Search posterous

Search all posts and users. Type a name, type a favorite song title, whatever! See what comes up.
  

More posterous blogs











More recommended blogs »

Here are posterous posts filed under pakistan...

NightWatch

For the Night of 7 December 2009

North Korea:  Update.  During the weekend, foreign diplomats, accredited in Pyongyang, claimed that large spontaneous rallies protesting the currency devaluation and replacement have been breaking out in the North Korean capital and other major cities.  The Army has been put on a heightened state of alert in case of mass acts of disobedience.

North Korea-South Korea:  Delegations from North and South Korea will begin a joint inspection of industrial complexes in China and Vietnam on 12 December, according to the South Korean Ministry of Unification.  The South will send 10 officials led by Kim Young-tak, the senior representative for inter-Korean dialogue at the ministry.

"We are making preparations, assuming that the delegates will depart on the 12th.  Flight schedules and other personnel have yet to be confirmed,'' ministry spokesman Chun Hae-sung told reporters. He did not elaborate, saying that the two Koreas agreed not to make the details public.

South Korea proposed the joint survey in June as part of efforts to benchmark industrial parks abroad and learn lessons to develop the joint Kaesong Industrial Complex in the North. The survey results are expected to form the basis of assessing North Korea's demands for a drastic increase in salaries for North Korean workers at the complex and rent for the site.

The two Koreas conducted similar inspections in 2005 and 2007.

North Korea-US: Ambassador Bosworth, special representative in charge of policy for North Korea, is due in Pyongyang on 8 December to open direct talks with the North. North Korea announced that it was willing to return to multilateral talks depending on the progress in direct talks with the US.

A pro-North Korean media outlet, Choson Sinbo on 5 December published a commentary on the North’s objectives in direct talks, which is to replace the Armistice with a peace agreement.

In the article, the writer recalled that North and South Korea once proposed the idea of holding "trilateral or four-party summit talks" to pursue the issue of declaring an end to the war in the agreement of leaders two years ago…. “In order to guarantee peace on the Korean peninsula, the process of the DPRK and the United States, which are the two parties at war and direct parties in the nuclear issue, putting an end to their hostile relations should first be carried out in the end.  If belligerent nations which are aiming their gun muzzles at each other attempt to hold direct negotiations and fundamentally resolve the pending issues, "peace" will be a subject that cannot be ignored.”

“Special Representative Bosworth's visit to Pyongyang is not an idea of any individual foreign official.  Last August, the DPRK opened the phase of dialogue with the United States based on General Secretary Kim Jong Il's decisive measure.  President Obama, who is also the supreme commander of US Forces, came to dispatch a special envoy to the DPRK.  A dialogue venue, where mutual willingness on policy can be exchanged while a high degree of political judgment is in action, came to be prepared.  This is the very reason why DPRK-US talks, which will be held in Pyongyang, have attracted the attention of the world.”

Not much new, but the article is a reminder that the North considers its initiatives to be responsible for the US interest in sending Bosworth, which is typical. But the movement is by a US delegate is traveling to Pyongyang, which the North considers a diplomatic victory because of the brilliance of Kim Chong-il.  

It would have been better for the US to hold such talks in Kuala Lumpur. At least Bosworth would not appear in Asian eyes as a supplicant.

The agenda is not nuclear talks, but the end of the armistice.  The lack of progress towards a peace agreement is the meaning of the North’s recurring accusation that the US has a hostile attitude, i.e., it won’t negotiate a permanent peace

North Korea-Iran:  Kyodo World Service reported on 6 December that Iran has decided to postpone the test launch of a new intermediate-range ballistic missile apparently due to problems with the delivery of components ordered from North Korea, a Western diplomatic source said Sunday.

According to Kyodo’s account, Tehran told Pyongyang that electronic parts for improving the missile's accuracy have yet to arrive from North Korea.  North Korea claims it shipped the components in 10 Iran-bound containers that were seized in the United Arab Emirates in July.

''The shipment of the electronic components was supposed to be part of the new agreement signed in late 2008 between Iran and North Korea for the continued supply of the new missile's technology,'' the diplomatic source said.  Iran supposedly suspects the components were not actually in the containers, according to the source.

North Korea is believed to have developed the new intermediate-range missile by modifying a Soviet-made submarine-launched ballistic missile, the SSN6, one of the most reliable nuclear-capable missiles ever built. It is known as the BM-25 or Musudan among Western intelligence circles and military experts. Several sources indicate Iran bought this system from North Korea in 2005 and has a complete firing unit of 18 missiles, according to the Israeli Intelligence Chief in 2006.  It probably lacks the latest electronics or production technology.

