Search posterous

Search all posts and users. Type a name, type a favorite song title, whatever! See what comes up.
  

More posterous blogs











More recommended blogs »

Here are posterous posts filed under constitution...

Hi, this is great news and something to celebrate over. I’m excited to be represented in the Senate on this issue. I’m definitely going to be ripping the webcast stream on ParlVu’s servers for this event. Stay tuned!

Natural Health Products Protection Association
Protecting access to Natural Health Products and Dietary Supplements

UPCOMING EVENT OTTAWA RALLY ON NOVEMBER 25TH

 

Your calls, faxes, letters and emails prompted the Senate Committee on Social Affairs to reschedule for November 25th to hear Shawn Buckley on Bill C-6.

Now send another Stop Bill C-6 message to the Senators but this time do it in person by participating in the Ottawa Rally on Wednesday, November 25th.

As a constitutional lawyer, Shawn is uniquely qualified to address the concerns of Bill C-6 on our behalf. Show Shawn your support by attending the rally.

 

The Canadian Natural Health Collective (CNHC) has organized the Ottawa Rally on behalf of the NHPPA.  CLICK HERE for further details on the rally.

 

If you are unable to attend the Ottawa Rally you can still listen or watch the November 25th 4:00 PM (EST) Bill C-6 hearing LIVE via the Senate Committee’s webcast.

 

CLICK HERE to check the status of Bill C-6.

 

Protecting Our Access,

Tiffany Sampson
Project Coordinator
NHPPA

#2-953 Laval Crescent,
Kamloops, British Columbia
V2C 5P4

P | 250 – 377 – 4930  
F | 250 – 377 – 4990


info@nhppa.org   
www.nhppa.org

 

Filed under: constitution

samdunstan says...

(download)

Wow, this can't be good.
Kevin Rudd PM, you've got some explaining to do!

Filed under: Constitution

P.S. And BTW, when CNN sits there making a point to say several times there are no internment or concentration camps here in the U.S., that's 110% Bull Sh!t.  I just got done watching the extremely hard hitting movie "Camp FEMA" and I couldn't sleep for 2 friggin days. It is that bad, it's really happening, and it's for the American public. Look for yourself.

What does it mean when the talking heads on 24 hour cable news networks spin the fact that members of www.OathKeepers.org, are patriotic US Military, Police, and Law enforcement personnel that are reaffirming the very oath they took in to first place... portraying them as dangerous radical extremists?

Well, I don't know what that means (*cough, cough*) exactly.  Are the discredited Main Stream Media and their elitist masters getting worried about something?

Doing hit pieces on The Oathkeepers for pledging to uphold and defend the Constitution and Bill of Rights from all enemies, foreign AND domestic, even drawing attention to "Fall of the Republic" after it's director has been banned from CNN forever. I sense something...

--Seditious Blasphemer
Sedition, Sorcery, and Blasphemy

Filed under: Constitution

American Pride / Brand Manifesto
The Liberty Bill Act is an initiative started by teachers and students at Liberty Middle School, VA, which aims to amend the US currency to include an abridge version of the American constitution on the reverse of every single one Dollar bill: "Imagine seven billion one Dollar bills exchanging hands each day among the six billion people around the world ... the democracy, freedom and goodwill of the Constitution - America’s pride - on every single one." Backed by Congressmen Eric Cantor (R-VA) and endorsed by Ralph Nadar, the Liberty Bill Act is slowly moving its way up the Congressional ladder. Conceptually this act has much merit and we applaud the teachers and students of Liberty Middle School for pursuing their cause and for also gaining such widespread Congressional recognition too - its highly impressive to say the least. But what really makes this initiative interesting is that on many levels the Constitution represents America's 'brand values,' and it also outlines what defines America's 'brand personality.' Therefore, essentially the Constitution is the 'brand platform' from which any rebranding initiative could begin. And perhaps rather than including all seven articles and every 27 amendments on one bill, it might be clearer to communicate each one - or include a summary or use a visual metaphor instead - across several bills of every denomination. Then occasionally interject those with bills including visual representations of various national achievements - man on the moon and so on - and hey presto we have a complete 'brand communication program' based on what makes this country great. A communication program that represents a set of beliefs and values that we all - more or less - adhere to and believe in. Wow! I'm really beginning to see the 'light.' Next stop Washington.

Filed under: Constitution

Truehope "Raids" Health Canada...

Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen

Tuesday, November 3rd, 2009

Yesterday, a Canadian company Truehope, the makers of EMPowerplus, the first supplement product in North America to be protected against attack by a government agency by the Court System, started their second round of assault against Health Canada. 

Let's wish them well...

In their first round they slapped Health Canada around a Canadian Courtroom, getting the Court to Order Health Canada to leave them alone.  The Court ruled, simply, that EMPowerplus, a supplement product that reverses Bi-Polar issues, did not require approval from Health Canada, and that it was "a necessity" to the people that used it.  Health Canada employees had stopped entry of the product into Canada (it is manufactured in the US) causing several people to die, and many others to suffer, without it.  No Health Canada employees, however, were ever criminally indicted for those deaths.

Yup - they are attacking Health Canada one more time - and if they win this assault they will have completely removed Health Canada's teeth, so to speak.  Health Canada might as well, after this, lock the doors and send the employees home.

Why?  Because if Truehope has their way Health Canada won't be able to attack Vitamin Supplement companies any more.  It has been a simple fact that Health Canada, from the top down, sees its role as protecting the pharmaceutical industry it is supposed to be regulating against competition. 

