Search posterous

Search all posts and users. Type a name, type a favorite song title, whatever! See what comes up.
  

More posterous blogs











More recommended blogs »

Here are posterous posts filed under philosophy...

Jessica says...

Contents

[hide]

[edit] Biographical information

Artaud's parents, Euphrasie Nalpas and Antoine-Roi Artaud, were of Greek origin (Smyrna), and he was much affected by this background.[1] Although his mother had nine children, only Antoine and two siblings survived infancy.

At the age of four, Artaud had a severe attack of meningitis. The virus gave Artaud a nervous, irritable temperament throughout adolescence. He also suffered from neuralgia, stammering and severe bouts of depression. As a teenager, he was allegedly stabbed in the back by a pimp for no apparent reason, similar to the experience of playwright Samuel Beckett.

Artaud's parents arranged a long series of sanatorium stays for their disruptive son, which were both prolonged and expensive. They lasted five years, with a break of two months, June and July 1916, when Artaud was conscripted into the army. He was allegedly discharged due to his self-induced habit of sleepwalking. During Artaud's "rest cures" at the sanatorium, he read Arthur Rimbaud, Charles Baudelaire, and Edgar Allan Poe. In May 1919, the director of the sanatorium prescribed laudanum for Artaud, precipitating a lifelong addiction to that and other opiates.

[edit] Paris

In March 1920, aged 24, Artaud moved to Paris to pursue a career as a writer but quickly discovered he had a talent for avant-garde theatre. Whilst training and performing with the most acclaimed directors of the day, most notably Charles Dullin and Georges Pitoeff, he continued to write both poetry and essays. At the age of 27, he sent some of his poems to the journal La Nouvelle Revue Française; they were rejected, but the editor, Jacques Rivière, wrote back seeking to understand him, and a relationship in letters was born. This epistolary work, Correspondence avec Jacques Rivière, is Artaud's first major publication.

In 1925, Artaud effectively took over directing the surrealist movement, writing many of the articles for The Surrealist Revolution and running the Bureau of Surrealist Research, a loose affiliation of surrealists interested in exploring automatic writing, recording dreams and engaging in anything which rejected rationality. After about 18 months he grew increasingly frustrated by what he perceived as the surrealists' unwillingness to do any more than disrupt bourgeois art events and create scandal. They in turn, spearheaded by André Breton who possibly felt his leadership of the movement to be threatened by Artaud's dynamic energy and extreme radical commitment, set about ejecting him from the group after he publicly began to call their revolutionary bluff.

Artaud cultivated a great interest in cinema as well, writing the scenario for the first Surrealist film, The Seashell and the Clergyman, directed by Germaine Dulac. Dali and Bunuel, two key Spanish surrealists, took their cue for Un Chien Andalou from this. He also acted in Abel Gance's Napoleon in the role of Jean-Paul Marat, and in Carl Theodor Dreyer's The Passion of Joan of Arc as the monk Massieu. Artaud's portrayal of Marat used exaggerated movements to convey the fire of Marat's personality.

In 1926-28, Artaud ran the Alfred Jarry Theater, along with Roger Vitrac. He produced and directed original works by Vitrac, as well as pieces by Claudel and Strindberg. The theatre advertised that they would produce Artaud's play Jet de sang in their 1926-1927 season, but it was never mounted and was not premiered until 40 years later. The Theater was extremely short-lived, but was attended by an enormous range of European artists, including André Gide, Arthur Adamov, and Paul Valéry.

In 1931 Artaud saw Balinese dance performed at the Paris Colonial Exposition. Although he did not fully understand the intentions and ideas behind traditional Balinese performance, it influenced many of his ideas for Theatre. Also during this year, the 'First Manifesto for a Theatre of Cruelty' was published in La Nouvelle Revue Française which would later appear as a chapter in 'The Theatre and Its Double'. In 1935, Artaud's production of his adaptation of Shelley's The Cenci premiered. The Cenci was a commercial failure, although it employed innovative sound effects—including the first theatrical use of the electronic instrument the Ondes Martenot--and had a set designed by Balthus.

After the production failed, Artaud received a grant to travel to Mexico, where he met his first (Mexican) Parisian friend, the Painter Federico Cantú in 1936 when he gave lectures on the decadence of Western civilization. He also studied and lived with the Tarahumaran people and experimented with peyote, recording his experiences, which were later released in a volume called Voyage to the Land of the Tarahumara. The content of this work closely resembles the poems of his later days, concerned primarily with the supernatural. Artaud also recorded his horrific withdrawal from heroin upon entering the land of the Tarahumaras; having deserted his last supply of the drug at a mountainside, he literally had to be hoisted onto his horse, and soon resembled, in his words, "a giant, inflamed gum". Artaud would return to opiates later in life.

