Search posterous

Search all posts and users. Type a name, type a favorite song title, whatever! See what comes up.
  

More posterous blogs











More recommended blogs »

Here are posterous posts filed under flow...

bj says...


Photo attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/heypaul/1832151/

I often feel like the tech / social media news cycle is a bit like watching cats chase a laser pointer around the room.

On the one hand, I feel like I am in a flow of rich information. One the other hand, I feel like a large amount of data I feel compelled to pay attention to because of "the crowd" is focused on the smallest minutiae: incremental feature & network enhancements, new companies that likely won't be around in 3 years, and flamewar 2.0 dialogues about the state of social media personalities.

What to do? I've tried a couple of things:

Filtering:
In the last month, I have started to lean more on delicious feeds from a small network of folks. I'm also starting to participate with Twine more. The last thing I'm doing is paying attention to favorited tweets from the "SuperFilter" personalities, like @Scoble.

Assessing:
I'm also in the process of reassessing information sources I pay attention to, particularly blogs and tech news sites. For any given day's content stream:
• Will this matter in 3 months? In 36?
• What impact does this information have? Feature, product, company, industry, society? (scale~ from small to large)
• Can I use this information, in a practical sense, for my work?
• Am I (or my clients) missing out by not knowing this? (news item X)

p.s.: I discovered some great pics on flickr if you want to explore the intersection of technology and fluffy cuteness:
http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=cats%20chasing%20laser%20pointers&w=all

What do you think? How are you managing your information stream?

Filed under: flow

Jerry says...

One picture.

More than a thousand words.

Filed under: flow

Conscious says...

"Be formless. Shapeless. Like water. Now you put water into a cup - it becomes the cup. You put water into a bottle - it becomes the bottle. You put water into a tea pot - it becomes the tea pot. Water can flow--or it can crash. Be water my friend."

~ Bruce Lee

Filed under: flow

Bryce says...

Filed under: flow

Bryce says...

Filed under: flow

Business quiz: If your company has to decide between doing what’s right and making a profit, which should it be?

Answer: Both.

What if the distinction between business and doing good vanished? What if all those who engaged in business were committed to a deeper purpose, and all those committed to doing good were entrepreneurial and enterprising? What would it take for a world of seven billion such people to solve all the world's problems?

If you are one of these people, wondering where to go from here...

Visit FLOW.

Filed under: FLOW

Anadin says...

100% agree, this is how it will be, obviously we will need to be able to use larger screens and maybe even wireless keyboards to do some of the bigger jobs at times but personal computing is back. Most of us don't/won't need the multi-user power machines - my iPhone is more powerful than probably half the machines I have ever had - the future of computing is in your pocket..

I am not even convinced about having 'full' OS's for those times when you are in 'workstation' mode, in an effort to simplify and focus, more and more I appreciate the single tasking on the iPhone. The ability to run 10's of apps at once is a nice idea but seems to just slow things down.

All I need is the ability to sometimes edit pages/numbers/keynote docs, do email and browse the web or use web apps - one a time suites me :) very kanban.

Filed under: Flow

SunWALKing says...

Chris Orwig in his wonder-full photography book Visual Poetry says’

If there is one lesson that photography’s taught me – life is short.  I use my camera in order to extend and slow life’s time frame.  Sometimes it works and other times it gets in the way.  Either way, whatever gear you have, whatever light is available….it is good enough.  Don’t let another day pass.

Orwig makes the above statement having told the story of a student who travelled home to take photograph’s of his father.  He didn’t because he didn’t think the light was very good – and shortly after returning heard that his father had passed away.

Extending or slowing down the time frame is an example of a more general truth about new media and the digital age.  The Mp3 player, the Sky+ box, podcasting, DVDs are all about control of time-arranging time, allowing us experiences that are outside of the normal time-frame.

This Eternal Moments blog is my journal exploring the spirit of photography, including the idea that photography like cinema bears close similarity to what’s called the mystical experience which in shorthand might be said to be a three stage experience – 1. me and object – 2. object -  3. object and me.  This experience was caught a long time ago (8th Century) by the Chinese poet Li Po;

“The birds have vanished from the sky,

and now the last clouds slip away.

We sit alone, the mountain and I,

until only the mountain remains.”

