Search posterous

Search all posts and users. Type a name, type a favorite song title, whatever! See what comes up.
  

More posterous blogs











More recommended blogs »

Here are posterous posts filed under hewlettpackard...

travistubbs says...

It's still Friday for about another hour, meaning this post counts! Needless to say, I still have plenty of stuff to give away! If you've missed out on any of my other posts on what's for sale, you can now do that with ease! Just head on over to http://travistubbs.net/tag/2009fallgaragesale. If it doesn't say it's gone, it's still available! So, check out that, along with today's offerings!

IMG_0220.JPG
Product: HP LaserJet 1018 black and white laser printer
Asking Price: $55.00

There's really not much to say about this. It's a laser printer. It prints in black and white. It's not exactly speedy, but does what it does. Still good for those that print out a lot of documents. Just don't expect the speed of a copier. Definitely faster than an inkjet printer, though (once it gets going). According to the box, the printer can print up to 12 pages per minute at 600 dpi.

One thing I want to stress about this printer: out of the box, the HP LaserJet 1018 is NOT compatible with Mac OS X and Linux-based operating systems. This is a Windows-only printer. That being said, there is a small possibility to get this printer working in those incompatible OSes, but it requires a LOT of work and is still NOT guaranteed to work. You've been warned.

More information can be found on HP's web site:
http://www.hp.com/hpinfo/newsroom/press_kits/2006/ipgconf/ds_lj1018.pdf?jumpid=reg_R1002_USEN [PDF]
http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/us/en/sm/WF10a/18972-18972-3328059-14638-3328066-1814092.html?jumpid=reg_R1002_USEN

Original Purchase Price/Date: $85.49 / 2007 Jun 04

IMG_0203.JPG
Product: HP 2101nw Wireless G USB Print Server
Asking Price: $35.00

Let me start out by saying the name of the product is a lie. Let me explain. Although this is a wireless print server, it's not a TRUE networked printer device.

To use the printer wirelessly, each computer must install the Wireless G USB Print Server software (available for Windows XP and Vista, and Mac OS X 10.4 and 10.5 at http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/softwareCategory?product=3662206&lc=en&cc=us&dlc=en&submit.y=0&submit.x=0&lang=en&cc=us). Before you can print, you must tell the software you want to connect to the print server (though the Notification Tray or Dock icon). Your computer will take a couple moments to recognize the printer, at which point you'll be connected and then can print.

Only one person can be connected to the print server at a time, thus if anyone else is connect, they will be disconnected if someone else connects. With this understand, the device is really more of a wireless USB port and not a print server (although compatible HP printers are the only thing that can be connected to this). For a list of compatible printers, head over to http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/document?docname=c01428401&tmp_task=prodinfoCategory&lc=en&dlc=en&cc=us&lang=en&product=3662206.

Outside of it's true functionality, it does work as it should. A printer doesn't have to be connected directly to your computer anymore and can be placed anywhere within range of your wireless router/access point. This is definitely useful for those with space issues.

Check out HP's web site for additional information:

Original Purchase Price/Date: $49.99 / 2008 Dec 29

(NOTE: Original Purchases Prices on all items shown before shipping and tax. Items, if bought together, will have to be shipped separately due to their large size.)

More Photos (if available, more upon request)

Filed under: Hewlett-Packard

Terr says...

CorporateRegister.com is pleased to announce that the full NEWSWEEK GREEN RANKINGS REPORT is now available to purchase at http://www.corporateregister.com/greenranking.html.

CorporateRegister.com played a key role in these rankings, drawing on the resources of our site, our users, and our partners, in order to contribute to what we believe is the first objective ‘green’ analysis of America’s 500 largest companies.

The rankings are a product of a year-long collaboration between CorporateRegister.com, Newsweek, and environmental research firms KLD Research & Analytics and Trucost. Despite the challenges of comparing sustainability across sectors, the team created an overarching methodology to compare firms based on a Green Policies Score, an Environmental Impact Score, and a Reputation Score. 

Companies that topped the rankings include Hewlett-Packard, Dell, Johnson & Johnson, Intel, and IBM, and additional rankings by sector were also clarified. 

The full report, available in PDF and printed formats, features additional details of the findings, including:

  • Proprietary data for all 500 companies in the NEWSWEEK GREEN RANKING.

  • Sector-by-analysis, including an overview of 15 industry sectors, detailed performance data about the top 10 companies in each sector, and each company's ranking relative to its peers.

  • Expanded information about the NEWSWEEK GREEN RANKING environmental reputation survey results, including how a company's U.S. image differs from how it's seen abroad.

The online summary report can be found at http://greenrankings.newsweek.com/.

Registered CorporateRegister.com users can request a discount code for online purchase of the full report. Simply contactinfo@corporateregister.com with subject line ‘Newsweek’ and your username to request the discount code. Then go to http://www.corporateregister.com/greenranking.html to purchase the full report.

