Search posterous

Search all posts and users. Type a name, type a favorite song title, whatever! See what comes up.
  

More posterous blogs











More recommended blogs »

Here are posterous posts filed under genderroles...

     I recently read the book " The Men We Never Knew: How to Deepen Your Relationship With the Man You love" by Daphne Rose Kingma. It had been recommended to me by Kala Kos, an author, workshop teacher and self-growth therapist. I loved the book, as it validated a thesis I had for many years about men, their struggle with expressing their full selves and how society keeps that struggle in place.

      I had been introduced to feminism in 1975 by a man who held men's consciousness raising groups. It made sense to me that men would want to free themselves from the limiting roles that had been taught and enforced by their parents and society.  I assumed that was what feminism was about, both men and women freeing themselves from limiting roles and opening up to their full expression of both their male and female sides.  I did what I could think to do to free my son from those limitations as I figured men had mostly been raised by women, so it was my job to do what I could to support my son in expressing all of himself.  I'm sure, as a parent, that I didn't do all I could do, but I did my best.

      Later on, I met feminists that didn't understand my open view of it all, and seemed to be very angry at men, wanting to blame them for all of their struggles and limiting roles, and at the same time, demanding that men now behave like women, being able to access and express their emotions, and talk about them fully and easily, just as most women are able to do.  But what I heard in listening to both the male clients I had in my body/mind therapy practice and the men I knew as friends, was that women were still expecting them to be strong, stoic, the one who fixes things and is the breadwinner, and often ran if they cried or expressed their feelings. I could see that men were being given a conflicting message about what was expected of them.

     I loved that this book talks in detail about how men got to be where they are, what keeps them behind this wall not expressing their feelings, how women ended up giving this double message, and why women are afraid to truly assist a man in learning this language of feeling. I can understand that as women demand that a man access his feelings on the spot, given how and why a man is taught not to do so, leaves the man struggling to access something he has no clue how to access, and creates fear as well. The author explains why it is the woman's job to teach the man how to access these feelings and gives practical suggestions on how to do it.  The book also details how this journey helps to free women, too, and allows them to more deeply express their male sides and become more balanced in the process.

      I've since seen two movies that show this male struggle. The first one I watched was "Reservation Road", a tense drama with Joaquin Phoenix and Mark Ruffalo.  Mark Ruffalo ends up running over Joaquin's son, in a hit and run, and like many men, Joaquin turns to anger and action to deal with his grief, before he is finally able to express his grief and immense loss of his son. The movie also explores the lack of self-esteem and feelings of failure and disappointment that many men feel about themselves and are met with through failed relationships, as well as dealing with the woundedness that men inherit from their fathers. The other movie I watched was "When did you last see your father?", with Colin Firth and Jim Broadbent, another drama about a son growing up with a larger than life Father, who dearly loves his son and yet through words and the lack of acknowledgement creates much pain and anger in his son. It shows how much a Father can wound his son and how that wound affects the child and later the man. It also sweetly shows the various stages of a male child's growth and how you reconcile the secrets, struggles and pain in your relationship with your parent, and come to a place of receiving and giving love.

     I feel like this healing is a worthy journey for both men and women, because I feel that the more we heal the male and female parts within us, we are able to create healthier and more deeply spiritual relationships.  Also, we are more able then to express our true divinity.

Filed under: Gender roles

jqr says...

Deeds of endurance, which seem ordinary in philosophy, are rare in conduct, and Bathsheba was astonishing all around her now, for her philosophy was her conduct, and she seldom thought practicable what she did not practise. She was of the stuff of which great men’s mothers are made. She was indispensable to high generation, hated at tea parties, feared in shops, and loved at crises. Troy recumbent in his wife’s lap formed now the sole spectacle in the middle of the spacious room.


 
—Thomas Hardy, Far from the Madding Crowd, Chapter LIV
 
This is one of the best-known Thomas Hardy quotes out there. Generally everyone loves a mother, and everyone loves finding something to say about a mother. I happen to see it as a little bit of damning-with-faint-praise: accomplish all this and the most you achieve is to have a future president or poet laureate slip from your womb? (Quick, can you name Barack Obama’s mother?)
 
Bathsheba is attending a Christmas party at Boldwood’s, when all of a sudden her presumed-dead husband appears and shatters Boldwood’s chances of marrying Bathsheba on the rebound. So Boldwood, taking his cues from R. Kelly’s Trapped in the Closet videos (or the Jimmie Rodgers–popularized ‘Frankie and Johnny’ song), does what any insane admirer would do and shoots his rival dead.
 
Somehow, in this one episode, Hardy manages to unite Bathsheba’s earthy practicality in love—as expressed in her reluctance to dally with the affectionate male gaze—with her earthy practicality as a small business–woman. She is the all-practical All-Star here, combining her unquenched affection for Troy with sure steps to save his quickly waning life. 


