Search posterous

Search all posts and users. Type a name, type a favorite song title, whatever! See what comes up.
  

More posterous blogs











More recommended blogs »

Here are posterous posts filed under fud...

I have been sitting on my hands on this subject for quite a while now, I can no longer prevent my fingers from gracing the keyboard. The time has finally come.

The final straw for me is the e-coli outbreak, where petting farms have now been closed to the public because children who were at the farm contracted the disease after handling and stroking the animals.

Those farms would have been closed anyway, without the scrutiny of the media. Sure draw attention that there is an outbreak, but let's stop with the scaremongering. Move on to a new story.

I was a child once back in the 70s. I used to get covered in cow shit and mud, I used to stroke animals and put my fingers in my mouth, I also would eat sweets without washing my hands before hand. Did I once contract e-coli during my childhood? No I didn't.

If you tell your child to wash their hands because of the slightest bit of mud on their hands, isn't going to help their immune system.

I grew up in a era where children respected their parents and their elders and those in authority because we knew we would get a hiding from our parents or our teachers if we misbehaved, or didn't do our homework.

You would respect the police because we would get a clip on the ear and taken to see our parents.

When I used to get cuts and scrapes, the teachers would patch me up without a second thought and really look after you.

You could catch the bus and walk home without any trouble.

Do you know what has changed? It is fear.

Fear generated by the government, fear generated by the Health and Safety people. Teachers now fear repercussions if they dare to patch up a childs knee after a fall, for fear of being labelled a "child abuser".

Paedophiles have been around for generations, so what's different now? Nothing, just that the media strike fear into people, children are still going to get snatched or abused despite the best intentions of their parents, despite the media attention. If you are really worried about your child, get them a mobile phone so they can call you if they feel they're unsafe.

Wrapping up your children in cotton wool isn't helping to prepare them for the world.

Take some risks, let your children live their lives with the same freedoms you had when you were growing up.

We are in a really dangerous era in our evolution as a society, ruled by political correctness and FUD (fear, uncertainty and doubt).

Don't get me wrong fear in small doses prevents us from doing things that could endanger our own lives or those of others. But we do not want to become paralysed with fear so we end up doing nothing at all.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Filed under: fear, FUD, Health & Safety, political correctness

gellenburg says...

debt_b69dd.gif
Ever notice the deficits are only a problem when Democrats spend to help the rest of us?

Krugman explains why the deficit isn't the huge problem Republicans always say it is (but only when there's a Democratic president, of course):

So is there anything to worry about? Yes, but the dangers are political, not economic.

As I’ve said, those 10-year projections aren’t as bad as you may have heard. Over the really long term, however, the U.S. government will have big problems unless it makes some major changes. In particular, it has to rein in the growth of Medicare and Medicaid spending.

That shouldn’t be hard in the context of overall health care reform. After all, America spends far more on health care than other advanced countries, without better results, so we should be able to make our system more cost-efficient.

But that won’t happen, of course, if even the most modest attempts to improve the system are successfully demagogued — by conservatives! — as efforts to “pull the plug on grandma.”

So don’t fret about this year’s deficit; we actually need to run up federal debt right now and need to keep doing it until the economy is on a solid path to recovery. And the extra debt should be manageable. If we face a potential problem, it’s not because the economy can’t handle the extra debt. Instead, it’s the politics, stupid.

Filed under: FUD, healthcare, politics

gellenburg says...

Filed under: advertiser, backlash, boycott, fox news, FUD, glenn beck, Keith Olbermann, MSNBC, video

gellenburg says...

Filed under: FUD, GOP, healthcare, reform, video

gellenburg says...