Filed under: Hewlett Packard

Filed under: hewlett packard

Nanjunda says...

HP 3Q profit drops 19 percent as sales of PCs and printer ink remain weak

  • By Jordan Robertson, AP Technology Writer
  • On Tuesday August 18, 2009, 9:13 pm EDT

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- Hewlett-Packard Co.'s profit dropped 19 percent in the latest quarter, dragged down by ongoing weakness in sales of personal computers and printer ink.

The Palo Alto, Calif.-based company reported Tuesday that consumer spending on PCs is improving, and business in China was particularly good. Corporations are still being tightfisted, though.

Because of the recession, 2009 is shaping up to be the worst year in nearly a decade for the PC industry. HP, the world's No. 1 PC maker, has been branching out into other areas, like technology services and computer networking, but the PC business still makes up nearly a third of its revenue.

Sales in HP's PC business eroded 18 percent in the three months ended July 31, even as the number of units sold ticked up 2 percent. The discrepancy is explained by the fact PC makers have been slashing prices, a trend that has also hurt rivals. For instance, Wall Street projects a 23 percent sales drop at Dell Inc., the No. 2 PC maker, which will reports its latest quarterly numbers Aug. 27.

HP edged past Wall Street's profit and sales forecasts, and issued better-than-expected profit guidance. But expectations had been high, with HP's stock climbing about 75 percent since March.

Shares fell 96 cents, or 2.2 percent, to $43 in extended trading following the results. The stock had closed earlier Tuesday up 85 cents, or 2 percent, at $43.96.

HP reported after the market closed that it earned $1.64 billion, or 67 cents per share, in the fiscal third quarter. A year earlier the company made $2.03 billion, or 80 cents per share.

Excluding one-time items, HP earned 91 cents per share, a penny better than the average estimate of analysts polled by Thomson Reuters.

Sales fell 2 percent to $27.45 billion, slightly ahead of analysts' projections for $27.26 billion. Sales would have risen 4 percent were it not for currency fluctuations.

Revenue from printing supplies was down 13 percent. One of those supplies -- printer ink -- has long been one of HP's biggest moneymakers, but has been facing competition from generic, cheaper brands.

HP has been reluctant to call a bottom in the PC market, as chip maker Intel Corp. did in April -- one of the first bullish signs about a turnaround in that sector. Cathie Lesjak, HP's chief financial officer, said in an interview Tuesday that PC demand appears to have "stabilized."

Lesjak said the decline in printing supplies revenue was mostly caused by currency fluctuations and changes in the way HP manages inventory at resellers. She said she expects the supplies business to improve over the next couple of quarters.

Analyst Rob Cihra with Caris & Company said despite management's explanations of inventory adjustments, trends in HP's core printing business "looked pretty underwhelming once again."

HP is encroaching more onto rival IBM Corp.'s turf since last year's $13.9 billion acquisition of Electronic Data Systems, a technology services company. IBM went through an aggressive transformation of its own over the past decade, shedding its PC and hard drive businesses as it tried to focus more on services and software.

Services are now HP's biggest revenue and profit generators. The combined HP-EDS had $8.47 billion in services revenue in the latest quarter. It's hard to compare that to last year, though, because the numbers HP has released don't compare directly year-to-year. HP says that's because EDS wasn't a part of HP at this time last year, and the companies are still being integrated.

Aggressive cost-cutting has been a major help to HP's finances and has been a hallmark of CEO Mark Hurd's 4 1/2 years at the company.

HP is cutting 24,600 jobs as part of the EDS acquisition and in May announced a separate round of 6,400 cuts involving workers from the product divisions. HP had about 320,000 workers before the layoff plans were announced.

Looking ahead, the company's fiscal fourth-quarter profit outlook of $1.12 per share, excluding one-time items, is better than the $1.07 per share that analysts were expecting. Its forecast for revenue to rise about 8 percent quarter-over-quarter is in line with analyst estimates.

HP also reaffirmed its full-year 2009 revenue outlook.

The numbers were good and "the guidance is a relief. Their commentary though is what I would focus on: conditions are stabilizing, and some of the cyclical businesses should show a rebound next year," said Jayson Noland, an analyst with Robert W. Baird & Co.

Still, there were "no big surprises, ho hum," he added. "I don't expect the stock to do much one way or the other. (The stock) has been very strong."

Filed under: Hewlett Packard

 


Intel has confirmed that it has been working with Google to develop the just-announced Chrome Operating System for netbooks, a potential competitor to Microsoft's Windows franchise.

