Search posterous

Search all posts and users. Type a name, type a favorite song title, whatever! See what comes up.
  

More posterous blogs











More recommended blogs »

Here are posterous posts filed under liberal...

sassieq says...

 

 I have never one of Malcolm Turnbull’s supporters.... until now. It is so rare for us nowadays to see a politician (particularly one who has so much a stake) standing their ground in the eye of the storm. The press conference he called yesterday demonstrated a real commitment to tackling climate change. I don’t care how many Liberal ex-frontbenchers tell us that the public wants the Government to wait until Copenhagen to decide on our response to climate change, it is not true. Anyone with kids, anyone who wants to have kids, anyone who cares about the future WANTS ACTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE.

The Liberal shadow cabinet and party room agreed on a set of changes that would make the  ETS palatable to them. The vast majority of these changes were actioned by Labor.  I guess the only conclusion that can be drawn is that the Libs didn’t really think Labor would come to the party.

Turnbull has showed courage, charisma and, most importantly, that he is a man of substance. He has also showed us that he is leading a party of dinosaurs. Ironic isn’t it? Many academics say that climate change killed the dinosaurs too....

 

Thank you to David Williams for drawing my attention to my spelling error

Filed under: Liberal

Hope is Fading Fast

This is why there is no credible or real opposition from the Republican Party or from the conservative movement as a whole:

It’s been easily a decade since Freshjive did something to truly get collective panties in a bunch. But this new “Hope Is Fading Fast” shirt is sure to have some folks up in arms. The real question is, would you wear it?

Basically, the “Freshjive” people have these grievances against the Obama Administration: 

  • consolidates a multi-tiered “state always wins” system of “justice”
  • continues to assert a radical version of the “state secrets” privelidge
  • nominates a pesticide pushing lobbyist to a top agriculture post, breaking once again his campaign promise not to hire lobbyists
  • nominates Bush’s final spokesliar, Dana Perino, to the Broadcasting Board of Governors
  • breaks his promise to close Guantanamo prison within a year, even as people long known to be innocent still languish there- not to mention an expasion of that other “Guantanamo” at Bagram Air Base
  • protects torturers from accountability
  • and contemplates a massive escalation in Afghanistan
  • Now, contrast that with something from Larry Johnson’s “No Quarter:”

    1.Select government reports to the contrary, the massive failings within the financial regulatory structure with specific emphasis on FINRA and the SEC.

    2. Goldman Sachs CEO Llloyd Blankfein’s confession just this week that Goldman had engaged in activities that were clearly wrong and led to the economic crisis.

    3.I have no doubt that many within our nation believe the Obama administration fundamentally believes in the principle of redistributing wealth via a number of programs. This emphasis on redistribution in one direction while simultaneously bailing out financial institutions leaves a very large percentage of those in the middle and on both sides of the aisle feeling totally disenfranchised. Not only do these people feel disenfranchised, but they feel that the government is not being honest with them regarding its motivations.

    Now, ask yourself this.

    Who nailed it?

    The attack from the left absolutely nails the Obama Administration. The attack from the “center,” which is where I’ll put the above, whiffs and misses.

    Oh, from the right? From the right, you ask?

    Barack Obama and his liberal allies do not even pretend to care that these are anything other than show trials that will end in the deaths of the defendants. It needs to be said—very clearly and plainly—that the reason the Administration decided to avoid the proper forum of a military tribunal for these terrorists is a warped, bitter desire carry out yet another partisan attack against the successful work of their predecessors. And in a sad way, it makes sense.

    If the radical leftists in the White House cannot use this circus to publicly invalidate the eight years of successful tactics and strategies developed during the post-9/11 Bush years, then they cannot easily return to the 9/10, head-in-the-sand, terrorism-is-a-law-enforcement-problem mentality that is their comfort zone.

    No. No, that does not nail it like the attack from Freshjive does. If anything, that makes people want to run out and vote for President Obama, and it isn’t even election day yet. It is much more effective to go with the rule of law than against it, and it is much more effective to go with the idea that a broad international footprint with an overstretched military that is costing us billions works against us rather than for us. And, of course, we already know that the more effective way to fight terrorism is with law enforcement techniques, not with putting several hundred thousand U.S. troops halfway around the globe.

