Search posterous

Search all posts and users. Type a name, type a favorite song title, whatever! See what comes up.
  

More posterous blogs











More recommended blogs »

Here are posterous posts filed under eatingdisorders...

serra says...

Filed under: eating disorders

serra says...

UGH WIIFIT NEEDS AN I HAVE AN EATING DISORDER MORE

i decided to do my usual wii yoga. usually i ignore its demands to
weigh me, but after a week or so it gets stroppy and insists. so i
give in and say ok, after all it just tells you your BMI and you can
choose not to look at the actual weight. i could handle that better
than seeing the KG.

next thing i know its telling me i have gained 1.5kg in the last
however many days and that its not healthy to gain that much so fast
and presents me with a list of options and a question as to how i
gained the weight. the options were eating too much, drinking too
much, not exercising, and other such options

and no option to skip it or any other way out without turning the
whole thing off, after its already told me how much ive gained and
that its not healthy. and i wanted to do my yoga!

UGH

all i wanted was yoga

Filed under: eating disorders

Jaakko soittaa Barcelonasta joltain messuilta. Hän kertoo esimerkkejä kännykkäelokuvista. Ne vaikuttivat aika koomisilta. Lähdimme pohtimaan jotain uutta tulokulmaa ja päätimme tehdä oopperan, joka esitetään kännykässä. Siis musiikkiteatteria, joka on kirjoitettu ja sävelletty katsottavaksi ja kuultavaksi mobiilipäätelaitteen avulla.

Jo alusta lähtien oli selvää, että juttu olisi tosi outo. Kännykkä ”esitystilana” toi mukanaan tiettyjä mahdollisuuksia, vaatimuksia ja suoraan sanottuna myös ongelmia: Mikä toimii ja mikä on musiikillisesti mahdollista? Kännykän avulla olisi ainakin mahdollista tehdä oopperasta interaktiivinen, mutta mitä tarkoittaa interaktiivinen ooppera? Pitääkö interaktiivisuuden olla sitä, että katsoja valitsee tietoisesti A:n ja B:n välillä, eihän oikeassa elämässäkään käy niin? Onko typerämpää ajatusta kuin kirjoittaa uutta taidemusiikkia esitystilanteeseen, joka voi olla yhtä hyvin bussipysäkki kuin kesämökki?

Vuonna 2007 suomalaisessa mediassa kirjoitettiin paljon syömishäiriöistä. Olin jo pitkään ennen kännykkäoopperan ideaa pohtinut, olisiko tästä tematiikasta mahdollista kirjoittaa musiikkiteatteriesitystä. Idea oli varmaan muhinut siitä lähtien, kun luin Sofi Oksasen ”Stalinin lehmät”. Kirja kuvaa syömishäiriötä uskonnollisesti, mutta uskomattoman musikaalisesti.

Tuntui vaikealta, ellei mahdottomalta löytää laulajaa, joka pystyisi vastaamaan tällaisen teeman näyttämöllisiin vaatimuksiin. Laulaminen on tosi fyysistä työtä, ja vaikka sopraanot kuolevatkin keuhkotautiin päivittäin oopperalavoilla ympäri maailmaa, pelkäsin silti hommasta tulevan helposti falskin. Ehkä pitäisi etsiä asiaan joku ihan uusi tulokulma, tyyliin yhdistämällä näyttelijöitä, muusikoita ja laulajia jossain uudessa kombinaatiossa?

Nämä kaksi ideaa, kännykkäooppera ja ooppera syömishäiriöstä törmäsivät ja kaksi mahdotonta tuntuikin muodostavan mahdollisen. Juuri kännykän pieni näyttö ja rajallinen äänentoisto voisivat tuoda yhteen laulajan ja aiheen.

Jaakko calls me from Barcelona. We discuss an idea about a contemporary musical theatre piece specifically written and composed for mobile devices.

From the outset it was clear that the opera would be really weird. Mobile phones as performance space is a starting point that presents certain opportunities, requirements, and, frankly, problems: What works and what is musically possible?

A mobile phone allows an opera to be interactive, but what is an interactive opera? Does interactivity mean that the viewer has to choose between content A and B, real life doesn’t work that way. Is there a more stupid idea than to write new contemporary music to be experienced at a bus stop or at a summer cottage?

In 2007, there were many articles about eating disorders in the Finnish media. I had been thinking if it would be possible to write a musical theater piece centered around this topic long before the mobile opera idea. This theme had been in my head ever since I read Sofi Oksanen’s ”Stalin’s Cows" The book describes eating disorders almost in a religious tone, and the text is written in an icredibly musical manner.