 

Read more: 

http://globalitnews.blogspot.com/2009/07/intel-confirms-it-helped-develop-google.html


Related Articles:

http://globalitandbusinessnews.blogspot.com/2009/06/intel-and-nokia-announce-long-term.html

http://globalitandbusinessnews.blogspot.com/2009/06/intel-to-buy-wind-river-systems-for-884.html

http://globalitandbusinessnews.blogspot.com/2009/06/cisco-joins-dow-jones-industrial.html

http://globalitandbusinessnews.blogspot.com/2009/06/cell-phone-that-never-needs-charging.html

http://globalitandbusinessnews.blogspot.com/2009/06/history-and-future-of-computer-memory.html

http://globalitandbusinessnews.blogspot.com/2009/06/google-android-steals-show-at-computex.html

http://globalitandbusinessnews.blogspot.com/2009/06/homebrewed-cpu-is-beautiful-mess-of.html

http://globalitandbusinessnews.blogspot.com/2009/06/us-inquiry-into-hiring-at-high-tech.html

http://globalitandbusinessnews.blogspot.com/2009/05/real-time-web-new-prime-time.html

http://globalitandbusinessnews.blogspot.com/2009/06/cisco-addition-to-dow-boosts-tech-clout.html

http://globalitandbusinessnews.blogspot.com/2009/07/kosmix-tries-to-avoid-google-search.html

http://globalitandbusinessnews.blogspot.com/2009/07/technorati-to-launch-twittorati.html

http://globalitandbusinessnews.blogspot.com/2009/07/hp-web-connected-printer-no-pc-needed.html

http://globalitandbusinessnews.blogspot.com/2009/07/ballmer-all-traditional-content-will-be.html

http://globalitandbusinessnews.blogspot.com/2009/07/google-unveils-sms-service-for-africa.html

http://globalitandbusinessnews.blogspot.com/2009/07/china-google-and-pornography.html

http://globalitandbusinessnews.blogspot.com/2009/07/yahoo-ceo-stop-comparing-us-to-google.html

http://globalitandbusinessnews.blogspot.com/2009/07/google-attacks-heart-of-microsoft.html

http://globalitandbusinessnews.blogspot.com/2009/06/google-facebook-launch-persian-services.html

http://globalitandbusinessnews.blogspot.com/2009/06/is-google-getting-ready-to-enter-ebook.html

http://globalitandbusinessnews.blogspot.com/2009/05/google-they-might-be-little-evil.html

http://globalitandbusinessnews.blogspot.com/2009/05/google-tv-google-hits-upfront.html

http://globalitandbusinessnews.blogspot.com/2009/06/google-to-take-on-amazon-books.html

http://globalitandbusinessnews.blogspot.com/2009/06/google-flipper-is-about-to-jump-out-of.html

http://globalitandbusinessnews.blogspot.com/2009/05/went-walkabout-brought-back-google-wave.html

http://globalitandbusinessnews.blogspot.com/2009/05/five-reasons-to-be-terrified-of-google.html

http://globalitandbusinessnews.blogspot.com/2009/05/google-vp-on-twitter.html

http://globalitandbusinessnews.blogspot.com/2009/05/bing-meaning-but-it-not-google.html

http://globalitandbusinessnews.blogspot.com/2009/06/googles-schmidt-rips-microsofts-bing.html

http://globalitandbusinessnews.blogspot.com/2009/07/singularity-university-launches.html

http://globalitandbusinessnews.blogspot.com/2009/05/google-wave-could-transform-net.html

http://globalitandbusinessnews.blogspot.com/2009/05/google-adds-new-features-for-bloggers.html

http://globalitandbusinessnews.blogspot.com/2009/06/is-this-finally-thin-client-from-oracle.html


Tags:

Google's open-source, Linux-based Chrome OS, netbooks, x86 Intel, ARM chips, manufacturers, Acer, ASUS, Freescale, Hewlett-Packard, Lenovo, Toshiba, netbooks to market with the Chrome OS, Global IT News, Global IT and Business News,

 

Filed under: Hewlett-Packard

Stephen says...

Want To Position Your Start-Up To Be Acquired? Follow These Tips
By Scott Austin, WSJ.com

Last August 2008, Hewlett-Packard Co. signed a letter of intent to pay $360 million cash for LeftHand Networks Inc., a venture-backed provider of storage systems. A few weeks later, Wall Street’s collapse sent the economy in a tailspin and threatened to knock the screws out of the deal.

But after a two-week pause the two sides got back together and in November 2008 closed the acquisition on the same terms. LeftHand was able to hold its ground because it had proven itself valuable well before Hewlett-Packard offered to buy it. H-P had been reselling LeftHand’s software on some of its servers for nearly three years, and realized it couldn’t do without it.

The deal signifies the importance of setting up strategic relationships with possible acquirers, especially in this environment, said the aforementioned investor, Matthew McCall, a managing director with Draper Fisher Jurvetson Portage Venture Partners.

“When your hair’s on fire as a corporation, you’ll try anything to make the pain go away,” he said. “Now’s a great opportunity [for start-ups] to enter partnerships, distribution agreements, and dialogues with larger corporations.”