    So far, there are more credible attacks coming from the left than from the center or the right. Sometimes, you just have to play to your base. Like it or not, it did work pretty well for President Bush to play to his base, and to keep them as happy as he could for as long as he did. Despite empirical evidence to the contrary, they still carry water for him.

    Filed under: Liberal

    The last week of New Democracy’s internal electoral campaign has started. Lots of calls to left, right and centre have been made by all three candidates who want to become the future PM candidate. And therein lies the problem.

    The sorry state of New Democracy, and the wider Greek society, is reflected by the lamenting comments of Antonio Samaras last weekend, when he was saying that it is not acceptable in Greece to bang one’s own drum as a liberal or conservative right-winger. The word right has such bad (and wrong) connotations.

    It gets worse because the intuitive answer to everything is more Government, not less. One could expect that approach from Pasok, or particularly from Syriza, but from New Democracy too? As an innocent bystander, I benefit from the right to summarise the New Democracy dilemma in a couple of bullet points:

    ·         Right or not right? Which one is right, or is it simply wrong?

    ·         More or less Government? The answer shouldn’t be not more or less the same.

    ·         Liberal or conservative? Value liberal or conservative? Economically liberal or not? What’s liberal in Greece? Has anyone heard of Christian Democrats?

    There is no straightforward answer to these questions, but it surprises me that the system, whatever it is, doesn’t allow any type of clarity in party programming. Everything is a bit wishy-washy. It reflects the voters who doubt anything Government does but still want its protection. It is intellectually dishonest, but it serves a purpose.

    Whoever wins the New Democracy ballot will have a major task ahead, but in a country which doesn’t break out from a de facto two party system, the tide will always turn after a while. Now is a good occasion to gather the courage. New Democracy needs to throw the skeletons out of the closet and come outside. It’s a brand new day out here.

    Filed under: Liberal

    Don't speak of a honeymoon--that's long gone. That's over. That's a thing of the past.

    Liberal blogger Jane Hamsher goes after the Obama Administration and the Congress:

    There’s a shit storm going down on TV right now on CSPAN as the health care bill hits the floor of the House.

    Thank you Democrats, for making women take a punch in the throatfrom a bunch of old men who have spent the better part of the last century avoiding their own problems. So Rahm and Obama (who did nothing to stop it) can have their “w”:

    The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops delivered a critical endorsement to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Saturday by signing off on late-night agreement to grant a vote on an amendment barring insurance companies that participate in the exchange from covering abortions.

    “Passing this amendment allows the House to meet our criteria of preserving the existing protections against abortion funding in the new legislation,” the Bishops wrote in a letter to individual members. “Most importantly, it will ensure that no government funds will be used for abortion or health plans which include abortion.”

    Well, you have to give the culture warriors something, so they can go around cheering about the big victory that they got in this bill.  So happy to have the chance to line it all up for you all.

    Thank you, Planned Parenthood and NARAL, from the bottom of my heart, for sitting on your hands and enabling this shit.  Hope you have fun at all those Common Purpose meetings, those cocktail parties at the Pelosi’s.

    You own this one.

    There's no way a Republican could write or say anything worse about this administration. That's a devastating attack from the base, and it is the kind of attack that should make a sensible incumbent fear for their job.

    I firmly believe that 2011 will be spent pandering to the liberal base to try to make up for days like today. Whether that will do any good is anyone's guess. Will there even be a thing called blogging in 2011? Is it going to become micro-blogging or something like Tumblr? Yes, I did figure out Tumblr. Now, I cannot stop. I just...cannot stop. It possesses my soul now, like some religious artifact from a long-dead religion based on fear and evil.

    Wait, who were we talking about?

    Filed under: Liberal

    Sam says...

    A lot has been said about the impact of technology on HealthCare and how 50,000 HealthCare IT jobs will be created as part of the healthcare reform debate.

    Let me share an example of the reality of what is occurring due to the utter lack of transparency coming from D.C. around HealthCare reform.

    Healthcare organizations are planning to run lean in 2010.  While the quality and quantity of care will continue to be emphasized and of paramount importance, the much touted impact on HealthCare IT is a different story. 

    Capital expenditures are being scaled back to the absolute critical projects – and even there hard choices are being made. Maybe you can wait another year for new hardware or the next version of software.