''The test, when it succeeds, will enable Iran to improve its operational SSM (surface-to-surface missile) capability, to advance to mass production of the new missile,'' the source added, noting that the missile's target range is between 2,500 and 3,500 kilometers depending on the warhead payload, thus posing a threat to most of Europe.

This is the most dangerous operational missile that Iran and North Korea have. No source in the public domain has reported that Iran has acquired production technology for the missile, but the North Koreans are known to sell turnkey production capabilities, which they did to Syria and Pakistan for other ballistic missiles.

The delay might be a measure of success for the counter-proliferation lobby. The usual explanation is the Iran’s are always trying to stiff the North Koreans by not paying on time or not paying the amount due. Still the Iranian arms relationship is one of the most enduring that North Korea has, after Syria and Pakistan.

Philippines:  Update. Rebel forces loyal to a powerful Muslim clan whose stronghold is under martial law in the southern Philippines have engaged troops in clashes, Agence France-Presse reported 7 December. Interior Secretary Ronaldo Puno said the rebel groups and the Philippine National Police were engaged in firefights.

During the weekend, security officials found large weapons caches in the stronghold of the clan responsible for the massacre of the family and supporters of an opposition politician. One report said the clan has a militia of 3,000 armed men.  Nevertheless, the Muslims will be the losers. They are too few to reverse the domination by the Philippine Christians. These incidents serve the Christians more than the political interests of the Muslims, even in the Muslim autonomous region, because Muslims are fighting other Muslims. The Philippine Army intervenes to keep the death toll from becoming too embarrassing.

India-Israel:  For the record. Israel Defense Forces Chief of Staff Lieutenant General Gabi Ashkenazi will begin a three-day visit to India on 8 December, Press Trust of India reported. General Ashkenazi will meet with Indian Chief of Army Staff General Deepak Kapoor, National Security Adviser M.K. Narayanan and the leaders of the Navy and the Air Force.  A delegation of Israeli defense officials also is accompanying General Ashkenazi.

This visit is almost not newsworthy which why it is significant. The two usually discuss advanced weapons systems and subsystems, intelligence, special forces operations and air defense.  They also could talk about Israeli access to India, say, after an attack on Iran, but that is speculation based purely on geography.

 Pakistan:  During this Watch, the News International reported the death toll from today’s two bombings in Lahore, in eastern Pakistan close to the Indian border, rose to 37 with 100 injured.

In western Pakistan, authorities in the North West Frontier Province government said ten people died when a suicide bomber detonated outside a Peshawar courthouse, Agence France-Presse reported 7 December. Bilor said the bomber arrived in a rickshaw and tried to enter the building, but was blocked by security.  At least 49 people were wounded in the blast including three policemen and two lawyers.

On Friday, a suicide bomber detonated at the Parade Land Askari Mosque in Rawalpindi in northern Pakistan, killing 44 and injuring 17. This mosque is located close to Army General Headquarters. A serving major general of the Pakistan Army, a brigadier, two lieutenant colonels, a major and a number of soldiers were among those killed in the multi-pronged attack.

According to metransparent.com which quoted the Ministry of Interior, at least 366 Pakistanis have been killed and 901 injured through November 2009 in seven bombing attacks targeting m

Comment: In Peshawar, bombings have became nearly a daily occurrence in the past two weeks. They are less frequent in Lahore. In both cities, local internal intelligence and security are poor or penetrated by Islamist sympathizers.  In Rawalpindi, attacks also are infrequent, but occur randomly with impunity and are well targeted, apparently with the planning, guidance and leadership of former Pakistan Army officers.

The genuinely ironic twist to today’s events is a report in the 7 December edition of Dawn News that Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (Pakistani Taliban) leaders have said they will cease attacks on Pakistani soil if the government agrees to sit with them on the negotiation table.  The leader of a legal Islamic political party told Dawn News that Interior Minister Rehman Malik contacted him to seek his party’s opinion on the Pakistani Taliban's latest strategy.  Rehman Malik disclosed that Taliban had contacted the government for a dialogue and if their offer was accepted the Taliban would abandon suicide attacks and other subversive activities in the country.

Afghanistan-US-NATO:  The United States wants to get all the new troops allies have pledged into Afghanistan by mid-2010, Reuters reported 7 December, citing a Pentagon official. U.S. Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Michele Flournoy said some of the additional troops allies have committed are already in Afghanistan. What?

