Search posterous

Search all posts and users. Type a name, type a favorite song title, whatever! See what comes up.
  

More posterous blogs











More recommended blogs »

Here are posterous posts filed under michelleobama...

peza679 says...

GorillaObama

First lady Michelle Obama Monkey picture

I got told not to post this, so I posted it, I took a trip to another country (on Google) to find this as it has been removed from the site it had been posted on HotGirls.com , so it will soon be gone from google (I think it is already gone coz I cant find it).

As you can see the Image is Michelle Obama  in monkey form, it has been deemed as racist and google have recived many complaints about keeping it on there search engine.

Google had previously gave a lame appolagy above the image saying.

"Offensive Search Results" that states "Sometimes our search results can be offensive. We agree."

Users who then clicked on the ad were directed to a letter from Google that explains its results "can include hilarious disturbing content, even from innocuous queries" but notes that Google doesn't endorse content on these Web sites.

Google says its search formula relies on thousands of factors to rank a Web page's importance, and says it doesn't eliminate search results simply because of user complaints. However, Google says it will take down images in certain cases, such as when required by law to do so.

So who do you think took it down? Google or the host website?

We are pretty sure google loved the traffic they were getting from the image!

In no way I am been racist posting this image, I'm just reporting. 

Do you think the image is inappropriate to be on Google?

Filed under: Michelle Obama

lisas says...

I do NOT get the American obsession with their President's wives, maybe if they had a Queen they wouldn't need to aristocratize (yes that's a word goddammit) these women.

That being said, how could I not post this picture of lovely Michelle? Her skin looks amazing, she has incredible arms and shoulders - this lady was MADE for strapless gowns. The Obamas are waiting to greet the Indian President and his wife.

Filed under: Michelle Obama

wrdeer says...

OK so first the good news, the image has been removed by the website who posted it.

A search for Michelle Obama now actually returns pictures of Michelle.

Article about the apology from the site concerned over at the guardian 

The bad news however is that Google doesn't seem to have learned anything from this debacle and are just pleased to see the whole problem go away.

Not only was this a public relations disaster but it highlights some serious flaws in their rating engine. 
Putting the moral component to one side for a second (  don't be evil hmmpfh )  their engine was returning erroneous results. 

Instead of being happy to find out and changing their ranking accordingly they abdicated responsibility.

If I searched for apples and got oranges surely they would see how importat it was to fix this as soon as possible.  Failure to respond would mean people loosing confidence in the validity of their  search.  
Here we had thousands of people pointing out that their search wasn't working as advertised, and thousands more who would have agreed that the image displayed as number one wasn't what they would have wanted to see. 

The image was the number one image, not because it was the most appropriate image for the search but because the site was trying and succeeding in their efforts to game Google’s search algorithms to garner site traffic.

Google aim to provide the most accurate image returns for the stated search.  The point is that this image was by no means what the majority of people typing Michelle Obama into the engine wanted to see.  Once it was there however the number clicking it to find out what the hell was going on would have been very high thus reinforcing the problem.

Should google be responsible for clearing up hateful material on the internet, no.

Should they be responsible for correcting errors or exploits in the way their search algorithm returns inappropriate results hell yes.

I believe in freedom of information I don’t think something should be removed just because I don’t like it.  

This is not a freedom of information issue.

The image was inappropriate and if it was within Google's power to re-rank it more appropriately then it had a duty to do so.

Unfortunately they don't agree.

Filed under: Michelle Obama

lebovaryste says...

Oui, c'est vrai : souvent, on fait une recherche Google, et on tombe sur des résultats aberrants. Et : d'habitude, ça nous fait sourire. Sauf que : certains Américains qui sont tombés sur une image jugée raciste en tapant Michelle Obama dans Google Images, eux, n'ont pas souri.

Michelle Obama est un singe : la controverse Google.

Allez-y, faites l'expérience : en tapant Michelle Obama dans Google Images, le deuxième résultat, c'est la première dame en chimpanzé.