McCall was on hand at the National Venture Capital Association’s annual meeting in Boston last week to provide some pointers on how start-ups can position themselves effectively for a possible exit. McCall, who says his firm has scored 10 exits in the past 18 months, offered a few “key elements” that have helped his portfolio companies exit the past couple of years:

Form a strategic relationship with a potential buyer.

“Companies that have been successful in this enviroment are great at identifying who the strategic players are out there that would rather see you alive versus dead. Some of our portfolio companies are aggressively approaching them as a sugar daddy, as a protector in the market place.

They’re going to them and saying, ‘We’re going to get a production line out for you, but getting lease financing is very difficult, would you do that for us?’ And we’re seeing some of these guys come up with corporate lease lines for them or helping guaranteeing those lease lines.”

Look at it from the acquirer’s perspective. “Too many people try and sell from the position of fear. Especially in this marketplace, instead of saying, ‘How can we sell this?’ you need to get into their shoes and say, ‘Why do they need to buy it?’

One of our most successful sales in the last year happened because this was a critical piece of the buyer’s portfolio. You could see this was a hot part of the market, that they didn’t have a strong position in it and there are two or three competitors. If you can identify that and position it accordingly, you’re in a great position.”

Identify the alternatives. “If you’re the clear superior company in the market and there are no alternatives, you’ve got leverage. If you’re the No. 2 or 3 technology out there, you can push as hard as you want, but they’re going to push back on you. And then at the end of the day they could buy one of your competitors and could really put you in a bind.”

Make sure at least two mortal enemies are bidding on your start-up. “We had a company that was looking to sell, and went to a potential acquirer and said, ‘If you don’t move now, so and so will.’

They said, ‘Go ahead sell to them, we’d love to kick their ass in the market.’ About three weeks later we engaged their mortal enemy - the two had a Coke/Pepsi type of relationship. Two weeks later, we signed a letter of intent and closed it in six [weeks], at twice the original bid.”

Source.

Filed under: Hewlett-Packard

Stephen says...

The Twitter Revolution by Michael S. Malone, WSJ.com

"Twitter is the side project that took," says company co-founder Biz Stone, 35. "Now it's our chance to do something transformative."

When I arrive at Twitter's headquarters on a recent morning, Jerry Brown is waiting in the lobby, just another day at the world's hottest high-tech company. "It's pretty bizarre," says co-founder Evan Williams, 37. "At least once per day we look at each and say, 'What the hell?' It's like we're living out the script of the ultimate start-up company story."

But other than the familiar face of California's attorney general standing near the steel front door, you would hardly know that this little company of about 30 employees is the epicenter of the Web, used by an estimated 20 million Americans on a daily, even minute-by-minute, basis. Just how fast Twitter is growing is a company secret, but its traffic appears to be more than doubling every month.

The company itself seems calm and casual. The employees drift in, grab some free food and eventually make their way to their desks. It's located in an anonymous warehouse just a couple blocks from South Park, the once-frenzied environs of the dot-com companies of the first Internet boom.

In his sports shirt and slacks, sipping a bottle of apple juice, Mr. Williams exhibits indifference to the trappings of success. So does Mr. Stone, who last year won an Oxford Union debate wearing a borrowed bow tie and a pair of black sneakers.

The company is hiring like crazy, it expects to double its size in the next month or two, and is also adding a senior management, notably new vice-president of global operations Santosh Jayaram, hired away from Google. "We've never had a company that grew past 15 to 20 people," says Mr. Stone, "We're kind of excited about that."

Even faster than Google, Amazon and eBay in their days, the three-year-old Twitter has become deeply embedded in the culture. President Barack Obama twittered the words, "We just made history," on the night of his election. It was a twittered image that first captured the forced landing of US Airways Flight 1549 in the Hudson River.

Scores of people trapped in the Mumbai terrorist attack twittered desperately for help. And in a much discussed event, a San Francisco technology writer twittered his surprise to discover his home was being broken into.

Strictly speaking, Twitter is a social networking application that enables users to post short text messages,  called tweets, of no more than 140 characters on their personal feed. These real-time diary entries can then be read by other users, called "followers," who have subscribed to that page.

Twitter is much more than a novel way to share updates of one's daily life with friends. It's now evolved into a powerful new marketing and communications tool. Regional emergency preparedness organizations are looking at Twitter as a way to reach millions of people during a disaster.

NASA is using it to regularly update interested parties about the status of space shuttle flights. And one journalist solicited help from fellow Twitterers to get himself out of an Egyptian jail. It worked.

The real Twitter revolution may prove to be much more everyday. When I stop for a latte at Peet's Coffee on the way to the interview, the manager tells me that he plans to start sending out tweets to let regular customers know when a table is open. He isn't alone.

A Manhattan bakery twitters when warm cookies come out of the oven. "It's those small stories that really inspire us," says Mr. Stone. "Those are the things that transform people's lives."