I’ve suggested that perhaps there is no such thing as the spirit of photography – HERE Perhaps the camera is no more, and no less, than the calligrapher’s brush, or the dancer’s body in space.

Chris says; ‘ I use my camera in order to extend and slow life’s time frame.’

The moment ‘captured’ in the photographic image reminds us of the eternal now.  Whether we wallow in regret and a longing for what cannot be re-created or whether the moment simply reminds us to come back to the now, and to there rest content, depends on how egoic we are being at that time!  Tolle is a contemporary master teacher who is completely relevant to the idea of exploring how and in what ways photographic experience (photographer and viewer) is like spiritual experience – some of my favourite Tolle-isms are HERE.

Chris says, ‘….Sometimes it works and other times it gets in the way…’

What does it get in the way of – when it doesn’t work?  My answer is it gets in the way of the flow of spirit, life-force, xin in Chinese.  This includes flow in the traditional Chinese sense of chi, the interruption of which, or the diminution of which, is re-balanced via such arts as acupuncture.  It is also flow in the sense of by Mihály Csíkszentmihályi, the positive psychology concept who gave us the notion that flow is   the mental state of operation in which the person is fully immersed in what he or she is doing by a feeling of energized focus, full involvement, and success in the process of the activity.   See – HERE

The timelessness of the contemplative experience has a co-equivalent in photography.  For the photographer it is the flow experience that culminates in a perfect, or sufficiently perfect, photograph.  For the viewer it is the experience of a photograph, or set of photographs, that provide the kind of experience that Li Po describes in his poem. We then have what I am sure is a highly unfashionable aesthetic theory – namely that the art experience is the mystical experience.

The spirit of photography perhaps is the spirit of being human – experienced via the photographic medium.

Is there such a thing as the spirit of photography?  Perhaps there is a spirit in the sense that the medium has a number of distinguishing and defining characteristics – some shared with painting, dance, music et – some not.

If the spirit of photography relates to the characteristics of the medium does Barthes in Camera Lucida conflate two subjects best kept apart; the workings of the human spirit and the distinguishing features of the photographic medium?

I am so glad Chris Orwig has published his wonder-full book.  I say this as has someone who has loved poetry, and the teaching of poetry, for a very long time – and as someone who has loved photography for a long time.  But I never put the two together.  It is possible that Orwig’s main contribution might well turn out to be his extending of the language of photography, and thereby extending the language of the human spirit.

I’m off to do Assignment 1!

-0-

The Visual Poetry site is HERE

The Visual Poetry FLICKr site is HERE – send in your Visual Poetry assignment photographs!


-0-

Filed under: Flow

redpen21 says...

Flickr photo by David Lipscomb

I just spent about 20 minutes explaining to my four year old why the old leaves need to fall to make room for the new leaves in the spring.  Nature moves old to new.  So, too, does good writing.  (Actually, the principle of "old to new" applies to lots of things, including teaching and marketing, but I just want to talk about writing in this post.)  

When it comes to writing, the principle of old to new is simple: If you want your readers to find your writing clear and fluid, lead them from things they find familiar to whatever you want to tell them that they'll find new, unfamiliar or difficult.  Think of it as a dance.  Start paragraphs and sentences where your readers are and then dancing them "old to new," or "them to you."  If you don't do this dance, your readers will find your writing "choppy" or "jumbled."  Consider these two sentences: 

  • An immunological overreaction in susceptible people occurs when immune-system cells just beneath the lining of the nose are impacted by pollen.
  • When pollen bumps into immune-system cells just beneath the lining of the nose, it provokes an immunological overreaction in susceptible people.

It's a lot easier to understand the second sentence, but why?  Yes, it's partly about the verbs. The second sentence is a lively drama of bumping and provoking, whereas the first sentence is merely assembled with the weak verb "occurs."   But  that second sentence gives us something maybe more important: a familiar actor, named pollen. In contrast, note how the first sentence begins with a long abstract noun phrase: an immunological overreaction in susceptible people.

Yes, you can find the identical phrase at the end of the second sentence.  But in writing, placement is everything.  Near the beginning of each sentence, readers need a familiar subject – ideally a short concrete noun that takes action, or in the words of author Joseph Williams, a character.  Giving your readers a familiar character at the beginning of sentences doesn’t mean “dumbing down” your sentences or avoiding complex material.  It does mean that when you are introducing new or complex ideas, you should do so at the end of a sentence, after you have set your reader on comfortable ground, with a familiar subject that takes action. 

