Search posterous

Search all posts and users. Type a name, type a favorite song title, whatever! See what comes up.
  

More posterous blogs











More recommended blogs »

Here are posterous posts filed under eink...

white says...

Damn, so when would we see it introduced to ebooks market?

It seems pretty slow though. But clearly their screens are bigger than Kindle's 6" or even DX 9".

Anyway eink's fragility is bad. Pretty bad.

http://consumerist.com/5360174/epic-kindle-2-fails-mans-drop-test-forces-amazon-to-pay-him-400

Filed under: eink

fmafra says...

features_space.jpg

Not sure about catalog or quality, but this sure is nicer-looking then kindle.

at Barnes & Noble
Via @mnetto

Filed under: e-ink

Mo Hall says...


Barnes and Noble’s nook may not be the first wireless ebook reader we’ve seen, but with its dual displays, color touchscreen, compact form-factor and Android OS it’s perhaps the most distinctive. The nook isn’t expected to launch until the end of November, but SlashGear were at the B&N launch event in NYC today. Check out our coverage – and some first impressions

more details and pics at link...

Filed under: E INK

andresus says...

Según varios rumores, la empresa de contenidos más grande del planeta -o una de las más grandes-  se encuentra buscando hace mucho tiempo, la forma de eliminar la forma en como presentan su diario. El famoso New York Times dedicado a la producción de contenidos periodísticos y prensa impresa desde 1951, quiere transformar su negocio completamente en una experiencia digital a través de gadgets por suscripción, interfaces de software como Times o incluso la misma aplicación beta del diario Times Reader 2.0 (diferente del anterior).

No me parece una decisión menor, después de todo, la prensa escrita como la conocemos lleva mucho tiempo en el mercado pero, de la misma manera, el mercado de lo digital cada vez nos empuja a leer el contenido en alguna de nuestras pantallas (Laptop, PC, Teléfono, Consola portátil, etc), donde la gran mayoría -y un futuro todas- se conectan a internet. Sin embargo, debo hacer hincapié en la revolución que se encuentra viviendo los canones establecidos por la industria y como esto les abriría un mundo de consecuencias muy positivas si logran adaptarse con inteligencia.

Me parecería realmente genial eliminar todas esas toneladas de papel por pantallas eficientes y lejos de árboles destruidos, pero la verdad que pienso que este será uno de los medios más duros de roer. Y, al igual que sucedió con el disco frente al MP3, no creo que desaparezca por completo -no en el corto plazo por lo menos. La perspectiva con más futuro -la cual creo- es que los medios tendrán un modelo mixto, el papel continuara siendo importante pero desde la perspectiva de la experiencia, es decir, concretamente disfrutaremos del diario los fines de semana -más las toneladas de catálogos- y en la semana, gracias a los medios inmediatos como twitter-facebook-cualquierotroqueaparezca-, disfrutaremos del contenido en nuestros lectores electrónicos de diversos formatos. Desde el celular con aplicaciones dedicadas, hasta un gadget como el Kindle donde se destinará todo el contenido al cual estemos suscritos (incluso llegó a pensar en que los stands de diarios venderán tarjetas de memorias desechables con el diario del día... si es que no te lo pasan inalambricamente primero). Desde mi perspectiva, creo que un medio tan grande como el NYT podría hacer una transición fácilmente con un motor de inteligencia preferentemente con sus suscriptores, los cuales estarían felices de probar opciones como las que aparecen en el video.

