Search posterous

Search all posts and users. Type a name, type a favorite song title, whatever! See what comes up.
  

More posterous blogs











More recommended blogs »

Here are posterous posts filed under reform...

You've got to hand it to David Cameron.

Making it easy to get involved in social action - MyConservatives is open to anyone who wants to make a difference in their community and in our country.

A whole host of campaigns, each with their own video and fundraising targets. I've counted 165 so far, nationally and locally, your party needs you:

David Cameron for Prime Minister http://tinyurl.com/yet796q
Conservative Women's Organisation http://tinyurl.com/ybxa8sq
Mark Garnier for Wyre Forest http://tinyurl.com/yz5b7b7
Walker for Worcester http://tinyurl.com/yfng8xt
Harriett Baldwin for West Worcestershire http://tinyurl.com/yewyoe6
Margot James for Stourbridge http://tinyurl.com/ye3fuch
Paul for Wolverhampton South West http://tinyurl.com/yz523eh
Graeme Brown for Dudley North http://tinyurl.com/ybueboy
Chris Kelly for Dudley South http://tinyurl.com/yh8ahzl
Deirdre Alden for Birmingham Edgbaston http://tinyurl.com/ya2w9rb
Maggie Throup for Solihull http://tinyurl.com/yl5krnr

Filed under: Reform

Andrew says...

What's the market solution? This is the question I have been driving at for a while. The video above does a nice job outlining many of these thoughts.

Filed under: reform

‘In the middle of a crisis the absence of leadership can quickly become a live issue, and yet what we mean when we invoke the term is hotly disputed.’

My take on leadership is that leaders should be the architects of an organisation. To do this effectively they need to understand in detail how all aspects of a business, in terms of its purpose, principles, policies, systems, processes and people fit together to work harmoniously to achieve desired outputs and goals within a given budget. This means understanding how culture, environment, finance and economy impact on the needs and expectations of a myriad of different personalities, skill sets and styles of working.

It means understanding what is working and what isn't which can only be achieved by working with and talking to the people working on the shop floor and on the front line. I am passionate about elevating the position of every individual who works for an organisation to that of an expert or potential expert. Only the people working on the job in hand know how to get the job done.

This should be seen as a critical obligation of our society - to educate, train and enable every individual to learn by doing things, to achieve a level of competence that over time enables them to become experts in their own right - only then can people take on responsibility, become accountable and ultimately satisfy their need to become good at something, to achieve, to progress and make a valued contribution.

Being a leader, as the term suggests, is therefore a huge undertaking, especially when the existing culture of an organisation is inherently flawed as it often is through the lack of this understanding and/or commitment to properly measure the reality of what is happening and make changes that will align all these facets effectively.

John's Systems Thinking Model of Leadership is probably one of the best definitions I have come across in my many years of studying this subject:

1. Convert principles into practice
To thoroughly understand the principles, and know how to convert theory and knowledge into practice.

2. Working on the work, in the work with the worker
To give energy to the system, leaders must get out of the office and personally lead bits of work. To do this properly requires the application of method to achieve understanding. A leader’s job is to act on and improve the system, something that can’t be done from an office. It requires a thorough knowledge of method and confidence that improvement work is firmly designed against demand.

3. Be purposeful and understand purpose
Have a clear understanding of purpose. The purpose of each individual system and how each relates to the other. Then ensure that everybody understands what each system’s purpose is and what their purpose is in relation to the system.

4. Use measures correctly
To make the correct choices about improvement, to experiment and improve, it is necessary that all decisions are based upon data. Often this comes in the form of measures related to purpose.

5. Protect flow
Another is linked to protecting the system from things that would disrupt flow. In the command and control paradigm, top-down organisations are designed upon the need for control. Control becomes its de-facto purpose (literally keeping people in line).

6. Be honest and open
In command and control organisations many people spend their time putting a good face on the information provided (spinning). Improvement requires honest and open reflection. Honesty and openness, backed up with data should aid reflection and achieve results. Mistakes are okay, especially where people learn from them.

7. Ensure that you remain relevant
Leading pieces of work in each system, understanding purpose and understanding performance in the system most come hand-in-hand with a regular re-evaluation of purpose. Ensure that there is a clear relationship to your strategic purpose and day-to-day operations.

