Search posterous

Search all posts and users. Type a name, type a favorite song title, whatever! See what comes up.
  

More posterous blogs











More recommended blogs »

Here are posterous posts filed under independent...

Hope is Fading Fast

This is why there is no credible or real opposition from the Republican Party or from the conservative movement as a whole:

It’s been easily a decade since Freshjive did something to truly get collective panties in a bunch. But this new “Hope Is Fading Fast” shirt is sure to have some folks up in arms. The real question is, would you wear it?

Basically, the “Freshjive” people have these grievances against the Obama Administration: 

  • consolidates a multi-tiered “state always wins” system of “justice”
  • continues to assert a radical version of the “state secrets” privelidge
  • nominates a pesticide pushing lobbyist to a top agriculture post, breaking once again his campaign promise not to hire lobbyists
  • nominates Bush’s final spokesliar, Dana Perino, to the Broadcasting Board of Governors
  • breaks his promise to close Guantanamo prison within a year, even as people long known to be innocent still languish there- not to mention an expasion of that other “Guantanamo” at Bagram Air Base
  • protects torturers from accountability
  • and contemplates a massive escalation in Afghanistan
  • Now, contrast that with something from Larry Johnson’s “No Quarter:”

    1.Select government reports to the contrary, the massive failings within the financial regulatory structure with specific emphasis on FINRA and the SEC.

    2. Goldman Sachs CEO Llloyd Blankfein’s confession just this week that Goldman had engaged in activities that were clearly wrong and led to the economic crisis.

    3.I have no doubt that many within our nation believe the Obama administration fundamentally believes in the principle of redistributing wealth via a number of programs. This emphasis on redistribution in one direction while simultaneously bailing out financial institutions leaves a very large percentage of those in the middle and on both sides of the aisle feeling totally disenfranchised. Not only do these people feel disenfranchised, but they feel that the government is not being honest with them regarding its motivations.

    Now, ask yourself this.

    Who nailed it?

    The attack from the left absolutely nails the Obama Administration. The attack from the “center,” which is where I’ll put the above, whiffs and misses.

    Oh, from the right? From the right, you ask?

    Barack Obama and his liberal allies do not even pretend to care that these are anything other than show trials that will end in the deaths of the defendants. It needs to be said—very clearly and plainly—that the reason the Administration decided to avoid the proper forum of a military tribunal for these terrorists is a warped, bitter desire carry out yet another partisan attack against the successful work of their predecessors. And in a sad way, it makes sense.

    If the radical leftists in the White House cannot use this circus to publicly invalidate the eight years of successful tactics and strategies developed during the post-9/11 Bush years, then they cannot easily return to the 9/10, head-in-the-sand, terrorism-is-a-law-enforcement-problem mentality that is their comfort zone.

    No. No, that does not nail it like the attack from Freshjive does. If anything, that makes people want to run out and vote for President Obama, and it isn’t even election day yet. It is much more effective to go with the rule of law than against it, and it is much more effective to go with the idea that a broad international footprint with an overstretched military that is costing us billions works against us rather than for us. And, of course, we already know that the more effective way to fight terrorism is with law enforcement techniques, not with putting several hundred thousand U.S. troops halfway around the globe.

    So far, there are more credible attacks coming from the left than from the center or the right. Sometimes, you just have to play to your base. Like it or not, it did work pretty well for President Bush to play to his base, and to keep them as happy as he could for as long as he did. Despite empirical evidence to the contrary, they still carry water for him.

    Filed under: Independent

    Mike says...

    email is needed...

    Filed under: Independent

    A-side for the independent single released by Men At Work before signing contract with CBS/Columbia

    Keypunch Operator by Men At Work  

           

    Filed under: independent

    nileshbabu says...

    In the days when all doctors were men, all gynaecologists obviously were too. A few may have chosen the specialty for dubious motives but, having done a few gynaecology outpatient sessions myself, there's nothing remotely titillating about it. Most male gynaecologists just have a fascination for the subject.

