Search posterous

Search all posts and users. Type a name, type a favorite song title, whatever! See what comes up.
  

More posterous blogs











More recommended blogs »

Here are posterous posts filed under government...

I don't know what else to add. The Salahis may very well be supporters of President Obama. Too bad their quest for fame and for status have inadvertently cheapened the office of the presidency. Too bad their actions have exposed a glaring fault in the way that the Secret Service is protecting the President. I don't think anyone--anyone--could have gotten this close to President Bush by lying their way or bluffing their way past a Secret Service check point. And then to stand there, and shake his hand, while he stands next to another head of state?

Where is your shame, ma'am? Where is your sense of personal shame and responsibility? Do you have no idea what you did? Are you that irresponsible and childish and caught up in yourself that you can't think past your own cloying attempt at getting on a television show or elevating your status in the rarified air of D-list Washington D.C. celebrity?

What makes this different is that it happened at the White House. At a political function elsewhere in the country? Still not good, but that places the story in a slightly different context. This was a state dinner where an important ally, India, was feted. And how do you think they feel, given the past year of heightened anxiety in India after the Mumbai attacks, to see that these cheap, unsavory people were able to get this close to the President and their Prime Minister?

This was a stunt gone awry, and it happened because of a sickening quest for fame and attention and status. If I were the President, I would wonder what the hell is going on with the Secret Service. I would expect people to be fired or disciplined here. I don't think a reasonable American would conclude that this was a harmless gatecrashing prank or something funny. I think this was a very serious breach of security, happening at a very tense time in American history.

Filed under: Government

One of these people wasn’t invited to the Ball, and no, I’m not talking about Joe Biden

Really, what’s going on in Washington D.C. these days? I refuse to go there. It’s just not my thing anymore.

Attention whores always annoy me (the blonde, not Joe Biden, by the way).

A couple in the running for a spot on the reality television show “Housewives of Washington” may have crashed the state dinner last night at the White House, the Washington Post reports.

Tareq and Michaele Salehi were not on the invite list, according to a White House official, but posted pictures of themselves at last night’s event to their shared Facebook page.

One of the pictures shows them with White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, described as “Ron Emanuel” in the caption.

I have the photo—why doesn’t CBS News? Are they that lazy?

U.S. Secret Service spokesman Ed Donovan told CBS News that initial findings suggest a Secret Service checkpoint at the party “did not follow proper procedures” and may have permitted them admission to the dinner.

The spokesman says the Secret Service Office of Professional Responsibility has been directed to conduct “a comprehensive review” of the incident.

But Donovan is emphatic in stating that the Salahis, “went through magnetometers and other levels of security, as did all guests attending the dinner.”

Wow. And there’s a pretty good chance they weren’t the only ones. But, to be fair, the Salahis have been photographed with President Clinton, Prince Charles, and a host of other Washington D.C. luminaries—even John McCain, if you can believe it. They’re not exactly nobodies and they’re not exactly “reality show” fodder. They’re more like B-list or C-list Washington D.C. flunkies. They’re not Omarosa, in other words, begging for clothes and hustling for attention. 

Do we even have a Secret Service anymore? Is the President being guarded by a bunch of thick-necked Pinkertons?

Oh, and yes. Yes, they are a bit unsavory:

Even before their brush with reality TV fame, the couple had gained some notoriety for a long-running feud with Tareq's parents, Dirgham and Corinne Salahi, over control of the family's Oasis Winery in Hume, Va. Last year, Tareq accused his mother's attorney of punching him; the lawyer was found not guilty. Court records show that Oasis filed for bankruptcy in February, with Tareq listed as "debtor designee." A note on the winery's Web site Wednesday promised a reopening for business in 2010.

The America's Polo Cup has also endured controversy, last year drawing a lawsuit from a Middleburg caterer over alleged non-payment. That suit remains unresolved.

Definitely NOT A-list material.

Filed under: Government

  What do you do for money, honey?