8. Create curiosity
Systems thinking is just that, a thinking thing. Helping people become curious and learning by doing involves leaders designing learning cycles for staff. You have to help people get it.

The Systems Thinking Review

Let's Improve the System - A Systems Thinking Model of Leadership

Filed under: Reform

Professor John Seddon has been asked by David Cameron to join a new thinktank, ResPublica. Cameron is interested in how systems thinking can be used to improve public sector services.

I know John Sedden from my work at the Institute of Quality Management (now Chartered Quality Institute) as chair of The Human Factors Special Interest Group. I have always been impressed with John's direct approach and unashamed attack on top down quality standard systems such as ISO9000, Investors in People and the Business Excellence Model.

Whilst I advocate quality standards for different reasons, for the theory of best practice they represent, I agree whole heartedly that the use of accredited target measurement as a command and control system does nothing but sap an organisation of its life blood.

Making people do things according to a standard that has little to do with the real work that needs to be done, strips away any sense of empowerment, motivation or accountability from the people who know best - the real experts who understand how things should be done from their experience, expertise and commitment to do their job well.

John had the impression that my staff motivation survey represented such a control and command system. I was delighted to have been give the opportunity to persuade him that my passion was to measure 'what is', using academically researched questions designed to gauge the real feelings of people towards their organisations, towards the quality of leadership and management, towards the efficiency of systems and processes in place and, above all, towards the treatment of themselves as human beings and individuals in their own right.

I look forward to following the progress of the Systems Thinking Review and wish John every success in getting his point across to our new government.

The Systems Thinking Review

 

Please Note:

Hi Sue, A correction here. The Local Government Chronicle (LGC) reported this wrongly (and so did I). Seddon has joined the thinktank however, it was Philip Blonde who invited him and not David Cameron. My apologies. Howard Clark, Management Consultant at Calchas PSS (LiinkedIn Conservative Group)

Filed under: Reform

‘If everyone could spend an hour with a Young Ambassador, they’d realise we’ve got every reason to be hopeful and positive about the future’

Vision - Every young person should have a chance to succeed

Mission - To help disadvantaged young people change their lives 

Values Approachable, Inspiring, Enabling, Passionate, Committed

Business Plan Focus

·      Maximise young people entering/staying in education, employment, training 

·      Provide a voice for young people to influence public opinion/government policy

·      Grow private sector income, diversify supporter base, maximise unrestricted funds

·      Improve the mentoring support for young people

·      Implement a strategy/support engagement through improved communications

Success Story

·      Since 1983 helped over 70,000 young people to start their own business

·      60% still trading into their 3rd year

·      West Midlands aim to support 500 people into business/ongoing support to 800

·      Volunteers are critical to the success of The Prince's Trust

CALL TO ACTION

I was invited to become a Prince’s Trust mentor in 2007 and since then have been working closely with young clients who are starting out in business. I thoroughly enjoy this work, especially as my clients are making excellent progress having had no previous business experience. It is a delight to see them take on the challenge with such commitment and enthusiasm and I am very proud of their achievements so far. I believe that with my support they will continue to go from strength to strength which is most rewarding.

I would thoroughly recommend becoming a Prince’s Trust Mentor. The clients I work with are bright, intelligent, extremely dedicated and consistently appreciative of my support. These young people are most deserving and I cannot speak too highly of the work the Prince’s Trust does to help them create a brighter future.

My Profile – The Prince’s Charities

Become a Volunteer Business Mentor – The Prince's Trust 

 

 

 

Filed under: Reform

Social Enterprise Coalition

David Cameron stressed the importance of social enterprise in rebuilding our economy and tackling social breakdown in a speech to the Social Enterprise Coalition national conference.

He talked about the need to take power away from government and give it back to individuals, communities and civic institutions, like social enterprises.

And he outlined plans to change the training system in the UK to fit in with the times:

Scrapping Bureaucracy –putting training money directly into the hands of employers, creating 100,000 new apprenticeships a year

Empowering Individuals – with a £100 million Adult and Community Learning Fund to support those laid off

Opening up the System to New Providers –£100 million NEETs fund which will be open to all types of training provider or innovative project

David stressed the need to change the way we think about training ‘so we protect the people in this recession and make sure they succeed in the recovery’.

