Search posterous

Search all posts and users. Type a name, type a favorite song title, whatever! See what comes up.
  

More posterous blogs











More recommended blogs »

Here are posterous posts filed under financialplanning...

Are your assets protected? Are you sure? If you're like a lot of people, you may think your assets are safe, but the reality is very different.

 

What is asset protection? Well, it is creating barriers between your assets and anyone who is attacking them. This includes lawsuits and taxes among others.

 

Just know that if you own any assets in your own name they are generally NOT protected.

 

As physical therapists the following example should hit home.  Let's take the subject of lawsuits. Did you know that in the US alone there are more than 50,000 lawsuits filed each day? When is your turn? How do you structure your affairs so that you have your assets protected from creditors? The tools are relatively straight forward: state and federal statutes, business structures and trusts, and the intelligent use of debt.

 

When I first introduce the topic of asset protection to my new clients, the answer often goes like this:

 

"No thank you. I already have a trust (or a corporation). My attorney set that up for me."

 

But what kind of trust is it? As it turns out, the vast majority have what is called a revocable trust or marital trust as opposed to an irrevocable trust. A revocable trust means that it can be revoked and you can get at your money-just as if you held the title of the assets in your own name. But there's a nasty surprise: If you can get your hands on your money, so can your creditors.

 

And what about that corporation? If you have a C or S corporation, you have more exposure than you may think. Should ever find yourself at the losing end of a lawsuit, those assets will be at risk of loss.

 

So what should you do to really protect your assets?

 

First of all, you should probably speak with someone who has experience with asset protection, such as a financial advisor and a skilled attorney. They will be able to help you.

 

The reason why you may not want to go it alone is that every state is different, and every situation is different. State statutes differ in terms of what assets are protected and to what degree. In some states, only a small amount of equity in your primary residence is protected, for example, whereas in some other states substantially all of the equity is protected.

 

Second, you can make them undesirable by borrowing against them. Creditors are not interested in assets that are mortgaged to the hilt. This is otherwise known as a "debt shield".

 

And third, you make them difficult to reach altogether by putting them into a proper trust. If you use a trust then it has to be an irrevocable trust, i.e. a trust that is NOT revocable. This means that you will not ever be able to get your money back. But your creditors can't get it either. That's why it works-you essentially give the assets away to a purpose that is important to you.

 

Another way to make assets difficult to reach is through legal entities such as LLCs or Limited Partnerships. However, you need to make sure it's set up correctly in a desirable jurisdiction with excellent statutes for this purpose.

 

The subject of asset protection is widely overlooked by business owners and many financial advisors. But what good does it do to work hard to accumulate an asset only to have it open to lawsuits and potential losses? That just doesn't make sense.

 

So if you think you have asset protection, think again. Almost all of the business owners for whom we write financial plans have at least 50% of their assets unnecessarily open to creditors and at risk.

 

Filed under: Financial Planning

Richard says...

Here is a quick summary of the main points to come from this afternoon's speech:

Pensions Tax Relief

As previously announced in the April 2009 Budget, individuals on incomes above £150,000 will have tax relief on pensions restricted from 2011. The relief will taper on income between £150,000 and £180,000 – eventually restricting relief to the basic rate (20%).

For this purpose income will now include payments made by employers, so that anyone with income below £130,000 will have any employer contributions excluded from the restriction.  The restriction of relief will normally be administered via the self-assessment process – rather than via the pension provider.  Where the charge is particularly large, individuals will be able to elect to have their pension scheme pay the charge as a deduction from their pension fund.

This will apply to defined contribution and defined benefits schemes.

Because of this change the anti-forestalling measures introduced in April 2009 will be extended to cover anyone with an income of above £130,000 from today, 9th December 2009.

Banks

A temporary bank payroll tax of 50% will apply to discretionary bonuses above £25,000 awarded in the period from the Pre-Budget Report to 5 April 2010.  This tax only applies to banks and building societies, financial companies that are members of bank and building society groups and UK branches of foreign banking groups.  It will not apply to insurers or non-banking group asset managers. Importantly the bank will be liable for this payment not the employee.

Personal Accounts

The Chancellor has said very little about personal accounts except that he is committed to private pension’s reforms with a timetable which has auto enrolment starting in October 2012.  For larger firms the timetable appears remains unchanged.  Start ups and small firms will be able to start auto-enrolling later than planned – after October 2015.  The phasing of minimum employee contribution levels will now be 3% from October 2016 and 4% from October 2017.  Employer contributions will be increased to 2% from October 2016 and 3% from October 2017.  This delays the timetable to reach steady state by one year to 2017.