Después del anuncio de la crisis hasta hace unos meses atrás, el primero medio que escuché en irse del medio impreso fue la revista PC World. Para mi esta decisión no solamente obedecía a políticas medioambientales sino por todo lo contrario atendia a hacer la oportunidad del negocio impreso para reinventarse,  ahora o nunca y con ávidos lectores que si entenderían migrar a digital.

| andresurena.com
Tecnología - Marketing y Negocios

Algunos derechos reservados bajo una licencia  Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 2.0

Filed under: eink

Richie says...

kindle dx

      Amazon just released a new Kindle, the Kindle DX. When I first heard about this I thought it was a pretty shaddy move by Amazon. Releasing a new version just 3 months after the release of the Kindle 2. After looking at the specifications of the new DX, I realized they are for two different markets. The Kindle DX boast a descent 9.7'' screen compared to the Kindle 2's 6'' screen. The large screen makes the DX better for newspapers, magazines, PDF textbooks, and technical documents/manuals. They are both still lacking a color screen which could get in the way of some technical documents and manuals for professionals.

Filed under: e-ink

eug says...

A couple days ago, Ad Age--by way of contributor Steve Rubel and Director at Edelman's digital group--suggested that the print industry heavily subsidize the Kindle because of its enormous potential . . .

"The good news is your great white hope has arrived. It's the Amazon Kindle. My unsolicited advice is to jump in now. This could be your last chance to monetize content . . . One unsolicited suggestion: Offset part of the cost of the Kindle to get them into the hands of loyal readers with content preloaded. Imagine if Time Warner gave readers $100 off a Kindle that came with a year of digital subscriptions to Time, Sports Illustrated and Fortune. I bet a lot of people would jump in and stay for years.

. . . thus, enlivening the figmenting of imagination around the Kindle, much of it built from a stack of articles of similar sentiment earlier in the month (e.g.), and handily opens up a mythbustering opportunity for the bored. Sure, the expectation is that the Kindle will sell 450 million units this year (and double that next year), clearly prodigious, but that's still just 1/20th of iPhone's volume, and less than 1% of all smartphone sales. It's tiny.

iPhone_vs_Kindle
It's a great machine, the Kindle, and I wish I could trade in my Sony e-Reader for one. (That Sony's best answer to Amazon is a Google Book Search partnership only makes the Kindle look better.) But e-ink ultimately turns the device into a relatively dumb terminal, putting a serious stranglehold on flexibility/agility in user experience, which is of course key to creating value-added services that can be monetized. It's difficult to see how e-ink can hold its own against bigger screen LCDs coming up--especially so when you hear that Apple is perhaps--or perhaps not--already rolling out newer models this year--or OLED five years from now, or electrowetting/quantum-dotting/interferometric-modulation in T+10,

I'm also pretty sure the publishers are well aware of all this, choosing to test the Kindle waters for the time being, offering subscriptions, but focusing on the bigger opportunity--smartphones. Neither does the $100-subsidy Ad Age is proposing make much sense: it implies a 2-year payback--only half of it guaranteed--longer if the reader drops SI after Year 1, never if he switches to competitors Newsweek/Businessweek in Year 2/3, not to mention 12 months of lost fees from his now-canceled Time/SI/Fortune print subscriptions (assuming he was on print before the Kindle switch). And all this makes even less sense if Mr. Ruben suggests giving away a whole year's worth of subscriptions for free ($54 worth, assuming $1.49/month on each of the 3 subscriptions), which I think he just might be, pushing the payback period to 3 years.

Subsidy

Just how extreme is 3 years in the world of hardware subsidizing? Take mobile handsets as an example. Telco operators average $200 in subsidies on smartphones, but they pocket $50 every month for at least a year. That's a 4-MONTH payback. And it's guaranteed. It's gotta be even shorter on an iPhone, especially now, with Apple's roll out of subscription and e-commerce APIs on OS 3.0, or on Android handsets where operators wring out 30% on all app sales.

Mathematical semantics, all this, I know, but I'm calling out AA/Rubel nonetheless.

Filed under: e-ink

Åke says...

Imagine a library with a lot less paper, almost none at all, and at the same time a whole lot more to read... Wouldn't this device be just perfect as a lendable reading tool for e-books, e-mags, e-papers, e-periodicals etc? Why bother with Kindle when you can get something bigger, smoother and and still less heavy and less ugly?

http://www.plasticlogic.com

Filed under: e-ink