody calls people who tweet "tweeters", but I suspect far fewer have heard of an App called Tweeter (I certainly hadn't until I read this).

Does nobody review App Store rejections before they're issued?

Filed under: rejection

In the midst of all the buzz around Apple responding to developer complaints and iPhone boycotts, I thought I would share what happened to me.
 
In my case, Apple has resorted to intimidation tactics to reject an application.
 
I have worked on and off, as a side to my day job to develop applications for the iPhone, and while there are plenty of problems I am willing to accept as a developer, the application approval process was always a frustrating one.
 
I have developed a small "joke" application, called ShakeCharge, that simulates recharging the device by shaking it, much like some real flashlights that actually work that way. I had this idea when Apple started approving all kinds of fart apps, and thought that maybe I could make a few bucks and share a few laughs with some customers. I always made sure that I marketed the application so that the user would understand it was a joke. In the last version of the app, the main screen was a warning screen, that nobody could confuse for the real thing.

Fast forward to a few weeks ago. I get a call from a person at Apple (the same Richard that everyone has been mentioning), that said they were reviewing my application "ShakeCharge", and that I had submitted it multiple times without modifying it. The last time I did indeed do that, but all the previous times I made modifications to the application, to make sure that I would comply to every criteria.
 
The person on the phone told me : "Please don't ever re-submit this application, we will never accept it. Spend your time and energy on other applications." . I replied that I didn't understand the rejection as they had approved a very similar app that simulate recharging the battery with the screen acting as a solar panel. His reply was : "I am not authorized to engage in such a discussion". The call ended basically in us both agreeing that we would not agree.
 
For me this is a intimidation tactic. There is nothing in my application that violates the terms of the iPhone Developer Program. They are somehow threatened by this application, and I don't understand why. What is certain is that this Richard person is relaying scary messages to the developers and that however is in charge of these refusals should seriously reconsider, because as these horror stories accumulate, all the good developers will start looking elsewhere, leaving Apple with just the developers that will do anything to make a quick buck.

9a7gyr5zxw

Filed under: rejection

redwoodred says...

I suppose it is fair to say that everyone at some point suffers from fear of rejection, unless they are a complete Narcissist. I don't happen to be one, and though I might seem composed, acclimated and in control at most public functions, my insecure evil twin raises her snake-tangled head more often than some might suppose.

The big difference between being normally insecure and down-right paranoid is that we have to understand the limitations of those around us. It is also the difference between having an adult mentality and that of a child. As humans we place a lot of responsibility on complete strangers as well as the people we know. We all expect others to act in a specific way, a way that is predetermined by our own knowledge, upbringing and previous relationships. If we expect all those around us to act like babies, we shouldn't be disappointed or outraged when they meet our expectations. Similarly, we cannot expect all humans to act like perfect angels.

Okay Lori, you say. What the hell is your point? Good question. I could go on and on about the human condition, but I would just lose readers, and since no one subscribes to my blog feed anyway, that would be pretty dismal. And we ARE talking about me being hurt by rejection, right? I will, instead, tell you about some recent experiences I've had with rejection.

You will have noticed that I haven't blogged since mid-April. Since right before the Reindeer Rock-Off, to be exact. The boys did fine. The audience? They were much older (I'm talking GREAT-grandmothers, here!) and had little tolerance for the very loud Prog-Metal sound of Auxiliary. It shocked me how many people left the auditorium complaining about how LOUD they were. Um? It is a rock music competition/showcase? What part of that was not listed on YOUR program? Due to this, the audience energy level was way down. They get scored on that. Couple that with how many of the judges weren't even present for the first three performances, but still felt that they were qualified to grade them? Yeah. REAL professionalism there. Auxiliary DID win second place in Marketability, but technically, that was due to their promoters, not them. And neither Doug nor Matt won anything for their skill at playing their instruments. Matt should have got a minimum of second place as drummer! He received accolade from most of the other bands and many, many audience members for his skill and speed.