« Q&A: Are freshwater fish as healthy to eat as ocean fish? | Main | Send your kids back to school with these 5 healthy habits »

August 14, 2009

| More

Health reform AdWatch: New ads mislead or dizzy seniors

Few groups are more coveted in the battle over health reform than seniors. The beneficiaries of 40-plus years of Medicare, America’s older adults are living longer, fuller lives than ever before and are very active participants in the democratic process. And this week, they’re the targets of two opposing ad campaigns. One is from American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) and the other from the 60Plus Association, a group that positions itself as a “conservative alternative” to AARP. Their home page has a photo of Pat Boone; AARP’s has a photo of Woodstock. ‘Nuff said.

Patronizing seniors with misinformation

The ad from 60PlusAssocation, running on cable TV, is sixty seconds of dramatically deployed misinformation. “Seniors have sacrificed,” a voiceover intones, as photos of the Great Depression, the landing at Normandy, white-haired veterans, and Arlington Cemetery cross the screen. Patriotic music and 60 Plus ad

a flag waving in the breeze segue to sad Grandmas in wheelchairs waiting for MRIs that, one assumes, will never come. The images are beyond condescending, right down to the man strapped to an oxygen tank with a doctor peering ominously down at him, as if ready to move in for the kill.

The ad repeats the usual scary predictions voiced by opponents of health reform, such as the charge that reform will limit your choice of doctors, result in long waits for care, and leave “government, not doctors, deciding if older patients are worth the cost.” (Uh, no, health reform does NOT promote euthanasia). It’s true that President Obama and House Democrats want to trim $500 billion in spending from the Medicare budget over the next 10 years, but these cuts would affect mainly providers, not benefits. And the new legislation would also pump in several hundred billion dollars in new Medicare funds targeted toward improving primary care and closing the “doughnut hole” that’s made prescription drugs unaffordable for many seniors.

AARP counters with dizzying ambulance ride

AARP ad

In the opposite corner, this week AARP launched a full-court TV, Web, radio, and print campaign aimed at busting health-reform myths. In the TV ad, running in national and local markets, a speeding ambulance repeatedly gets blocked or cut off by cars as an announcer says, “Special interests are trying to block progress on health care reform, derailing the debate with myths and scare tactics.” (Get it? The ambulance is reform and the cars are special interests.) It then reassures viewers that health reform won’t—depending on the version of the ad—force you to give up your current coverage, weaken Medicare, or result in care rationing. Now, as it happens, we think the points are spot on; in fact our publisher, Consumers Union, has worked with AARP on advocating health reform. But while the ad may be intended to relieve fears, the veering ambulance, blaring sirens, and screeching tires made us dizzy and a tad nauseous. The subliminal message seems to be: Don’t bother your dear gray head with a lot of facts—just work up some anxiety picturing yourself in an ambulance that can’t get through traffic. Surely America’s adults, older or not, can handle the facts about reform and skip the drama.

Seen a health reform ad you want us to critique? Tell us about it here

Jamie Kopf Hirsh, associate editor

Take a look at our comprehensive online guide to health reform, find out how we'd fix the broken health-care system, and see our critique of other health-reform ads.
 

For complete Ratings and recommendations on appliances, cars & trucks, electronic gear, and much more, http://www.consumerreports.org/main/prePurchase.jsp?INTKEY=I95BHT0">subscribe today and have access to all of ConsumerReports.org.
Print This Page
Posted at 01:35:38 PM in AdWatch | Health reform | Healthy after 60

Comments

Posted by: Don Nesbitt | Aug 15, 2009 12:07:00 PM

Only a person who has no knowledge of what is in the bills before Congress, no knowledge of how the consequences of the bills will play out, or someone parroting the party or his employer's position, Jamie Kopf Hirsh, could call the points made in the AARP ads "spot on".

While the bills do not call for one to "give up your current coverage" the provisions in the bills all either price the "public option" or tax the employers' payroll in such a way as to incentivize the employer to cancel his employees' current coverage, thereby forcing them to give up their current coverage and go into the "public option".

And, while supporters of the "reform" claim there will be no rationing, no one is explaining how we add 47,000,000 new insureds to the system without either rationing care or instituting very long waits for services. Just use your common sense!