Public Sector Pensions

The Chancellor has announced reforms to the Teachers, Local Government, NHS and Civil Service pension schemes which will cap the contribution to pensions made by employers, thereby limiting the liability of the taxpayer as pensions become more valuable.  Cost increases below the cap will be shared equally between employers and employees, and those above the cap met solely by employees.  In addition, as part of cap and share, the Government will expect those earning the highest salaries to pay a greater contribution towards their pension.  These reforms will save an estimated £1 billion a year from 2012-13, and at least twice this amount over the long-term.

Other measures

  • Income Tax bands have been frozen for 2010/11 due to negative RPI. Also, the higher rate band frozen for 2011/12.
  • National Insurance Contributions have been increased by a further 0.5% from April 2011 although there will be a higher starting point of £20,000.
  • Despite a negative RPI, the Basic State Pension will increase by 2.5%.
  • Inheritance tax 0% band has been frozen at £325,000.
Perhaps of most importance to the population, and a measure clearly defined to rescue the economy, is the reduction in bingo tax from 22% to 20%!

Filed under: financial planning

Richard says...

In the investment industry, we think risk equals standard deviation. Therefore, risk can be measured, and the amount of risk we take can be controlled. It's a nice, clean way to fit risk into our models. If clients can handle more risk based on their answer to our "risk tolerance" questionnaire, we just turn the dial, and increase their allocation to equities.

The problem is that when real people, in the real world, think about risk, I am almost positive they don't ever use the term standard deviation. Can you imagine a client losing sleep because they are thinking about the high level of standard deviation in their portfolio?

Real people lose sleep because they are worried about not having the money to fund their most important goals. They lose sleep thinking about not having the money to send kids to collage or retire. To real people, risk equals not meeting their financial goals.

We are measuring their tolerance for fluctuation, while they are worried about running out of money.

Now, maybe you can make the claim that standard deviation (using Monte Carlo analysis) is one way of quantifying the possibility clients have of not reaching their goals. However, if you use a "risk tolerance" questionnaire WITHOUT the context of the client's goals, how would you know?

Filed under: financial planning

This time of year, now through the first quarter of next year, you will see articles offering year-end tax planning tips. Tax planning tips can increase income in future years, so be careful. Many tax tips often involve accelerating deductions, deferring income, or last-minute charitable deductions (the first three following tips).

For example you may be compelled to make a large charitable contribution this year by December 31st. However if you could be in a higher tax bracket next year because your income is going up because of a substantial raise or bonus, you would have been better off to make the contribution next year. Some may say this is heartless, but I say just the reverse. If you pay less in taxes because of good planning, your will be better off financially and able to give more in the future.

If you have volatile income, before you use the tax savings tips here and in other articles, you may want to run projections for this year and next. A good accountant will run these calculations for you, but understand that tax law changes from year to year and from one administration to the next can often make predicting tricky.

1. Defer income

If you are able to defer income, such as commissions and bonuses until next year, you might be able to pay lower income taxes this year. However, you must consider what your income and taxes will be next year to be sure that you are not actually increasing your taxes.

2. Accelerating deductions

Accelerating major deductions such as state income taxes, property taxes, and mortgage interest may help anyone, especially during a high-income year. If you don’t think your personal income tax bracket will be higher next year, and you’re not affected by the alternative minimum tax, you can make state and/or local tax payments before the end of this year so you can take a deduction this year.

3. Charitable Contributions

Consider making chartable deductions before the end of the year to receive a deduction. You must make the contribution by 12/31/2007.

Donate appreciated property such as real estate or stock instead of the proceeds of the sale. You may be able to receive a deduction for the value of the contribution without paying tax on the growth portion resulting from a sale, then a gift. If you intend to transfer appreciated property, begin early since it will take several weeks to make the change.

4. Alternative minimum tax traps

Many people face large AMT bills compared to previous years. Be warned if you have larger than usual medical expenses, non-federal income and real estate taxes, or miscellaneous itemized deductions; or if you have exercised large stock options, to name a few.

Year-end tax planning strategies can backfire under AMT. Be very careful accelerating some deductions and exercising stock options at year end. See a tax professional for information on your specific tax situation.