    This enthusiasm was first documented by J Marion Sims, a bloke who practised surgery in Alabama in the 19th century and is credited as the founder of modern gynaecology. Of one patient with a fistula (an abnormal connection between vagina and bladder) he wrote: "Introducing the bent handle of a spoon I saw everything as no man had ever seen before. The fistula was as plain as the nose on a man's face." You might query his note-taking but Sims enjoyed his work. He may have liked looking, but with detached objectivity not lust. He invented a speculum, a catheter, several new surgical techniques and kept a straight face when a patient "was embarrassed by an explosive sound of air". A true professional.

    There are now far more women in medicine and gynaecology, and you've got a good chance of being treated by a female doctor – more so if you ask. But the sex of a doctor is far less important than the manner.

    Filed under: independent

    philwbass says...

    Check out this website I found at delocator.org.uk

    Enter a UK postcode or partial postacode to find a non-corporate cafe near you!

    Filed under: independent

    mmrpdx says...

    MMR's new sister label Ghetto Quietly launches in Dublin this weekend with a rock solid line up of Prince Kong, Bluefood and A-Force peddling their sonic wares along with various MCs.

    Prince Kong's 'Proper Horror Show' on 2 x 12 inch vinyl will be the label's first release and expect much of the material from this release to feature in Kong's set.

    Dublin based Ghetto Quietly will concentrate on limited runs of vinyl for local artists... thus far: Prince Kong, Bluefood and A-Force. Expect GQ vinyls to coincide roughly with MMR digital download releases for these Irish artists.

    Perhaps not so much a sister label as a bastard cousin.. the one your Mom never wanted you to hang out with as they were from the wrong side of the tracks!

     

    http://www.ghettoquietly.com

    Ghetto Quietly Launch Party

    Filed under: independent

    mmrpdx says...

    Detroit Nocturnes

    This ones been in the works for a long time!!

    Phylum Sinter will be releasing his long awaited MMR debut release in November. 'Detroit Nocturnes' is a fitting tribute to the city that shaped the electronic music revolution that twenty eight year old Christopher Todd grew up to be a part of.

    Watch this space for further details.

    Filed under: independent

    mmrpdx says...

    indiefeed.com

    Ian Neal's incredible 'Kingdom Of The Birds' is now featured on top US music site indiefeed.com.

    'Kingdom Of The Birds' is taken from the 'All In The Golden Afternoon...' LP and was one of the stand out tracks on the excellent Amorphous Androgynous (FSOL) compilation 'A Monstrous Psychedelic Bubble Exploding In Your Mind Volume 1 - Cosmic Space Music'.

    Ian Neal's LP is available from all good online retailers via IODA distribution.

    http://indiefeed.com/2009/10/ian-neal/

    Filed under: independent

    ♥♥ To all of YOU THANK YOU for supporting independent artists!!! ♥♥

    Filed under: independent

       Beware of What You Pick From the Vine

    Now, I am against the idea of marginalizing critics and creating an "enemies list." I don't think you can do such things and still claim to be governing effectively in this country. You can keep tabs on the people who oppose you, and you can certainly hit back at anyone who takes shots at you. I don't think we should expect the Obama Administration to roll over and absorb body blows. I do think we can rise above this sort of thing:

    Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) accused the White House on Wednesday of "street-brawling" with opponents, and said the West Wing's strategy of freezing out opponents amounts to a latter-day "enemies list," a reference to an infamous practice of President Richard Nixon.

    "An 'enemies list' only denigrates the Presidency and the Republic itself," Alexander said on the Senate floor. "These are unusually difficult times, with plenty of forces encouraging us to disagree. Let’s not start calling people out and compiling an enemies list. Let’s push the street-brawling out of the White House and work together on the truly presidential issues: creating jobs, reducing health care costs, reducing the debt, creating clean energy."

    Alexander quoted from a POLITICO article headlined "White House plan: Neuter the Chamber."

    "According to Politico," Alexander said, "the White House plans to 'neuter the United States Chamber of Commerce," an organization with members in almost every major community in America. The Chamber had supported the president’s stimulus package and some of his early appointments, but has problems with his health care and climate change proposals."

    In this post-Karl Rove world, the Republican Party cannot lecture anyone about anything, I'm afraid. Insinuation and political ruin were the favored tactics of Mr. Rove, and, love him or hate him, he has as much to do with the low state of our political discourse as anyone. Years of going for the jugular and hitting below the belt have left people reeling. How do you express your disapproval of what the Obama Administration is doing without being labeled racist or crazy? How do you engage in legitimate dissent and operate from a position of being loyal, yet opposed?