The old-to-new principle is not a recent discovery (although the latest cognitive research has confirmed it). Here's how Ben Franklin articulated the principle in more stately 18th-century language:  “If he would inform, he must advance regularly from things known to things unknown."

The principle of old-to-new applies to passages as well as sentences.  In the following passage from a New York Times Magazine story on Claritan, note how journalist Stephen Hall -- the author of the second sentence on pollen above -- moves from the familiar concept of pollen to the more technical concept of histamine, while moving gracefully from old to new in the sentences in between:

When pollen bumps into certain immune-system cells just beneath the lining of the nose, it provokes an immunological overreaction in susceptible people. Thus perturbed, these "mast cells" shudder, churning out at least 15 different inflammatory molecules, many of which contribute to the allergic reaction. One of those molecules, unleashed instantaneously, is called histamine.  When roving histamine molecules attach to receptors on nearby nerve cells, you feel an itch or a sneeze or a ticklish palate.

For more on the principle of old to new, pick up a copy of Style: Ten Lessons in Clarity and Grace by Joseph Williams.

Filed under: flow

Anadin says...

Reading these got me motivated to finally post a bit more Kanban Using-a-personal-kanban-board & http://personalkanban.com/

As a big proponent of kanban at work and of course, personal kanban. I want to share my thoughts on personal MMF's (Software by Numbers: Low-Risk, High-Return Development) or Minimal Marketable Features - shall we say 'life by numbers'? 

I personally believe in allowing my team to be professional and know their own tasks. Individual tasking in a team is so changeable on a daily basis that it is more efficient to focus on a higher level of functionality that we measure and monitor on our Kanban board. What this gives us is a big picture view rather than everyone so focussed on the little details that we lose our goal. This does not mean that we don't care about the little details or tasks within feature teams, just that they should defined, monitor and track their own tasks, whether using tools such as GTD, personal Kanban boards or even the Pomodoro Technique.

I believe that this is important in our lives too. I have been huge fan of GTD and still believe Dave Allen has a lot of good stuff to say about how we can improve our lives my favourite being about moving from 'unconsciously incompetent' to 'consciously competent'. 

But! the next action process for me turns into more work than I think we need. If you want to flow and be able to get things done it makes more sense to think about our Projects or MMF's. 

Get a list of the things you need to achieve, this is the same for either a team or an individual, define small(ish) goals that can be completed and have value either for you, your family or your end users. These become your Backlog. Prioritise these Projects, try to focus on a small number of most important ones (for individuals look for three (ZEN to DONE) and with teams I like eight to ten. 

For my current team we have a limit of Work in Progress of 8 things, once we have chosen these 8 and assigned all of our people to these things we work on them until they are done. For me, I have three in progress at once. This does NOT mean I multitask, it means I have three important things I need to do, I choose one of the three and work on it for a minimum of 25 minutes or whatever time it takes to progress it to a level I want, afterwards, my mindset, energy levels, changing priorities, the weather - many factors - help me choose which one of the three I am going to action next.

Cycle through our most important projects/MMF's and determine the next action when you are going to work on the project, it really is no effort to figure out the next most important task or action to progress your MMF. This way you don't need to think about that until you get there, know in yourself that you have you 'eye on the goal' by having prioritised your 'features'. Once you are on that action you need a way to get that done, I am experimenting with the Pomodoro Technique at the moment and can say it works pretty well - I use either the kitchen timer, the timer on my iPhone or Focus Booster.

If you finish the project it moves to Done and one more can move into you Work in Progress queue - wash, rinse, repeat.

Context (such as used in GTD) takes care of itself - I have a Kanban @work with stuff I need to do there, a board @home with stuff I need to do there and a mobile list on my iPhone using Things. (@errands, @personal)

Note: I do keep adding things I know I may need when I am out to a 'shopping list' if I am looking at my WiP or my Backlog and it occurs to you that you will need something in the future, write it down, next time you are going out, you will have a list you can reference and may be able to action stuff quicker when you get to that MMF.

To summarise, don't think of the actions before you get there. Raise your eyes and look at the big pictures of our lives. Maybe not at 30,000 foot level but a lot bigger than 'buy a stamp to post that letter'

Filed under: Flow