    New HIT jobs are being scaled back or eliminated directly; the money, rightfully so, goes towards clinical service and quality first. Maybe you can just buy a third party product, if you can get a pricebreak.

    Healthcare Organizations just don’t know and simply cannot divine from the offal of entrails they are being thrown from D.C. as to what the impact to their bottom lines are going to be – and keep in mind, most of them struggle to stay in the black, and what profit is made is typically reinvested, not sent to line any pockets. Further many of these organizations genuinely emphasize quality care of their customers (aka patients!).

    Gone is the talk of decoupling insurance, patient choice, portability standards and tort reform, replaced instead with an obfuscated miasma from the swamp that is already having a negative impact on that which can bring about efficiencies – information technology.

    If healthcare organizations, even healthy ones, are scaling back on IT now, what, one wonders will occur when it finally becomes a reality?

     

    Filed under: Liberal

    Art says...

    Salon released their beta web design a few weeks back:


    This morning CNN released their new look:

    The similarities are quite interesting. Check out that red up in the top banner, and the new column format. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery but red? Is blue just played out? Sure both logos have always had some red but this is quite a shift from the recent past. Is this a political "align with the left" sort of thing? Even that'd be weird since red states in the media in the recent past have meant aligning with the political right in this country.

    Filed under: liberal

    This interesting infographic compares Left-leaning views with Right-leaning views from almost every dimension. Obviously, some simplifications, generalizations and stereotypes must be made to do such a comparison, but on the whole, most of the assessments are pretty valid, and it does not appear that there was any overarching bias one way or the other. An interesting look, if I do say so myself.

    Filed under: liberal

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/oct/15/inside-the-ring-2059116/#

    Another example of Obama selling America down the river.  Why not open up all of our military inventory and capabilities to anyone who wants them.  Then we will be safe and loved by everyone.  NOT!!  It is times like this when I begin to wish Carter was back in office.  (Yes I am old enough to remember that bumbling idiot)

    Filed under: liberal

    vpm says...

    Here's a visual. I'll call her "one woman", but it could be anyone. We're all the same, and we're also all different. What's the same in us, though, is, that we have different formulas of subpersonalities. So follow my little story...

    There is a home that some people live in. Several people live in this home. It isn't very large, but it has quite a few inhabitants. It's a two story home, with a basement, too. From the outside, the home looks lovely, just like other homes. Lots of homes on the street are similar in look and feel, but it's paint, garden, decor, etc. makes this home unique, and all the other homes on the street are unique in their way.

    This particular home that we are talking about, though, inside and out, has a modern, yet warm, earthy, homey feeling. You walk inside. The home is decorated in a most pleasant combination of earthy colors, modern shapes, lived in and welcoming. It's a combination of earthy (not country) and contemporary. The person living in the house with the most "personality" decorated it and controls it. That family member, modern, outgoing, warm, democratic, progressive...is sitting in the living room, living her life, as you enter her home to visit. This particular person, let's call her IN THE NOW/MODERN, controls that house. That house is me, aka "one woman". IN THE NOW/MODERN is so strongly identified as me, "one woman", that she thinks she IS "one woman", but she's not; she is simply a part of "one woman". The big twist is that most of her life, until this was learned, "one woman" went about on HER merry way thinking that SHE was IN THE NOW/MODERN. "One woman" did not understand that the IN THE NOW/MODERN is only a part of "one woman" that "one woman" seems to indentify with and define herself as.  This, however, is very limiting, and also, very likely, an inaccurate definition.

    The IN THE NOW/MODERN is a separate entity living inside of "one woman"...simply living HER life INSIDE of "one woman". She has a whole story, life, belief system, feelings, nature, etc. If you sat on the living room couch inside of "one woman's" home and spoke to that part of "one woman", she could tell you her full life story...when she was born inside of "one woman", why she exists, how she saved "one woman", how she protects "one woman", who she's stifling, why inside that same house lives a TRADITIONAL side, too. That TRADITIONAL side stifled inside of "one woman" is is forced to live in the basement, hiding in a corner. The IN THE NOW/MODERN side won't let the TRADITIONAL side come out and be free. The TRADITIONAL side is stifled, and angry, and, because it's been stuffed down for so long, it has become bigger than it really is. It really is a small part of "one woman", but, without attention, it grows and grows, longing to be heard and seen. When it does see the TRADITIONAL subpersonality in other people, free and roaming around, it shouts out from the basement, "I'm here. I hear you. I want to get out. I agree with you." But, the IN THE NOW/MODERN, who is on the surface and seemingly in charge, clamps down on the TRADITIONAL subpersonality, pads the basement so that the IN THE NOW/MODERN can not hear what's going on in there, and locks the basement door. In this scenario, "one woman" is living eyes wide shut, and is oblivious as to her inner world, and as to how the outer world affects it. Until "one woman" realizes that this is going on inside her, "one woman" is oblivious to the situation, and no real choice can be made directly by "one woman".