The numbers reports start to look like a shell game. The NATO countries apparently are getting credit as supporting the US new plan by double counting forces they deployed to improve security during the elections. 

The US press is reporting as future increases some forces that are already counted in the current totals of NATO and International Security Assistance Force. Extending time in country for forces already present does not raise the total of new forces to near 40,000, as one news commentator reported yesterday.  This kind of troop math might make good sound bites in NATO and the US, but the Taliban are not deceived. So how many countries really are adding to their commitments already in Afghanistan? Clearly not the 20 mentioned during the weekend.

Iran:  Update. Today more than 2,000 Iranian students gathered outside Tehran University's technical facility and marched toward the university's mosque, BBC Monitoring reported, citing Fars News Agency. Coinciding with Students Day, the students chanted "death to opponents of leaders" and "God is great; Khamenei is the leader," Fars

Fars did not report the violent clashes in Tehran between police and other students who are continuing to express their opposition to the fraudulent re-election of President Ahmadi-Nejad.

The BBC reported at one university, students tore down a poster of Mr Ahmadi-Nejad and trampled on it.  Elsewhere, in a highly unusual move, they chanted against the Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Police and members of the government's Basij militia tried to contain the protest within the universities. At the gates of Tehran University and several other universities, there were angry clashes.  As in previous protests, opposition supporters, some wearing green scarves and masks, chanted "Death to the Dictator". Green is the color adopted by the reformist movement in recent months.

The significance of the protests is that they show the student opposition movement is still alive, for whatever that is worth.  They also show it is fragmented, dispersed and has no impact on national policy except to reinforce the harshness and accelerate the speed of the leadership movement to oligarchic dictatorship

Venezuela: For the record. Today President Chavez announced the arrival of a first shipment of modern tanks from Russia. He said the tanks are needed because Colombia plans to wage war against Venezuela!

Bolivia:  Update. President Evo Morales is claiming victory in Sunday’s presidential election and looks to have secured a second five-year term. Exit polls suggest Mr Morales polled at least 63% of the vote.

The tragedy is that the poor are the electoral majority, but the rich minority controls the wealth.

End of NightWatch for 7 December.

Filed under: pakistan

RT @FartashPhoto: Yousaf Raza Gilani tells joint conference with Gordon Brown he does not believe the al-Qaida leader is in his country. #UK #Pakistan

Filed under: Pakistan

NightWatch

For the Night of 2 December 2009

North Korea: Update.  On the second day of the currency exchange, authorities froze all cash transactions using the green, internal won until next Monday. Transactions  involving foreign currencies and the international won are still allowed at some restaurants and shops for foreigners.

Possibly the most important impact of the freeze will be to force all foreign currency stashes in private hands into the open and into the government.  The government is looking for sources of cash.

Note to new analysts:  This kind of government action is always intended to confiscate wealth. In 1978 Vietnam ordered that no private citizens could possess gold, as a measure to confiscate the holdings of Chinese Vietnamese. Overseas Chinese, among others, are well known for holding gold in reserve precisely to guard against government manipulation of paper currency. The Vietnamese not only confiscated their wealth, but forced the Chinese Vietnamese to leave the country.

Analysts should watch for a backlash against the government over this.  Koreans tend to be volatile, even in the stodgy, stoic North.

India:  For the record.  The Indian Navy will add an additional 40 warships, 60 aircraft and 60 helicopters over the next ten years, Press Trust of India reported 2 December, citing a statement from Chief of Naval Staff Admiral Nirmal Verma. The expansion will include destroyers, frigates, fast attack craft and interceptor boats, submarines and fleet tankers, and 34 ships will be built in domestic shipyards, with six built in foreign shipyards. Verma said India is adding the ships and aircraft to protect its maritime interests in the Indian Ocean and counter other naval powers.

This announcement implies a strategic decision to make obvious to all that India is the dominant naval power in the Indian Ocean, with all that such a decision encompasses.

PakistanSecurity.  At least two people were killed and four injured in a suicide attack close to the naval headquarters in Islamabad, Pakistan's ARY News reported 2 December. According to various sources, a suicide bomber detonated when naval guards stopped him at the main gate.

This appears to be another in the series of attacks that retaliate for the Army offensive in South Waziristan.

Karachi Mayor Mustafa Kamal said 2 December in an interview that Taliban militants are financing their operations through kidnapping and drug trafficking in Karachi, Reuters reported. Kamal said militants are kidnapping people in Karachi and that the ransom money is being taken to Waziristan, and that the largest portion of the Taliban's revenue is earned through its activities in Karachi.