Mr. Stone vividly remembers the first time he appreciated the power of Twitter. He and his now-wife had just bought a house in Berkeley and, having spent the day scraping up carpet and painting walls, he was tired and sweaty. "That's when I got a twitter from Evan saying, 'Up in Sonoma drinking pinot noir after a massage.' I just started laughing. That's when I realized that this technology could be entertaining too," as opposed to a basic communications tool, he says.

"It took us a while to figure out that it really was a big deal," says Mr. Williams. It was at the annual South by Southwest tech conference/music festival in Austin, Texas, in March 2008, that the social power of Twitter came home to the co-founders. "I found myself watching groups of people twittering each other to coordinate their actions, which bar to go to, which speech to attend, and it was like seeing a flock of birds in motion," says Mr. Stone.

As with many Web entrepreneurs, Messrs. Williams and Stone took unconventional paths to success.

Mr. Williams was born on a soybean, corn and cattle farm near Clarks, Neb., pop. 361, where he attended the single public school there. In a class of just 14, he took part in everything from sports to band. "In a school that small, everyone does it all," he says.

But he was an indifferent student and felt like a black sheep at home, too. His father and brother loved to farm and hunt, while Evan, a vegetarian, preferred to read and ponder schemes for building enterprises.

Eventually he made it to the University of Nebraska, but he never declared a major, took as few classes as possible, and eventually dropped out. In the years that followed, Mr. Williams drifted around the country, Key West, Dallas, Austin, working various technology jobs and trying to pursue start-ups.

But every time he got started on one idea, some new idea would pop into his head, luring him away and preventing him from ever following through on a project. "It was turning into a constant pattern," Mr. Williams recalls.

By 1996, Mr. Williams found himself back on the family farm, with little money and few prospects. "I was in the dumps," he recalls. He had long worshipped California's Silicon Valley from afar, and now, with nothing to lose, he decided to move there. "Unfortunately, my aim was a little off," he says, since he landed in the farming town of Sebastopol in Marin County, working for the old-guard media/conference firm O'Reilly Inc.

In the end, that proved fortuitous. What began as a marketing job ended up as an independent contractor job writing computer code, and in short order, Mr. Williams parlayed that into freelance work with legendary Valley companies like Intel and Hewlett-Packard. "For the first time, I learned what it was like to work in an office and have a normal career. To be in real meetings. I also learned that I didn't want to do that."

Did Mr. Williams ever feel that there was something wrong with his inability to hold a traditional job? "No," he says. "I always figured there was something wrong with everybody else."

In 1999, Mr. Williams teamed up with another contractor, Meg Hourihan, and founded Pyra Labs to make management software. A much admired product which allowed managers to handle complex projects online, Pyra earned him a reputation as a brilliant entrepreneur who didn't know how to make money.

"The truth is," Mr. Williams protests, "we had revenues from the first day . . . there just wasn't enough of them." It should have ended in yet another business failure -- but in computer parlance, Mr. Williams decided to 'turn a bug into a feature.' This meant taking one of his distracting brainstorms and turning it into a company.

The new company, called Blogger.com -- Mr. Williams invented the term -- which was developed from a note-taking application on Pyra, was the original blog prototype. It proved to be one of the few successes of the era. Better yet, Mr. Williams even managed to nail down some real venture investment just as the bubble burst.

Mr. Williams finally had a real company and real money. Now he needed a team.

Enter Christopher Isaac "Biz" Stone. Raised in Wellesley, Mass., Mr. Stone had an early love for graphic arts and theater. But at the University of Massachusetts, he too had proven to be a distracted student, and when a job at publisher Little, Brown evolved from moving boxes to designing book covers, Mr. Stone dropped out of college.

In the years that followed, he, like Mr. Williams, discovered a natural gift for Web design and programming. In fact, the two young men had admired each other's work from opposite coasts.

So when Evan invited Biz to join Blogger, Biz moved West. He arrived just in time to get the news that Google decided to acquire Blogger. Messrs. Williams and Mr. Stone, neither of whom technically qualified for the CV-obsessed company, were suddenly Google employees.

The gig lasted 20 months and both men say they thoroughly enjoyed it. Mr. Williams even met his future wife at the firm. But the entrepreneurship gene couldn't be denied forever. And in 2005, both men decided to strike out on their own. "It was about the toughest decision I ever made," recalls Mr. Stone, "and if I'd known how high Google stock would go, I'm not sure I would have made it."

Once out of Google, Mr. Williams teamed with another entrepreneur, Noah Glass, to found Odeo, a podcasting company. It was a brilliant plan, until Apple decided to offer its own podcasting application in iTunes. Says Biz, who had also joined the firm, "I remember asking Evan, 'Do you really want to be the King of Podcasting?' And he said, 'No.' And that was it." Looking back, Mr. Williams says, "I didn't follow my gut. I intellectualized myself into Odeo."

Mr. Williams had taken venture capital money to build Odeo and to change its business model, and he had to buy out those investors with a big chunk of his Blogger cash. Once again abandoning the main idea for a sidelight, he transformed Odeo into Twitter by stripping down and selling off the podcasting component and keeping the social-networking tool, the last a concept proposed by Jack Dorsey, now Twitter chairman.

