Search posterous

Search all posts and users. Type a name, type a favorite song title, whatever! See what comes up.
  

More posterous blogs











More recommended blogs »

Here are posterous posts filed under issues...

Dallas says...

Expanding upon the post that I... well posted earlier, I want to make it clear to whoever reads this, and to myself, that... for some reason, like the rest of my family, I never really stepped into the borders of smoking, gambling, or drinking.

To make it fair, my mom and dad smoked. I don't know to what extent, but I know that by the time I was born, they took the responsibility to quit, for my own health, and their health, now that they had a family.

I tend to lean away from social events, not that because I am an anti-social person, who constantly stays home and plays on his XBOX. It's because, I don't tend to follow ideas that most people do. I don't listen to the kind of music that most people do, and I don't follow ideas that most people share. Drinking... is sort of a gray area. People my age aren't allowed to drink alcohol, as it is, but they do it anyways. Have I drank alcohol before? Yes. Did I like it? No.

Some say that drinking alcohol is not so much a taste preference, but moreso for the after effect. If you haven't noticed, beer is FUCKIN expensive, and it's the CHEAPEST of alcohol. Hey, would you look at that, beer is expensive, because here in Canada (or in Ontario, not sure), it's regulated, and can only be served or sold by licensed LLBO or LCBO companies.

If my memory servces correctly to my grade 10 history course, Canada went through a couple of years in the 1900s of prohibition, after many men had become alcoholics after the war. This led to the government completely BANNING alcohol. Did that work? Simply put, no. Not at all. In theory, banning something might eradicate the issue at hand for the first few weeks, but knowing society, we run underground systems. Systems that the government have no complete idea of.

Are these underground systems legal? Not so much. People would have to buy themselves into "bars", to drink alcohol. And since it's already unlawful to drink alcohol as it is... the only law that people follow in those houses, are their own. Meaning people started gangs, and gang wars inevitably formed. Blood was spilled, violence was amongst everyday life, because of the growing obsession for illicit alcohol, and the corruption of the law enforcement didn't help.

Once prohibition was ended, all was well (sort of.)

So back to my main point, alcohol is not illegal. But it certainly isn't my cup of tea. Had it been illegal that I drank once or twice in my life? Yes. But can I be convicted of having HALF a shot of tequila (I am a pussy), or having a sip of smirnoff? I honestly don't know, but I really doubt it. Alcohol really fucks with you once you start consuming it at high amounts. Would I know of that effect first hand... not really, but I have seen people drunk the FUCK out of themselves, and they wipe out. Sure it sounds fun... but drinking to the point where I don't remember anything..? Not my cup of tea.

Smoking cigarettes is another case. Is it stupid? Yes. End of story. Are there adverse health effects to it that can potentially cripple you in the long run? Yes. Would I ever smoke a cigarette in my life? No, because I hate the smell of it, and I hate pretty much everything of it.

Blazing. It's a habit that most people have tried by the time they hit the age of 16. Smoking, blazing, chronic, smokin the ganja, the 'erb, the green, etc etc. We know it, we've seen it, and a good chunk of the population has done it, and is still. Have I smoked at all? No. Will I ever? No. The legality of weed is pretty questionable, and the health effects of it, is also questionable compared to other substances like heroin, cocaine, alcohol, caffiene, and tobacco and nicotine.

Substances like heroin and cocaine, that shit is hard. As in, it will FUCK YOU UP. Hence the huge prices of them, and the massive costs to buy it. Like weed, people can buy cocaine with $10, in a dime bag. According to wikipedia, that gets you 0.1 grams of coke. Where the hell is that going to get you? As a general stand point, weed is allocated in the similar category as these hard drugs, which actually fuck you up badly. Does weed have that much adverse effects on the body like cocaine and heroin does? Not that I know of, you get red eyes, your hands get really numb, and you feel hungry. And just for the record, this is not first hand experience, just experience told by people I know.