Multiple reports from McClatchy news investigators in Karachi have been relating events and items that bear out the Mayor’s story.  Some parts of Karachi are completely under Pashtun control, including both Afghan and Pakistani Pashtuns.  The Karachi port operations finance fundamentalist Islamic terrorism along with more legitimate business interests.

Reactions to the President’s speech:

Pakistan-Afghanistan: Sirajuddin Haqqani, a Pakistan-based Afghan Taliban clan leader, said the coming surge of troops into Afghanistan will not prevent an eventual Western defeat, DPA reported 2 December. Haqqani, son of former mujahideen commander Jalaluddin Haqqani, also told Geo television that the United States was sending secret messages to the Taliban to request talks.

Afghanistan Taliban:  “Many more troops the enemy sends against our Afghan mujahedin, they are committed to increasing the number of mujahedin and strengthen their resistance,” the Taliban said in a statement e-mailed to media.

Around the world: In Europe the reaction to the speech was roundly favorable. All the Scandinavian states plus Poland, Macedonia, South Korea supported the US President. France and Germany were more reserved.

Even Russia appears supportive, especially in anticipation of increased American use of Russian rails and airspace for supplying the reinforcements.  “The measures relative to the new American strategy in Afghanistan and Pakistan set out by US President Barack Obama are all welcomed positively in Moscow," a Foreign Ministry statement said.

The response from China that Xinhua published 3 December is that the new US strategy faces hurdles. Pakistan has been supportive but India has been skeptical.

Iran-UK:  Iran’s Siri naval guard command announced that the five detained Britons were released, Fars news agency reported today.  The naval guard command said the passengers of the yacht entered Iranian waters in the Persian Gulf by “mistake.”  Investigations and inquiry into the five British yachtsmen's case established that their illegal entrance was accidental. The decision was made to release the detainees.

The Iranians have used this incident to establish a baseline of fairness in their legal investigation procedures. That would seem to be an ominous portent for the three American backpackers.

Saudi Arabia: Update. A Saudi naval force official said two patrol ships joined the battle against infiltrators, combing an area of 200 nautical miles on the Red Sea, the Saudi Gazette reported. The two ships, Hitain and Badr, started cruising the territorial waters to cut off the supply of food and arms to infiltrators. More ships from the Western Fleet are expected to support ships already cruising in the Red Sea, Gulf of Aden and the Arabian Sea. The official said the Saudi navy is in full control of its territorial waters.

Lebanon:  The Cabinet voted today to approve a policy statement allowing Hezbollah the right to use arms against Israel, Agence France-Presse reported, citing a statement from Lebanese Information Minister Tarek Mitri.

Mitri said the policy statement will be made public on 7 December and that the final draft included language to permit "Lebanon, its government, its people, its army and its resistance" to liberate all Lebanese territory, with "resistance" being the commonly used term in Lebanon to refer to Hezbollah.

This policy purports to legalize the military operations of an autonomous non-state entity within the Lebanese state.  It is a significant measure of the failure of western policies to strengthen the pro-western factions in the Beirut government. This is a significant advantage for Iran, Hezbollah’s benefactor because it legalizes support for the “resistance.”  In a future Israeli war in Lebanon, Hezbollah is now part of the Lebanese national forces. In other words, western military arms aid for the Lebanese Army apparently could be transferred to the “resistance.”

Honduras:  Update. The Honduran Congress decisively rejected the restitution of deposed President Mel Zelaya in a vote of 62 to 8, after six hours of debate on 2 December. Only 70 of the 128 legislators cast ballots in the evening vote.

The Congress began on Wednesday to debate whether or not to reinstate Zelaya but the powerful National Party announced its support for the 28 June decree that removed Zelaya, thereby virtually quashing any chance of his return to power.

"We declare ourselves in favor of the ratification of Decree 141/2009 approved on June 28," said party chief Rodolfo Irias before the full Congress, and the statement essentially closed the door on any reinstatement of Zelaya because the votes of the 55 National Party lawmakers were necessary to return him to power.

"This position is unanimous, removed from any opportunism," added Irias, the head of the party of Porfirio Lobo, who won the presidential election last Sunday, a balloting result that was rejected by the majority of the international community with the argument that it came about amid a rupture of the country's constitutional order.

