Search posterous

Search all posts and users. Type a name, type a favorite song title, whatever! See what comes up.
  

More posterous blogs











More recommended blogs »

Here are posterous posts filed under feature...

guosheng says...

Filed under: browser, feature, new, retweet, tag, tweet alert, twitter

adaptive says...

http://bird.ly

Filed under: feature, ui

vsagarv says...

"The thrill of possibility, the chance for recognition, the chemical high of anticipation.That's what people pay for." - Seth Godin

Don't take Godin's words literally and say that people also pay for their plain bread loaf daily. If you are a startup making bread loaves, good for you and read no further.

Many of us in the startup space start out with dreams of changing the world. (Being the next Google is secondary; We actually dream of dwarfing GOOG). But then, quite mysteriously, we tend to forget that dream while conceptualising & engineering the product. For example:

  • "Aggregation / mashup / kitchen sink": My product has all the features that all competitors have. [So, what? Can it change the world?]
  • "Differentiated": My product has features that no one else has out there. [So, what? ...]
  • "Improved": My product improves productivity / experience. [So? ...]

Those are actually examples of subtly disguised "me too" products. Since there's no 'thrill of possibility', such products are at the mercy of luck.

Filed under: change, competition, feature, Godin, luck, product, Seth, Seth Godin, startup

Johann says...

media.io doesn’t support any and all file types yet. Whenever someone tries to upload something media.io doesn’t know yet, I can find out what it was. That’s good for everyone because I can concentrate on audio formats most people want. Here’s the list so far:

  • 13 wma
  • 1 rm
  • 1 ram
  • 1 ogx
  • 1 mpeg
  • 1 flv
  • 1 flac

As you see, many people want to convert WMA – Microsoft’s audio format – to other formats. Understood :-) It’s coming soon

Filed under: audio format, audio formats, conversion, feature, features, format, formats, soon, wma

desdemona says...

Robert Scoble Gives It To Ya Better:

Twitter Lists; Limitations, bugs, impact, and brilliance

First off, I +love+ the new list feature that's coming to Twitter. Last week more than 1,000 people were randomly added to a beta of the new feature. What does it do? It does a few things (TechCrunch wrote an article about the new feature and has screen shots which show what it looks like):

  1. It lets you put the people you are following into lists. (I have several lists, for instance, one for photographers, another for tech executives, another for my most favorited Twitterers, and another for programmers).
  2. It lets you see a feed for each list. The feed is made up of only the people on that list.
  3. If you are the person who made the list you can delete or add people to the list.
  4. You can block the user of any list.
  5. You can subscribe to any list, which will add it to your home page and other places.
  6. You can later delete any list.
  7. You can later rename any list (that's pretty cool, although renaming does change the URL of the list).
On your home page you'll see a few changes:
  1. You'll see a new "listed" item. That tells you how many lists you have been added to.
  2. You'll see a new "Lists" area on the right side of your page which shows you which lists you've made and which ones you've followed (up to a maximum of 20).
  3. If you click on a list name, you'll see the timeline for just that list and you'll also see "view list page." If you click on that you'll see the people that the list is following and who is following the list. You'll also see you can edit or delete the list there.
I've used this feature extensively now and I've found several limitations:
  1. You can only add 20 lists to one Twitter account.
  2. Each list can only have 500 members.
  3. Your sidebar can only display 20 lists. First it will display your lists, then others but you won't be able to control the order or really anything about the list. I even tried changing the spelling on the lists.
  4. If you click on "listed" on your home page, you'll see a list of the lists that have added you. Unfortunately only the last 20 will be listed and you can't see others. I already have more than 200 lists following me and I can't see most of those.
  5. There is a tab that shows you the lists you follow. However, in my case, it only is showing 39 lists. I know I'm actually following about double that amount already. And of course you can't scroll the list or anything like that. I believe these last two limitations are actually bugs or poor design decisions.
What will the impact be of this new feature?
  1. You'll follow a lot more people. Why? Because you'll find someone who has done a really great list, say, of programmers, and you'll add the whole list. I've already done this a LOT and found that Twitter has gotten way more interesting because of it.
  2. You will spend a lot of time managing lists, at least at first. I went through that over on FriendFeed, which has a similar feature (Twitter's implementation is better, by the way).
  3. I can see a raft of new searching and discovery mechanisms. Already I've been invited to the beta test of a new directory service. Which brings me to the next point.
  4. Directories based on numbers of followers are dead. Yes, Wefollow, I'm looking at you.
  5. Anything to do with numbers of followers is now dead. WHAT KIND OF LISTS you are on will be far more important. Who cares if someone has 145,000 followers if no one will put him on a list because they don't like his Tweet style?
  6. Follow Friday is dead. Lists are FAR superior.
  7. Twitter will have scaling problems almost immediately due to these lists because lots of people will start using Twitter more again.
I'm hitting a variety of bugs, too.
  1. First the technology is very slow. It sometimes takes up to a minute after I click to add someone to a list before it releases the UI and shows that that person has been added to the list (if you visit your "following" list you can click a drop-down menu and then you'll be able to click to add that person to one or more of your lists. Sometimes this is very fast, othertimes it's dreadfully slow).
  2. Sometimes I click to add someone to a list and it doesn't add them. 
While I'm here, I do have one feature request. I'd like to add all the people on someone else's list to mine. For instance, I've found a couple of lists of Rackspace employees already. Why can't I visit those lists and say "add all the list members to one of my own lists?" That would be very useful. Or have a way to add groups of people from your following list instead of forcing us to add people one-by-one. 