Since there's not such serious health effects to smoking weed... you'd say, why not? Why wouldn't I smoke? Is it because it's illegal? No. I'm not saying that I would be willing to break the law at some point (hell, I would even avoid a fight if I really wanted to; I don't like trouble even if I am a trained martial artist), but, regardless of the legality and the criminal status of the green, I would not do it. It's because I have morals. I'm not saying that whoever smokes weed has no morals, I mean a priest could smoke weed, but he is still a saint at heart, maybe not for breaking the law, but whatever.

It's my personal choice, and ethics of my life, regardless of the legality, and effects on my own body. Drinking? No. Smoking? No. Blazing? No.

Do I look down upon those who choose to drink, smoke, or blaze? It's not necessarily looking down, but I tend to see them differently as a person. I don't disrespect them at all, because it's their choice to make, and if they choose to act a certain way, by all means, but as long as you don't fuck with my life. If a friend of mine starts smoking or blazing, or excessively drinking? I tend to be disappointed in them, because I generally make friends with those aren't stupid, and I'm not saying potheads and smokers are stupid, but it's questionable. Disappointment is as far as I get, and I tend to treat them differently, per se.

Illicit drugs are expensive, because they're illegal. There are no laws pertaining to the price of it, just the fact that you have it or not. If I had the chance to deal, I wouldn't. It'd be tempting, but I wouldn't do it. Profit margins in accordance to dealing illicit drugs is huge. To put it into perspective, ground beef per pound, vs weed per pound. Ground beef costs $3 per pound, and weed is on average $3000 per pound. Sure you're not going to smoke a pound of weed in the same time you're going to eat a pound of beef, but that's just RETARDED. Making money off of dealing is CRAZY, but it's still illegal. The same illegal as selling fake LV purses, and pirated DVDs. It's against the law.

Now with that said, I'd like to finish off a quote that I thought of... many years ago. "What's profitable, is illegal."

I'm hungry.

Filed under: issues

Dallas says...

I had posted this on my tumblr earlier this week, mainly because of shifting visions of people, and how quickly you are to notice change.

"As you grow up, you tend to see life in a different way. You meet others, you forget others. You forget the morals that you once held to yourself when you were younger.

You find about the truth about the world, and what you manage to make out of it.
You find out that the world is much more vast, and less centered on yourself.

You find out that there is more to life than the little bubble that you live in. There are other lives that will affect you.

And the morals that you held to yourself at some point in your life don’t mean shit, because once you hit high school, new things occur, and you’ll have to cover your tracks from then on.

It’s interesting watching people you knew as a kid, become what they are now. It’s interesting how different they were when you were 13. They were different, because there was less to think about. Now that you’re in high school, and going into university, priorities shift, and they become a whole different person that you never expected."

Filed under: issues

Terr says...

That’s right. Are you pissed off, over it, fed up, incensed? Well, we want to know about it. PeaceKeeper Cause-Metics, the first cosmetics company to give donations to urgent human rights issues LOVES RIGHTEOUS ANGER…yes, we do. Righteous anger is what has transformed all sorts of despicable things throughout human history.

So, we want to know what you are pissed off about, what you are doing about it, and what ideas you have on how to transform it. Send us a short-ish video using speech, song, poetry, drum-beating, plate smashing and/or any other creative methods your emotions can conjure and tell us what you are mad as hell about that will inspire others to get angry and DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT with you. Of course it would help if you included our company’s name, PEACEKEEPER, in the video. After all, we aren’t going to wait for the next generation to call B***-S*** by its real name. OUR time has come right now!
 
The winner of the best “PeaceKeepers Rant” video will win $1,000 and “We’re Over It” bragging rights! Two other winners will receive a gift basket of PeaceKeeper products valued at $300. So Speak up. Use Your Voice. HEAL THE WORLD. E-mail us your video today.
 
