going off the grid ... part 4
so ... finally I managed to install the solar panels on top of the caravan.
so ... finally I managed to install the solar panels on top of the caravan.
The Fisker Karma
This one is blue, but it’s actually green, and it’s a Fisker.
Never heard of it? Neither had I, until I was stumbling through another confusing day on the Internet. Sounds like someone remembered how to build, market, and sell to the American people:
Fisker Automotive plans to fire up its production line in May and have the first Karma plug-in hybrids in showrooms by September.
Founder Henrik Fiskerrevealed the production version of his superluxe car here at the Los Angeles Auto Show and said the first customers will be driving them by this time next year. Some 1,500 people have placed orders for the $87,900 Karma plug-in hybrid, which will be built in Finlandby Valmet Automotive. Fisker said he wants to have as many in driveways as possible by the end of 2010, but some who have already placed deposits may have to wait until 2011.
“The line at Valmet starts in May,” he said. “We’ll see how fast we can ramp up production. What I can say is if you haven’t placed an order by now, you won’t see a car until 2011.”
Fisker Karma Interior (experience tells me this would be an excellent car to use while Ghost Riding the Whip)
Fisker says the company is currently crash testing cars on its own. Federal crash testing will begin once the production line starts. And though he’s still got a lot of work to do if the company is to hit its goal for the Karma, Fisker is already looking ahead to several new models.
Fisker says project engineering for Project Nina, his mid-sized plug-in hybrid sedan, will begin in January now that the Department of Energy has approved a $528.7 million loan to help get the car built.
“The DOE loan means we’re stepping in the accelerator yet again,” Fisker said.
Nina will be built entirely in the United States at a former General Motors plant in Wilmington, Delaware, that Fisker Automotive bought in October. The company will spend $175 million refurbishing the plant to build the car. Nina is slated to cost $39,900 after the $7,500 federal tax credit for EVs and plug-in hybrids. Fisker says Nina will see production in mid-2012 but we won’t see what it looks like for another year or so.
I’m all for giving them a loan, provided there’s a viable business model there in order to get the money back, with a slight bit of interest added on, of course. Just the fact that there are plans to build them here in this country, fine and dandy with that as well. Now, given that no one has any money, we’re in debt up to our eyeballs, and treading water with an overabundance of cars flooding the American market, you have to admire the chutzpah in starting a car company. The only people who will be able to afford these cars are whoever just won American Idol and government contractors and neither are a reliable economic indicator.
Would I buy one? Sure. This thing looks amazing. I’d want to drive one, but yes. I think I would buy one.
nown as Oyster, the device has been officially launched by Scotland's First Minister Alex Salmond MP, MSP at the European Marine Energy Centre (EMEC) in Orkney.
It is currently the world's only hydro-electric wave energy device producing power and is now producing power by pumping high pressure water to its onshore hydro-electric turbine. This will be fed into the National Grid to power homes in Orkney and beyond. A farm of 20 Oysters would provide enough energy to power 9,000 three bedroom family homes.today I built the controller box for the system;
I finished today the frame for the solar panels and mounted the three modules on top.
last years subject of sustainable development and especially the part about green energy and building inspired me very much.
Fish inside of a caulking tube
If you have spent time on the water in the blue water part of the oceans on this Earth, you'll know what I'm talking about when I speak of debris. I have never seen what is described here, but it sounds awful:
In this remote patch of the Pacific Ocean, hundreds of miles from any national boundary, the detritus of human life is collecting in a swirling current so large that it defies precise measurement.
Light bulbs, bottle caps, toothbrushes, Popsicle sticks and tiny pieces of plastic, each the size of a grain of rice, inhabit the Pacific garbage patch, an area of widely dispersed trash that doubles in size every decade and is now believed to be roughly twice the size of Texas. But one research organization estimates that the garbage now actually pervades the Pacific, though most of it is caught in what oceanographers call a gyre like this one — an area of heavy currents and slack winds that keep the trash swirling in a giant whirlpool.
Scientists say the garbage patch is just one of five that may be caught in giant gyres scattered around the world’s oceans. Abandoned fishing gear like buoys, fishing line and nets account for some of the waste, but other items come from land after washing into storm drains and out to sea.
Plastic is the most common refuse in the patch because it is lightweight, durable and an omnipresent, disposable product in both advanced and developing societies. It can float along for hundreds of miles before being caught in a gyre and then, over time, breaking down.