Sour apples, you say? Maybe. If you weren't there, try not to judge me. I was. So were hundreds of other people. They know the truth.

After spending months in preparation for this event, when it was over, the band was relieved. Me? I was crushed. I went from overdrive to reverse in a matter of hours. I'm getting better about being motivated, but my energy level just isn't there. So, when I was invited for a night out by a group of people I'd met on Twitter, I thought it was just what I needed. I accepted the invite, and had a great time. I met new people and, best of all, I got out of the house. I didn't care about the average age of those with whom I was cavorting. It didn't matter to me. We were bonding over drinks, enjoying the moment, telling jokes and inventing new inside ones. Over the next few days, I discovered that the person who invited me considers me something of a fogie. I remind him of his "best friend's Mom". I guess that will get one excluded from future fun times, and subsequently ignored/shunned in conversations that one was formerly a key contributor to. Yes. I feel VERY rejected.

I'm NOT old. Does ones' physical age dictate acceptance? I suppose it can, if that person is in the company of people who do not appreciate what might seem a dated perspective. I hadn't been aware of the carbon-14 being administered, but I gather I am up their with Ida. We like the same music, we ate the same food and enjoyed the same booze. I just didn't go to college with them? I don't get it. I didn't ask them to adopt me into their inner circle, but I have been kicked out of the arena entirely. I've since moved on. Maybe. Sort of. Okay, I'm still feeling it.

So I wouldn't spend much more time moping over lost 30-somethings, I went to a Tweetup in Portland, ME, that had so many people attending, there were people there the entire time I was and we never so much as bumped elbows! I had promised Whoopie Pies to one of my TwitterPeeps, so, I took a variety of Whoopie Pies, muffins and cookies. I felt like a drug pusher, putting overly sweet confections in the hands of my fellows, all grinning like kids. I always enjoy meeting new Tweeps, and my S.O. (Eric) even showed up. As with all previous METweetups, the minute it is over, those who did or didn't attend begin asking when the next one will happen. Being that we were in the high days of Spring, an outside Tweetup sounded like a fun option, it was said.

So, I suggested having a Tweetup at my place. I live on six acres in a relatively remote portion of Waterboro in York County. Directly adjacent to, and encompassing part of my place, is a baseball/football field. And so, I decided that hosting a Tweetup for softball and whiffle ball, having Auxiliary perform live, and making it a BBQ and potluck would be a great idea. We could even have a Rock Band/Guitar Hero PS3 type of competition. It had been mentioned that June was when the next Tweetup should happen. I checked my crystal ball and popped the date of June 20th in front of Tweeps. It seemed like a good idea, especially since many comments have been made about the mid-week get-togethers being rough on those who have to work the next day. So, Saturday, June 20th, right?

Here is where my rejection behavior is put to the test. Most folks are already R.S.V.P.ing that they won't make it, for whatever reason. Would it be better to reschedule? If I ask for a consensus, the committee will be permanently deadlocked and nothing will happen. So, I'm trying not to throw out this baby with his bathwater... my first inclination is to say, "Nope. Sorry. It's canceled. Find somewhere else to have it. Someone else to host it." That would be a cop-out, and what about those who have already said that they CAN attend?

I guess I'm seeking positive affirmation. I won't hold my sarcastic breath.

Filed under: Rejection

69mainstreet says...

September 26, 2008 - 10:00 am, By Kathryn S

worried-girl.jpgJust because you’ve finally hooked up with someone, doesn’t mean anything has been solidified or any questions have been answered. In fact, the love sesh may have raised even more questions: was it good? Was it just a fling, or were there feelings involved? Is it going to happen again? Should you regret it? Does he regret it? Can you go back in time and pretend it never happened?

