We're in for decades of chaos...
Media chaos that is.
Clay Shirky, author of Here Comes Everybody, argues that the next 50 years of media will be chaos, as old models break faster than new ones are being created.
Media chaos that is.
Clay Shirky, author of Here Comes Everybody, argues that the next 50 years of media will be chaos, as old models break faster than new ones are being created.
Photo by Flickr/PictFactory
This evening I've been listening to Clay Shirky, on Penguin podcasts, talk about the sociological aspects of the internet. Clay Shirky is the author of 'Here Comes Everybody' and a lecturer at NYU.
The podcast features Shirky talking about large group collaborations and co-ordination on the internet especially for addressing global issues, and the future of online media. If you're curious and want to understand more about how we, as a society, use the internet and what emerging patterns are laying a path for the future of the web then Clay Shirky is not only a brilliant thinker on the topic but also a concise and elequent speaker. Although the talk dates from when 'Here Comes Everybody' was first released, in 2008, much of what he discusses is still relevant now.
Penguin podcasts are a great resource for hearing other authors speak on equally interesting works of both non-fiction and fiction.
Link to Podcast:
Penguin Podcasts: Clay Shirky Talk
Related Links:
Round and round this goes, with the people committed to saving newspapers demanding to know “If the old model is broken, what will work in its place?” To which the answer is: Nothing. Nothing will work. There is no general model for newspapers to replace the one the internet just broke.
With the old economics destroyed, organizational forms perfected for industrial production have to be replaced with structures optimized for digital data. It makes increasingly less sense even to talk about a publishing industry, because the core problem publishing solves — the incredible difficulty, complexity, and expense of making something available to the public — has stopped being a problem.
SIMON: We, as you know, have tried to work the use of social media into our program. We do get some resentment from people who, some people, not everybody has access to the internet or think that they have no interest in social media sites.
Mr. SHIRKY: The conversation around the digital divide, this gap between who can participate and who can't, has shifted. In the '90s, it was mainly about access to hardware and network connections. Right? Not everybody has a computer. But as computers have gotten cheaper and spread, as they started showing up in specific places like libraries, and as phones increasingly have, even just through SMS, these kind of functions, the conversation's really shifted from the question of access to a hardware to the sense of permission and to the sense of interest. And that's a much squishier, more social question.
So part of the digital divide question, the new digital divide question is, how do we go to people who don't sense they have permission to speak in public and offer them that permission? And then the other, as you say, is the interest. If there are people who are just uninterested in this stuff, how can you make an experience that's still satisfying for them as, you know, traditional consumers of media, without making them feel bad for not being the people posting the Flickr pictures of potholes or, you know, adding a comment to an NPR story?
This is from an interview of US National Public Radio with Clay Shirky. The Digital Divide issue is often seen in simple terms - those that can access and those that can't. However, I think Clay is right that the issue has shifted. While not discussed in this interview, another point is the gap between those that do want to engage online but in a particular domain are not given the chance (such as local government consultations that are only conducted face-to-face).
This is the world we now live in...what now...jump in...participate...figure out what it means to you as we all are.
Great presentation by Clay Shirky.
Clay does a great job of objectively highlighting why the internet is the greatest communication breakthrough to date.
"The loss of control you fear is already in the past.""We're not good at thinking fast. We are good at feeling fast." "Tools don't get socially interesting until they get technologically boring.""Once one person solves the problem once, the problem stays solved for everybody.""The intention of users has more impact than the intention of the designers." "Each of us is simultaneously an individual person and a global publisher.""Start small and good, then make it bigger.""We spend more time figuring out whether something is a good idea than we would have just trying it." "Don't hire consultants. Hire your own 23-year-olds.""Just take our organization and add some Internet.""It's not just about delivering content to members, it's about the convening power to help members discover each other." "Fail informatively - Fail like crazy.""My guess is that the high water mark of Facebook's universality has passed.""Nothing says dictatorship like arresting people for eating ice cream. The problem wasn't the ice cream, it was the group." "I was just making things up."
With the recent acquisition of Zappos by Amazon, many companies are now taking a serious look at social innovation especially after the latest Engagement report by Wetpain and the Fluent report by Razorfish on social influence marketing. Basically these reports prove that brands with high social media activity increased revenues while the less active ones aren’t as profitable.
The statistics not only adds fuel to the social media hype but helps to convert the naysayers to believers. Even Twitter is leveling the playing field by publishing its own “Twitter 101” guide, which contains ideas, tips and case studies intended for businesses to make the best of the service. The beginner's guide to Twitter is intended to lower the learning curve but could evolve into the ultimate Twitter knowledge base. This is actually a good thing because it allows users to focus more on the strategic usage of Twitter rather than the tactical side. It also forces the “experts” to elevate their game to the next proof of concept level on those “how to use social media” content. Recently I've notice that there has been a lot of coverage on social media from the mainstream authorities from Wall Street Journal to Reuters, another tell that the knowledge is becoming ubiquitous. While the nature of using social media has low barriers to entry, some brands are still struggling in defining their social media strategy. Having a presence doesn't necessary mean a good thing, the fundamental of networking online is essentially the same as offline - engage in meaningful conversations with your audience. In my opinion, that's the core element of any networking beyond the high-level fundamentals that we all agree: be authentic, credible, and identifiable. If not you can read the post “Why You Should Always Be True to Your Brand." Let’s look at the change in social media to better understand how it should be used in conversation marketing.