5. Be careful when investing new money in mutual funds at the end of the year

Call the mutual fund and find out when the distribution date is. You may want to purchase after the distribution date to avoid owing taxes on fund shares that you owned only for a short period of time and had little to no gain.

6. Contribute the maximum to retirement accounts

Contribute the maximum allowable to employer-sponsored defined contribution retirement plans, such as profit sharing, 401(k), 403(b) and 457(b) plans. This not only provides an excellent tax deduction, but it also helps you to plan for your future retirement.

You may want to contribute to an IRA; up to $2,000 is fully deductible if you did not participate in a company-sponsored retirement plan or if your income falls below certain levels.

If you are self-employed, you can contribute more to a pension plan than into an IRA. You have until December 31 to set up the plan.

7. Investment Losses

If your investment portfolio has stock that has depreciated in value and is worth less than when you originally purchased it, you may want to consider selling it. You may be able to use that loss to offset capital gains and ordinary income.

Be careful though; investment decisions should not just be for tax purposes. Make sure that you do your research before selling any investment. Some people react too quickly when investments lose value; others sometimes hold on too long. If you decide to sell and invest in something new, make sure that you examine your portfolio to ensure that you have the right mix of investments to match your investment profile, risk propensity and asset allocation model.

8. Save for College

Consider contributing to your child’s college savings into a 529 plan. The contributions are not deductible on your Federal return, but parents may be able to write off contributions up to a certain dollar amount on their state income tax return. Log on to SavingforCollege.com to find out information about your state.

9. Home Improvements

Here is a great deal. How about saving energy and the environment, lower utility bills, increase the value of your home and save on taxes all at once. Projects for the home’s shell (insulation, windows, sealing) and heating and cooling may qualify for a one time tax credit of $500. However you are running out of time, since they must be in place by the end of 2007. So while crawling around your attic looking for ornaments, think of adding insulation. If you made home improvements over the last couple of years, be sure to dig up your records; you may already be eligible.

Before moving forward on one of these projects, make sure that you get full information about these and other energy efficient tax incentives from The Tax Incentives Assistance Project at http://www.energytaxincentives.org/. There you will find more information about Home Shell and Heating & Cooling as well as Hybrid Passenger Vehicles and Solar Energy Systems.

10. If self-employed, buy equipment and supplies

Have you been putting off buying needed business equipment and supplies, or do you know that you will soon need them? Now may be the time to invest in your business and save taxes as well. Business tax can be complex; therefore it may be wise to first call your accountant prior to large purchases.

11. Give gifts to children

When you give to friends and family, it is usually not taxable to the recipient or the giver. Many people do not realize though if that gift exceeds $12,000 per person it is taxable to the giver, and at a high rate. Therefore, if you intend to give anyone more than that amount, you could give some this year and some next. The second tip is that you and your spouse can both give $12,000 per person, doubling the amount not subject to tax. Be sure to consult your legal and tax advisor prior to making all gifts.

Kent E. Irwin, ChFC, CLU, CAP, co-founder and CEO of eFinplan.com. eFinPLAN is the first and only web-based comprehensive consumer financial planning software designed for people who are trying to do a lot of their own financial planning. Find out more about how do-your-self financial planning and how to reach your goals at: => http://www.efinplan.com/

Filed under: Financial Planning

Forbes.com

Mel Lindauer, 11.27.09, 12:00 PM ET

 

 

Since The Bogleheads' View is going to be a regular Forbes.com column, we thought it would be appropriate to start out by sharing some background information on who the Bogleheads are and how we got our name.

The Bogleheads follow the investing principles espoused by John C. "Jack" Bogle, the founder and former chairman of The Vanguard Group (thus the name). This means you won't find any get-rich-quick advice offered in this column. Our only get-rich advice centers on these timeless Boglehead principles:

--Start early (the earlier you start, the better off you'll be, due to the power of compounding)

--Live below your means (that's the real key to financial independence)

--Save and invest wisely (Vanguard is a good place to start--and stay)

--Asset allocation (Set it to properly reflect your "sleep-at-night" risk level)

--Keep costs low (As Jack Bogle is fond of saying "Costs matter.")

--Diversify (Own the market. Indexing is an easy way to make sure you've got this covered.)

--Buy and hold (Markets will go up and they'll go down over your investing lifetime, but it's time in the market that counts, not market timing)

--Rebalance (Rebalance back to your desired asset allocation to control your risk level.)

