Please pay your fine: Or else
While it’s a huge fine, still some questions about where it will go…
So two directors at the JSE-listed Huge Group – James Herbst, the CEO and the executive chairman Anton Potgieter have been slapped with a R5m fine: “…as a result of the breaches of their fiduciary duties as directors of Huge and their actions that had resulted in breaches by Huge of the Listings Requirements…”
I spoke extensively with the executives soon after the news broke earlier this year and they were adamant that they hadn’t done anything wrong. The technical details of the trade are complex and not being an registered JSE advisor, I wont go into the detail.
What I can say is that the JSE were tight-lipped about the trade and its own investigation and findings. I made several attempts to engage the JSE at the time, to no avail. So on Thursday last week the news broke.
A spokesperson at the Financial Services Board (FSB) suggests that the company had contravened the listings requirements of the JSE, something that the FSB doesn’t have jurisdiction over. In terms of the Security Services Act, the JSE is responsible for the listing requirements and as such, may apply a sanction.
Huge CEO James Herbst says that he will keep us updated should he and Anton (executive chairman Anton Potgieter) decide to make an announcement in their personal capacities.
Meanwhile Huge Telecoms says that it is pleased to announce that its dispute with the JSE has ended after the JSE announced it had imposed a public censure on the company, relating to the purchase of derivatives contracts in October 2008. It appears that the group is also pleased that no fine was imposed on the company. The company says that the board of directors will fully support Potgieter and Herbst should they decide to appeal against the penalties.
And then after months of silence, the JSE opened up. From the statement we received it appears that the JSE applied their collective minds to the matter, and went through all the correct processes to reach their decision.
So whether the directors decide to appeal the fine or not is really a moot point. What has yet to play itself out behind the closed doors of the corporate environment is whether the nature of the relationship between the two executive directors and the rest of the board and management has changed.
The bottom line is that the company’s two most senior executive directors have been found wanting in terms of their behaviour. And what about the relationship between the CEO and his management team? How are clients reacting to the news of the fine?
What is very clear is that investors and traders aren’t completely convinced, either way. The share price has been hammered, trading at a 12 Month Low of 28c on 28 Oct ‘09, coming off a high a little over 12 months ago of 300c on 11 Nov ’08. In the last two days of last week alone the share price has moved up 18%, although on very few trades.
Would you invest in this company? Would you use this company’s services? More and more questions than answers…
Speaking about questions and answers, and transparency, if the fine is paid, where does it go? Well, to the JSE. There is the guarantee fund. This is an off-balance sheet fund and thus not reported on in the listed entity’s results. It appears that the JSE guarantee fund is a separate structure and is managed as a trust fund.
The JSE Guarantee Fund on the other hand would protect the investor (secondary market) in the event that a broker defaulted. It appears that there are three investor protection funds on the balance sheet. According to the JSE the penalty is received in terms of their rules and can go either to the fund or to the JSE, and possibly to the surveillance department. A decision has not been taken on this, yet, says Freda Evans, JSE chief financial officer.
We are still trying to determine which asset manager manages the fund and where are the assets invested.