Malgré que plusieurs aient demandé son retrait du moteur de recherche, Google tient son point, tout en s'excusant. Sur la page de la requête "Michelle Obama" sur Google Images, le célèbre moteur de recherche a apposé cette petite publicité, qui nous amène directement à une page d'excuses formelle. Cette page explique comment fonctionne la recherche Google, avec ses algorithmes et tout le tra la la.

Une page d'excuses formelle aux utilisateurs de Google.

Traduction libre :

"Il arrive que les résultats d'une recherche Google contiennent des contenus dérangeants, même provenant de requêtes inoffensives. Nous vous assurons que les opinions exprimées par ces sites ne sont, en aucun cas, endossées par Google.

Les moteurs de recherche sont un reflet du contenu et de l'information disponibles sur Internet. La façon dont les résultats de Google sont disposés repose grandement sur des algorithmes générés par ordinateur, algorithmes utilisant un millier de facteurs afin de calculer la pertinence d'une page à une requête donnée.

Les croyances et préférences de ceux qui travaillent chez Google, aussi bien que les opinions du public en général, ne déterminent pas et n'ont pas d'impact sur nos résultats de recherche. Des citoyens et des groupes d'intérêt public nous exhortent quelques fois à supprimer certains liens ou à ajuster nos résultats de recherche. Même si Google se réserve le droit de considérer chacune de ces requêtes individuellement, Google voit dans l'intégrité de ses résultats de recherche une priorité extrêmement importante. Et donc, nous n'enlevons pas une page de nos résultats de recherche simplement parce que son contenu est impopulaire ou parce que nous recevons des plaintes à son sujet. Nous effacerons, par contre, les pages qui violent notre Guide de conduite du Webmaster, si nous croyons y être obligé par la loi, ou à la demande du webmaster qui a créé lesdites pages.

Nous nous excusons si vous avez eu une expérience choquante en utilisant Google. Nous espérons que vous comprendrez notre position concernant ces résultats offensants.

Sincèrement,
L'équipe Google."

Un contrôle ou pas?

Qu'en pensez-vous?

Un moteur de recherche devrait-il rester neutre, peu importe les contenus générés par ses résultats?

Ou devrait-il opérer un certain contrôle sur ceux-ci? Du moins, dans la façon dont ils sont disposés, indépendamment des algorithmes?

Serait-ce de la censure? Ou une exigence éthique?

lebovaryste.

Filed under: Michelle Obama

wrdeer says...

Do an image search for Michelle Obama on Google ( 24/11/09) and you get this racist image.

 

NOW THAT THE IMAGE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE SITE IN QUESTION I HAVE ALSO REMOVED IT FROM THIS SITE

 

As of right now google is pointing to its algorithm and  saying that unexpected things can happen so it is not up to them to change it.

If this was a search for racist images of Michelle Obama or crude monkey images of Michelle Obama then they may have a point. 

It isn’t and they don’t.

The number one image is a doctored image this is not what the majority of people searching for Michelle Obama pictures want to see ?.

 

I have included the original unedited image for comparison.

Google do no evil ?  I am not a happy man

They need to change this now .
please express your feelings to Google at your earliest convenience.

This debate is also being featured in more detail on my summary personal blog:   urban ascetic redux
and on Mashable .

Filed under: MIchelle Obama

tsevis says...

Experimental portrait of the First Lady Michelle Obama for a grassroots project.

Filed under: Michelle Obama

Terr says...

Corporate Social Responsible News: Cause Marketing Reports by Performance Research + IEG; Institute of Green Professionals' Honorary Fellows; Michelle Obama's Challenge to the George Washington University + Volunteer Match


Filed under: Michelle Obama

Terr says...

Following a unique challenge issued by the First Lady, The George Washington University and VolunteerMatch have partnered to launch a new Web site that will enable the GW student body to inspire and track the 100,000 hours of service that Mrs. Obama challenged the University to complete by May 1, 2010.

When the new site launches in early November, it will connect GW students with volunteer opportunities from more than 2,600 participating organizations in the Washington, D.C. metro region. VolunteerMatch and the University’s Office of Community Service will also highlight additional volunteer roles at GW’s network of student service agencies.

