Search posterous

Search all posts and users. Type a name, type a favorite song title, whatever! See what comes up.
  

More posterous blogs











More recommended blogs »

Here are posterous posts filed under clayshirky...

davidalvarez says...

Round and round this goes, with the people committed to saving newspapers demanding to know “If the old model is broken, what will work in its place?” To which the answer is: Nothing. Nothing will work. There is no general model for newspapers to replace the one the internet just broke.

With the old economics destroyed, organizational forms perfected for industrial production have to be replaced with structures optimized for digital data. It makes increasingly less sense even to talk about a publishing industry, because the core problem publishing solves — the incredible difficulty, complexity, and expense of making something available to the public — has stopped being a problem.

Filed under: Clay Shirky, periodismo

chieftech says...

SIMON: We, as you know, have tried to work the use of social media into our program. We do get some resentment from people who, some people, not everybody has access to the internet or think that they have no interest in social media sites.

Mr. SHIRKY: The conversation around the digital divide, this gap between who can participate and who can't, has shifted. In the '90s, it was mainly about access to hardware and network connections. Right? Not everybody has a computer. But as computers have gotten cheaper and spread, as they started showing up in specific places like libraries, and as phones increasingly have, even just through SMS, these kind of functions, the conversation's really shifted from the question of access to a hardware to the sense of permission and to the sense of interest. And that's a much squishier, more social question.

So part of the digital divide question, the new digital divide question is, how do we go to people who don't sense they have permission to speak in public and offer them that permission? And then the other, as you say, is the interest. If there are people who are just uninterested in this stuff, how can you make an experience that's still satisfying for them as, you know, traditional consumers of media, without making them feel bad for not being the people posting the Flickr pictures of potholes or, you know, adding a comment to an NPR story?

This is from an interview of US National Public Radio with Clay Shirky. The Digital Divide issue is often seen in simple terms - those that can access and those that can't. However, I think Clay is right that the issue has shifted. While not discussed in this interview, another point is the gap between those that do want to engage online but in a particular domain are not given the chance (such as local government consultations that are only conducted face-to-face).

Filed under: clay shirky, digital divide, interview, technology and society

This is the world we now live in...what now...jump in...participate...figure out what it means to you as we all are.

Filed under: Clay Shirky, Facebook, Social Media, Twitter

Great presentation by Clay Shirky.

Clay does a great job of objectively highlighting why the internet is the greatest communication breakthrough to date.

Filed under: cell phones, Clay Shirky, internet, Mike Hickinbotham, social media, TED

Ublogo says...

Here's a very interesting article comparing local blogging with local media, with a lot of great discussion in the comments.  This is directly related to politics, which is, and always will be the most controversial.  

Politics always gets the most attention, there's always a different view point, and there's usually always someone, that is offended.  The local media has straddled this fence for years, and the world of local blogging will as well.  

"A couple of months ago I signed up as a local blogger to the Newcastle Journal’s Your Place regional blogging project. It’s created a network of 22-local micro sites each of which are fed with content by local bloggers."

"Clay Shirky, Seth Godin, and others have spotlighted this approach as a means of breathing life into regional media. But I’ve very quickly identified a flaw in the model of using bloggers to contribute to local media properties."

Read the rest here

Filed under: Clay Shirky, Local Media, Seth Godin

edwardharran says...



I know it was ages ago, but god I loved Clay Shirky at NTEN09
 
"The loss of control you fear is already in the past."

"We're not good at thinking fast. We are good at feeling fast."

"Tools don't get socially interesting until they get technologically boring."

"Once one person solves the problem once, the problem stays solved for everybody."

"The intention of users has more impact than the intention of the designers."

"Each of us is simultaneously an individual person and a global publisher."

"Start small and good, then make it bigger."

"We spend more time figuring out whether something is a good idea than we would have just trying it."

"Don't hire consultants. Hire your own 23-year-olds."

"Just take our organization and add some Internet."

"It's not just about delivering content to members, it's about the convening power to help members discover each other."

"Fail informatively - Fail like crazy."