The calculations and permutations of possible outcomes were made pointless by the lopsided vote. Zelaya supporters in Congress failed to show up, despite the fact that they were the majority party.  The defeat in Congress did not prevent Zelaya from broadcasting his vitriole from the Brazilian Embassy, which probably ought to consider packing up and leaving Tegucigalpa. Sic transit gloria Zelayae.

Still, it is not clear how many popular and Congressional votes it will take to convince outsiders that the Hondurans rejected Zelaya and his party. This is a study in democracy.

End of NightWatch for 2 December.

Filed under: pakistan

Arasmus says...

At the outset, it is worth mentioning that as I watched President Obama's speech on Afghanistan tonight I realized that the luxury of not being governed by an idiot has yet to wear off. Obviously, the entire Iraq War has been a complete distraction from the efficient prosecution of the war in Afghanistan. On somewhat of an aside, I also appreciated Obama's reference to Eishenhower's principle that every issue of national policy must be placed in balance with every other issue. I thought his short-list of our present challenges as (1) the economy and (2) China, showed the proper focus, or at least one with which I agree.

Now with respect to Afghanistan, I see 2 challenges.

The first is the definition of success. In this speech Obama defined success as destroying Al Qaeda's ability to act. He did not include in the definition of success building a vibrant and successful Afghanistan. That was wise. Although I am only half-way through Ahmed Rashid's excellent book on the Taliban (Taliban: Militant Islam, Oil and Fundamentalism in Central Asia), I can already appreciate just how far behind Afghanistan is in terms of thinking of itself as a single nation and possessing national institutions that command the loyalty and support of the civilian population. The problem is whether you can quench Al Qaeda's ability to operate and avoid having to suckle a fledgling Afghanistan. Didn't Al Qaeda select Afghanistan precisely because it was unable to hold itself together? (By the way, there is no shortage of failed states, which has always led me to wonder why we define the theatres in the "War on Terror" with such a geographical emphasis). I agree no nation can afford to bankroll Afghanistan, especially the United States in its current condition. But the ability of Afghanistan to have a concept of itself as a multi-ethnic nation and rise up from the ashes of ethnic and tribal violence does not at this point look promising. There will have to be some nation-building, the question is how much time and how much money will it take to get to a critical mass that can effectively police disrupting influences like Al Qaeda.

The second issue is Pakistan. An Al Qaeda or Taliban leader watching tonight's broadcast will probably go through the following considerations if he hasn't done so already. An enlarged American force is on its way. The first rule of guerrilla warfare is to avoid all confrontations with a superior force and to instead wear that force down by hit and run tactics, draw it into situations where its size becomes a disadvantage and target its weaknesses. In his speech tonight Obama said that he would start pulling troops back from Afghanistan in 18 months. This weekend I briefly caught an interview with Reza Aslan who has written the book, How to Win A Cosmic War, God, Civilization and the The End of The War on Terror. He captures quite well the perspective that Islamist fundamentalists have of this conflict as one which they don't see ending any time soon. So for them, it is a viable option to withdraw forces from Afghanistan, probably to Waziristan in Pakistan, wait there for 18 months and return once the Americans start to leave. The question then becomes whether Pakistan will attack them in Waziristan. Pakistan is an anemic state. Since partition it has failed to build up the type of democratic institutions that might have at this point afforded it greater economic growth, reduced poverty and inequality, rule of law, a military under civilian control and reduced corruption. It has none of these things so it has little ability to act. Pakistan is also disinclined to act because their number one priority is to counter their heightened sensitivity to Indian influence in Afghanistan. Given the precarious position in which Pakistan finds itself (specifically the the high water mark of concern re the security of Pakistan's nuclear weapons during the Swat Valley insurgency) this obsession with India seems to me a poor choice of priorities. But Pakistan believes that the Americans are not in Afghanistan for the long haul. And they are right. So Pakistan sees the relationship between its security services and the Taliban as a potential pawn that they can use in a post-American Afghanistan to counter Indian influence in the region. If Pakistan does not prosecute the war on their side of the border Al Qaeda will not be neutralized in Afghanistan. They will merely move to Pakistan and lie low. Pakistan is key. And the key to Pakistan is India.

Filed under: pakistan

NightWatch

For the Night of 1 December 2009

North Korea:  For the record. South Korea's Unification Ministry dismissed rumors that North Korean leader Kim Chong-il had been attacked and killed, Reuters reported 1 December. When asked about rumors that Kim was dead, Ministry spokesman Chun Hae Sung said he had not heard anything about it.  No further information.   