Best known for its award-winning public Web service, www.volunteermatch.org, VolunteerMatch provides businesses, campuses and organizations with Web-based solutions to track and manage volunteer engagement at local and national levels. In a typical deployment, a campus, company, or cause campaign uses the service to connect students, employees, or consumers to the VolunteerMatch network of nonprofit organizations. GW’s Office of Community Service will use its VolunteerMatch deployment to report the hours of its student volunteers.

"We want to make participation in this challenge as simple as possible," said Robert Chernak, the University’s senior vice president for student and academic support services. "Our partnership with VolunteerMatch will not only help the GW community find volunteering opportunities they can be passionate about, it will help us ensure that service hours are tracked accurately for this challenge."

Mrs. Obama issued the challenge on September 11 during the first ever National Day of Service and Remembrance, an event which marked the culmination of President Barack Obama's "United We Serve" summer service initiative.

"The call to service is being heard loud and clear at The George Washington University, and the spirit and energy of this student body is contagious," said Greg Baldwin, president of VolunteerMatch. "We look forward to working with the GW community to make this effort a success."

To learn more about VolunteerMatch’s solutions for campus involvement, visit:
http://www.volunteermatch.org/corporations/engagestudents.jsp

To learn more about The George Washington University’s Service Challenge, visit:
http://serve.gwu.edu

via 3blmedia.com

Filed under: Michelle Obama

I mean...

From current.com

Michelle Obama may have white slave-owner ancestor

Geneologist traces first lady's family back to unknown white patriarch, who have fathered child with black slave girl.

Michelle Obama had a great-great-great grandfather who was white and may have been the master of a black slave known as Melvinia, living in South Carolina.

The discovery of the first lady's slave ancestor on her mother's side rounds off a picture of her family tree that until now has remained elusive in crucial parts. During last year's presidential election, the Obamas made something of the slave history in her past, but the full details were never known.

Now an expert in genealogy, Megan Smolenyak, has followed Obama's family tree back five generations on both her maternal and paternal branches, with some interesting findings. The most eye-catching is the existence of Melvinia Shields, a slave girl owned by a David Paterson in Spartanburg, South Carolina.

Melvinia, who was Obama's great-great-great grandmother, was passed on as property to Paterson's daughter and son-in-law – Christianne and Henry Shields – when he died in 1852. About seven years later, when she was still a teenager, she gave birth to a boy, Dolphus T Shields.

Smolenyak specialises in tracing family connections and last year followed Barack Obama's roots back to Ireland, revealing he is a distant cousin of the actor Brad Pitt. She tracked down a reference to Dolphus and his siblings in the 1870 US census.

That census is seen as a crucial document in the history of race in America as it was the first post-civil war count in which former slaves, who previously had gone unnamed as they were classed as property, were listed.

Dolphus was recorded in the census as "mulatto" – denoting one white and one black parent. The identity of the father is not known, though the fact that his surname was Shields suggests he may have been a member of the family that owned Melvinia.

"This is a very universal story," Smolenyak said. "It's a story of the spread of slavery through the south and the Great Migration of African-Americans to the north. The fact that there is mixed heritage involved will not be a great surprise to many as it was so common between masters and slaves."

Filed under: Michelle Obama

thetrudz says...

In high school, most of the students, especially the minority students, loved to hang out in Mr. Harris's office, our magnet school's occupational therapist. He was a great counselor to us, always gave us a chuckle and help most of us get through the process of getting accepted to college. One day in my senior year, Mr. Harris had a chat with one of my current best friends, another friend and I. He briefly showed us a group photo of some girls that were also seniors and had jokingly asked us if they were the "it" girls. I chuckled. Our magnet school was one filled with lots of cool smarty pants kids--most of our student body was full of future Ivy Leaguers, in-state and private university scholarship recipients and other forms of brainiacdom so we didn't have the heavily delineated social castes that other high schools had. I couldn't say for sure if these girls were the "it" girls, since everyone at our school seem to have cliques and all the cliques didn't seem to mind mingling with others cliques. 

