As reviews of Verizon's next flagship phone, the Droid, roll across the interwebs there is much consternation and gnashing of teeth over why it is being compared to the iPhone. Mostly, it must be said, from the non iPhone crowd.
So allow me to wax poetic for a bit on these shenanigans. First - the qualifying statements. I do not own either device. However, I do own an iPod touch (2nd Gen), I currently use a blackberry and I have been in the Wireless Telecom industry for 17 years. I am a gadget junkie and avid reader of tech sites. I am primarily an apple user - macbook, iMac, apple routers.
The iPhone, in a very short period of time, has managed to do something unique. Not it's features. Not it's services. It has separated device from carrier in the public mind. Is that all the iPhone and Apple's doing? Hardly. Some of it is just because of the way the chips fell. There was no carrier choice - so carrier was never really a topic in iPhone discussions. Once you got beyond "It's on AT&T, love it or leave it" - the carrier discussion ended. Next, even though you have the iPhone, iPhone 3G and iPhone 3Gs (as well as the iPod touch) - it was always "the iPhone." If I have an iPhone and you have an iPhone - chances are they are the same and we don't typically regard them as the iPhone 3G or 3Gs unless talking about performance of games or something. With WinMo hardware, Palm to an extent, and even blackberries - we need to know a model. Curve or Tour? Storm? HTC Hero or Samsung Omnia? The iPhone device became one with it's OS and it's Carrier and became an entity in and of itself. The iPhone has become the wireless equivalent of the home phone - I don't care if you have a princess phone on PacBell or a plain black wall phone on Verizon - if I ask if you have a "phone" you will respond "yes." The iPhone is no different. If I ask if you have a blackberry, however, you may reply with - "yes…a curve on Sprint" because both carrier and model are necessary to properly frame the response.
The iPhone, as a piece of technology, is attractive to look at and thanks to it's OS, very easy to use. Damn near anyone can pick up an iPhone and know how to use it. Many reviews have even pointed that fact out. Apple has taken an advanced (by most measures) smart phone and made it immediately accessible to the lay person. That is important because now Joe User, who was perfectly content with his LG8300 handset now begins to think "Hey, Bob's iPhone is really easy to use and it does so much more than my phone does" and he begins to covet one - not just because it's easy - but because there is no learning barrier to him being "cool." I defy you to say the same about WinMo or Blackberries.
The iPhone has the App Store. 100,000 ways to make your device unique (I believe Scoble said that first). Interestingly enough, the iPhone App Store lets you take your otherwise homogenous device and differentiate it. If I feel that the best use of my 32GB is to fill it with Fart Apps - I can. If I feel it is better served by saying I own the Wolfram Alpha app for $50 - I can do that too (I do). I can carry a library in my pocket or log into the Mainframe via a 3270 emulator. It is eminently customizable and allows me to make it my "go to" device for damn near anything I can think of. It becomes PART of my life - not a bolt on like a handset.
Finally, the iPhone does multimedia in a spectacular fashion. Music, pictures, video, movie rentals - it's got it all. There isn't much to say here - it's all good.
But what about Web you might ask? The iPhone browser is fantastic but not perfect. Before the app store the browser was the key selling point for geeks like me. Now…not so much. I use it - but I prefer a dedicated app when I can get one (I love you regator app!) Now the browser is more of a fallback or for quickly checking things out. At least in my use cases.
So where am I going with this? When a phone is launched with a marketing campaign pitting it against the iPhone - and the iPhone has done to the wireless world what it has - you HAVE to compare. It's good journalism. Everyone knows someone with an iPhone. Everyone covets an iPhone to some extent. If you are going to sell me a phone you need to tell me how it will make me better than my friend with his iPhone - or at least where I have the bragging rights.
Why WOULDN'T you want an iPhone or something everyone thinks is better?
All that said and done, I am looking forward to buying a Droid. Why? 90% of my use on my device is for email. The iPhone email client is horrendous. Period. So why leave blackberry then you might be thinking? (and if you weren't then I just planted the seed) Because the Curve was the last decent blackberry I used. The Storm out of the box. Sucked. The Tour? Trackball issues and overall sense of "meh." Rim has tried too hard to break into the mainstream and in so doing has created instability in their software and a patchwork of apps that don't all seem to fit together.
So, you can probably surmise then that I am a VZW customer, and that is the final reason I would not buy an iPhone. AT&Ts network is bad. Not just bad - horrible. Let me quantify that statement more objectively. I worked for the Original AT&T Wireless for 6 years. I had an AWS phone for free because of my job. I have had a VZW phone for the last 7 years.
Comparing one to the other is as simple as this: "AT&T's calls generally had better quality (in the NY Metro area) but dropped CONSTANTLY. VZW calls are a little muddier but I haven't had more than 2 or 3 dropped calls in 7 years. Who cares if they sound better if they drop every 10 minutes?"
Data coverage? VZW. Voice and Data simultaneously? Give me more than 1 use case for simultaneous voice and data. I LIVE with my gadgets - right now I have my MiFi, iPod, blackberry, a second phone, a netbook, a camera, a voice recorder and a second, larger laptop within arms reach - and I am not home.I am connected constantly - and I can not think of one instance in 7 years where I have thought "dang, if only I could browse the web while I talk to my wife."
Is the Droid better than an iPhone? Depends. Will the Droid usurp the iPhone's ability to be ubiquitous in the public mind? Nope. Will the Droid be a fantastic device on it's own for people with no interest in or ability to own an iPhone? Most likely.
While I would love to see more reviews of the Droid that tout the Droid's strengths on it's own I completely understand why tech journalists compare it to the iPhone. The iPhone, for better or worse is the benchmark that everyone knows. However, I think the iPhone fanboys need to be more realistic when commenting on these reviews - better devices mean Apple needs to be better. Instead of laughing at the Droid - you should be cheering it on.
Hey look - it's FREE Additional content!!
This doesn't really fit in with the rambling paragraphs above, but it occurred to me that carriers don't quite understand why the iPhone is what it is within the wireless industry.
Look at the VZW Storm launch. "HEY! It's got a touch screen!!"
Woo…hooo… At the time it was not the touch screen itself that made the iPhone so wanted - it was the browser and the UI. The Apps just added to that…but none of it was primarily related to the touch screen.
Then it was "HEY! We've got an HTML Browser built right in!!"
Yes, but the interface was horrible and the browser - while it supported HTML, did not support javascript or flash.
Ok, how about "LOOK! We have an APP STORE!"
Continued fail. The apps are crap and the device itself was lackluster.
Now…along comes Google. They get it. The device needs to be responsive. The Brower needs to be fully web compliant. The app store needs quality apps and an easy shopping experience. All tied together with a UI that works.
But they can't get carriers to relinquish control of their handset long enough to get a decent one out the door. The Droid seems to be the 1st real attempt at this - but it remains to be seen if it lives up to it.
Give Android some time to refine and decent hardware to run on - THEY will give the iPhone a decent race. Which means better devices for all of us.
(and don't even talk to me about multi touch zooming or I will slap you. Over rated gesture. Yes it's intuitive. Yes it's easy and natural. But it is not the only way to accomplish that task. Multi touch = good. Hang up with one multi touch gesture = bad)