Here's what Jack Bogle had to say about the Bogleheads in his latest book (Common Sense on Mutual Funds: Fully Updated 10th Anniversary Edition):

"Individually and collectively, the Bogleheads have come to passionately believe in Vanguard's mission of investment simplicity--economy, efficiency, asset allocation, widely-diversified portfolios of high quality and low cost, and, above all, a commonsense focus on the wisdom of long-term investing and the folly of short-term speculation. They also share a confidence in Vanguard's philosophy of trusteeship, holding the interest of our shareholders above those of all others."

The Beginning

In 1998, a number of Vanguard investors who were fans of Jack Bogle were posting on various investment forums at Morningstar.com. These "Bogleheads" felt there was a need for a forum that focused entirely on Vanguard mutual funds, so they asked Morningstar to establish a forum of their own. After a little cajoling, Morningstar established the Vanguard Diehards forum. The forum's sub-title was "Bogleheads unite! Talk about your favorite fund family."

The Vanguard Diehards forum quickly became the most successful Morningstar forum and soon had more posts than all the other Morningstar forums combined. The forum excelled in both quantity and quality, and it became a resource for both ideas and quotes for many of the national media writers.

The Next Step

The Bogleheads community decided to expand to our own commercial-free moderated forum in February 2007 at www.Bogleheads.org. All of the forum's posts can be read without registering, but you do need to register and create a screen name in order to post (registration is free). The forum policies, which include a ban on political and religious discussions, promote a high level of civility. The Bogleheads.org forum is a place where both beginners and seasoned investors can discuss investing theory, ask for and receive help on any number of investing topics, and exchange ideas with other investors.

Since its start in 2007, the Bogleheads.org community has grown to nearly 16,000 registered members. On a typical day, the forum will get 600-900 posts, with more than 1,000 posts on some days. The total number of posts on the forum is now approaching 600,000.

More than 100,000 investors visit the site each month, and members and visitors combine for an astonishing one million page reads per month. These figures make Bogleheads.org the most widely followed investing discussion forum on the Internet. In addition to The Bogleheads' Guide authors, others who contribute content to the forum on occasion include authors William Bernstein, Bill Schultheis, Larry Swedroe, Allan Roth and, once in a while, even Jack Bogle himself. So there's lots of good information sharing available on the Bogleheads.org forum, and 16,000 friends are there to greet you.

In addition to sharing information on the forum, the Bogleheads have conducted eight annual national get-togethers with Jack Bogle and other dignitaries in major cities around the country. There are also 38 Local Boglehead Chapters throughout the U.S. and one in France that hold local meetings, so there may well be one near you. You can find the local chapter contact information here.

Now you know who we are and what we're about. In future columns my co-authors, Rick Ferri and Laura Dogu, and I will start providing what we hope will be helpful and timely information on various investing topics that the Bogleheads discuss on the forum. See you next column!

Mel Lindauer, CFS, WMS is one of the founders of the Bogleheads community and co-author of The Bogleheads' Guide to Investing, along with Taylor Larimore and Michael LeBoeuf. He is also co-editor of The Bogleheads' Guide to Retirement Planning, along with Taylor Larimore, Richard Ferri, and Laura Dogu.

 

Filed under: Financial Planning

Richard says...

Some good examples of video being used as online marketing by advisers. 

These both succeed in getting the nature of the company over in a simple and yet powerful way.  Both have inspired me to invest some time improving my own video skills - stay tuned for the results!

Filed under: financial planning

Richard says...

An interesting article in Financial Adviser with the view that advisers will no longer be able to recommend funds or even multi-manager propositions without an awful lot of extra resource.

The RDR is forcing investment advice into a regulatory model that will encourage outsourcing to discretionary managers rather than multi-managers alone, according to executives in the sector.

Neil Darke, head of Collins Stewart's wealth management and fund management divisions, and Robin Minter-Kemp, managing director of investment funds at Cazenove Capital Management, said IFAs were looking at firms with both discretionary and multi-manager capabilities to be able to offer the widest possible range of services for their clients.  In particular, Mr Darke raised the concern that outsourcing fund selection to a fund of funds would still count as outsourcing to a particular portfolio.

Under the RDR, this would still require IFAs to do whole-of-market research to determine that the fund of funds would be the best option for their clients.  A discretionary manager could avoid this by discussing a client with an IFA and then recommend they use a multi-manager portfolio, although concerns have been raised a double layer of charging could result.  This would not be a service all IFAs would be qualified to perform under the RDR, Mr Darke warned.