He then asked us if these girls were who the boys liked. I knew that they were the girls who tended to date athletes and older guys, but none of my friends, all very pretty in their own right, had trouble with boys asking them out either. There did seem to be a line between dating an academic guy versus an athlete though. However, many of our academic guys were considered attractive (and a few were also athletic) just as some of the athletes were. Anyway, he then proceeded to say that it didn't matter if they didn't ask us out because many of the boys would be sorry, and will hope to have someone like us in the future. He basically surmised that they would "all come back" in one way or another. I didn't really believe or completely pay attention to his statement at the time; I was on the edge of seventeen and not really concerned with what a boy wanted or didn't want. I was so excited to be moving away and starting college soon, a new chapter that most young people look forward to. 

More than ten years later, every single ex-boyfriend and others that I will elaborate on later have "come back." I do not mean in the cute way that you reacquaint yourself with friends of both genders from the past on social media sites such as Myspace, Twitter and Facebook. In that way, I have "virtually" reacquainted myself with hundreds of people that I went to school with at some point and time. Many were friends back then and some were even enemies with selective memories now seeking to be my new best friend. Many shared old photos and laughs with me and the whole reminiscing experience was fun. How interesting is it to know someone from childhood, then see them post their graduation, travel, maternity or child's photos, and we then take a step back to look at our emotional, spiritual and physical growth? It's great.  

No, unfortunately that is not what I am referring to in this case. What I mean is that guys that I have dated and not dated seem to think that because we are approaching 30 (I just turned 30 in August) they have to fill their Erik Erikson's Stages of Psychosocial Development - Stage VI** quota ASAP. I now call it a quota because it seems to be the way that some guys are approaching this critical developmental stage: "Intimacy vs. Isolation."** For some of these guys (some already divorced), they are watching their friends marry off and realizing that they have squandered their 20s away as far as romantic relationships go--bludgeoning the heart and spirits of many women along the way and manage to still think that they deserve some magical love story that will start promptly on their 29th, 30th or 31st birthday. This isn't a clinical assessment or even an assumption, this is an observation and for some, the exact words out of their mouths. Now who am I to say someone does not deserve love, despite what they have done in their past? That is not what I mean at all in the previous statements. What I mean to say is that they will not be receiving it from me. 

One ex I have not seen since 1999. I am not joking. He contacted me through Facebook and said "hey, I would love to say hi, can I call you?" You would think after every single other ex contacted me (he was the last left to do so) and having to advise them that I am not interested in picking up where we left off so that they would meet the criteria necessary to oneup their friends or meet their personal goal by their 30th birthday, that I would take a hint. However, sheer curiosity lead me in this case. He had mentioned that he was trying to find an old mutual friend of ours. Later that same night he called. He was not trying to find an old mutual friend. He then divulged some faint memory of listening to music with me as "one of the best times in his life" and it took all of my might not to laugh. He brought up some other memories, and I just sat there on the phone stunned. We were very young, freshman at the time, and the relationship was emphatically shallow at best. He knew it and I knew it. Yet he continued to progress in the conversation, leading it with this lie. He asked if we could go on a date. I declined. It's entirely too odd for someone to call after 10 years and ask for a date, especially when they follow the first question with "what are your hobbies?" (People on Twitter who are complete strangers know what my hobbies are and he doesn't.) Further into the conversation, he revealed that his last relationship didn't work out and it actually ended two weeks prior to the conversation that we were currently having. Ah...and there was my answer. He was turning 30 the month that he called me, just ended the major relationship of his twenties and was sizing up his life. If the American dream or a person's personal dream includes the house, wife and first child by 30 and the person's behavior for their entire 20s were actions contrary to those needed to make that dream come true--well they would have to make up for lost time, right? Why not call an ex from a decade past? Perhaps he called all of his exes to to see who would bite. I politely let him know that I was not interested in anything beyond a hello here and there on Facebook. After the call and another email exchange, he then followed up with an email packed with insults. I deleted him from Facebook. I've also received emails that do not ask but demand to know if I am married (I don't post a relationship status on any site...I mean who cares, other than if I were married, I see no reason to change the status), having friends contact me for them, pretending to be interested in my photography or travel, feigning interest in psychology, or doing whatever it takes to reach their goal, regardless if my feelings are trampled on or not.  