DEADLINE is January 31, 2009. Send your video to info@iamapeacekeeper.com.
PeaceKeeper reserves the rights to use any and/or all videos submitted at any time, and by submitting your video you are agreeing to waive any request for fiscal remuneration.
The winner of the video contest will be asked for one interview and photo session. No cursing outright, if you don’t mind! Modified cursing is always encouraged!

 

 

Filed under: Issues

Go Dutch or Ditch??? Who should pay for the 1st date? http://ow.ly/zZv4 dating sex adult relationships men women issues talk

Filed under: issues

dragswolf says...

Obama: Tribal Nations Conference Just a Start

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Fulfilling a campaign pledge, President Obama welcomed nearly 400 tribal leaders to his White House Tribal Nations Conference on Thursday and assured them that his support of Native issues is genuine and his historic summit is no mere "lip service" to Indian Country.

 

Filed under: issues

Got Annoying Neighbors???? http://ow.ly/woXd badneighbors issues drama

Filed under: issues

Back to Where they grow our junk food

Where they grow our junk food

October 11, 2009

Margaret Webb

{{GA_Article.Images.Alttext$}}

Dave Ferguson grows mostly corn and soybeans on his 364-hectare farm.

CRAIG GLOVER FOR THE TORONTO STAR

Follow the flow of food. That's what any farmer will tell you. Because apples don't grow in supermarkets.

So to get to the root of the exploding obesity epidemic, I went in search of a junk food farm.

Such farms are not so easy to spot. No fields of Dorito bags waving in the breeze, no orchards blooming with soda pop, no soil bursting with 99-cent burgers.

What you do see are vast operations growing the raw materials for junk food: soybeans and corn.

The two crops go into the production of many things: pharmaceuticals, industrial products, animal feed – and inexpensive calories.

Tonnes of soybeans and corn are turned into "edible food-like substances," as food system critic Michael Pollan calls them, used in virtually all processed foods, beverages and junk food.

Last year, Ontario farmers planted 2.4 million acres of soybeans and just over 2 million acres of corn. That's nearly half of all cropland in the province, a near-colonization of Ontario farms by the soy and corn industry.

It has provided an abundance of cheap calories for a food system that operates by Doritos economics. A bushel of corn produces some 440 two-ounce bags of 99-cent chips. Farmer grosses $3.70 for the bushel of corn, Doritos more than $440.

Dave Ferguson grows ingredients for junk food on his 364-hectare farm about an hour west of London, Ont. With no market for local food in his area, he has few other options than to grow soybeans and corn, along with wheat and a little alfalfa.

A portion of his harvest heads to Windsor, to American-owned ADM Agri-Industries Ltd., and to London, to Casco Inc., an affiliate of U.S.-based Corn Products International.

ADM crushes soybeans, producing feed for livestock, which helps make the 99-cent burger possible, while extracting the oil for lards, frying oils, shortening and margarines. Soybean oil is responsible for much of the added fat in our diets.

From corn, Casco produces syrups, sweeteners, starches and oil. Some 55 per cent of the sweeteners used in the food and beverage industry derive from corn. Corn supplies our diet with its sugar high.

Ferguson, a fit 50-year-old, says the demand for cheap food, combined with competition from ever cheaper global imports, has placed relentless pressure on farmers not only to grow these crops, but to expand (Ontario is beginning to sprout 2,000- to 4,000-hectare crop farms, which dwarf Ferguson's and are even less environmentally sustainable than his).

He says the demand for cheap food also puts pressure on farmers "to work every corner, every square inch" – eliminating woodlots, wetlands and buffer strips near vulnerable waterways. He knows that current farming techniques – growing too few crops in limited rotation, with chemical fertilizer, and returning too little organic matter to the soil – is mining his land of fertility, and that the current methods will not feed increasing populations.

