Search posterous

Search all posts and users. Type a name, type a favorite song title, whatever! See what comes up.
  

More posterous blogs











More recommended blogs »

Here are posterous posts filed under glbt...

joshuaseek says...

No matter what you think about gay marriage and adoption, you have to wonder what is worse: A life in foster care, or a life with a gay family.

From the policies of many conservatives, the latter is much worse.  Growing up without caring parents, having high chances of living the rest of your life on the streets, receiving a lower level of education, and learning few marketable skills, is a far more acceptable fate than being in the house of two women or two men.

As an adopted person myself, I would certainly choose a family over foster care.  With more than 500,000 children in foster care in the US, we're not looking for just a beating pulse, but for anyone who is loving and able to accept a child and provide them with a family.

If you want to be the first to toss stones, let you also be the first to adopt one of these five hundred thousand children.  I'll make it easy for you.  Call Christian Family Care here in Arizona and they would be more than happy to assist you in adopting.  My cousin is a social worker there. Ask for her.  While you're at it, adopt a special needs child, or one who is black, or over the age of 5.  These children are pretty much doomed to live in foster care for their entire lives.  It you want to cast stones, you better be blameless yourself.

Below is a post from Zach Lind's blog.  It rings so true, and I pray that people who condemn homosexuals that adopt would be the FIRST to step up to care for the least of these, the many children who need a home.

“Anyone who stands between a hungry kid and home with food is doing something immoral. Anyone who stands between a child who is not safe and safe home is wrong. And if you think that heterosexual parents make better adoptive homes, and want to make a big deal about it, you had better have at least one adopted, high need kid if you want me to give a hoot what you think. I realize that’s a much more visceral than rational response, and probably a little unfair. But as I’m sitting in my Moms’ living room, cooking for tomorrow, when 28 of our family - my sisters and their husbands and kids, my aunt and her adopted daughter and her elderly mother, two former foster kids and their kids, my aunt and uncle (on step-Mom’s side) and their kids are coming together, I find I simply can’t come up with anything else to say.”

- Sharon Astyk, a commenter at Rod Dreher’s blog, Crunchy Con, who was raised by two moms. Read her entire comment here.

There is a great deal of grandstanding by conservatives on issues such as gay equality and the rights of the unborn yet there are so many unwanted kids left to fend for themselves in a nation of staggering over-abundance. In the abstract, these arguments succeed at unifying the true believers but all the while the day-to-day lives of the forgotten trudge on. The reason conservatives are slowly but surely losing in these kinds of debates is evident in stories like the one above. These stories expose in plain site that the only value that keeps the conservative flame flickering is their own dogmatism, their own greedy hunger to be “right.” If their concern was for the children themselves, they’d most likely be too busy raising them to give a shit what others think.

 

Filed under: GLBT

tichris says...

In the past weeks I’ve decided to clean out my closet. I’ve realized that I am in that social timeline where I need to make new friends – no necessarily wiping out all the friends I have, but a few. For example: the ones that are overly involved with their significant other where there is no time to hang out [without the significant other].

I can’t really say that I dislike all people who are in serious relationships (or so they think) but I dislike the ones who are too much into each other where when I call to hang out, one of them doesn’t want to and so the other half will absolutely not go out. I find it extremely pitiful. I believe people should lead different lives and not be totally infatuated with one another.

I’ve been in a couple of long-term relationship, but my very first LTR had to be with Hope. With her, I had a hard time letting go. I always wanted to be around, hang out, and go out together. When it was time for her to meet new friends (she started this 20 something group friends thing at the center) my insecurities grew to the max. Not only was I going to miss having her around on Tuesday nights but also I had to deal with the issue when her friends met up at bars/restaurants sans moi. I actually learned from my relationship with her. I learned that life doesn’t always revolve around your other half. There is in fact, some time needed to get away from one another. This is one of the lessons I carried with me to my next LTR. I always gave her space and in return I was happy to see my friends and go out without having my girlfriend glued to my waist.

I suppose that is what my friends who are currently in LTR have. I can’t talk for a lot of them, but I am pretty darn sure that it is their first “real” relationship. I guess with every failed shot, I will see them once a year.

Having friends who are highly drawn in with their significant other can be draining. I can’t just call a friend and ask them to come out because they have to confirm with their partners. It is one of my pet peeves. I repulsively hate when I do all the calling or texting and trying to make plans only to find out that they are “staying in” (not too sure if that’s a special code for leave us the fuck alone, we are making sweet-oh so sweet loving)

Maybe I am taking this too seriously, maybe I am the one who has a problem and I don't realize that time spent with the love one are precious (which I think they are) but I do think that time spent with friends is also precious and memorable and FUN (selfish me!). Maybe I need to get a new crowd – a "I'm in a LTR but I have a life" group where we can run wild in the wee hours of the morning and not have lovers to tame us – calling/texting every minute of the night just to see what we are up to.

Really – can they be any more understanding?

Filed under: GLBT

joshuaseek says...

Nicholas Kristof had an intersting op-ed in the NY Times yesterday on the religious wars.  Traditionally, these wars have been fought with swords, but in the past few years they have been fought with the pen.  I've found that the pen has a greater power to inflict pain than the sword would.  The sword inflicts a temporary pain, while the pen harms feelings - and relationships - for a long time.

I don't know if I think that things are calming down.  Being involved with many conversations on spirituality (emergent church, Islam, life issues, GLBT issues), I've seen a lot of anger expressed.

Are the religious wars calming down?  What do you think?

Just a few years ago, it seemed curious that an omniscient, omnipotent God wouldn’t smite tormentors like Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens and Sam Harris. They all published best-selling books excoriating religion and practically inviting lightning bolts.

Traditionally, religious wars were fought with swords and sieges; today, they often are fought with books. And in literary circles, these battles have usually been fought at the extremes.

This year is different, with a crop of books that are less combative and more thoughtful.

Read more...

Z9NEQ7SPXEY2 

Filed under: GLBT