Between my 28th and 30th birthday, in total, my 4 ex-boyfriends, 6 men that I never dated but went to secondary and/or post secondary school with, 3 from elementary or middle and many strangers (or "sort-of acquaintances" via social media) have come to me with the same swiss cheese full of holes, connection or re-connection proposal. It is not genuine interest from the "sort-of acquaintances" and past schoolmates or "undying, unyielding love for me" from the exes that are their driving motivations. Believe me, I am not saying that I am so special that someone will die if they are not with me. In fact, it has nothing to do with whether or not I am special. It is one of three impulses that are the motivation: fear, entitlement or competition/oneupmanship. For some it is fear. I could hear the fear in their voices and read it in their emails. The desperation that I've seen is frightening and unnerving. They are throwing out feelers and trying to see what will stick. For others, it is an entitlement to what they feel a "good woman" is, despite how they have treated other women. They have publicly destroyed other women's lives and seem to think they can move on to me. I am not interested in being someone's victim. For the rest, they are competitive. Their friends have the house, corporate career, wife, and baby or are working on a baby. Some have even mentioned Obama's name to me, so I mention the next statements with purpose. Their friends seem to have what the Obamas have, and the Obama marriage is idolized by many. But see, they fail to read Obama's books and watch interviews where they actually discuss their marriage. It takes work and having a life that "looks" like the Obamas' life is not the same as putting in the work to build a strong relationship. In several interviews, they have alluded to the work that it takes to build a relationship. I suspect that these guys ignore the interviews and view the happy photos instead. This is not to say that every guy who approaches me is this way. On the contrary, I am speaking of the specific ones I accounted for via number or anecdote. Certainly, every guy doesn't operate this way. However, I and several of my friends' have experienced what I speak of in this post.

Any time you want to achieve a goal and it doesn't materialize right away, fear can surface. I've felt just as afraid when grad school became difficult (time-management wise), I was tired from daily life and thought I would not finish, or when I tried to complete another goal, things got in the way and I felt that "time was running out." But if a goal involves another person, such as dating/marriage, perhaps some consideration for that person should enter the picture. Everyone makes mistakes, I certainly have, but these behaviors that I describe are not mistakes, but instead are complete methodologies for behavior and action. From my experience, I can surmise that women are not the only ones that may have the fear and desperation that can surround the desire for marriage or the life associated with it.  What bothers me is that for some people, this desire seems to come from feelings of entitlement and the desire to compete with/oneup friends. I guess Mr. Harris's hypothesis was right. They "all come back." I simply had no idea that it would be like this. 

Note: People have repeatedly brought up two points concerning this: 1) What if God sent one of those people to be "the one." My reply: I do not believe that someone is sent to be "the one" with intentions like what I described above. They may have a purpose...a lesson for me to learn, but I do not accept that someone with cold or selfish motivations like this is "the one." 2) Isn't some element of competition between men normal, such as wanting the "best person" to reproduce with etc. My reply: Perhaps, but the ones I speak of are competing with 1040 line items--I am not sure if the biological complexities that are involved in choosing a mate are heightened in the ones I mention--no more than a man who chooses to pursue a woman he is actually interested in beyond the realms of the "quota." 

** I don't seek to oversimplify a complex psychosocial theory. In stage VI of the Erik Erikson model, an individual faces the "conflict" of intimacy vs. isolation. This is whether the individual will have the ability to create healthy intimate relationships with others, and includes "partnering" up. So when I make the inference of the "quota," what I mean is that some seek to slap a partner in a slot and call that "intimacy" when true intimacy with another human being is more than just romantic relationships and the capacity for intimacy is deeper than finding anyone to "fill a slot" in a hurried fashion. Read more on the Erik Erikson model.

Filed under: michelle obama