In 1937, Artaud returned to France where he obtained a walking stick of knotted wood that he believed belonged not only to St. Patrick, but also Lucifer and Jesus Christ. Artaud traveled to Ireland in an effort to return the staff, though he spoke very little English and was unable to make himself understood. The majority of his trip was spent in a hotel room that he was unable to pay for. On his return trip, Artaud believed he was being attacked by two crew members and retaliated; he was arrested and put in a straitjacket.

1938 saw the publication of The Theatre and Its Double, his most well-known work. This book contained the two manifestos of the Theatre of Cruelty, essential texts in understanding his artistic project.

[edit] Final years

The return from Ireland brought about the beginning of the final phase of Artaud's life, which was spent in different asylums. When France was occupied by the Nazis, friends of Artaud had him transferred to the psychiatric hospital in Rodez, well inside Vichy territory, where he was put under the charge of Dr. Gaston Ferdière. Ferdière began administering electroshock treatments to eliminate Artaud's symptoms, which included various delusions and odd physical tics. The doctor believed that Artaud's habits of crafting magic spells, creating astrology charts, and drawing disturbing images, were symptoms of mental illness. The electro-shock treatments have created much controversy, although it was during these treatments — in conjunction with Ferdière's art therapy — that Artaud began writing and drawing again, after a long dormant period. In 1946, Ferdière released Artaud to his friends, who placed him in the psychiatric clinic at Ivry-sur-Seine. Current psychiatric literature describes Artaud as having schizophrenia, with a clear psychotic break late in life and schizotypal symptoms throughout life.

Artaud was encouraged to write by his friends, and interest in his work was rekindled. He visited an exhibition of works by Vincent van Gogh which resulted in a study Van Gogh le suicidé de la société [Van Gogh, The Man Suicided by Society], published by K éditeur, Paris, 1947 which won a critics´ prize [1]. He recorded Pour en Finir avec le Jugement de dieu [To Have Done With the Judgment of god] between November 22 and November 29, 1947. This work was shelved by Wladimir Porché, the director of the French Radio, the day before its scheduled airing on February 2, 1948. The performance was prohibited partially as a result of its scatological, anti-American, and anti-religious references and pronouncements, but also because of its general randomness, with a cacophony of xylophonic sounds mixed with various percussive elements. While remaining true to his Theater of Cruelty and reducing powerful emotions and expressions into audible sounds, Artaud had utilized various, somewhat alarming cries, screams, grunts, onomatopoeia, and glossolalia.

As a result, Fernand Pouey, the director of dramatic and literary broadcasts for French radio, assembled a panel to consider the broadcast of Pour en Finir avec le Jugement de Dieu. Among the approximately 50 artists, writers, musicians, and journalists present for a private listening on February 5, 1948 were Jean Cocteau, Paul Éluard, Raymond Queneau, Jean-Louis Barrault, René Clair, Jean Paulhan, Maurice Nadeau, Georges Auric, Claude Mauriac, and René Char. Although the panel felt almost unanimously in favor of Artaud's work, Porché refused to allow the broadcast. Pouey left his job and the show was not heard again until February 23, 1948 at a private performance at the Théâtre Washington.

In January 1948, Artaud was diagnosed with intestinal cancer. He died shortly afterwards on March 4, 1948, alone in the psychiatric clinic, seated at the foot of his bed, allegedly holding his shoe. It was suspected that he died from a lethal dose of the drug chloral, although it is unknown whether he was aware of its lethality. Thirty years later, French radio finally broadcast the performance of Pour en Finir avec le Jugement de Dieu.

[edit] Artaud's Theatre of Cruelty

Artaud believed that the Theatre should affect the audience as much as possible, therefore he used a mixture of strange and disturbing forms of lighting, sound and performance.

In his book The Theatre and Its Double, which contained the first and second manifesto for a "Theatre of Cruelty," Artaud expressed his admiration for Eastern forms of theatre, particularly the Balinese. He admired Eastern theatre because of the codified, highly ritualized and precise physicality of Balinese dance performance, and advocated what he called a "Theatre of Cruelty". At one point, he stated that by cruelty, he meant not exclusively sadism or causing pain, but just as often a violent, physical determination to shatter the false reality. He believed that text had been a tyrant over meaning, and advocated, instead, for a theatre made up of a unique language, halfway between thought and gesture. Artaud described the spiritual in physical terms, and believed that all theatre is physical expression in space.