There is a non-scandal brewing over the choice of words used to describe Louisiana Senator Mary Landrieu. Apparently, some talk radio hosts used a shocking term for her, and the liberal media jumped all over it like catnip. Cue the phony outrage:

Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh make deeply offensive comments on a near-daily basis on their respective radio programs. Mostly, I don't feel the need to draw attention to them. But yesterday both men crossed into completely unacceptable territory. Followers of the health-care debate will know that Louisiana Senator Mary Landrieu is high on the list of moderate Democrats who may ultimately vote against the bill. On Saturday, she was the second-to-last senator to lend her vote to a motion to open debate on the bill. Part of her motivation to consent came form a concession she successfully extracted from leadership $300 million to pluga gaping hole in Louisiana's budget, a state still suffering in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina and the botched emergency response to that crisis. The formula that determines federal Medicaid funding counted one-time post-Katrina aid to Louisiana as an increase in household income, thus causing the budget shortfall. The funds will help cover medical costs for the poor and uninsured, which, in part thanks to Katrina, Louisiana has in spades. Landrieu says that Louisiana's Republican Governor Bobby Jindal had explicitly asked her to pursue these funds. Sources on Capitol Hill confirm that Jindal had been pressuring Landrieu on the issue for months.

Such a deal shouldn't be a surprise. Like it or not, it's routine practice on Capitol Hill to trade your vote for something that helps your state. That's just the cost of doing business in D.C. And yet Landrieu's actions prompted Beck and Limbaugh to call her a prostitute. Beck likened her to a high-class hooker, saying, "She may be easy, but she ain't cheap." Limbaugh dubbed her "the most expensive prostitute in the history of prostitutes." (Keep in mind though, that Landrieu still hasn't committed to voting for final passage of the health-care bill. She's openly declared that she still has reservations about the bill. Saturday's vote was simply about opening debate.)

What that makes here is a whore, not a prostitute. A whore has no scruples, and will do anything to get something from someone--hence, Landrieu is a whore for attention, and wants whatever she can get, and, like Lucy with the football, she'll take everything they give her and promise the moon and then give everyone the high hat. A prostitute has sex with people for money. Radio talk show hosts are whores for ratings. Everything they do is designed to create phony issues. Anyone who takes them seriously is not a serious person, in and of themselves.

The problem is, whore sounds worse than prostitute, and men can certainly be whores. Man-whores abound in places like Washington D.C. and you can scarcely go a few blocks without running over someone who is willing to whore themselves out to a lobbying firm, a head of state, a media company, or a tourist. We have a huge problem with men and women whoring themselves out for cash in Washington D.C. Don't hold your breath--no one cares and no one is doing anything about it.

It's never a nice thing to call someone names, however. It would be better if the good Senator simply acted like a responsible steward of her responsibilities and voted according to her own convictions. Did she have an internal struggle with the idea of voting to get money that might, in the long run, be better spent or not spent at all? Did she put self-interest ahead of the good of the country? She is there to represent her constituents; that she traded her vote to help them is what it is, and that is, a transaction for money. We sometimes put politicians in jail for that sort of thing, or perhaps I have that backwards. Can you trade your vote for money? Can you sell your vote as a U.S. Senator for $300 million dollars, even if none of it goes to you? Because, I can guarantee you, if $300 million dollars goes back to the state of Louisiana, a very small chunk of that is going to go right back to Landrieu is some way, either as a donation to her re-election campaign, as funds spent on something that benefits her business interests, or to hire people who will then owe her some sort of patronage favor.

All of her previous statements about honor and integrity are now the most laughable form of hypocrisy. She can be bought with legislation, and I guess that makes us a Republic.

Filed under: Government

CB Radio Setup

I have to admit that, while coming of age and being a man in the 1970s, I engaged in some rather unsavory behavior. I wrecked a lot of women. I slept with a lot of sports cars. I ate a lot of meat. I talked on the C.B. radio.