While Kim is apparently still alive, all is not well in the North Korea. The Daily NK posted a report today that North Korean authorities finally announced the national “currency reforms” publicly through the “third broadcast,” the colloquial name for cable broadcasts sent directly into North Korean homes. Previously, news of the currency reform reached the outside world via traders in Shenyang, China.

According to the Daily NK, a source explained in a telephone conversation today, “There was a broadcast on currency reform from yesterday at 2 P.M. The exchange starts officially from today.” The source said, “For five days, from December 1, they said they will exchange old bills for new ones at a 100:1 exchange rate, according to an additional decree. The new bills go into circulation on the 6th.”

Some analysts opined the purpose of the measure is to stop runaway inflation and to increase social control of the population. Whatever the motive, it was not announced in advance precisely to prevent people with savings from converting them into Chinese yuan or US dollars on the black market. According to international news services, the start of the exchange has been chaotic and its impact devastating to North Koreans.

According to The Daily NK, sources inside the country reported that the People’s Safety Agency (PSA) was ordered to control residents, and the National Security Agency, Defense Security Command of the People’s Army and army bases were all placed on standby alert, apparently to guard against rioting.

The authorities also warned people not to damage the old bills, reminding them, “Spoiling money on which Great Leader’s portrait is printed is treated as treason.”  Defacing any media, including newspapers, that display a picture of either of the Kims is a capital offense.

In North Korea, there is a high savings rate because many basics are supplied by the state and the economy is not consumer based.  Wages are low, but over time savings mount up and have to, if a family needs to replace a refrigerator, say, or wants its own black and white TV.

That liquidity will now be wiped out because not only has the government devalued the currency, it also placed limits on the amount of old currency that could be converted. Plus prices are unchanged. Apparently in a concession to avert civil disobedience, authorities expanded the maximum amount which could be exchanged from 100,000 won to 150,000 won in cash and 300,000 won in savings accounts.

One person said that this was the first time since the death of Kim Il-sung in 1994 that he saw North Koreans weep openly in the streets.

India: Update. In January 2010, the Navy will “launch” a 1,000-sailor force to monitor coastal areas from Gujarat to West Bengal as a result of the November 2008 Mumbai attack, Press Trust of India reported 1 December, citing a senior naval officer. Personnel will include 61 officers and 939 sailors, with 95 “Fast Interceptive Craft. “

One of the failings of Indian security forces in November 2008 was that the Pakistani perpetrators came by boat from Karachi. Indian news services reported that Indian security authorities had warning of seaborne infiltration, put some patrol craft on alert but failed to intercept the terrorists. This measure responds to those findings.

Pakistan:  The initial editorial reaction to President Obama’s speech tonight was concern about the use of troops along the border, not about the troop increase itself. More later.

Politics. The Supreme Court announced today that starting 7 December an expanded bench of Pakistan's Supreme Court will begin hearing petitions against beneficiaries of the National Reconciliation Ordinance, the Daily Times reported on 2 December.  A petition filed in Sindh Province High Court begs the court to review more than 8,000 criminal cases that were closed by Musharraf in issuing the Ordinance in October 2007.

President Zardari and his late wife Benazir Bhutto were beneficiaries of the temporary case closures, without which Zardari could not have served as President. However, the lower house of parliament, the National Assembly, refused to make the closures permanent or to extend the effects of the Ordinance, which many legal scholars consider unconstitutional.

>

The Ordinance expired over the weekend without extension by the parliament. Pakistani analysts wrote that normalization of those cases and a determination as to the constitutionality of the Ordinance required petitions to and findings by the Supreme Court.  Those initial steps have now begun.

Comment.  This has significance because the Supreme Court could require Zardari to step down as president, should it determine that Musharraf violated the constitution in issuing the Ordinance. The Pakistan Army would likely oppose any move to discredit Musharraf that also would discredit the Army. However, it would back any move to have Zardari replaced through legal action.

In that respect, the Army would be a member of an odd informal alliance of Opposition leader former prime minister Nawaz Sharif and Supreme Court Chief Justice Chaudhry, all of whom disdain Zardari for different reasons. His prospects for remaining in office much longer do not look bright with today’s petitions.

Zardari squandered a once-in-a-generation opportunity to become a legendary president of Pakistan. He reneged on his political promises; promoted his personal business interests and those of his cronies; appointed flagrantly corrupt officials and mishandled national security secrets. The latest charges against him are that he has gotten too close to the Americans and, in the process, compromised Pakistan’s defense posture against India.

He has been good for American interests, to be sure, but so was Musharraf for a time. What is worth noting is how policy can become hostage to the fate of individual leaders,  one of whom already has been rejected by the people and courts and the other is heading in the same direction.