These giant whirlpools are where the garbage itself becomes encrusted with organisms and turned into floating carriers. As the organisms grow and multiply, their weight sinks the debris slowly, causing it to go down far enough to kill what it is on it and shed what is on it and then pop back up to the surface to do it all over again:
There are researchers trying to do comparative analysis of this problem:
Charles Moore found the Pacific garbage patch by accident 12 years ago, when he came upon it on his way back from a sailing race in Hawaii. As captain, Mr. Moore ferried three researchers, his first mate and a journalist here this summer in his 10th scientific trip to the site. He is convinced that several similar garbage patches remain to be discovered.
“Anywhere you really look for it, you’re going to see it,” he said.
Many scientists believe there is a garbage patch off the coast of Japan and another in the Sargasso Sea, in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean.
Bonnie Monteleone, a University of North Carolina, Wilmington, graduate student researching a master’s thesis on plastic accumulation in the ocean, visited the Sargasso Sea in late spring and the Pacific garbage patch with Mr. Moore this summer.
“I saw much higher concentrations of trash in the Pacific garbage patch than in the Sargasso,” Ms. Monteleone said, while acknowledging that she might not have found the Atlantic gyre.
Ms. Monteleone, a volunteer crew member on Mr. Moore’s ship, kept hoping she would see at least one sample taken from the Pacific garbage patch without any trash in it. “Just one area — just one,” she said. “That’s all I wanted to see. But everywhere had plastic.”
Yes, it is everywhere. It sounds like the Pacific Ocean truly has a problem with this trash. Finding a way to clean it up and turn the plastic into something that can be safely disposed of is a problem we could try to solve with better technology. An organization called Project Kaisei, cited in the article, is looking for a viable way to study this debris and use the material positively and wisely.
Oil Rig Fire, Timor Sea
In case you haven't heard, there's an oil rig on fire in the Timor Sea:
An oil spill disaster that could rival the impact of the Exxon Valdez is playing out tonight off the coast of Australia. For 10 weeks, a crippled deep-water oil rig has been leaking millions of gallons into the ocean between Australia's northwest coast and the islands of Indonesia. It is bringing to light the possible environmental impact when offshore drilling goes wrong, as CBS News correspondent John Blackstone reports. With explosive gas spewing into the air and thousands of gallons of oil pouring into the water each day the spill began claiming sea snakes, birds and dolphins. The blowout is thought to have been caused by a fracture in a pipe 8,000 feet beneath the sea floor. Again and again over two months the Thailand-based company that owns the rig tried and failed to plug the well. "We remain committed and resolved to achieve our goal," said Jose Martins, chief financial officer of the company, Pttep Oil. "That may require a few more attempts." Just how much has spilled is uncertain. Environmental groups say satellite photos show its spread across more than 9,000 square miles and estimate some 9 million gallons have poured into the ocean - nearly as much as the 11 million gallons that escaped from the Exxon Valdez in Alaska.
While there may be some use of this symbolic image to try to slow down offshore drilling, you have to remember that the defenders of offshore drilling are going to attack this issue in several different ways. First, they may point out that the state of the art technology used by the oil rig is different from the state of the art technology we might be using off the coast of Florida or Texas. Second, they may point to it as an isolated incident, blown up out of proportion to how safe and reliable offshore drilling really is. Third, there is always the fact that oil and natural gas has always leaked into the ocean naturally, through deep fissures in the ocean floor. Even though I'm not a geologist, and I have never had occasion to pretend to be one to get a government loan, I do know that you can certainly fudge the amount of oil that it is possible to extract from a site. That might be another argument against banning or slowing down the expansion of offshore drilling.
Then there is an entirely different angle that I am afraid they might use, and that's the angle nearly everyone uses to attack anything Australian, and that's the "drunk Aussie" angle. This is so wrong, I hesitate to bring it up. The image of smash-drunk Aussies, dancing around a neglected bonfire, shooting guns and throwing fat girls into the ocean springs to mind.
Let's be brutally honest--the Australians are a bunch of drunken louts. They're not as bad as the Russians, but, bear in mind, a lot of Russians emigrate to Australian because their livers can't take the vodka anymore, and they move on to that weak Australian beer they serve down there. There's a term for this type of individual by the way, and it's "yabbo." When you think of a drunken Australian, dropping his freshly-trimmed short pants and howling into a rolled up sheet of aluminum like it is a ten dollar megaphone, think of the hateful implications of assuming that a rollicking yabbo party on the main deck of the oil rig, complete with Radio Birdman songs and sex dolls cavorting with wallabies, caused this disaster. Don't give in to the hate. Incompetence is a disease, and, brother, that disease has taken hold in Australia.