"My guess is that the high water mark of Facebook's universality has passed."

"Nothing says dictatorship like arresting people for eating ice cream. The problem wasn't the ice cream, it was the group."

"I was just making things up."


From Non Profit Tech Conference 09
via Shirky Quotes That Blew My Mind - thanks for sharing Chad. I had about 500 things written down.

Read his stuff:
http://www.shirky.com/

Note to Self:
Get autographied book back to @SarahMoran

Filed under: clayshirky

designdamage says...

With the recent acquisition of Zappos by Amazon, many companies are now taking a serious look at social innovation especially after the latest Engagement report by Wetpain and the Fluent report by Razorfish on social influence marketing. Basically these reports prove that brands with high social media activity increased revenues while the less active ones aren’t as profitable.

The statistics not only adds fuel to the social media hype but helps to convert the naysayers to believers. Even Twitter is leveling the playing field by publishing its own Twitter 101” guide, which contains ideas, tips and case studies intended for businesses to make the best of the service. The beginner's guide to Twitter is intended to lower the learning curve but could evolve into the ultimate Twitter knowledge base.  This is actually a good thing because it allows users to focus more on the strategic usage of Twitter rather than the tactical side.  It also forces the “experts” to elevate their game to the next proof of concept level on those “how to use social media” content. Recently I've notice that there has been a lot of coverage on social media from the mainstream authorities from Wall Street Journal to Reuters, another tell that the knowledge is becoming ubiquitous.  While the nature of using social media has low barriers to entry, some brands are still struggling in defining their social media strategy. Having a presence doesn't necessary mean a good thing, the fundamental of networking online is essentially the same as offline - engage in meaningful conversations with your audience. In my opinion, that's the core element of any networking beyond the high-level fundamentals that we all agree: be authentic, credible, and identifiable.  If not you can read the post “Why You Should Always Be True to Your Brand." Let’s look at the change in social media to better understand how it should be used in conversation marketing.

World-of-Mouth Consumption to Production

In the social marketing landscape, word-of-mouth (WOM) starts playing a factor immediately effecting restaurant reputations to box office numbers.  You no longer need to wait to meet someone in person to discuss a movie you watched, a product you’ve purchased, or an event you’ve attended to get feedback.  Simple use your internet enabled mobile device to start aggregating content into your social networks letting everyone know your views.  For live events, people are broadcasting themselves via Twitter or Ustream for real-time content production not to mention the interaction as others tweet, retweet, comment, like, or post reactions. The traditional "push" communications techniques are becoming less effective while still costly.  We’re transitioning into a media environment meant to be about conversations where the media and its message, instead of articulating the endpoints of meaning, represent the staring point for the production of meaning in social media.  Digital media has relinquished the control to the increasingly social crowd as both the conductor and engineer. Viewing a TV commercial, reading a blog article or listening to a radio ad are all forms of production as the viewer or listener interprets and makes sense of the message.  Following the consumption of the content is a reaction which could potentially spiral into further conversations and that conversation can get into another network and so on and so forth. The take way: If you're actively using social media, you have a higher chance of being heard, connected and engaged because you’re part of the viral WOM network.  This is why brands care more than ever about you, what you say, and how you say it.  They are actively listening and participating in order to humanize the relationship through interactions.  Or simply put, managing their reputations.