If Nawaz Sharif were to be elected the next president of Pakistan, for example, US policy would be unhinged.

Security.  A suicide bomber detonated at a guest house owned by North West Frontier Province (NWFP) assembly member Shamsher Ali Khan. The Daily Times reported at least 13 others, including Khan's brother, were seriously injured in the attack near Mingora in Swat District. He was exchanging Eid greetings with people at his residence in Dherai village when the bomber struck, NWFP Information Minister Mian Iftikhar Hussain told the BBC.

The lawmaker's name was on a list of 65 people the Pakistani Taliban had said would not be able to return to Swat. They proved true to their word..

 

Iran:  Update. An aide to President Ahmadi-Nejad said Iran will take serious measures against five British yachtsmen detained in the Gulf if it proves they had "evil intentions," Reuters reported today. Esfandiar Rahim-Mashaie, the president's chief of staff, said that the judiciary will decide.

British Foreign Secretary David Miliband said there is no argument or confrontation and the five people are being well treated. He added that Tehran is investigating the incident and the U.K. looks forward to it being sorted out.

The three US backpackers remain in Evin political prison in Tehran, awaiting trial for espionage, according to the Telegraph.

Iran-China:  China said more dialogue -- not sanctions -- is needed to resolve the issue of Iran's nuclear program, The Associated Press reported 1 December. China Foreign Ministry spokesman Qin Gang stated that sanctions "are not the goal" of the UN resolution and pressure on Iran. He added that the issue should be properly resolved through dialogue and that all parties should step up diplomatic efforts.

Iran-Russia: In reaction to Iran’s announcement of its intention to build more nuclear enrichment facilities, the Russian government said it would support a consensus in favor of sanctions. The Russians did not say they would stop selling technology to Iran. China’s statement above would seem to pretty much ensure no Security Council consensus.

The Russians benefit by appearing to be cooperative with the US at no cost to their interests.

Switzerland:  For the record. The Swiss People's Party will attempt to ban forced marriage, female circumcision, dispensation from swimming lessons, the burqa and special Muslim cemeteries to contain what one party leader called Islamicization of Swiss society, Swissinfo.ch reported 1 December, citing Adrian Amstutz. Amstutz called for Muslims to integrate into the Swiss culture.   This party is rightwing populace and hostile to foreign residents. In 2007 elections it won 29% of the popular vote. 

The Swiss seem to be joining the French in insisting that resident Muslims must adjust to the national culture instead of craving exception. Most of the demands will not be enacted by the government, but anti-Muslim sentiment appears to be rising.

International Criminal Court-US: For the record. The chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) said in a recent interview with the Wall Street Journal that although the U.S. is not a participant in the ICC, the ICC has jurisdiction over U.S. soldiers because Afghanistan is a signatory to the Court’s founding treaty.  The Afghan government ratified the Rome Statute in 2003.

ICC chief prosecutor, the famous Argentine human rights attorney Luis Moreno Ocampo, told the Journal, “We have to check if crimes against humanity, war crimes or genocide have been committed in Afghanistan. …There are serious allegations against the Taliban and al Qaida and serious allegations about warlords, even against some who are connected with members of the government.”

Regarding Western soldiers, he said, “there are different reports about problems with bombings and there are also allegations about torture.” Ocampo told the Journal he is already conducting a "preliminary examination" into whether NATO troops, including American soldiers, fighting the Taliban may have to be put in the dock. He also said the way NATO fights has changed forever.

Something is seriously wrong when NATO, Allied and US soldiers are lumped in the same class as Taliban and al Qaida murderers.

End of NightWatch for 1 December.

Filed under: pakistan

Sale of knives, barbecue grills on the rise news grill pakistan http://ping.fm/uQ2SM

Filed under: pakistan

hop says...

Following in the long tradition of fearless home ministers, Union Home Minister P Chidambaram visited Mumbai on the first anniversary of the 26/11 terror attacks. And now dear readers, here's a little quiz for you. In Mumbai, what did P Chidambaram unveil?

1) more evidence of Pakistan's complicity 

2) a specific new policy to deter future attacks 

3) a martyr's memorial

If you guessed 3) then you're catching on.