Under the guise of a fun communications tool, Twitter is building one of the world's most valuable real-time information caches. And as Twitter's profile continues to explode, Oprah just sent her first tweet on yesterday's show, many wonder whether the company will ever find a revenue model.

Others speculate about who will buy the young company. Google seems to be the leading candidate. "We know there are a lot of people looking at Twitter right now," says Mr. Stone.

For now, Messrs. Williams and Stone are keeping their plans secret. With patient investors who just put in $35 million in third-round funding, the company is in no hurry. Mr. Stone will only say that "we are enamored with the idea of going all the way." Adds Mr. Williams: "We want to have as large an impact as possible."

Mr. Williams says that the amount of money it would take to buy Twitter right now is more than any company could justify to its shareholders, but suggests three other possible scenarios.

First, that Twitter could go public, probably without him, as he has little interest in running a public company. Second, Twitter could remain private and somehow buy out its investors. Or third, they discover some other option no one has thought of yet.

Of course, there's still one more possibility: Yet another one of Mr. Williams's obsessive distractions, as he calls them. Lately, he's been pondering a way to revolutionize email.

Source.

Filed under: Hewlett-Packard

Stephen says...

Fund manager Richard Parower is proving that it is possible to generate bull market returns even in a tough investment environment.

Parower is the portfolio manager of the Seligman Global Technology Fund (ticker: SHGTX), which recently earned a five-star Morningstar rating.

So far this year, the fund has generated total returns of 15%, outpacing its benchmark by 5.4 percentage points and the Standard & Poor's 500 by 23 percentage points.

So what's the winning strategy? It's pretty simple. Parower sticks to the No. 1, 2 or 3 industry players that can generate double-digit earnings and revenue growth. In this economic downturn, he looks for companies that have defensive cash flow and earnings power.

In addition to constructing financial models and dissecting trends, Parower travels to get a sense of what products and services are hot. In places like India, China and Taiwan, he visits companies, Internet cafes, looks for advertising campaigns and does a lot of people watching to see what mobile phones they use.

Parower recently discussed his investing approach with Barrons.com.

Q: Some technology chief executives have been saying over the past several months that an economic recovery will be led by the tech sector. Do you agree?

A: Generally, I agree with that. I don't want to get too complacent about that though. The reason why we are thinking that technology should lead out of the cycle is the proper application of technology generally helps companies reduce costs and makes them more efficient.

These are usually rapid return on investment projects. For instance, with systems-management software it ends up being a way to reduce the overhead cost of your IT [information technology] department using zero people to manage that many more resources.

Q: Overall tech spending has been on the decline. Where are the bright spots?

A: If we look at the enterprise [side], what has gone on so far this year and to a significant degree last year as well, corporations are being very careful about what they are spending. They are spending on things like security, risk and compliance. We've owned some of the storage names like EMC (EMC) and NetAPP (NTAP).

As this year progresses, the real surprise at the beginning of this year has been this inventory restocking that has gone on in the hardware food chain. They got caught shorthanded in terms of the comfort level of the components they had on hand to meet end demand. It doesn't mean it is getting better, but it has just stabilized.

Q: What are you seeing on the consumer side?

A: The consumer generally is still pretty tough at this point. One interesting thing that is going on with the consumer, and I kind of laugh about it, is flat panel TVs are doing really well.

Q: That's a surprise.

A: Exactly, you would figure in this more frugal environment that they wouldn't be doing that well. But I guess people decided, "Well, I'm going to stay home more, and I want a big TV to stay home with." But really what it is, too, is there has been very competitive pricing at retail and so TVs have generally done pretty well.

The numbers have been good so far this year in the U.S. In China there is a stimulus program that tends to work actually relatively quickly where the government is subsidizing purchases of things like handsets, low-end PCs, TVs up to a 32-inch panel, major appliances such as refrigerators and stuff like that, mostly outside of the Tier 1 cities.

Q: What companies are benefiting from these flat-panel sales?

A: We've owned some of the Asian names: AU Optronics (AUO) is not one of our top holdings, but it is one of our bigger holdings in Asia and they're a panel manufacturer. We've also owned some LG Display (LPL). With demand picking up they are able to crank up their factories more, cover their fixed-costs better. Pricing was actually modestly improving at the beginning of this year.

Q: What's driving security and what are your favorite stocks?

A: Security is one of those areas that if you are a corporation or a consumer you end up having to continue to spend on it, because there are always new bad guys or bad guys trying different ways to hack into your enterprise or to get access to things like your social-security number at home, credit-card information, bank information. New attacks make for a new demand or for new products from the security-software vendors.

We like three of the bigger players in security: McAfee (MFE), Symantec (SYMC) and Check Point (CHKP). One really good feature about that part of the security-software business is that they get their customers to sign up as subscribers. Most enterprises will re-sign with the same security vendor, and so you have this recurring revenue stream that generates nice consistent cash flow.

