Search posterous

Search all posts and users. Type a name, type a favorite song title, whatever! See what comes up.
  

More posterous blogs











More recommended blogs »

Here are posterous posts filed under hackers...

Uh, oh.  The Chaos Computer Club are back at it and looking to make good on their promise to break the GSM security code.  It’s a good thing Sprint  uses CDMA.

 

This via www.physorg.com via twitter.

 

GSM system about to be compromised http://tw.physorg.com/179479214

 

sent via API

On Twitter: http://twitter.com/physorg_tech/status/6465198655

 

“Karsten Nohl, a research scientist at a Californian security research firm H4RDW4RE, and a member of the Chaos Computer Club (CCC) in Germany, is behind the effort to crack the A5/1 encryption technology used by GSM, and he plans to release the keys publically on the Internet by the end of the year.”

 

Yikes, come down and see us at the Kingsport, TN Sprint store next to Applebees if you are currently using a GSM phone and this story gives you the chills. 

Filed under: hackers

Victor says...

Filed under: Hackers

Andrew says...

Narrator

Our very planet depends on them. Yet they remain nature's most elusive scientific species, inhabiting some of the world's most delicate and daunting academic environments. But thanks to new breakthroughs in high speed cameras and email files, metascientists are finally beginning to understand their mysterious behaviors and complex social interactions. Tonight on Iowahawk Geographic: step inside the Secret Life of the Climate Researchers.

French Horn Fanfare Theme

Fast-cut montage of walrus mating with polar bear, astronomer peering through telescope into neighbor's window, cheetahs chasing penguins on the Serengeti, scientists filling out NSF grant proposals

Dah dat dat DAAAH dat, dah daht duh dah dee-dah dee dah-dah!

Narrator

This is the University of East Anglia in the United Kingdom, home of one of the largest nesting populations of climate scientists in Europe.

Gentle ant's-eye scene of idyllic campus lawn, strewn about with drunken mating undergraduates

Each year it attracts magnificent migratory flocks of graduate students, adjuncts and visiting faculty from across the northern hemisphere.

Shots of jumbo jets landing at Heathrow; herds of climate researchers busily milling at Duty Free shops, retrieving baggage, phoning for prearranged limo service

Within minutes of arriving on campus, the migratory researchers approach the entrance of the Climate Research Unit and perform the secret credential dance, fiercely displaying their prominent curriculum vitae. This signals to the security drone that they can be trusted with the sacred electronic lanyard badge that will grant them entrance to the hive's inner sanctum.  

During the upcoming research season, this hive alone will produce over 6 million metric tons of grant-sustaining climate data guano, but until recently little was known about the elusive genus of homo scientifica living inside. Where do they come from? What strange force draws them here year after year? In order to unravel the mystery, Iowahawk Geographic documentary filmmaker David Burge undertook a painstaking one-week project to finally capture the climate researchers in their native habitat.

In this exclusive footage, Burge warily approaches the hive's security drone, disguising himself as smelly graduate student. Burge has theorized that as a member of the lowest stratum in the hive's social system, the drone likely enjoys partying. He reaches into his backpack and offers the drone a pint of Guinness and a small bag of weed in exchange for the hive's internal security tapes and email files. Success.

The never-before seen security tapes obtained by Burge provide a rare glimpse into the inner working of the climate research hive and its amazing guano production. In this sequence, we see one group of researchers entering the hive each carrying a datum they have retrieved from a distant climate measuring station. This is the cause of much excitement among their colleagues, who buzz around in a grant-writing frenzy.

Infrared heat map film of highly agitated researchers

But there's a problem: as the worker researchers attempt to store each raw datum into the neat honeycomb hockey stick structure provided by the hive's Alpha Grantwriter, they discover that few will fit. The infrared shows them growing cool with fear. This signals the climate researcher's instinctive behavior to begin viciously beating, rolling and normalizing the data into submission. According to Dr. Nigel V.H. Oldham, professor emeritus at Oxford University's Centre for Metascience, this violent data dance is what makes climate researchers unique among breeds of scientists.