The Theatre of Cruelty has been created in order to restore to the theatre a passionate and convulsive conception of life, and it is in this sense of violent rigour and extreme condensation of scenic elements that the cruelty on which it is based must be understood. This cruelty, which will be bloody when necessary but not systematically so, can thus be identified with a kind of severe moral purity which is not afraid to pay life the price it must be paid.
– Antonin Artaud, The Theatre of Cruelty, in The Theory of the Modern Stage (ed. Eric Bentley), Penguin, 1968, p.66

Evidently, Artaud's various uses of the term cruelty must be examined to fully understand his ideas. Lee Jamieson has identified four ways in which Artaud used the term cruelty. First, it is employed metaphorically to describe the essence of human existence. Artaud believed that theatre should reflect his nihilistic view of the universe, creating an uncanny connection between his own thinking and Nietzsche's:

[Nietzsche's] definition of cruelty informs Artaud's own, declaring that all art embodies and intensifies the underlying brutalities of life to recreate the thrill of experience … Although Artaud did not formally cite Nietzsche, [their writing] contains a familiar persuasive authority, a similar exuberant phraseology, and motifs in extremis …

Lee Jamieson, Antonin Artaud: From Theory to Practice, Greenwich Exchange, 2007, p.21-22

Artaud's second use of the term (according to Jamieson), is as a form of discipline. Although Artaud wanted to "reject form and incite chaos" (Jamieson, p. 22), he also promoted strict discipline and rigor in his performance techniques. A third use of the term was ‘cruelty as theatrical presentation’. The Theatre of Cruelty aimed to hurl the spectator into the centre of the action, forcing them to engage with the performance on an instinctive level. For Artaud, this was a cruel, yet necessary act upon the spectator designed to shock them out of their complacency:

Artaud sought to remove aesthetic distance, bringing the audience into direct contact with the dangers of life. By turning theatre into a place where the spectator is exposed rather than protected, Artaud was committing an act of cruelty upon them.

Lee Jamieson, Antonin Artaud: From Theory to Practice, Greenwich Exchange, 2007, p.23

Artaud wanted to (but never did) put the audience in the middle of the 'spectacle' (his term for the play), so they would be 'engulfed and physically affected by it'. He referred to this layout as like a 'vortex' - a constantly shifting shape - 'to be trapped and powerless'. [needs citation]

Finally, Artaud used the term to describe his philosophical views, which will be outlined in the following section.

[edit] Philosophical views

Imagination, to Artaud, was reality; he considered dreams, thoughts and delusions as no less real than the "outside" world. To him, reality appeared to be a consensus, the same consensus the audience accepts when they enter a theatre to see a play and, for a time, pretend that what they are seeing is real.

Artaud saw suffering as essential to existence, and thus rejected all utopias as inevitable dystopia.

[edit] Influence

Artaud was heavily influenced by seeing a Colonial Exposition of Balinese Theatre in Marseille. He read eclectically, inspired by authors and artists such as Seneca, Shakespeare, Poe, Lautréamont, Alfred Jarry, and André Masson.

Artaud's theories in Theatre and Its Double influenced rock musician Jim Morrison. Mötley Crüe named the Theatre of Pain album after reading his proposal for a Theater of Cruelty[citation needed], much like Christian Death had with their album Only Theatre of Pain. The band Bauhaus included a song about the playwright, called "Antonin Artaud", on their album Burning from the Inside [2]. Charles Bukowski[citation needed] also claimed him as a major influence on his work. Influential Argentine Progressive rock band Pescado Rabioso recorded an album titled Artaud (album). Their leader Luis Alberto Spinetta wrote the lyrics partly basing them on Artaud's writings. Composer John Zorn has four records, "Astronome", "Moonchild", "Six Litanies for Heliogabalus" and "The Crucible" dedicated to Artaud.

Theatrical practitioner Peter Brook took inspiration from Artaud's "Theatre of Cruelty" in a series of workshops that lead up to his well-known production of Marat/Sade. The Living Theatre was also heavily influenced by him, as was much English-language experimental theater and performance art; Karen Finley, Spalding Gray, Liz LeCompte, Richard Foreman, Charles Marowitz, Sam Shepard, Joseph Chaikin, and more all named Artaud as one of their influences.