Ferguson is trying to turn things around. He is the volunteer chair of the Rural Lambton Stewardship Committee. When he's not farming, he encourages fellow farmers to create wetlands and native grass buffers to protect waterways in the local Sydenham River watershed. Ferguson himself has taken several acres out of production for such "ecological functions" – at his cost, he says, though it's society that benefits.

The Sydenham is a lazy stretch of water that oozes through the last remnants of Carolinian forest south of Lake Huron. It has the greatest diversity of flora and fauna of any Canadian river, including some 80 species of fish and 32 kinds of mussels.

The Sydenham once supplied drinking water to some area communities. But it has turned the colour of chocolate milk. Bacterial levels are high, the water quality too poor for swimming. Some 14 aquatic species have been designated endangered, threatened or of special concern.

Muriel Andreae, co-chair of the Sydenham River Recovery Team and a biologist, can pinpoint the cause of the damage – topsoil erosion and runoff from intensive crop farms and livestock feeding operations, as well as some outdated septic systems. "Nitrogen and phosphorous from manure and chemical fertilizers are big issues," she says, as well as "historically high levels of glyphosate," a widely used agricultural herbicide.

Walk upstream of the Sydenham, or any waterway in Ontario's agricultural belt, and you can find a junk food farm. Turns out environmental degradation and junk food farming go together like fries and a Coke. Or a Coke and insulin.

The Sydenham is just a snapshot of what's happening to waterways around the world. Nutrient runoff from agriculture starves water of oxygen, fish of life, and us of a healthy, once-reliable source of protein.

In all, some $1.5 million in grants have been spent on 240 projects in the Sydenham watershed. That doesn't include the value of land voluntarily retired, without compensation. Not surprisingly, only about 5 per cent of landowners have done so.

Ferguson says farmers alone can't shoulder the expense of caring for the environment. "Until society gets in their mind that they have to pay to get these farms sustainable ..."

"If you want cheap food, that's what you're going to have."

In the 1950s, before farming started to industrialize in Ontario, we spent about 20 per cent of our income on food. Most of us spend less than half that now, less than any other nation in the world.

But we're paying in other ways – environmental degradation, health-care costs and transportation (half of Ontario's soybean harvest, for example, is exported).

Instead of an official food policy, Canada has an unofficial cheap food policy that no one voted for, yet it shapes our food system all the same. It lets private companies largely drive our food system, without paying for health and environmental repercussions. They have had a heyday.

Ferguson recommends a read of the report, "Compare the Share," written by his father, Ralph, a former Liberal MP. The National Farmers Union has produced similar research, "The Farm Crisis and Corporate Profits."

The reports show that an incredibly small number of large food processors, retailers and agricultural businesses are generating massive profits delivering cheap food by squeezing farmers' incomes, forcing farmers into environmentally unsustainable practices – or out of business.

Those corporations also manage to make massive profits from cheap food by cheapening food.

Just follow the flow.

"Unfortunately, there is a real disconnect between agriculture, food and health," says David Jenkins, one of Canada's top nutritional researchers. "We've compartmentalized too long."

Jenkins, a professor at the University of Toronto, is conducting a study of 720 Toronto families to find out what level of intervention is required to get people to eat healthier. He says it's a massive challenge to turn families off processed food and toward fruits, vegetables and grains.

Former federal health minister Carolyn Bennett said the same thing at a 2006 conference on food policy organized by the McGill Institute for the Study of Canada. Bennett voiced frustration at being unable to make progress on health issues because there's no Ministry of Food. Instead, responsibility falls between the silos of government: Health, Education, the Environment and Northern Affairs, which must deal with the consequences of Industry, Agriculture and Fisheries treating food as commodities produced for profit rather than public good.

Jenkins would like to see policy changes: better food labelling, health claims on fruits and vegetables, healthy food cheaper than junk food, government support for farmers who grow good food in an environmentally sustainable manner.