It’s confusing, therefore, that Hardy then sets out to diminish her with the mother simile. Is it that her power over the narrative has reached such a point that he needs to undercut her authority in order to bring the book to a close?
 
Retweet this!

Filed under: gender roles

jqr says...

‘Do you like me, or do you respect me?’

 ‘I don’t know—at least, I cannot tell you. It is difficult for a woman to define her feelings in language which is chiefly made by men to express theirs. My treatment of you was thoughtless, inexcusable, wicked! I shall eternally regret it. If there had been anything I could have done to make amends I would most gladly have done it—there was nothing on earth I so longed to do as to repair the error. But that was not possible.’


 
—Thomas Hardy, Far from the Madding Crowd, Chapter LI
 
Bathsheba Everdene responds to Boldwood here with an utterance that seems as if it had been inserted into the galley proofs of Thomas Hardy’s idyl of the Wessex countryside with a drawing knife and rubber cement. Could this be feminism? Of course, I’ve known women who would have taken the opposite approach, and celebrated that as feminism: fearlessly appropriating male discourse and then not apologizing for her rude treatment of her suitor.
 
Retweet this!

Filed under: gender roles

jqr says...

‘And, dear miss, you won’t harry me and storm at me, will you? because you seem to swell so tall as a lion then, and it frightens me! Do you know, I fancy you would be a match for any man when you are in one o’ your takings.’

‘Never! do you?’ said Bathsheba, slightly laughing, though somewhat seriously alarmed by this Amazonian picture of herself. ‘I hope I am not a bold sort of maid—mannish?’ she continued with some anxiety. ‘Oh no, not mannish; but so almighty womanish that ‘tis getting on that way sometimes. Ah! miss,’ she said, after having drawn her breath very sadly in and sent it very sadly out, ‘I wish I had half your failing that way. ‘Tis a great protection to a poor maid in these illegit’mate days!’



—Thomas Hardy, Far from the Madding Crowd, Chapter XXX

This excerpt is just right for one of those middle-school language-arts exercises, where you put all the adjectives that mean the same as “mannish” in one column, and all the synonyms for “womanish” in another column, and all the words that the students might venture to use to describe Bathsheba in a third, and pretty soon the bell rings, and the class is left with a bunch of new words to describe what they already know.

In a private chat with Liddy, her maid, Bathsheba is furiously squashing gossip about her and Sergeant Troy, about whom her other servant, Maryann, has earlier declaimed, “He is a wild scamp now, and you are right to hate him.”

Part of the joy of reading Far from the Madding Crowd is admiring how Bathsheba, though in the strictest sense she’s alone in the world, creates a family of sorts around her, despite the varying motives of her entourage. Hardy’s chapter-after-chapter focus on the natural world and the folkways of Wessex makes it apparent that his characters belong in Wessex, their native habitat. And like all such creatures of their context, his characters can express a wider bloom of variation in their comportment and conduct because they have a place to belong. Bathsheba’s “almighty womanishness” fits right in to the landscape, traditional roles be thrown aside.

We city-dwellers, in contrast, are the ones who are obliged to conform because we belong nowhere in particular.

 

Filed under: gender roles

Judith says...

The women.

In the mid 70s in SF, I attended what turned out to be a large organizing meeting with people whose sexual orientation was varied, at the very least, LGB and allies, before the rest of the acronym was developed.  While the goals of the meeting were the same, gay rights, the men and women didn't get along, could not come to agreement on anything. One would think that because the goals were the same that they could quickly come to agreement related to strategies.  No way.  Then I finally realized that while these were gay men, they were still men first, socialized as men, and women, who communicated differently.   I had thought that issues of being gay would transcend issues of gender roles, but it didn't.  And that was an interesting aha!

So the women were lobbying for gay and lesbian rights.  A popular book at the time, "Sappho was a Right On Woman" (http://www.amazon.com/Sappho-Right-Woman-Sidney-Abbott/dp/0812824067).  raised or exposed the issue of heterosexual woman's homophobia. Women involved in the women's movement were fearful of gay women becoming involved and of the issues being hijacked from Women's Issues to Lesbian Rights. Of course, not only were lesbians involved, but they were the one's who had time and energy, who often didn't have husbands or children who needed attention, and who were able to and who did provide much of the work and backbone for the women's rights movement.

In addition, I also knew and worked with Phyllis Lyons, ( who with her partner, Del Martin, wrote the Lesbian Bible, "Lesbian/Woman" (http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/091207891X/ref=sr_1_olp_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1229360791&sr=1-1) . Del, who recently passed away, and Phyllis, were able to marry, not once but twice under California law, the second time was June 15, 2008, before Proposition 8 was passed. They had been together for over 55 years.

Think of all the women for whom they served as role models, teachers, mothers, grandmothers, families, and think of all who were able to learn from their example, their talks, their book, their interviews, humor, love and their courage.

Filed under: Gender Roles