Depending on the relationship you had with the guy before the hook-up; the scenarios in which you’ll interact after the hook-up; and how much discussion you had before, during, and after the hook-up, the first “reunion” can be totally smooth, or completely cringe-worthy. And, for the record, the first reunion does not include your first words the morning after when both of you are still in bed…naked…and possiby still drunk.

How do you deal? If your first meeting with your last fling falls into one of the following categories, you need to work on your post-play approach.

1. The Awkward Aversion

You don’t know how he feels, and if it means avoiding rejection, you’re fine not knowing. You may respond to his presence by interrupting someone else’s conversation to avoid having to talk to him, fumbling with your phone to appear busy, or simply leaving the room. This will come off as either immature or disinterested. If he does like you and you blatantly ignore him, he’ll think you regret it. Unlike girls who want what they can’t have, guys are more likely to give up if you’ve bruised their ego. If you do like him, I suggest developing a different method.

2. The “Sex? What Sex? We Never Had Sex” Approach

You’re trying to play it cool. Too cool. You smile at him -great!- and follow it with a punch to the shoulder and a “Hey, buddy! Did you catch Monday Night Football last night?” You probably won’t catch his eye for more than a nanosecond, and rapidly come up with small-talk conversation starters because you’re afraid of a lull in the conversation, which may or may not lead to the line, “Should we talk about last Saturday?” You may use this approach if you were comfortable with him before, and afraid that you’ve ruined the friendship (or acquaintanceship) you used to share with the guy. This could be taken two ways: like the aversion approach, your guy could assume that you want to forget about it; on the other hand, you could come off as being too casual in the wake of the hook-up. Perhaps you’ve done this before, and often.

3. The Shameless Strut

You want him to remember what he had, and want it again. Even if you aren’t looking for a relationship, you want the satisfaction of knowing he’s still attracted to the cow after he’s gotten the milk for free. If you anticipate the reunion, you dress up for the occasion. Even if it’s unexpected, you immediately try to be the center of attention and the life of the party, so he can see that along with your hot looks you’ve got a great personality. Perhaps you’ll even place yourself in the middle of a passionate conversation with another guy, just so the recent fling will see what a hot commodity you are. But this isn’t the best idea; like the “We never had sex” approach, this can make you look like you bedhop more often than a European backpacker.

4. The Far-Too-Forward Front

He obviously wanted you on Saturday, so why should he feel differently on Monday? As soon as he enters the room, you’re glued to his side, cracking inside jokes that you shared last weekend (well, inside jokes to you, but neurotically minimal details to him). You find flirty ways to touch him, and don’t let him get a word in edgewise with any other girl in the room. This move immediately raises a red flag, because even if he was interested in moving into a relationship, he’s now seeing the next few months flash before his eyes, and it involves a clingy, controlling girlfriend. It’s the moment when you brush his hair out of his eyes and call him a brand new nickname that he realizes how much he loves being single.

5. The Fatal Attraction Fiasco

Your first meeting with him since - you know - is an encounter with him and at least one other girl. It could be as harmless as him tutoring a girl from his English class, or talking to a few old female friends around a keg. Maybe he’s simply holding a door for a stranger who happens to possess two X-chromosomes. No matter how innocent, it triggers some sort of jealous rage that prompts you to bitch him out, call him a player, and basically look like a complete psycho. Do I need to explain why this is going to put him off?

It can be difficult to play your cards right the first time you bump into a former fling, especially if you have your own doubts about the way you left things when you said goodbye. The best thing to do is be yourself, and try to read his own body language. If you want to talk about what happened, approach the subject honestly, and at the right moment. You don’t want to call him out in front of your friends, but you also don’t want to corner him and put him on the spot to evaluate all of his feelings for you.

If you play it cool, you have a far better chance of getting what you what (if it’s him that you want), and if things don’t work out, good news: you’re young, you’re single, and you’re on a college campus with thousands of other cuties to choose from.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

 

69mainstreet | sex toys | intimate pleasures

Filed under: rejection