You still have Symantec, even today, trading at under 10 times free cash flow. You have McAfee, which is a better growth profile right now, trading probably somewhere around 11 times free cash flow. This is for calendar '09. Check Point's earnings and free cash flow are pretty similar, "[but they aren't] as big on the subscriber side as McAfee and Symantec. But Checkpoint is trading at about 8.5 times calendar '09 earnings.

Q: What is a good way to play risk and compliance?

A: In risk and compliance the companies that we like in that space are Open Text (OTEX), a Canadian company. They do content-management software. When a company gets sued now, there are e-discovery requirements. It is not just e-mails, it's instant messages, it's any content across the enterprise. And it is not just finding [the content], it is getting it into a database and getting it deliverable and searchable.

Q: Are you expecting further earnings downward revisions or are earnings hitting a trough?

A: I think we are getting pretty close to the trough here especially, knock on wood, for the companies that we own in the portfolio. We would not typically own a company where we thought we were going to have a negative revision. In general things are stabilizing. The business environment is stabilizing, that's what we are hearing from salespeople, and that's what we are hearing from the buyers as well.

We are starting to hear more noise about M&A [mergers and acquisitions] and that's actually a good sign. Obviously, we saw IBM (IBM) and Sun Microsystems (JAVA). I think Sun was crazy not to take that deal [with IBM] because I don't think there is going to be a better offer.

Q: Do you think Sun is good as a stand-alone company?

A: No. We don't own Sun. We are not very positive on the company. We don't think they're terribly well positioned in servers. They have some interesting products in software, but they don't make that much money in the business and they are not going to be a big player in it.

Q: What do you think about the prospects of Apple (AAPL) as a company and as a stock?

A: Over the past 12 months, we've seen things like the iPhone and the iTouch really start to take off because of the App Store. [The store's applications] can only be delivered to an Apple device, and the Apple devices are very attractive. So I think that model continues its virtuous cycle.

We believe there is going to be new lower-cost version of an iPhone later on this year. There is going to be certainly some new notebook products as well from Apple, and we do think they'll continue to do well. We are still pretty happy owning [the stock] at this point.

Q: What do you think about the flurry of netbooks being released? Is it a growth driver for PC companies?

A: It is sort of a catch-22 for most companies because you are selling a notebook for $300 or $400 instead of selling one for a $1,000. It does expand the market, but a certain part of the market it certainly cannibalizes for companies like Hewlett-Packard ([HPQ) and certainly Dell (DELL).

It is a big issue because Dell is not that good in notebooks to start with. To now have a lower selling price for a product that you are not really competitive in, where all the growth in the market is, becomes a big problem for them.

The one way to play netbooks and get good positive leverage in terms of earnings and revenue growth from netbooks is Acer, which is a Taiwanese company. Quite frankly, we have been lightening up on it some, but it is one of the things that we have played.

Q: What tech areas are you avoiding right now?

A: Communication equipment in general, so the infrastructure guys we are avoiding at this point. The telcos are not buying that much equipment right now. IT services are generally a late-cycle play in technology; that also means that when things start to rollover, it is one of the last things to rollover.

Q: Thank you.

Source. Subscribe to Barron's. Seligman Global Technology Fund.

Filed under: Hewlett-Packard

Stephen says...

Cisco Systems (ticker: CSCO), long a favorite among growth investors, is better known these days as a value investment. Despite worries over the global economy, there's still abundant value in the stock at a recent price of $17.

The company did most of its growing in the early 1990s selling machines, called routers and switches, that connect together personal computers in offices by directing the flow of packets of data. It got even bigger later in the decade as the Internet went mainstream.

Now Cisco would seem to be moving far afield of its networking roots with its $590 million all-stock purchase last month of consumer video camera maker Pure Digital. The company makes the wildly popular "Flip" video cameras, praised for their simplicity and small size. It's sold two million of them since 2007.

The payoff for Cisco is uncertain. But if history is any judge, buying shares of Cisco at just above a market multiple has tended to be a good time to place a bet. At a price-to-earnings multiple of 16.5 times the next four quarters' earnings, Cisco's premium to the Standard & Poor's 500 index is 1.2, well below its premium over the last two decades of 1.5 times, according to Thomson Reuters.

In fact, Cisco is cheap by a few measures. The company had $4 billion in cash on its books and $25.4 billion in investments at the end of the January quarter, and $6 billion in debt. Given that, Cisco trades at about four times the cash on its books, a steal compared to large-cap tech stalwarts such as Microsoft (MSFT), at 9.2 times, or Intel (INTC), at 8.6 times.

While Cisco's sales are expected to fall by roughly 10% in the fiscal year ending in July, there are signs business is stabilizing in its traditional networking market. In a technology rebound, a giant with unparalleled resources such as Cisco is one of the best horses to bet on.