It seemed difficult, if not impossible to find a singer who could believably carry this difficult theme on stage. Singing is hard physical work, and even though sopranos die of tuberculosis every day on opera stages around the world, I was afraid the whole concept would turn out to be corny. A new angle, a new combination of actors, musicians and singers would be needed to make it work.

Suddenly these two ideas, a opera mobile and opera about eating disorders begun to make sense together. A small mobile phone screen and limited audio capacity could bring together the singer and the subject.



Filed under: eating disorders

serra says...

 

ok i received this email in relation to this post

 

 

 

Dear Madam,

Thank you for your interest in MeMe Roth. While your general attention
is appreciated, your lack of attention to substantiated facts is
alarming.

Please be aware that a formal complaint including a request for
retraction and formal apology has been leveled against Ms. Gaby Wood
and The Guardian regarding the piece you reference in your blog post.

To avoid publishing false, libelous and defamatory comments, you may
reach Ms. Roth at your convenience to check your facts.

We understand members of the pro-fat-acceptance movement and lobbyists
for the food/bev industries regularly publish falsehoods or
sensationalized accounts regarding Ms. Roth, but we have all
confidence you respect journalistic ethics of reporting facts, not
falsehoods, unless the published work is clearly defined as fiction.

Thank you.

www.MeMeRoth.com
www.ActionAgainstObesity.com
www.MeMeRoth.net

Filed under: eating disorders

serra says...

Filed under: eating disorders

serra says...

 

A former Ralph Lauren model whose image in a roundly criticised advertisement was digitally slenderised claims the apparel maker did not renew her contract because she was "too large".

Polo Ralph Lauren Corp is contending that it dismissed Filippa Hamilton because of a contract dispute and that the photo was mistakenly released.

"They fired me because they said I was overweight and I couldn't fit in their clothes anymore," 23-year-old Filippa Hamilton, who worked for the company since she was 15, told the Daily News. She said she considered Polo Ralph Lauren her second family.

The company acknowledged in a statement that the image of Hamilton that appeared last week in a Tokyo mall had been digitally altered.

She went public after the photo surfaced.

Hamilton, a New York resident who is half-Swedish and was raised in France, has been looking for another job since she was let go in April, said Jesse Derris, her spokesman at Sunshine Sachs & Associates. She has not decided whether to sue, Derris said.

The photo's emaciated depiction of her, with hips about as narrow as her head, could make young women "think that it's normal to look like that - and it's not," the 1.8-meter, 54-kilogram model told NBC's Today show.

"I saw my face on this super-extremely skinny girl, which is not me; it's not healthy, it's not right," she said.

Polo Ralph Lauren claimed she "was too large," she added, saying that she's a size 4 and that her weight has remained constant during eight years as a model for the iconic American brand, which has dressed US Olympic teams.

In recent years, designers have typically sought models that fit into clothes that are a size 4, or even 2 or 0.

In a statement, the company said the "very distorted image of a woman's body" - Hamilton's - was "mistakenly released" and displayed in the Japanese department store.

Bloggers also posted the photo on several websites, fueling the controversy.

On Tuesday, Polo Ralph Lauren released a statement that read: "We take full responsibility. This error has absolutely no connection to our relationship with Filippa Hamilton," who is a "beautiful and healthy" woman.

That relationship ended last April "as a result of her inability to meet the obligations under her contract with us," a contract whose terms are confidential, according to a Polo Ralph Lauren spokesman.

Derris said Hamilton was not available for an interview with The Associated Press.

 

Filed under: eating disorders

23narchy says...

Ralph Lauren fires photo-chopped model for being too big

Picture 2.jpgFilippa Hamilton, the model who Ralph Lauren's ad people crudely photoshopped, is looking for work. Ralph Lauren fired her, she said in an appearance on NBC's Today show this morning, due to her inability to fit into his clothes.

She's 5'10" and 120 lbs.

Update: NY Daily News has a statement from the company:

Polo Ralph Lauren said in a statement Tuesday night that Filippa is a "beautiful and healthy" woman but their relationship ended "as a result of her inability to meet the obligations under her contract with us.

In the same piece, reported by Carrie Melago, her lawyer says that he fears Ralph Lauren's treatment of Hamilton "will be extremely damaging to her."

Filed under: eating disorders

serra says...