    Time passes. The "TRADITIONAL" magnet subpersonality inside of "one woman", buried in the subconsious, has enormous power in its unknown state. The "TRADITIONAL" chooses a husband for "one woman". Who, you might ask? Someone who the "TRADITIONAL" can relate to...another "TRADITIONAL". (what you resist persists, remember?). Some years pass. There is great love, but also marital conflict. The "MODERN" wife can't relate to the "TRADITIONAL" husband's values, and vica-versa. Don't even bring up the subject of politics...way too hot a topic. They irritate and grate at one another. They both yearn to know someone more similar to who they are. They both do not see that they are each other's disowned subpersonalities, missing in the other.

    "One woman", over time and with work, slowly wakes up and realizes there is an inner world inside her. "One woman" realizes there is choice through the path of balance and embrace. "One woman", now in a healthier scenario at this point in her life, is still more modern. Her primary belief system is still what it is, and her primary subpersonality is MODERN, not TRADITIONAL. However, "one woman" now understands the inner workings of the mind and psyche and the personality structure within.

    Like developing a muscle, she works to develop her inner CHOOSER. This CHOOSER, like any other inner member of society, has always existed, but simply needed to be exercised and fine tuned and worked. The CHOOSER/DIRECTOR becomes a main, everyday component in managing the responsibilities and roles in the inner family of "one woman". The CHOOSER/DIRECTOR turns to the INNER MOTHER, who has been dormant. The INNER MOTHER is finally is strong enough to help the inner family and to see the need to help. She finds an enormous microscope and takes hold of it. It's two times the size of her. She walks over to the basement and unlocks the door. The MODERN subpersonality is right there in the living room, extremely nervous and unhappy and fearful of being disenfrancised. She would like to stop the INNER MOTHER, but the INNER MOTHER is not stopping. Their eyes meet and they both share piercing expressions, though the INNER MOTHER's face is filled with love for the MODERN and knows that she will not harm the MODERN in any way. The INNER MOTHER continues with her goal: she goes into the basement with the enormous microscope. It may be the first time she's been there. It's dark, and in the corner is a vision of someone who is hiding like a child. It is the hidden TRADITIONAL/CONSERVATIVE. It is actually very small, just a few inches tall, but it exists and needs recognition. The INNER MOTHER puts the TRADITIONAL/CONSERVATIVE underneath the microscope, and is now bigger than life. It is truly a conservative; truly a traditional; truly raging and angry at being ignored for so long. Right there, inside of "one woman"...to the surprise and shock of "one woman"...is an INNER TRADITIONALIST/CONSERVATIVE! Holy cow!

    The INNER MOTHER, lovingly, lets the TRADITIONAL/CONSERVATIVE speak, share it's point of view, it's beliefs, it's sadness, it's oppression. The MODERN, out of sight, fears this inner CONSERVATIVE and has a long term inner hatred for it. But, ear pressed to the door of the basement, the MODERN hears every word of the TRADITIONAL/CONSERVATIVE'S story and, for the first time in all of their lives, the MODERN feels empathy for the TRADITIONAL and not threat. They never meet face to face; they never talk and never will, but the MODERN hears the whole story and is not threated by the small person in the basement. As the inner TRADITIONAL/inner CONSERVATIVE continues to get it's thoughts and feelings out, it calms down greatly. The pain of being stiffled has relaxed now. The INNER MOTHER assures the CONSERVATIVE that she heard the whole thing and will definitely take the CONSERVATIVE'S feelings into account, and will. The INNER MOTHER further nurtures the situation by putting on a nightlight so that the basement is not quite as dark as it once was...now there's some illumination. She raises the thermostat and makes it cozy, piles up some pillows from the basement to create a comfortable spot, and takes a blanket and covers the TRADITIONALIST and looks into her eyes and smiles. She slightly opens the curtains to the basement window and lets a bit of light stream in. It's homier down there now. The INNER MOTHER promises to revisit, and will. The INNER MOTHER then takes the microscope away, and poof, even to the INNER MOTHER'S amazement, the TRADITIONAL is again the size of a spec of dust. In reality, that's all it is in size, but it is alive and vibrant, and powerful and magnetic and it was heard and is now content and peaceful. The door to the basement is closed, not locked, though the INNER CONSERVATIVE gladly stays in "one woman's" basement for now, and later, may only occasionally come out. Still, even when or if it ever roams "one woman's" house freely, it's size is tiny. It's impact, when buried in the basement (subconscious) is enormous. Once it's heard, the impact changes. It can have more input into "one woman's life" with the permission of the "DIRECTOR" and the 'INNER MOTHER" and at the acceptance of the "MODERN", or it may stay as little as it is, but now calm and relaxed.