Improving our diets through education and persuasion alone will take decades, Jenkins believes. What's required is an overhaul of Canada's food system through focused public policy. "We're paying too little for our food. We're losing farmers like soil erosion. They're being lost to factory farms. What we're doing is screwing the land and screwing the farmers. It's almost a crime. We've got cheaper food and we've become fatter. We've got pollution closing beaches. We have built ourselves a mini hell and food is part of that problem."

But there is good news in this bleak harvest.

Food is powerful. Change is possible with every purchase we make, in every link we forge between good food and good farming, and in every bite we take.

And instead of an unofficial cheap food policy, we can create an official good food policy.

If we built this food hell then we can also fix it.

Health issues & costs, land & water pollution, extinction of species, obesity, big business, government, farming, your food choices & shopping dollars: an introduction in one article - read it - this progresses into gold!

Filed under: issues

astriddita says...

There are two important things that happened in the past two days in Indonesia.

The first is the West Sumatra 7.6 magnitude earthquake. We are deeply saddened for the losses.

The second is definitely another great loss, but it occured in Indonesia franchise business: few McDonald's outlets in Indonesia had just changed their brand to Toni Jack's.

I figured it out when passing the Bandung Indah Plaza (BIP) and couldn't find the signature 'M' golden arc; instead I saw an ugly green logo of this Toni Jack's. My mind was like, "Are they insane? BIP's McDonald' is like one of the modern landmark of Bandung.. And they sell well there! What is this Toni Jack's that I've never even heard of?"

Apparently it's only a desperate scenario of Bambang Rachmadi, Indonesian owner of those previously-McD-outlets, after McDonald's refused to prolong his franchise license.

And I bet he is totally desperate. He concepted the new restaurant brand as pirate-themed fastfood outlet. With Popeye's still playing in the Indonesian fastfood competition, looks like the pirate will not even be a worthy opponent for the wimpy sailor brand.

But I'm glad McDonald's make the right decision anyway; I went to several Bambang Rachmadi's McD outlets besides the BIP's, and found them to be quite gross. It's the right decision to keep a standard of hygiene and such to your outlets when you are a leading mega-franchise in the world, although your products' ingredients are only carb and fat.

Filed under: issues

astriddita says...

It's funny when we learn that the autopsy of Noordin's corpse reveals that he used to be sodomized.

A Islamic militant? Frequently sodomized?

Are you f*cking kidding us? I haven't found any passage in the Koran that says sodomy is permitted, moreover it's definitely a gay act for Noordin.

There has been many controversies surrounding the terrorist's death, but this one is simply way too controversial.

So here's a theory of mine:

  1. After the July bombing, Indonesian police force promised that they will finish the JW-Marriott & Ritz-Carlton bombing case, bring Noordin dead or alive, before the Eid.
  2. The chief of Indonesian police force, Komjen Susno, was at the same time suspected to be involved in the case of Century Bank's bailout.

Komjen Susno needed to secure his place. First, he needs to counteract the moves of Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK)--who possess evidences of his involvement in Century Bank's bailout case--by weakening them. This is managed to be done by accusing both of KPK executives of authority abuse as criminal act. Second, Komjen Susno realized that he has to win Indonesian people sympathy over him and the police force. Thus the Solo ambush scenario; they probably just kidnapped some male prostitute, kill him, put his body into the wrecked house where other militants were already dead, and claim that the random guy as Noordin M. Top. All these were done before the Eid; Indonesian police force kept their word.

Indonesian president, SBY, gained popularity from the police force 'heroic' act. He is praised by both his people and international leaders for this 'achievement' on war against terrorism. Hence this "Noordin M. faux" identity will unlikely be revealed, and Komjen Susno accomplished his personal mission as well.

Hey, it's just a theory. I'm not a fan of conspiration theories either.

 

Filed under: issues

First in a series of factual booklets describing nuclear power issues for the layman. The author, Dr Colin Keay, is a retired physicist, who advocates a scientific approach to the issues of nuclear power and endorses nuclear energy to save the environment.

Filed under: Issues