He said: "You will continue to see narrow banking and a narrowing of the financial services sector. The RDR will also result in the narrowing of IFA businesses. The umbrella days of doing everything are history, for regulatory and capital reasons.  "The RDR is going to make it much more difficult for the IFA to buy the fund. It's the same barrier whether you're recommending a multi-manager fund or a single-manager fund. You're going to see a convergence between multi-manager funds and wealth management."

The convergence between multi-manager and wealth management has proceeded apace in recent months.  Leading multi-manager and single manager Jupiter Asset Management has hired private client managers from Singer & Friedlander and Bestinvest. Cazenove Capital Management has also packaged its wealth management and multi-manager solutions for IFAs.  Mr Darke said IFAs may get rid of their investment advisory business altogether, rather than outsourcing it. This would leave clients free to be snapped up by private banks, he said.  Any shift towards private banking would move the UK closer to the continental model of financial advice, where banks are a far more dominant force.

The RDR has put pressure on British IFAs to outsource fund selection to private client or asset management groups, as it requires them to have higher qualifications to handle investments directly.  Mr Minter-Kemp saw a new era emerging in which wealth managers and fund managers would do more hands-on deals with IFAs, allowing the IFA to conduct a psychometric profile of the client and channel them towards a particular type of manager.  Although psychometric profiles are already an established part of the toolkit for IFAs, the managing director saw their usage expanding. Most psychometric profiles allow for more than the traditional three outcomes of active, cautious and balanced management.
But Mr Minter-Kemp said firms would not necessarily need to offer anything beyond that to establish a following in at least part of the risk-rated arena.

via FT Adviser

Filed under: financial planning

Forbes.com


Insurance
You're Retired. Should You Ditch Your Life Insurance Policy?
Amy Bell 11.11.09, 11:06 AM ET

After toiling away in the workplace for decades, you've finally reached those much-awaited, glorious retirement years. That means you can ditch those uncomfortable business suits, bid farewell to boring staff meetings and say good riddance to endless hours pecking away at a computer. And while you're at it, you might as well scrap your life insurance policy too. Wait, not so fast…

You may want to take stock of your current situation before you make this critical decision. For some people, it simply does not make sense to continue to pay into a life insurance policy after retirement. If you no longer have young children who rely on your income and your spouse is covered by retirement investments, maybe you should chuck that policy.

On the other hand, there are plenty of good reasons to hang onto life insurance for a while longer. For example, if you still have family members who rely on your income, if you own a high-value estate or if you simply want to leave a legacy behind, you may decide to keep paying into life insurance.

To keep or not to keep that life insurance policy? It's the million-dollar question for retirees across the nation. If you're trying to determine whether you should throw out your life insurance policy along with your business ties, here are a few things you should keep in mind.

It Isn't About You
It's important to remember that life insurance isn't about you. As a matter of fact, life insurance is not even meant to insure your life. The purpose of life insurance is to protect those who rely on your income from financial hardship if you were to die. If you were to pass away during your working years, an effective life insurance plan would ensure all your family's financial needs will be covered, from the monthly mortgage and utility bills to your child's college education.

But as a retiree, you (hopefully) no longer have children who rely on your income. By the time you reach retirement, your children are most likely grown and earning their own income. If your 35-year-old moocher of a mama's boy is still living your basement rent-free, it's probably time to give him the boot.

So, what about your spouse? At this point in your lives, if you were to bite the dust your spouse would probably be covered by income from your retirement investments. Because you are no longer working, you are not bringing in a stream of work income. There's no need to cover income that isn't there. Plus, if your spouse is also retired, he or she will continue to receive a steady source of income from your retirement funds. Therefore, his or her income would remain the same after your death.

To quickly and easily resolve this dilemma, all you have to do is ask yourself one simple question: Will any of my loved ones suffer from a financial loss if I were to croak tomorrow?

If your answer is "no," then there's probably no need for you to keep your life insurance policy. Unless, of course, you have other personal reasons to hang onto your policy.

It's The Gift That Keeps On Giving
Many retirees want to leave behind a legacy after they're six feet under. Maybe you're comforted knowing your family will receive some kind of payout after your death. Even if they don't need this money, you may want them to have it.

If you feel strongly about this, it may be worth it to give up some of your income now to make sure your heirs receive a special gift later. The significant death benefit could be enough to cover your grandson's college tuition or your granddaughter's wedding. Better yet, it could give your moocher of a son enough cash for a down payment on a house of his own.