Health Canada claims in its Mission Statement to so certain things, in reality it does exactly the opposite.  Read this below, from their website:

"Health Canada is the Federal department responsible for helping Canadians maintain and improve their health, while respecting individual choices and circumstances.  According to our mission and vision, Health Canada's goal is for Canada to be among the countries with the healthiest people in the world."

The old adage "Actions speak louder than words" comes into play here when you take a hard look at Health Canada.  When you do that there are only two choices here to consider:  (1)  either that is NOT Health Canada's true Mission Statement, and the agency website is a fraud, or (2)  certain employees (a lot of them, from the top down) are intentionally ignoring what the people of Canada set them in place, and ordered them to do, on their behalf.

I go for choice number two.  In this Health Canada duplicates the everyday duplicity in US agencies, like the US FDA and the CDC.

Removing Health Canada's Teeth...

In a letter I received from Truehope:

"Truehope co-founder Anthony Stephan claims that if the constitutional challenge is successful Health Canada will no longer be able to remove a product from the market without first proving in court that the removal will not harm Canadians who use it for their health. “Canadians are harmed when viable natural treatments or preventions are taken away. Drugs should not be the only option for Canadians who choose health. The judgment will extend protection to all Canadians and to all natural health products.”

Current Health Canada regulations allow bureaucrats to remove natural products at will without any accountability to Canadians for their actions.2 “We think this kind of unconstitutional freefor-all opens the door for corruption and for big pharma lobby, and closes the door on individual freedom and choice in personal health care,” says Stephan."

In short, it is a Constitutional Challenge to two subparagraphs of the Food and Drug Act - section 23(1)(d) and section 26.  The action claims that those two sections violate Sections 7 and 8 of  the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.  These two subparagraphs are the "teeth" of Health Canada.  Just below is the explanation, from the Court Documents, of the two sections:

 

The Constitutional Challenge, however, maintains that allowing this unrestrained activity by Health Canada violates sections 7 and 8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights  - for several reasons - and wants these sections struck down.  Below is why they want section 23 (1)(d) struck down:

 

 

 

Then they attack section 26 in much the same way...

 

 

 

Then they attack both sections...

 

 

 

But then it gets even better...

 

 

We'll keep you posted.

Stay tuned...

Filed under: constitution

Since the U.S. Court of Appeals, (Bowers v. DeVito, U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, 686F.2d 616 [1982]), reaffirmed that there is no Constitutional right to be protected by either the state or the Federal government from being MURDERED, does anybody else wonder how Obamacare leapfrogs being MURDED by Criminals or Madmen as being so important as to brake off the lawful bindings of the Constitution in order to be shoved down the throats of the American people?


"There is no constitutional right to be protected by the state (or Federal) against being murdered by criminals or madmen. It is monstrous if the state fails to protect its residents against such predators but it does not violate the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, or, we suppose, ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THE CONSTITUTION. The Constitution is a charter of negative liberties: it tells the state (gov't) to let people alone; it does not require the federal government or the state to provide services, even so elementary a service as maintaining law and order"

(Bowers v. DeVito, U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, 686F.2d 616 [1982]).

(emphesis added)

Please join me on www.TWITTER.com/s3d1t0r

Filed under: Constitution

netlex says...

 

Objections concerning the loss of the Czech Republic’s sovereignty

According to the Constitutional Court, “in a modern democratic state governed by the rule of law, state sovereignty is not an aim in and of itself, i.e. in isolation, but is a means to fulfilling the fundamental values on which the construction of a democratic state governed by the rule of law stands [...] The transfer of certain competences tot he state, which arises from the free will of the sovereign and will continue to be exercised with its participation in a pre-agreed, controlled manner, is not a sign of the weakening of sovereignty, but, on the contrary, can lead to strengthening it in the joint process of an integrated whole.”

The Constitutional Court also found unjustified the other reasons for the alleged inconsistency of the Treaty of Lisbon with the constitutional order, and, in the conclusion of its judgment, stated that “this judgment refutes the doubts concerning the consistency of the Treaty of Lisbon with the Czech constitutional order, and removes the formal obstacles to its ratification.

______________________

Press Release: The Treaty of Lisbon is in conformity with the constitutional order of the Czech Republic and there is nothing to prevent its ratification Brno, the Constitutional Court, 3 November 2009

Filed under: constitution

Zed says...

So today we learn the the Dimocrats are going to pass their healthcare bill including the government option. Against the will of the people. Against common sense. Against the U.S. Constitution. They're passing it in spite of these things and they're passing it the way they want it because... well, because they want it. And they keep telling us that the American People want it.

But we don't. I know we don't because I'm the American People, because I'm one of the majority. And according to the latest Rasmussen polls that majority is growing.

It's pretty obvious what's going on here - it's the sixties all over again. The hippies have morphed into politicians and they've moved to DC. They're still living by the philosophy "if it feels good do it!" Spending feels good. Ignoring the Constitution feels good. Passing ridiculous and useless laws that favor their special interest supporters feels good. Pretending at intellectual superiority feels good. Pretending at moral superiority feels good. Wallowing in their bloated self-importance feels good. Washington DC has become the great liberal orgasmatron and the Dimocrats have it cranked to maximum.

Unfortunately for the rest of America, we're paying for their party. And our kids will be paying for decades to come.

Filed under: Constitution

Fuzilah says...

Full documentary here:
http://www.youtube.com/user/alexjoneschannel3#grid/user/0D01C6963BFCE25A

Filed under: constitution

Sent from my iPhone

Filed under: Constitution