Influence the influencers

Whether you’re a blogger, a marketer, or an entrepreneur your opinion counts and can be contagious.  It’s now possible and easy to circulate your message via the new digital channels like Facebook (fan page), Linkedin (groups), Twitter (tweets) or Youtube (videos).  The key is to facilitate effective word-of-mouth campaign through these communities spreading horizontally rather than vertically described in Clay Shriky’s book “Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations.” Each time you’re able to influence experts, opinion leaders, or people with authority you’ll instantaneously gain a little more credibility and access to their fan base.  Then the collective minds with shared visions will continue to spread your message forming the viral wave pushing all the way to the long-tail shores. If you want to attract “relevant audience” to your branded social network, you must do more than just spam visitors with self-promoting ads.  In fact, you need to offer compelling value that keeps your audience engaged as well as perpetuating the interaction.  The more interactivity a social network platform allows their users to have, the more engaged users will tend to be which often leads to a greater chance of influencing the network effectively.  This is why blogs are still amongst the most influential social media because they encourage bloggers to interact with their audience in a simple and easy fashion. A recent NY Times article points out how Procter & Gamble focuses on getting honest opinions from bloggers rather than paying for positive press is the perfect example of targeting the right influencer.  However, P&G knew they had to leverage bloggers strategically because bloggers are being viewed by their fans as one of the trusted source, thus the pay-for-favorable-endorsement doesn’t work as well as the pay-for-your-opinion. In addition, according to a recent article from eMarkters, majority of the social media marketers “rated social media marketing effective at influencing brand reputation, increasing awareness and improving search rankings and site traffic.”
As you can see, social media is largely used as a mean to manage reputation and generating awareness.  Notice that the top 3 most effective tactics used are also the most interactive platform thus generating the most influence: user reviews or ratings, bloggers or online journalist relations, and forums or discussion groups.

Conversation and Behavioral Targeting

Great product and services can strike a stimulating discussion and ultimately leads to consumer buy-in. The goal is to have a strategy that will allow you into the ongoing conversation or to create the opportunity to start one. Social conversation is not about UVP (unique value proposition) or the USP (unique selling propositions), instead it’s an opportunity to discover and learn about the networking ecosystem (you, your audience, their audience etc.) in order to earn trust through caring and helping.  UVP and USP are important but should come later during the engagement cycle.  Think of the social media conversation as WOM on steroids. Once you have an understanding of your ecosystem you can then create targeted advertising strategies within social networking. The whole idea of collecting data is to learn and anticipate what your audience might be interested in based on their behaviors.  This enables advertisers to develop the proper call-to-action that could lead to conversions via conversation marketing rather than accumulation marketing (focus on quantity instead of quality of the traffic). As someone who started a career as a designer (graphic/web design and product design) and now providing brand strategies, I see the core elements in social media similar to that of communication design and user experience.  The difference is that a brand must communicate like a person optimizing the experience to initiate interaction. The intention should be to focus on adding value to the conversation, prolonging the dialogue and elevating its relevance to the participants. Not only will people come to expect more of the same great value you've provided but they may become your brand evangelist spreading your messages, advocating your brand. You can have the greatest product or the best selling book, if you don’t care about others the chance are, they won’t care about you to take actions.  Even if someone is influenced or bought the idea it doesn’t mean he or she will take action. So position yourself as a prolific contributor will definitely help but don’t loose your personality that’s uniquely you, and if you don’t have anything to say, simply listen first. Don’t become those annoying people who always talk about themselves and don’t listen to others. Another example what NOT to do in social networking is to just repeatedly blast out press releases or spam-like promotions ignoring the two-way communication dynamics.
Remember, anything that you put out there in the community can come back to you in a heartbeat. Monitoring the conversation is the foundation of engagement.  If you’re going to play ball, be ready to follow through and make it fresh and keep it real. Love to hear your tips, success stories, and pitfalls to avoid in the comments about  your social network engagement experience, how are you engaging your audience?

Filed under: amazon, brand, Clay Shirky, engagement, facebook, influencer, social marketing, social media, strategy, twitter, word-of-mouth, Zappos

23narchy says...

via cato-unbound.org

Filed under: broadcast, Clay Shirky, distribution, information, journalism, media, print

edwardharran says...

"Society doesn’t need newspapers. What we need is journalism. For a century, the imperatives to strengthen journalism and to strengthen newspapers have been so tightly wound as to be indistinguishable. That’s been a fine accident to have, but when that accident stops, as it is stopping before our eyes, we’re going to need lots of other ways to strengthen journalism instead." Clay Shirky

I really like this model.

Filed under: clayshirky, journalism

23narchy says...

Just started reading this - very good.

Filed under: 2009, Clay Shirky, communications, crowdsourcing, internet, networks, world wide web