Let's say your grandkids are spoiled rotten and you don't feel the need to leave any money to them. In that case, you may prefer to make your favorite charity the beneficiary of your life insurance policy. If there's a special charity that's near and dear to your heart, you could leave a big chunk of money behind to the cause.

Protecting Your Estate
If you own a successful small business or have a high net worth, your estate may be subject to estate taxes after your death. Depending on the value of your estate, these taxes can be extremely expensive. In the end, this could cause some serious financial turmoil for your loved ones.

If that's the case, you may want to keep that life insurance policy after all. However, a term insurance policy is probably not the best type of life insurance for those with large estates. You may want to look into a permanent life insurance policy. Although these policies are more expensive than term insurance, they come with longer term periods.

A term insurance policy typically only covers you for 15 or 20 years, and the payout amount decreases over time. On the other hand, permanent or "whole" life insurance generally remains in effect for your entire life as long as you keep paying premiums.

A whole life policy will provide your family with the money they need to pay off your estate taxes after you die. Not only will this ensure your family doesn't suffer financially, but it could also protect your business from being liquidated.

A Personal Choice
Of course, whether you choose to keep or ditch your life insurance policy post-retirement is entirely up to you. It all depends on your unique wants and needs. If you're struggling to make this decision, discuss the pros and cons with your financial adviser.

Filed under: Financial Planning

Richard says...

The Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners has introduced a new qualification, which it says is the first to cover trusts and estate planning for the industry.

The Step Certificate for Financial Services (Trusts and Estate Planning) has been designed as a level four qualification ahead of the Retail Distribution Review and with the Legal Services Act 2007 in mind.

The core text has been designed and edited by Julie Hutchison, head of estate planning at Standard Life. The qualification can be taken as a standalone qualification or as CPD for wealth advisers.

Rosemary Marr, chairman of Step, says: ‘It is the first in a new series of certificates for those who could benefit from knowing more about trusts and estate planning but may not need the depth of knowledge required for full STEP membership at this stage.’

Think I might have a go at this.

Filed under: financial planning

Richard says...

By Dennis Hall of Yellowtail from Citywire.

In his keynote speech at the Institute of Financial Planning (IFP) annual conference last week Tim Hartford ('The Undercover Economist' from the FT) seemed to poo poo the accuracy of forecasting. And given that the lifetime cashflow model is central to the IFP’s financial planning philosophy this might seem to be a paradox; but is it?

I could be wrong and it may be my selective hearing but Tim said that long-term studies had shown forecasting to be no better than random predictions. In fact it's worse than that, because in one particular study he said that a group of monkeys managed to perform marginally better than people.

Following Tim's speech I find myself re-addressing a couple of topics I covered earlier in the year; lifetime cash-flow modelling, and the unnecessary complexity of current software tools. All this effort into what is essentially a means of trying to forecast a person's financial success – and it's likely to be wrong.

Let's face it; on one level we all know it's wrong, it's why we have stochastic modelling and Monte Carlo simulations. We accept that predictions around investment returns can be wrong, and if we can accept that then why not all the other variables we set?

Take tax. Who predicted the 50% tax band on earnings above £150,000, or the removal of personal allowances on earnings above £100,000? And let's not even get started on the wholesale changes to capital gains tax in recent years. Beyond taxes how wide of the mark have we been when forecasting inflation, deflation (yes, look at the real cost of cars over the past twenty years) and interest rates? Shouldn't we be applying Monte Carlo simulations to each of these variables too?

I think not. What purpose would it serve other than to confuse, and absorb time that could otherwise be spent educating and coaching clients to a better financial future? Simple concepts rather than complicated charts are easier to use and better convey the need for clients to spend less and save more.

I often use the following when framing up the level of savings people should be considering for later life financial security:

'Mr Client you may remember when jobs came with final salary pension schemes. These schemes generally paid you half your final salary as a pension when you retired. Have you any idea the total amount that was paid in each year to provide these benefits? A ball-park figure might be 15% of salary, each and every year up to retirement age. Think about it, 15% of salary over 40 or more years to provide half your final salary.'

This leads to some interesting moments of reflection, particularly now that some other plans are not coming to fruition, such as the buy-to-let portfolios.

Cash-flow modelling can be useful in painting pictures and telling stories, and the simpler they are the better they are. They are after all, wrong.

Another sensible comment from Dennis Hall.

Filed under: financial planning