Father became enamored the the C.B. radio when he discovered that, relatively cheaply, he could put a C.B. radio inside of the cab of each of the riot control vehicles we were selling and turn, through the miracle of communications, six vehicles into a coordinated, powerful, crowd-flattening juggernaut.

That meant that all of us boys, and my sister Diedre, had to learn how to properly enter a C.B. radio network, use the appropriate 10-whatever codes, and properly leave the network by signing off. For example, for me to call up Father and tell him that the transmission was out on one of our R-362 Crowd Sweeper vehicles, I would have to ask for permission to enter the net. I would have to say something like,

10-41 [radio test], this is Sugar Foot, over (Sugar Foot was my “handle”).

Father would reply,

10-4, Sugar Foot, this is Tater Tot (Father’s “handle”). 10-67(prepare to copy message), 10-8 (stand by).

An hour or so would go by. I’d do a 10-41 again, and then Father would wake up and holler at me in the clear.

These lengthy harangues in the clear, abandoning all pretense of using 10 signals, would inevitably end up being recorded by HAM radio operators all over the Northeastern United States. For years, during the 1980s, Father’s lengthy diatribes were handed around at trade shows and exchanged via mailing lists. He is widely credited with inventing the words “Fuck Stick” and “Pigeon Fucking Toad.”

I can certainly see how this exact same thing could have happened to former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin:

[…] a few years later the young Sarah became enamored of Todd Palin, a quiet boy who’d moved to town to play basketball at the high school. He drove Sarah to practice. He owned both a car and a truck. He was polite. Her family approved. All was great.

But with four teenagers in the Heath household, calls to members of the opposite sex on their single phone line were banned. Sarah and Todd found a way around this when they discovered that if they stood on their respective back porches they could talk to each other on the VHF radios he used on his fishing boat in the summer.

They talked that way for months – until they discovered that the commercial trucks barreling through towns could hear them.

Instead of love, I experienced nothing but abuse on the C.B. radio. And, just like poor Miss Palin, the haters were listening and recording my conversations. Somewhere, those love notes over the open frequencies were recorded by horny truckers, and put on cassette tapes, and filed away. For her sake, I hope they don’t pop up at the next Republican National Convention.

I have a blog, and God, I love my blog. I love it MORE than my children, sir. As God as my witness, yes, yes I do...

Filed under: Government

Finne says...

This Man Cannot Be Trusted.

He is like a jew in Israel, he does what he likes, whenever he wants.

And he is following USA like a deaf and blind man without a stick.

Filed under: government

You know, when people say that we really have gotten “change” since President Obama took over, I always laugh and call them names. Well, not really. But I do laugh. I do note that President Obama is maintaining a perfect “C” average. He is never really doing the right thing, never doing anything entirely wrong, and is still getting by on looks, rhetoric and speeches when he should be burying the Republican Party with answers, solutions, programs, and achievements.

I have noticed that, if you happen to point out that one of his friends is a corrupt individual, they will cut you to pieces and destroy you—shades of Karl Rove—and they will get away with it because we have little or no functioning or working media anymore:

A GOP congressional report accuses the White House of doing favors for Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson, a former NBA star and prominent ally of President Barack Obama.

The report was spearheaded by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), the ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, and Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), the ranking member of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

The investigation also found evidence that D.C. schools chief Michelle Rhee handled “damage control” after allegations surfaced of sexual misconduct against Johnson, her now-fiancé.

The probe was launched after an AmeriCorps inspector general, Gerald Walpin, was abruptly fired in June by White House lawyer Norm Eisen. Walpin, who was appointed to his position during the Bush administration, was pursuing allegations that Johnson misused some of the $800,000 in federal AmeriCorps money provided to St. Hope Academy, a nonprofit school he headed for several years.

Among the accusations: AmeriCorps-paid volunteers ran personal errands for Johnson, washed his car and engaged in political activities.

Walpin’s firing caused an uproar, with his defenders arguing that his removal was politically motivated and that Walpin was an effective watchdog who blew the whistle on the president’s friends and pet causes.