Gone are the days of 50% sales growth at the height of the dot-com bubble, when Cisco held 90%-plus market share of Internet protocol routers and switches. In recent years, as Cisco's growth has slowed, the stock's main value for investors has been as a relative outperformer in a bear market.

What concerns Wall Street these days are two very large initiatives on Cisco's part, the Pure Digital buyout, and Cisco's announcement on March 16 that it will start selling servers this year in competition with Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) and IBM (IBM), each of which resell Cisco routers and switches.

At first blush, both initiatives offer growth at the expense of profit. Cisco's gross profit was 64% of sales last year. In contrast, servers offer a gross profit margin of 20%, and consumer gadgets like the Flip, offer even less. Then, too, Cisco stands to lose an estimated $2 billion annually in router sales through partners HP and IBM, analysts estimate.

But both deals make more sense upon further reflection. Hewlett-Packard has increasingly been selling its own router products in place of Cisco's. So the partnership was already headed for trouble. Relations with IBM are not as fragile as they may seem because Big Blue sells millions of dollars worth of chips to Cisco for routers and switches, so it has an investment in Cisco's continued success.

In both cases, Cisco is trying simply to follow where networking is headed. Where the company once sold machines that sat between computers, corporations today are trying to manage the networks evolving inside of large data-center computer installations.

Cisco can't just sell routers and switches anymore; it must provide the network that's inside all those metal racks of server computers.

As for Pure Digital, Cisco bought the company not just for the device itself, but to gain access to the design and marketing talent on staff at the company, which Cisco needs in a technology market increasingly driven by sales to consumers. "It's really all about creating fantastic consumer experiences, with easy-to-use software, and that's what Pure Digital has done," Charles Carmel, Cisco's vice president of corporate development, tells Barrons.com.

And so Cisco has chosen to bring its expertise directly to those gadgets that would otherwise be "off the grid." Meantime, there are bright spots amid the gloom for Cisco. In a note dated April 5, Goldman Sachs analyst Simona Jankowski argues that consensus earnings estimates are too low for this year and next.

Jankowski believes Cisco is taking share from, among others, Nortel Networks and HP. Cisco's sales will likely trough in the July-ending quarter, she writes.

Selling servers and digital video gadgets represents Cisco's biggest departure from business as usual in the company's 23-year history. While there's little proof either move will pay off, Cisco still has the resources to set the agenda in computer networking and the Internet.

Source.

Filed under: Hewlett-Packard

Stephen says...

VentureSource, the research firm that tracks venture investments in start-up companies, isn’t due to release first-quarter funding data for another week or two, though anecdotal evidence points to a drop in the year-over-year numbers. Venture firms are generally more guarded with their capital these days, and more suspicious of taking new stakes in start-ups.

On April 7, 2009, two technology companies are proving that the most promising and innovative businesses can still attract massive amounts of venture capital.

Fusion-io, a maker of storage drives that recently hired Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak as its chief scientist, announced it raised $47.5 million in Series B funding from a group of investors led by new shareholder Lightspeed Venture Partners.

Fusion-io has received a lot of attention for its flash-memory drive that can transform a low-cost Web server into a high-end storage area network transferring data at far faster speeds.

Fusion-io boasted in a press release that Hewlett-Packard and Fusion-io worked together on a server that used flash technology and became the first to process more than 1 million data transactions per second, a performance that would seriously improve data-intensive operations like order fulfillments or database mining.

That’s the kind of innovation that stands out in a depressed funding environment. Fusion-io isn’t simply modifying an existing product, it’s creating an entirely new way that data is stored at corporations.

Another start-up, online payment-processing company Revolution Money, said Monday it picked up $42 million from a consortium of large financial firms and individual investors. As Dow Jones VentureWire reported on April 6, this company is red-hot because it helps both consumers and retailers immediately save money.

By harnessing the Internet for its payment platform, the company slashes costs for accepting credit cards by up to 75% for merchants, who in turn pass part of those savings on to consumers to drive loyalty. Considering the money and minds behind Revolution Money, AOL co-founder Steve Case is the start-up’s largest shareholder, this business model could produce a sizable jackpot.

These two start-ups are defying the odds as they’re the only U.S. tech companies to disclose a venture round worth more than $40 million so far this year. Other start-ups that have done so work in the energy or health care sectors which traditionally require loads of capital for product development.

In last year’s first quarter, 14 technology companies raised at least $40 million in a single round, according to the VentureSource database.

Expect the median size of venture rounds to continue falling this year. According to VentureSource, the median amount invested in first rounds fell steadily last year to $3.8 million in the fourth quarter, a sign that venture firms are deploying capital cautiously.

The first-round median for the year stood at $4.2 million, the first year it has been below $5 million since at least 2001. The median size of a later-stage round in the fourth quarter was $9.1 million, the lowest since $8.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2004.

Source.

Filed under: Hewlett-Packard