Professor Nigel V.H. Oldham

Like other species in the order homo scientifica, the climate researcher gathers and organizes data to lure grant money to the hive. In contrast to those other species, however, the climate researcher has evolved a set of complex violent behaviors to insure any data leaving the hive is perfectly adapted to nature's most lucrative and sweetest grants. It really is a marvel of natural selection, and explains why the climate researcher continues to thrive in any kind of weather condition....

READ THE REST... iowahawk.typepad.com

This piece is referring to the unfolding ClimateGate scandal. If you haven't heard about it yet, don't be surprised. Most media outlets talk about Anthropogenic (man-created) Global Warming (AGW) as if it is already established indisputable scientific fact.

I'm mostly skeptical of claims like this, not because I am a scientist, but because anytime "science" blends with politics - it inevitably becomes ideological (if you don't agree, you are bad), rather than scientific (if you don't agree, that's good. Curiosity about why things are the way they are, is the foundation of science). The fact that Al Gore is the chief proponent of AGW, should be a sign, not to just write off his opinion, but to at least approach the topic with a measure of skepticism. (Political alignment is irrelevant. If Al Gore were substituted with George W. Bush or Dick Cheney, it wouldn't make AGW one bit more or less true, or scientific.) Also, red flags seem especially appropriate whenever any 'science' a) claims to be "closed," or that the "debate is over," (For example - here's the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change Report which argues the opposite) or b) predicts doom and gloom on an apocalyptic scale... "unless..."

And I can't stress this point enough: Whether or not you agree that man is causing detrimental climate change is not the issue. The issue is that AGW has entered the political body and there is already legislation (Cap and Trade) on it being written which will cause drastic changes to our economy. And make no mistake - additional fees or taxes on companies to regulate their carbon emissions WILL have drastic effects. Most notably with regard to jobs, and the poor. Rising costs of energy and products, due to climate legislation will take a huge toll on people who are already hardest hit by lack of jobs and/or poverty.

If we are going to pass legislation in regard to AGW - we had better be absolutely certain that we know:

 

  1. Beyond a reasonable doubt - AGW is a Fact,
  2. How much the legislation will cost, 
  3. Who will pay for it?, and most importantly
  4. Will the legislation address the problem?

 

If AGW is just speculation - why would we need legislation? 

If the legislation will cost everyone a fortune (Important: remember the Seen vs. the Unseen), not just in jobs and rising costs, but also in restricting personal liberty - there must exist no possible alternative.

If the proposed political action will not fix the problem - but will instead dramatically damage the poor and unemployed - then it is an unscientific and irrational policy, and must be rejected.

Remember, once a law is passed to tax businesses or people for their carbon emissions - it is highly improbably that it will ever be repealed even if the 'scientific claims' on which it is based are disproven in the future. Governments do not readily give up taxes.

With that in mind, here's ClimateGate in a nutshell

Basically - some hackers got their hands on a ton of emails between a notable group of climate scientists who are leading the charge for the idea that man is causing climate change through carbon emissions (AGW). The emails reveal many disturbing things, from attempts to manipulate the data to fit their hypothesis, unlawful destruction (hiding) of data contrary to their position, and even spite against other scientists who disagree with their position.

Obviously - if this is true - then it is a big deal given everything we just discussed.

Here are some articles to get you started:

 

 

Filed under: hackers

Mark says...

"Jail broken" iPhones hacked by new virus. (Not really)


http://us.mobile.reuters.com/m/FullArticle/p.rdt/CTECH/ntechnologyNews_uUSTRE5AM3T320091124

Filed under: hackers

Hundreds of Facebook Groups Hacked! http://ow.ly/B42k technology hackers facebook internet news social

Filed under: hackers

Mo Hall says...


(CNN) -- Worms, spam, viruses and hackers -- they're not just for your desktop or laptop anymore. According to internet security experts they could be well on their way into your pocket or purse. The popularity of smartphones -- like the Blackberry, iPhone, Palm and the emerging Droid -- is on the rise and shows no signs of letting up.

details at link ...

Filed under: Hackers

D says...