You have to be fair and cite the fact that Republicans in Congress acquiesced to far too much of what Rove did in their name, and you have to accept the criticism that they are without credibility on this issue. As I pointed out when Walpin was fired, they destroyed the man, personally and professionally:

When you hear Mr. Walpin’s side, you come away with a different view:

“Anybody who’s heard me speaking more than I’m used to speaking on radio and TV in recent days, obviously under great pressure from what happened would clearly know that I know what I’m saying and what I’m doing and I’m not incoherent,” Walpin told POLITICO. “There’s nothing confusing about malfeasance and there’s nothing confusing about what appears to be the fact that they terminated me because I was doing my job because the White House wanted to protect people who proclaim they are friends of the White House.”

Walpin said he did recall a board meeting where he became frustrated over “constant interruption…consistently breaking up my organization.”

Asked about the May 20 session, Walpin said, “It’s certainly possible at that meeting I had a bug and was tired. I can’t remember right now…All I can say is this is a weak reed to now be relying on.”

Walpin said he worked full-time in the Washington office for his first two years as inspector general and only began “teleworking” from New York after members of his staff convinced him to withdraw a resignation he tendered in January. He said he ran his plan to telecommute by the corporation’s acting CEO and general counsel, who had no objections.

“This is an afterthought,” Walpin said. “The problem isn’t that I’m not there. The problem is that I’m too much there.”

Walpin has alleged in recent interviews that his removal appeared to be in retaliation two reports he recently produced. One faulted a political supporter of Obama who is now mayor of Sacramento, Kevin Johnson, for misuse of federal Americorps personnel. Another criticized Americorps grants for participants in a City College of New York teacher training program.

Another man destroyed to protect a friend of the President. I wish it were not so, but this is commonplace in American politics. It is not new.

What is new is that many people seem to think President Obama is an annointed saint, sent to save us all. No, he’s just a President. They do things like this. They send their minions out to destroy lowly Poindexters and bureaucrats because of political expediency.

When Republicans do it, it is wrong. When Democrats do it, it is wrong. The only thing that changes is which side of the aisle that the mindless defenders will come from. We are inherently polarized, and reality and facts don’t seem to count for anything anymore. Change the “D” to an “R” and you see all kinds of righteous indignation replacing carefully parsed justifications. It’s merely intellectual dishonesty at work, all of it driven by a bloodlust for holding onto power.

So, what is Mr. Johnson, the former basketball star, accused of doing:

During the course of Walpin’s investigation into Johnson’s activities, according to the Grassley-Issa report, Walpin’s team received complaints that Johnson made inappropriate advances toward three young woman involved in the St. Hope program and that Johnson offered at least one of those young women hush money.

In one particularly incendiary passage in the report, one of the girls who had accused Johnson of inappropriately touching her said she told federal agents that he offered to pay her $1,000 a month to keep quiet.

Johnson’s spokesman vehemently denied the reports charges.

“There is absolutely no merit to these politically-motivated allegations,” said Steven Maviglio. “They are categorically false. It is sad and unfortunate that the right-wing minority in Congress is playing politics with rehashed allegations that have been dismissed by professional prosecutors, the Republican U.S. Attorney, and federal officials at AmeriCorps from both political parties.”

And Ms. Rhee is accused of:

When the complaints of sexual misconduct were first made, Rhee was a member of the board of St. Hope. A former St. Hope employee told Walpin’s investigators that Rhee “learned of the allegations and played the role of fixer, doing ‘damage control,’” the report states.

A spokeswoman for the chancellor’s office dismissed the allegations in the report as old news that never amounted to criminal charges against Johnson. 



“Chancellor Rhee is mentioned in one paragraph of the 62-page Joint Staff Report,” said Jennifer Calloway. “It rehashes old allegations that have long since been dismissed and deemed meritless by local and federal law enforcement officials, including the Sacramento Police Department and the U.S. Attorney.”