    "One woman's" marriage changes dramatically. The bond between the MODERN in her and the CONSERVATIVE in her spouse changes dynamic, and great respect for one another's differences takes place. It is remarkable. "One woman's" outlook on the world and others changes dramatically. She sees and understands with more respect other viewpoints, even if she disagrees with them. She still takes a stand, but sees value, at some level, regarding the other viewpoint. The inner war between these polar opposites has greatly diminished, and the outer war diminishes proportionally.

    The road to a healthy person has nothing to do with being left or right...not really. The road has to do with our relationship to the spec of dust within that is shouting. Under the microscope, that spec of dust can be given some respect and time to get it's beliefs expressed and to be understood. Then, after the spec of dust is done shouting and knows that it was heard and loved and understood, the microscope is taken away. The spec of dust is still there, but now it is calm and silent. Nothing seemed to change, but everything did change, because the inner war was arrested finally.

    People are either traditional or modern, Republican or Democratic, right or left, religious or new thought, believing or athiest, etc. But, in every person, there is a seed of the opposite view that he/she seemingly finds so irritating. It is an irritant because it is a strong but silent voice in their own padded basement, and when the opposite view pops up in people "out there", it stimulates the spec of a subpersonality "in here" that is longing to simply be heard and understood. That spec doesn't require control...just a voice.

    This is a great challenge to humanity. On the surface, it seems far easier to just have a position and despise the other position. That approach demands nothing of us in terms of being better people; it puts the onus on others...out there. However, the "seek within yourself" approach challenges us all to embrace the opposite. The traditional is challenged to embrace something progressive. The progressive is challenged to embrace the more traditional. Inner struggles are to be embraced rather than left dormant. People may hear what is going on inside themselves and come to peace with their emotional polarities. They will have an opportunity to open their minds and hearts to who they really are, and will have the additional opportunity to more easily accept others for whom they are. For those who cannot love beyond themselves, this will enable themselves to, because the more subpersonalities within themselves that they become acquainted with and befriend, the more they will be at ease with those subpersonalities in others in the outer world.

    I believe in a Creator with Infinite Wisdom. For those who do not, and feel otherwise, nothing really changes in terms of my message. I believe that what is asked of all of us is the mighty and correct task to attempt to reach, within all of us, our opposing beliefs and subpersonalities and to embrace them. I believe that religion, with all of it's wonderful differences and wonderful rites of passage and beautiful rituals and cultures within each religion itself, are all collectively on a mission to do the same, but they express it differently. Balance IS the path. This type of formula...embrace and balance...can help all people of all faiths leap from point A to point B, which appears to be the underlying goal of humanity at it's best, no matter what one believes. 

    All things that humans are capable of are within us. We are capable of utmost beauty and utmost evil. We are capable of creation and destruction. All the supersonalities from holiness to evil lies within us. It's amazing when you really look at it.

    The goal of embracing and balancing is not yet fully realized, but I tend to believe that the goal, at it's core, is to step inward, and all walks of life are trying to attain this. Which, when done, will release us from our personal and collective illusion and can change reality greatly.

    Comments welcome.

    "Balance is the path."

    Please note that this is original content and I am the author and copyright holder. This is original intellectual property belonging to onewomansthoughts.posterous.com.  Use of copyright protected material without permission is illegal under copyright laws.

     

    Filed under: liberal