Poet Allen Ginsberg claimed his introduction to Artaud, specifically "To Have Done with the Judgement of God", by Carl Solomon had a tremendous influence on his most famous poem "Howl".[2]

Artaud also had a profound influence on the philosophers Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, who borrowed Artaud's phrase "the body without organs" to describe their conception of the virtual dimension of the body and, ultimately, the basic substratum of reality.

The survival horror video game Silent Hill: Origins contains a segment in which the protagonist must solve puzzles within the "Artaud Theatre", which is in the town of Silent Hill.

note to self: read more about him

Filed under: philosophy

Great talk on the future of design that raises a great deal of questions about what design actually is and what it should be. It appears Aol must have had his council during their re-branding, and it's exciting to know that a man as innovative and thoughtful as David is heading an organization as massive, far-reaching and potentially toxic as Coca Cola.

Filed under: Philosophy

roe says...

Filed under: philosophy

Tom says...

In the words of Sheryl Crow, everyday is a winding road indeed!  In that song she proposes that life is a winding road and that she's getting closer to feeling fine all the time.  That song left me thinking that we all have to travel down this road of life, but so many of us tend to be asleep at the wheel!  Life is a funny teacher, we all rush around to do our tasks to get to the end of whatever we are doing!  The end of this winding road of life is the dirt nap!  That's why the saying, "its the journey, not the destination that matters" is so profound and wise!

Why are we not enjoying the journey instead of waiting to get to the end of it?  I don't want to get to the end!  So when you hit the road this morning, on your normal commute of life, take pleasure in the moment of the journey.  See, hear, smell all that's around you (safely if you are driving), and enjoy the sensations that you drink in.   Be present in life now because its fleeting and we don't know how much time each of us has been alloted on this earth.  Don't be afraid of what's around that bend up ahead, relish the excitement of not knowing, be prepared for new challenges, and practice love!

Filed under: philosophy

jp says...

John Cottingham On The Meaning Of Life by Edmonds And Warburton  

Philosophy - the very word can be a barrier, seemingly impenetrable and lacking in relevance to anyone other than navel gazing musos or academics who relate more to books than they do to people. But leave any preconceptions at the door and it can be a fascinating subject, rich in ideas and potential answers to some of the most fundamental questions that I am certain we all ponder upon, however briefly or privately.

I grant you, the work of some philosophers is impenetrable and so dense that you're almost suffocating in words and sentences that simply meander before finally ending up very closely to their own backsides. But there are others out there, writing now, who have opened up the subject in incredibly diverse and enriching ways - posing questions and answers to some of the most pressing concerns of what shapes our lives. Many of these contemporary philosophers write about the thing which interests me most - human relationships; how we communicate, how we behave, how we interact with and love and hate one another, what drives us, what should drive us and what we might one day become. I have found that some modern philosophy has helped me greatly in gaining a greater understanding of both myself and the kind of man I want to be as well as giving me insight into the people I have loved and lost as well as those I continue to hold in my life.

One of the most easily accessible ways I found of finding out the meaning of things from people far wiser than me was not just through books (more of which in another post) but through a brilliant series of podcasts featuring short (usually 15 mins or less) interviews with some of today's greatest thinkers. The series is called, 'Philosophy Bites' and you can find out more and subscribe to it by following the link at the end of this post.

I have embedded one of the first podcasts of theirs that I ever listened to and whilst at first it might seem incredibly dry I do urge you to give it a chance (but you do have to be in the mood!) This particular podcast deals with the most fundamental question of them all - the meaning of our lives. I liked it because it talks about the interior cultivation of ourselves and that belief in something does not necessarily come before the practicing of it - i.e. you should embark upon the practice of things before you begin to believe. I rather like that philosophy...

http://www.philosophybites.libsyn.com/

Filed under: philosophy

Tom says...

I’ve always been a curious sort of fellow.  Perhaps that’s why the idea of traveling around for months at a time, exploring new cultures and meeting new people, just plain excites me.  Who wouldn’t want to take 3 months off and roam the Italian back country or hike around the rim of Australia? 