Previously I mentioned I was invited to enroll in Harvard's Personal Genome Project. They take "informed consent very seriously." I am impressed with their frankness. They do not sugar coat anything.  They are very clear that there are no known benefits in participation. Being a participant in this study could potentially result in very bad consequences:  No privacy, no anonymity, insurance and employment nightmares AND the potential to be framed scifi-style in a criminal act... To all of this I say "YES PLEASE!"

The eligibility entrance exam can take anywhere from 50 to125 minutes to complete, not considering time spent taking the the exam over and over if one needs to: only a perfect score indicates "informed" and "knowledgeable" about rights, risks and benefits as a participant. 

Participants are also expected to answer questions on genetic material, gene transmission, gene expression, gene regulation and the potential relevance of genetics knowledge to society. I appreciate this inclusion. Not all scientific studies provide information about the science, let alone care that study participants know about the science they are participating in. A study guide is provided.

some Detail:

As noted, I relinquish hope for privacy:

PGP results will be published on publicly accessible websites. Although the PGP plans to implement standard security measures for the websites, the PGP does not guarantee that your personal data will remain confidential or that you can maintain your anonymity. When you consider that your PGP results will document your genome, hair and eye color, height, facial features, and unique medical conditions, it becomes clear that the PGP must warn participants that promises of anonymity are neither realistic nor ethical.

A flak jacket isn't body armor:

Even when strong security measures are in force, breaches happen. Hackers could gain access to your personal data; computers could get stolen; researchers or participants could unintentionally expose data that reveal more personal information than they intended.  In addition, computer forensics experts can sometimes retrieve data that have been deleted from computer hard drives. So, even if you request that all your data be removed from the project databases, it is impossible to confirm that the data were fully removed.

But put on a happy face anyway:

Because of these issues, the PGP [Personal Genome Project] cannot promise permanent confidentiality or anonymity. To participate, you should be comfortable with this fact.

They also take the silver lining off of the Genetics Information Nondiscrimination Act: it doesn't mean much for my future. Just as The Law doesn't do much for me socially:

Another risk associated with personal genomics is that an insurance company could refuse to cover you if your DNA shows that you have a genetic propensity for a disease, or an employer could refuse to hire you because providing health benefits could be too expensive. Genetic discrimination is against the law in the United States since President George W. Bush signed into law the Genetics Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) in May 2008. The law doesn't cover life, disability, or long-term care insurance, however, and has other shortcomings according to some bioethics experts. Plus, it's unrealistic to think that genetic discrimination won't occur, simply because it's against the law.

And then some reminders: (1) the researchers are human (2) machines are not always accurate (3) I am human:

... you should keep in mind that mistakes happen. The sequencing results, or the data that are posted on websites, could contain errors. The psychological impact of errors could be significant. If the project or some third party (possibly erroneously) claims that you have a predisposition to a debilitating disease, you shouldn't overreact. You should consult a physician or a licensed genetic counselor.

I think my favorite part so far is that they will try to make a new, immortal me:

Scientists will perform DNA sequencing on the tissue samples and use them to study biological characteristics, DNA, RNA (gene expression), physical traits, and the presence and characteristics of micro-organisms in the specimen sample. Scientists may also attempt to create a living tissue sample known as a cell line. Cell lines provide a renewable supply of your cells and DNA.

Brevity on the genetics portion: to emphasize unintended consequences of gene sequencing, I was to answer how researchers could tell if one of two parents was not a biological parent during routine screening. Oh, also, I messed up on simple math. Or the punnet square. Same diff. Or, I chose the default answer inadvertently. For this I will never know the truth. Still, note for next time: move the arrow away from the "ok" button immediately.

> Passed the exam. Submitted. Now awaiting results. Three possible scenarios: 1. accepted, 2. wait-listed, 3. rejected.

Personal Genome Project:  http://www.personalgenomes.org/participate.html GINA: http://www.genome.gov/24519851

Filed under: hackers

unugurn says...

Visual IP Trace 5.0c: Trace hackers and suspects, validate websites, report Internet abusers http://bit.ly/HeqL2

Filed under: hackers