'Thirty-Two Kilos': A Stark Look at Anorexia

By Rachel Beckman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, January 8, 2009; C04

The most common reaction to Ivonne Thein's photos is horror. The women
in them are emaciated, wrapped in medical bandages and contorted.
Hipbones, elbows and shoulder blades jut out as if begging for release
from their diseased bodies.

The wall text offers some comfort: The photos are digitally manipulated.

The exhibition, which goes on display today at the Goethe-Institut
Washington, is titled "Thirty-Two Kilos," which refers to the weight
(about 70 pounds) of a French actress who posed naked for ads
condemning anorexia.

Thein's decision to obscure the models' faces forces the viewer to
focus on their bodies, particularly the exaggerated limbs, says Al
Miner, a curator at the Smithsonian's Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture
Garden, who will be on a panel tonight at the Goethe-Institut to
discuss "Thirty-Two Kilos."

"It's clear that she's mocking or appropriating poses that we see in
edgier haute couture editorial work. . . . They look uncomfortable and
bizarre. The poses are a reminder that they're a critique of the
fashion industry and not just weight loss."

Thein, a 29-year-old German photographer and student, was inspired to
create the series of 14 photographs after reading about "pro-ana" (or
pro-anorexia) Web sites in a magazine. People on these sites, which
have been around since at least the late '90s, argue that anorexia is
a lifestyle choice like any other. Their fellowship revolves around
encouraging one another's starvation and offering weight-loss tips.

"It was a real shock for me," says Thein, who has shot commercial
fashion photography for European magazines. "It's important for people
to know that every teenager can get this information on the Internet."

In a twist that perhaps could have been anticipated, some of the
pro-ana sites have embraced Thein's work. On these sites, images of
skeletal women provide "thinspiration." One pro-ana blogger posted
Thein's photos and received mixed comments:

"Those pics are so, so beautiful! I want to look like them! They look
so fragil [sic] and like an angel."

"I still think that some of the models have a big [rear]. How distorted am I?"

Other commenters were aghast:

"you are crazy! go eat something! your brain cells are fading away
with your bodies!"

"seriously these girls, if they were as skinny would either already be
dead or would die very soon! Where is the point in being [skinny] when
[you're] dead!!!!"

When creating the photographs (which feature her friends, not
professional models), Thein worried about this very outcome.

"That's not what I wanted," she said. "It's important for me that if I
show my pictures, there's a statement that it's a critical position
and I don't glamorize anorexia."

Lynn Grefe, chief executive officer of the National Eating Disorders
Coalition, calls pro-ana Web sites "competitive, sick environments"
and points out that anorexia has the highest death rate of any mental
illness.

"Those pictures, that's what they're aspiring to because they can
never be thin enough," Grefe says. "It's not a mind-set that most
people can even understand."

Miner -- who as a painter himself creates work that deals with gender
and body issues -- hopes that tonight's conversation addresses the
question of what responsibility artists have to their audiences. He
doesn't think that Thein is accountable to the (mostly) young women on
the pro-ana sites because "it would never end if we tried to censor
what we put out there for their sake."


the photos are at http://www.ivonnethein.com/en/art1_1.html

honestly??? i dont think this is healthy, but then art is meant to
invoke emotion and debate right? personally its triggering as all hell

Filed under: eating disorders

Julia says...

What do think about this take?

http://www.channel3000.com/education/21154458/detail.html

Filed under: eating disorders

serra says...

The woman who hates food

American TV presenter MeMe Roth has attacked everyone from her own mother to Angelina Jolie in her one-woman campaign against obesity. She tells Gaby Wood why shaming people is the best way to a thinner world

MeMe Roth in Times Square

MeMe Roth in Times Square, Manhattan. Photograph: Andrew Testa

MeMe Roth is on TV. She is swishing her long blonde hair from side to side, widening her eyes behind sexy-secretary glasses, holding up a large pair of trousers to illustrate the size of the average American woman's bottom, and generating hate mail. Daily. "I'm called the C-word more than anyone I know, and they don't say 'cute'," Roth tells me when I meet her. "People have wished cancer upon my kids, I've had death threats ..." She's been compared to Hitler, Saddam Hussein, Pol Pot and Stalin. YouTube, to which Roth directs me unflinchingly, boasts a clip entitled MeMe Roth is a Psycho.