This is why I’m such a fan of Rolf Pott’s Vagablogging blog.  Rolf’s blog is inspirational to me because he’s actually living his dream of a Vagabonding life.  He routinely shares tips and travel tricks for Vagabonding your way to happiness.  Most of the stories posted are from contributing travelers who were curious and decided to go somewhere new.  They chose break out of their shells and it drove them to visit a new country and take a road less traveled.  In my opinion, this attitude eventually drives us to happiness and contentment

I fully believe that happiness is made up of at least a generous helping of curiosity.  It’s is like that special gift you unwrap on Christmas morning with ferocity!  What’s in the box?  What special meaning does it hold? Only you can find out! 

That’s why I say, stay curious my friends!

Filed under: philosophy

David Pettigrew is an Iphone application developer and a Montessori parent. We interviewed David to find out what prompted him to create Sandpaper Letters as an Iphone app.

Q: Why did you choose to develop a Montessori focused Iphone application?

A: I know Montessori is a great educational method because both of my children have attended Montessori schools and found it really engaging.

Q: When did you come up with the idea to develop the app?

A: Earlier this year, I was looking in the App Store for a good Montessori based application to share with my six years old daughter. I was surprised to see that there weren't any available. A short time later, I was invited to participate in the Corvallis Startup Weekend. When I mentioned the idea of a Montessori based Iphone application, I received lots of interest from the other participants, several of whom were also Montessori parents. Based on the positive feedback, I decided to develop this application.

Q: How will this product enhance the learning experience of your children?

A: It will definitely build on their experience at Montessori schools. It will help my daughter learn how to read and write.

Q: How does the future look like for Montessori Apps?

A: There are so many learning materials available in Montessori classrooms and all those can be translated into opportunities for Montessori Applications. With the IPhone market being expected to grow from $4.66 billion in 2009 to $16.60 billion in 2013, and with us developing new Montessori Apps, I am definitely optimistic about our mission to make this Iphone and IPod Touch software available to childrens and their parents.

Q: The pleasant class atmosphere is a key element in the Montessori learning experience. How do you address this?

A: The pleasant environment is indeed a key element and this is one of the reasons I wanted to be able to use the home environment and the moments I spend with my children as an opportunity to actively engage in their development.

Q: What are the skills that make your team successful?

A: Even though it sounds like a cliché, I really think that it’s the diversity that makes us stand out as a team. A key element is also the fact that two of our team members have strong connections with Montessori schools – Matt, my website designer ’s wife is a Montessori professor and I am a ‘Montessori parent’.

Filed under: philosophy

squidlord says...

  
(download)

We clearly need to find someone to blame for this nightmare. My immediate feeling about who to throw into the lion's den is eelpot, since she is the one who made the Kindly Ones post that I decided to use as the basis for this Thy Cock Doth Weep. She can take all of the blame. I would not suggest, however, that you sexually abuse her using your third eye. That just seems weird.

This is a particularly long post, but I think the content will appeal to a certain segment of my readership. You get strange voices, bizarre sex, weird voices, more bizarre sex, and Richard Burton having necrophiliac fantasies -- that's the only way I can explain what happened during this recording.

Sorry Richard, have your people call my people and we'll straighten it all out.

I apologize to people who been looking forward to this coming on a regular basis; I have been incredible slacker. Apologies all around. Hopefully, this horrific construct of evil will make up for it in some degree.

Filed under: philosophy

Matt says...

What's important isn't so much the initial state of the software -- in fact, some say if you aren't embarrassed by v1.0 you didn't release it early enough -- but what you do after releasing the software.

Couldn't agree more with this, and lately on some projects I've had to remind myself of this mantra on a daily basis. This is right in line with the "worse is better" principle ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worse_is_better ), and since by nature software developers tend to be perfectionists, it's often difficult to let go, realize it will never be done, and focus on the bare minimum to get the application out the door.

A commenter on this post does have a good point, namely that you shouldn't ship it so early that your customers lose faith. So focus on the bare minimum of features that make the application usable, make sure that small set of features is rock solid, and launch the damn thing! After launch you'll impress your users with all the cool features you add one by one, not to mention in the meantime you're getting real feedback from real users, and before you know it you have an amazing application on your hands.

Filed under: Philosophy

Hula says...

Who do you listen to?

Who are you trying to please?

Which customers, relatives, bloggers, pundits, bosses, peers and passers by have influence over your choices? Should the Pulitzer judges decide what gets written, or the angry boss at the end of the hall so influence the products you pitch? Should the buyer at Walmart be the person you spend all your time trying to please? Your nosy neighbor? The angry trolls that write to the newspaper? The customer you never hear from?

Just for a second, think about the influence, buying power, network and track record of the people you listen to the most. Have they earned the right?

Filed under: philosophy