The Minister also made a strong speech condemning Pakistan. Later at a press conference when asked by reporters what his government had done so far, he reeled off the punitive measures India had taken to date: first, he got the US Substitute Part-Time Deputy Assistant Under-Secretary of State to call his Pakistani counterpart, Zardari's Neighbor's Aunt's Daughter's Qawwali Teacher to express the US' strong views on the matter and this message delivery had continued all the way until Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's visit to Islamabad a few weeks ago where she suggested to Pakistan that maybe they should try and avoid such incidents in the future, or at the very least hide their tracks better.

And to drive the point home, he said that in the next few weeks President Obama would put out a twitter message saying "@pakistan Yo! No Mo Terro!". This he was sure would finally break the impasse and result in lasting peace.

Filed under: pakistan

tpad says...

Tpad, the global provider of the residential, mobile and business VoIP phone services, today announced that it is expanding its payments portfolio by offering a premium branded prepay Ukash voucher in hundreds of high street locations nationwide.

Ukash, which has the largest prepaid-cash issuing estate in the world from 300,000 global physical issuing points in 17 countries, provide e-commerce solutions by allowing customers to shop, play and pay online by just using cash. Ukash can also be obtained online from bank accounts and wallets in 22 countries.

This move is intended to vigorously compete with other VoIP telephony companies such as Vonage, Skype, Gizmo and Google Voice by giving users in less-developed countries the ability to experience the benefits of Tpad VoIP without the need for a bank account or credit card.

tpad ukash,voip sip free calls credit cash payment voucher

Tpad users can now avoid use of the credit card and opt for a safe, secure and readily available alternative from Ukash. These Ukash vouchers can be purchased with values from USD5 to USD20, meaning that users have a chance to test the call quality of the Tpad VoIP network without making a large initial investment.

Steven Johns, Brand Manager for Tpad, said: "It is vital in today's competitive VoIP market to offer all users a flexible and safe way to purchase VoIP calling credit, and with Ukash you can't get any easier than using actual cash to fully control your purchasing spend."

In order for users to take advantage of using Tpad for making free or low cost international calls, they need to sign up for a free Tpad VoIP account, download the free Tpad PC softphone or use any SIP or VoIP Device (IP Phone, Linksys ATA, Nokia WiFi Mobile or Webphone).

Customers will then simply purchase a Ukash voucher from their local shop or online and enter the 19 digit Ukash voucher code into the Tpad website and the Tpad call credit will be instantly added to their account, with no hidden fees or costs removed.

Johns continued: "The joy of this offer is that unlike other VoIP providers we allow our customers to take advantage of Tpad's ultra low discounted VoIP rates from the very first call they make and there are no harsh restrictions to follow.  If you include the facts that we don’t have any connection charges and we only bill per second of the call then we are a powerful force in the consumer VoIP industry."

Tpad have also recently launched new local access DID (Direct Inward Dialling) numbers in Pakistan that allow anyone in Pakistan to call Tpad users around the world using a normal phone at just the cost of a local rate call. In addition to strengthening international market ties, this new Tpad feature allows all poorer countries to benefit from the ongoing VoIP revolution.

"We want to make VoIP calling available to poorer areas that don’t have access to PCs or broadband, and our popular local access DID number service offers this feature and means users can make unlimited international calls from a normal landline or mobile phone and they only pay for a local call and not an expensive international call." said Johns.

About Ukash (http://www.ukash.com):
Ukash is a cash payment method available in the United Kingdom, Europe, South Africa, Australia, South America and North America for those who wish to shop online but either do not have a bank account/credit card or fear they will be the victim of credit card fraud or identity theft. Ukash is a safe way of shopping, playing and paying online without having to submit private bank details. The secure and unique 19-digit number on the Ukash voucher assures payment when it is presented online.
Currently available in 26 countries worldwide both online and from 300,000 physical issuing points, Ukash is the largest global prepaid cash collection network in the world. In the past year, the company has seen its physical estate expand into Australia, South and North America, and a number of new European territories.

About Tpad (http://www.tpad.com):
Tpad, the world’s most flexible communications company, offers next-generation telephony solutions for consumers and businesses. Tpad is a true global VoIP network and offers users a wide range of VoIP / SIP devices (Softphones, ATAs, IP phones or WiFi mobiles) to make free or low cost calls anywhere in the world with crystal clear quality. Tpad’s new telephony services make it easier and cheaper for people to stay in touch using any device, on any network, anytime, anywhere. The ever-expanding global IP telephony company is headquartered in the UK with offices in the UAE.

Filed under: pakistan

guosheng says...

Filed under: pakistan

tahirakram says...

Most of the places are of Lahore city.

                   
Click here to download:
My_collection_of_Pakistan_wall.zip (9466 KB)

Filed under: pakistan