That's not her official title. Technically she is president of the National Action Against Obesity, a one-woman campaign run out of Roth's home in Manhattan. An intense, sweet-voiced - and yes, very thin - mother of two, Roth, 39, has elected to combat the number one threat to global health, and has landed herself in the middle of one of the hottest political and economic debates of our time. While she does not enjoy the hate mail (as she meekly puts it), Roth sees herself as the bold purveyor of uncomfortable truths.

But is she taking on the fast-food industry? The sugar barons? The government? No, she is taking on Jennifer Love Hewitt in her unflattering bikini ("She'll be doing some serious squats from now on") and Angelina Jolie ("Every picture of Angelina Jolie shows her children eating a bag of Cheetos. How dare the richest, most educated people who have access to everything do this to their kids?"). While every media outlet of the relatively new century makes at least a token effort to help women of all shapes and sizes feel comfortable with their bodies, Roth manages to be swashbucklingly offensive. But she has a rationale for this. "Love it or hate it, whatever socio-economic category you're in, we are a People-magazine society. So if you get it right with Angelina Jolie, the kids will listen and everything will change."

I meet Roth in New York for not-lunch one afternoon. I had invited her for a meal but she suggested we meet "after lunch" instead, at one o'clock. The place Roth had chosen was canny, if a little soulless: the lobby of a large midtown hotel, where we could sit for hours without having to consume anything. As she intimates later, she is a master at finding ways to meet people that do not revolve around food.

But chastisement is not the same as persuasion, and some of Roth's formulations are of such questionable sanity that they can't possibly help her cause. For instance, she tells me: "The defence has been made in the case of sex criminals that there is pleasure on the part of the victim. The same is true with what we're doing with food. We may abuse our bodies with food, but it's incredibly pleasurable. From a food marketer's point of view, when your quote unquote victim is so willing and enjoying of the process, who's fighting back?"

Roth's mother, father, grandmother and uncles are all obese. Her father weighs 300lb. Her mother is diabetic. Her grandmother needs 24-hour nursing care. When I ask what her family thinks of her crusade, she acknowledges that "it's hurtful", but says they are "highly supportive". The thing is, Roth doesn't just see her parents as victims of obesity: "I've been to obesity," she says, "and I don't want anyone else to go there."

Her suffering was apparent early on. "When I was in kindergarten," she recalls, "no one taught me to be ashamed of obesity, but the day, on my birthday, that my mother was to bring cupcakes to my class, I put my head on the table because I knew that within minutes my mother would be there and everyone was going to know that my mother was fat. I felt ashamed. I was grateful that down the block there was another mother who was fatter than my mother."

When I ask Roth what her greatest fear is, she replies: "That my children will become sick, because this culture refuses to foster healthy children. Thank goodness my husband, who also comes from overweight people, also feels the way I feel." She wonders who Mason, 10, and Julia, seven, "will partner with. It scares me. And it's Darwinian. This isn't just my opinion: males with obesity have lower sperm counts and sperm motility; females have higher rates of infertility, higher rates of pregnancy complication and a higher rate of birth defects. So don't listen to me, listen to Darwin!"

What does Roth do? When I ask her if she's ever been anorexic, she gasps: "No! I've never even been on a diet!" So I ask her what she eats in an average day. On this, Roth is reticent. She now runs a private nutrition counselling business, she says, and because of that, "I don't spend a ton of time telling people what I do personally. What works for me may not work for other people."

That's fine, I say, but just as an example?

"I eat beans like nobody's business," she says hurriedly. "I eat more black beans than anyone else I know."

I try to pin her down to something more specific. Let's just do a sample day, I say. What about breakfast? Roth grimaces. "I hate to say this, because I think it's counter to what most people should do, but I never in my whole life have enjoyed breakfast. For me, it doesn't work as well as other things."

Right, I say. So how about lunch?

She squirms visibly. "You're taking me where I don't want to go ... What works for me doesn't work for a lot of people."

Well, you've said that, I insist, so taking that into account: lunch? Roth hesitates. "I discovered when I was in college that I work best when I get a workout in and eat after that. Sometimes I'll delay when I eat until I get a workout in. But I don't let a whole day go by without running four miles."

OK, I go on, but supposing you couldn't work out until four o'clock in the afternoon - would you not eat until after that?

"I might."

I look at my watch. It's 3.30pm. Alarm bells start to ring in my head. How about today, I ask. Have you eaten at all today?

Roth is a little quiet.

"No," she says.

There is a pause.

"But I feel great!"

now this is one person who makes me angry!!!

Filed under: eating disorders