    First, we must acknowledge the poisoning of the well. The well was poisoned by years of opposing President Clinton and by defending President Bush. Vicious attacks, unfair tactics, and unhinged accusations--the slate must be wiped clean. It's a little like looking down into an enclosed arena, and everyone is covered in mud and filth, and trying to say that the people with blue shirts are clean and the people with red shirts are more dirty than the others. Well, no, everyone has some degree of filth on them, some more than others, but the only way we're going to sort this out is to stop throwing the mud.

    Second, we must acknowledge the need to repair broken institutions and reform key aspects of what the government does. This is good for business, you see. No one can go forward with anything until we ease the health care burden on small business and get us out of the wars we are in. We are being bled dry, literally and figuratively. We have an out-of-control ship steering for the rocks. Now IS the time for good government, and our political elites are blind to this fact.

    Third, we must allow for reasonable dissent and we must denounce the hatred on the left and the right. I don't care what stripe you wear on your political underwear, sir--you don't get to hate people just because your daddy taught you to be a Republican or because your crazy aunt taught you to be a liberal. Attack the position, not the person, unless the person it a complete idiot. In that case, attack what they've done. Leave family out of it. I have a tag here called "Incompetence" and it covers stupid things and a failure to do the right thing and know how to do things. It's broad on purpose. You can be incompetent, but I'll still shake your hand and be your friend. I may not like what you do, but I'll still like you. I like President Obama--he's a good guy. I'd be happy and honored to meet him. The same with President Bush and President Clinton and President Bush the older and President Carter. All good guys, like them all, and remember--that's your President, sir. Have some respect. You can disagree, and you can say what you like because this is America. But grow up and maintain some dignity. Yes, you can slip up once in a while when you're mad. I think we all lose our minds when things matter to us. But your basic functioning state should be tolerance and skepticism, not screaming and frothing at the mouth.

    Fourth, quit thinking talk radio is relevant to the discussion. It's not. It's entertainment. Those people just talk that way in order to gin up phony outrage and make people howl. Ignore them and they'll go away because they don't really believe what they're saying--they just believe that they'll make more money if you start hopping up and down and writing curse words on your lame blog, sir.

    Fifth, the Republic has been here longer than you, and it's more important than you, and no one in the government is there to make you miserable. It's We the People, not I am John Galt. Let's dispense with that nonsense. The entire history of human civilization comes down to the rational way in which we organize ourselves into a society based on cooperation and living together, not running around, asking for a government grant in order to start a think tank subsidized by private enterprise that champions the individual's ability to live without government. I've never understood the attraction to Ayn Rand. Alexander Hamilton would have eaten Ayn Rand for breakfast. No one has the ability to ruin the American form of government, not least of which are the people who get to try for their entire lives. Senator Edward Kennedy spent more than half of his life as a U.S. Senator, and never even came close to ruining anything, so that ought to tell you something. President Bush didn't ruin America, nor did any of his pasty-faced underlings. They did the best they could with what they had, and got away with whatever they could get away with, so get over it. They're no longer running things, and the Republic is still here, so grow up. I know, I know--your little blog, lefty Blogosphere in general, not specifically, used to do gangbusters when you would howl about Bush and his cohorts and now, no one wants to read you because of the shellshock. I'm sure you're doing well enough without the phony outrage, but that's neither here nor there. All of your friends are in the same boat, and paddling wildly, trying to negotiate these new realities. Here's a hint--try thinking before you hit publish. It sometimes works for me.

    So, in summary--no, Republicans cannot lecture anyone. Democrats cannot claim the high ground, thanks to how they tread during the Bush years. Everyone, shush. Let's have honest dissent and advocacy, and start anew. Follow my lead, and try to dissent honestly and rationally. I'm not perfect, nor would I say that I was. I think the happy medium is to avoid being unhinged and insane, where possible. I readily admit when my bullshit is refuted. I readily admit my past indiscretions--of course I'm a hypocrite. We're all hypocrites. How a person looks into the mirror and honestly addresses past failures is the key. I own my failures, and I'm here because my heart is in the right place, I believe. I'm here because it's Wednesday, and I don't have anything else to do, actually. Do you need a better reason than that?

    Filed under: Independent