And he finished by saying, ‘Change won’t be easy – it never is. But it’s absolutely necessary – particularly at this time. And that’s why I’m so pleased to be here with you today, because I want social enterprise to be at the heart of our efforts to rebuild our economy and build the better tomorrow I know we can achieve.’

Read the full speech: http://tinyurl.com/y9vgu5x

Filed under: Reform

medmarket says...

In the course of a week, two separate surveys of the medtech industry have confirmed that executives foresee business in 2010 moving positively, but without an abundance of optimism -- or effort.

The Emergo Group survey of 1,000 medtech executives illustrated results similar to the smaller, anecdotal Tatum LLC, survey, which indicated that, in 2010, execs expect sales to increase, modestly, and hiring to increase only just modestly.

Overall, the industry sees growth happening less as a result of the actions they initiate (aside from the Emergo Group's survey indicating international market expansion into Brazil, China, Europe and India, in that order) than an apparent expectation of a turn in the economy and little else.

The past year has been a period of passive activity for the industry, starting with the credit crunch limiting investment, followed by the economy going negative causing most spending to be put on hold and capped off by the advent of healthcare reform and an impending device industry tax. Perhaps it shouldn't be surprising, then, that the industry expects even a modest reversal of fortune to take place without their active involvement.

Filed under: reform

medmarket says...

A recent survey of medical technology industry executives by Atlanta-based executive services firm Tatum LLC, as reported in The Journal of New England Technology, revealed a tone of "cautious optimism" among the group as they looked out over the next couple months:

Almost two-thirds of those executives surveyed — 40 in total — said they expected their business to improve overall in the next 60 days. More than one-third thought financing conditions would improve during the same time period, and one-third expected to make hires in the next 60 days.

The caution expressed in the survey is evident in the fact the three quarters of respondents indicated that they did not expect to increase their capital expenditures during this time, nor did many surveyed indicate an intention to increase inventories.

An apparent pall may have lifted that had been hanging over the industry in September/October, when economic indicators had not shown even the tepid suggestion of growth that exists now, the stock market had not quite yet shown its anticipatory surge in prices (with the Dow since crossing and staying above 10,000) and there seemed to be few prospects of even a contentious healthcare reform bill (or one without a prohibitory device industry tax) passing by year end.  All of that has has changed, though not in a way that has accomplished anything more than a tip toward optimism, as reflected in the survey.

The industry, through the remaining 4Q 2009 and into 2010, faces:

  • real uncertainty about the short- or medium-term impact of healthcare reform legislation
  • slow economic growth that will put constraints on investment, hiring and capital expenditures
  • a continued fallout of medtech startups and development stage companies, adding to the list of those who have succumbed to the financing pinch (see WSJ "Turning Out the Lights") with only a few noteworthy successes (gauged by follow-on investment or even acquisition)

Filed under: reform

angrymonkey says...

Rich Stockwell, senior producer of 'Countdown' shares his insights after a visit to a health clinic in New Orleans:

New Orleans, La. — - It happened as I watched a 50-something woman walk out, after spending several hours being attended to by volunteer doctors. "She's decided against treatment. A reasonable decision under the circumstances," the doctor tells us as she heads for the next patient. The president of the board of the National Association of Free Health Clinics tells me why: "It's stage four breast cancer, her body is filled with tumors." I don't know when that woman last saw a doctor. But I do know that if she had health insurance, the odds she would have seen a doctor long ago are much higher, and her chances for an earlier diagnosis and treatment would have been far greater.

After watching for hours as the patients moved through the clinic, it was hard to believe that I was in America.


Please read the entire piece and then remember the names of all the politicians fighting health care reform. And remind yourself that they don't have to worry about visiting a free health clinic .

Filed under: reform

onyeije says...

When all is said and done; the battle for health care reform in the US is not about the Democratic party or the Republican party. It is not about a vision of big government or small government. It is about patients. It is about whether we will place value in human life or the survival of the current insurance company business models. Regina Holliday's Husband Fred was 39 years old when he died of kidney cancer. Her mural in Washington has gained international attention precisely because it challenges us to put our focus on what is truly important in the current debate.

Filed under: reform