Even the President has said that we need to look the health system's delivery of care and that "it may be more cost effective for a patient to skip the hip replacement in favor of a pain pill". Sounds like centralized planning or rationing to me.

Don Nesbitt Cary, NC

Posted by: mommyofthree | Aug 14, 2009 5:37:19 PM

This is getting to be really a bit rich! Why are you even pretending to be non-biased when it's clear that you aren't?
You admit that "It’s true that President Obama and House Democrats want to trim $500 billion in spending from the Medicare budget over the next 10 years, but these cuts would affect mainly providers, not benefits." How can paying the providers less NOT have an impact on the service that is received; i.e. "benefits"? Of course it will!
The fact is, medicare providers are already underpaid for their services and those of us not on medicare make up the difference. I also know for a fact that the government pays providers much later than insurance companies do -- requiring them to "float" the money that the government owes them. If they are getting less money, less frequently, how is our access to high quality service not going to be impacted.
I must say, I am so disappointed in your coverage of this issue. There are many ways to make changes to improve access to health care but you seem to have jumped on the bandwagon for immediate changes that I'm not sure we need. Please see The Whole Foods Alternative to ObamaCare from the Wall Street Journal (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204251404574342170072865070.html) for some suggestions!

Posted by: Dave Johansen | Aug 14, 2009 2:52:48 PM

Yes, the ads may be over dramatic, but the concerns expressed in these articles are valid.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

Posted by:  | 

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Filed under: advertising, consumer reports, FUD, healthcare, reform


A small number of super-geeky obsessives are abuzz over the upcoming launch of Facebook Usernames, an exciting new feature that will let you put some parts of your name into a web address.

 

Since its announcement yesterday, there's been a lot of excited discussion of the feature, but in a dashes.com exclusive I can exclusively report this exclusive look at the future of the feature. We'll also cover how the feature's rollout will be covered by the technology trade press and the mainstream press.

 

June 13, 12:01am: Facebook launches Facebook Usernames. The gold rush is on!

 

Read more: http://globalitnews.blogspot.com/2009/06/future-of-facebook-usernames.html

 

Tags: Facebook, usernames, Linkedin, Mashable, Myspace, Bebo, AIM, Techmeme, Global IT News, Mark Zuckerberg, Iphone, FUD, Kanye West, Twitter, Flikr, Openid, Digg, 

Filed under: AIM, Bebo, Digg, Facebook, Flikr, FUD, Global IT News, Iphone, Kanye West, Linkedin, Mark Zuckerberg, Mashable, Myspace, Openid, Techmeme, Twitter, usernames

debsuvra says...

When Microsoft introduced Start Orb in the newly redefined Taskbar in Windows Vista, it broke a long clutch of those chunky Start buttons that plagued Windows for eons. Now looking forward to Windows 7, MS brought Superbar here with a new Start Orb. Bigger, more glowing and sparkling than ever but it’s not better. In the heavily praised public beta (build 7000), the new orb looks kind of weird. And currently as more and more new builds are leaking every day, they continue to add more glow to that orb. Even when I personally contacted Sinofsky for the proceedings on Windows 7, he assured me that when the new OS will reach RTM this year, Start Orb will glow so radiantly that it will blind most of the people who does not wear glasses and also blow CRTs and LCDs creating exploding monitors issue. I doubt how this ‘feature’ can stand those obvious objections from various jurisdiction across the globe. EU will always have a chance in support of Mac and Linux to bring a case on Anti-trust for Microsoft monopoly. Steve Jobs is likely to object on the fact that only Windows 7 can blind people and blast monitors, so why not Mac? Linux hedgehogs are expected to follow as usual. It seems that there are a lot more fireworks waiting for us, more than just meet the eyes.

Well, if you are still reading this, I was just kidding about all those. Don’t need to worry about them, Windows 7 is not going to blow anything or make your eye condition worse, it’s soon going to be world’s best operating system. Behold for the mighty Windows 7!

Filed under: Apple, FUD, Linux, Microsoft, Speculation