Anyway, if you are playing with the new list feature, how do you like it? What bugs are you hitting? Are you hitting any limitations?
Oh, and if you don't like it that I have access to this new feature, sorry, but lets meet after you get it and see if you agree or disagree with me on this.

I say that this is all brilliant because it instantly made Twitter much more usable and interesting again. It will be fun to watch when everyone gets to see this new feature and try it for themselves. I think it'll be VERY popular.

UPDATE: If you have an account that is "list enabled" you can check out my lists on my Twitter account. They are going to need a lot more work, but already you can see the direction I'm heading in with them.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Article #2

twitter listsWhen many users start out on Twitter, they follow a boatload of people and build a presence with their tweets. Soon, however, the list of people followed becomes so enormous it's nearly impossible to sort through all the blurbs. In comes the solution, Twitter's newest feature: Lists. Introduced earlier this month, Twitter Lists does precisely what its name implies: allows users to organize people into manageable lists and even broadcast these groups to friends. For instance, you can start a list of your college buddies, your high school sweethearts, and co-workers (not that anyone tweets at work).

Twitter Lists is still not available to everyone. If your account is enabled to use Lists, you should see a massive banner advertising the service. The Lists feature will appear beneath your bio twitteron the right-hand corner of the Twitter homepage. From there you can create a list, mark it as public or private, and scope out other user's lists.

Twitter Lists marks a step forward for the company in the realm of social networking. Lists will engage users to broadcast their groups of friends, suggest fascinating people, explore new hobbies, and more. It's kind of like how Facebook organizes your friends into categories. The problem is that Twitter does not have a user search function, and to add people to lists, you need to manually go to their profile or sort through your "following" group and add them there.

Lovers of the microblogging service will surely drool as Lists receives a broader audience in the near future. Paired with other great Twitter tools, you can become an organized Twitter powerhouse. via pcworld.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Article #3

Check out Sean Percival's Lists.

 

Filed under: Feature, Follow, How-to, Lists, Management, Marketing, New, Robert Scoble, Scobleizer, Sean Percival, Social Media, Social Networks, Tools, Tweet, Twitter

adaptive says...

Now you can broadcast your sightings to your friends via Facebook Stream. Help others see rarities and other important birds. This is an opt-in feature. Please send your feedback. Below is an example of a sighting by me.

Start today adding your sightings... Birds & Birdwatching

Filed under: feature, ui

TechGuyNate says...

Please click to enlarge if you can't read this...I put it together earlier today.  It was a pain finding some of the specs, but I managed to find most of them.  I tried to stay away from listing possible accessories etc.  I plan to do another matrix similar to this but focus more on the software features.  Feel free to share this and if you find a mistake then leave a comment or send a message via Twitter.  Thanks.

Filed under: Apple, Feature, iPod touch, Nintendo, Nintendo DS Lite, Nintendo DSi, Sony, Sony PSP go, Sony PSP-3000

(download)


Just something I wrote about an hour ago. Thinking of making "Late Night Script Writing Brought to you by Red Bull" a feature; not sure how often yet though.

I'm not sure how Posterous is going to present this on the site yet (this being a .pdf from google docs), but please do click the link to read it, it is both much appreciated, and possibly worth your extra mouse click and time. I'll experiment with how the file functions work over the next few weeks or so.

Thanks.
Ben.

Filed under: Feature, Late Night, Writing

bertwerd says...

"Why can't I tag people on my facebook status?  i type in @ and then nothing comes up so i start typing a name and nothing still comes up?"

From ReadWriteWeb article about the new Twitter-like tag feature from Facebook: "Look for the new feature to roll out incrementally in the next couple of weeks.."

You're doing it correctly. Most likely it's that the feature hasn't been rolled out to you yet. I just noticed yesterday that it's working for me now.

Note: Put in the at symbol and immediately after begin typing the friend's name, and it should automatically offer a drop down menu to click.

Filed under: at symbol, facebook, feature, status, tag, tagging, twitter

Colin says...

Extensive auditing capabilities was a recently released feature that really rounds out our offering (see above for a sample). Download the audit log for any file or message on Dialawg and you will have a read-only document that lists its complete history. 

Get proof of important events such as:

  • When was the message or file created? 
  • When were individual recipients added?
  • Who added so-and-so to the recipient list?
  • When were file attachments added to the message?
  • When did recipients first read the message or file?
  • When were new file revisions uploaded?
  • After edits were made, when did recipients first re-read the changes?
  • When were comments added to the file?
  • What did this message look like before I made edits?

Filed under: feature