Senator Grassley’s report goes on to say:

The report accuses the White House Counsel’s Office of withholding information from Congress and misleading investigators after Grassley and Issa questioned Obama’s methods and motives for removing Walpin.

It also provides new details about the role several other Obama allies played in Walpin’s firing. The then-chairman of the CNCS, a division of AmeriCorps that Walpin was investigating, is Alan Solomant, a prominent Democratic fundraiser and Obama supporter who spoke with Eisen in the White House parking lot hours after hearing Walpin’s objections to a settlement of the St. Hope matter. Solomant shared his concern that Walpin was no longer fit for the job based on his alleged inability to answer questions during the day’s board meeting, the report found.


Eisen has claimed that the president’s decision to remove Walpin was the result of a thorough review of his performance and fitness to continue serving as an inspector general. He also has said that Walpin’s firing was unanimously supported by the CNCS board.

I have to say, firing ANY inspector general is going to bring in charges of favoritism, pandering, corruption or whatever else you can throw in there—sodomy and grandstanding also come to mind. You simply cannot just go and fire an IG without expecting some sort of recrimination. The problem here is, Walpin got dangerously close to an Obama confidante, and Chicago-style politics kicked in. Sorry, kids. That won’t play everywhere you try it.

Filed under: Government

matthewr says...

Mr. Putin also took the credit for recent signs of economic recovery and pledged that his cabinet would continue to support industries hit by the economic crisis.

He said the government would continue to support carmaker AvtoVAZ. AvtoVAZ, Russia's largest automaker, has seen demand for its Lada cars fall sharply in 2009 amid the economic downturn and plans to lay off a quarter of its 102,000 workers. Mr. Putin offered to stimulate demand for new cars though an initiative similar to the U.S. "cash-for-clunkers'' program.

When Putin is getting his bad ideas from the US, it's time to start worrying.

Filed under: Government

matthewr says...

This week, the Czech Republic is marking the 20th anniversary of their Velvet Revolution. Many of the demonstrations are being recreated, thousands lit candles in downtown Prague in commemoration and Vaclav Havel, who emerged as the hero of the Revolution, is omnipresent. But how do the youth of that nation, whose forerunners were integral in bringing down the communist government, feel about the event today?

"Being a slave to capitalism is no different from being a slave to communism." That is what Jana Kajnarová's mother tells her. Kajnarová, who now lives in Berlin, says that nostalgia for the old communist system is particularly strong among the older generation.

"My mother -- who is sick and who is not sufficiently cared for by the state -- was happier 20 years ago," she told SPIEGEL ONLINE. "And many of the pensioners from my hometown Varnsdorf agree with her. Under communism, people worked with the certainty that one day they wouldn't have to work anymore," the 25-year-old adds. "Now, you just don't have that kind of security."

Exhibit A: The short-term memory problem with the human race, and why you can't please everyone. See any contradictions in that last paragraph? Boo capitalism, the state isn't taking care of us... There is some confusion about what capitalism is I think.

Filed under: Government

matthewr says...

The Senate bill would provide coverage to 31 million uninsured Americans by vastly expanding Medicaid and creating insurance "exchanges" for individuals who do not have access to affordable coverage through their employers. For the first time, it would require most people to carry health coverage, although families with incomes up to 400 percent of the federal poverty level would receive subsidies to buy policies.

The legislation would also force widespread changes to the insurance industry to end discriminatory practices, including the rejection of coverage based on preexisting conditions. It would provide new incentives to encourage disease prevention and to institute the most effective treatments for chronic conditions such as diabetes and asthma.

On the revenue side, the Senate bill would extract about $400 billion in cost savings from Medicare and Medicaid, and would impose an excise tax on the most generous health-care policies, dubbed "Cadillac" plans. It would raise payroll taxes for high earners and levy a 5 percent tax on elective cosmetic surgery.

The ripple effect from this bill cannot be fully known. If history is any indication; it will be worse from the beginning, crumbling within a decade and bankrupt within a generation.

Filed under: Government

Rick says...

 

Filed under: Government