CSR Minute: 12/8/09 - Bombardier's CSR Report; Cisco's Sustainable Cities w/ San Fran and Amsterdam
Corporate Social Responsibility News: Bombardier's CSR Report; Cisco's Sustainable Cities' with San Francisco and Amsterdam
Corporate Social Responsibility News: Bombardier's CSR Report; Cisco's Sustainable Cities' with San Francisco and Amsterdam
Architect Carolyn Steel looks at food and how our cities were originally designed around it, and how we have disconnected from food as the core organising principle.
Every day, in a city the size of London, 30 million meals are served. But where does all the food come from? Carolyn Steel discusses the daily miracle of feeding a city, and shows how ancient food routes shaped the modern world. Stunning photos and an explanation of the rise of cities and of the Roman Empire which has clear links to the patterns of expansion of today's empires. Big changes needed - or coming.Her descriptions of how our relationship to food has changed, reminded me of Geoff Lawton's admonition that we can solve all your pollution problems, and all your supply line needs, in a garden. It left me feeling more urgent to help build resilience into our local food system, and to getting back to my garden again. We have been living in another house, than the one where I established a garden a couple of years ago, and I'm looking forward to returning next weekend.I went to the Asian Art Museum in San Francisco a few weeks ago and just wanted to share some pictures of the pieces I saw. I was disappointed to see only one piece from the Philippines, though. That said, there were some excellent paintings, statues, and artifacts on display. I wish I took a picture of the replicated Japanese tea room; it looked pretty cool. At the time, there was a special exhibit featuring pieces from Siam and Burma.
Truth be told, I am not a huge art buff but after taking honors art in high school for two years, I learned to appreciate it! The museum was great and easy to get to. Just take BART and get off Civic Center.Here's more info on the museum, for those interested:
While reading Makers, you get caught up in the lives of Lester, Perry, Suzanne and the rest. There are villains and heroes, celebrations and catastrophes. Doctorow gives an addictive read; my thumb rapid-clicked the Kindle page button to move the words faster and faster.
While I was captivated by the story, that's not my focus here. I’ll save the story for you to read – no spoiler alert required.
The wealth of new images in Makers lets us peer into one scenario for 21st c cities. In this future, we live on a whimsical, resource-limited planet that I might love but also fear, particularly as an architect.
What Can Makers Teach Us About Possible Futures?
Here’s nine intriguing images, all plausible enough, and a few that scare the bejeezies out of me.
What Do I Love and Fear About Makers’ World?
Innovation celebrated, freedom from big business, robots constantly building cool things, rides that reinvent instantaneously, handmade cities with lively communities – what a fantastic world!
OTOH grand gestures seem completely missing in action. No mention of beauty other than humans and some of the Disney experience. The rest sounds like Frankenstein cities, assembled from cast-offs and gerry-rigged to new uses.
Architects and engineers would be part of the design/build crew – making, remaking, and programming robots. The rapid-fire change means we would learn from failures faster, do it better tomorrow. That’s fantastic, actually.
Does Makers Include Architects, Engineers or Contractors?
As it is now, we fear our mistakes since a botched design can live for decades. Or as Frank Lloyd Wright said: we plant ivy.
Frankly, some lessons are not at all clear until a place is built and used. On every project, the designer says “drat!” about something, “aha!” about something else. We live and learn with regrets; find joy in happy accidents. But we rarely get to fix problems. A missed opportunity is just that; gone.
With assembled structures and swarms of construction robots, we could improve a space constantly. Need a bigger assembly space? send the bots. More doors or windows? Better shading devices? Fire up the 3D printer. Thinking on your feet and working with existing resources become a new form of modeling at full scale. Thrilling! Design/build as performance art.
I would truly welcome this world, even though the pressure to perform would be enormous. Imagine, nearly instant turn-around!! Lag-time would disappear.
Yet, I bet architects, engineers, and construction folks would be far less useful or common. The concept of citizen inventors extends to citizen architects and builders too.
Those Professions Formerly Known As…
In this low-scale, robot-constructed world, expertise may be nearly worthless in design and construction. Computer models would set design parameters for spans and fire codes, even for functional uses and types of experiences. Want quiet and peaceful, pick Option 21058; workspace for call centers, pick Option 84205.
Instead, in the Makers world, we survive by the worthiness of our ideas. Buildings are built and perhaps rebuilt or modified in a day. We design, hit the send button, and then boom, it’s built by robot swarms and 3D extractions.
Services are shortened to schematics and oversight. Explaining what is needed, and what is possible will be accompanied by robot-built models. Presentations might be daily events, so gear up communication skills.
While knowledge of the field is essential, with automated design and construction processes, the number of people working at each role could be substantially reduced. Innovators, synthesizers, folks who can think across platforms, communicate ideas, and know how things fit together would be at a premium. Production jobs in today’s world and folks that make it happen may be less essential.
Picture cities as anthills, emerging from a million small actions instead of grand schemes orchestrated by experts.
How Much of a Stretch?
I’ve taken Doctorow’s ideas and asked: what would this mean for entire cities? If we had this technology, these sensibilities and resources, how would we make buildings? Furthermore, what would it mean for those of us that love to make cities? I hope the author is tolerant of my stretch.
Imagining the future is the best way to shape it and the only way to prepare ourselves.
Makers presents a scenario that is far from an architect’s dream. It’s a tough environment for engineers, planners, and contractors as well. Even city leaders and developers would have to step aside for this tsunami of citizen action.
Just as content and media platforms have become free for publishing, if materials and real estate lose their economic clout, and design/build processes are automated, active users will create cities.
Would you choose to live in Makers world?
You can buy it here: http://bit.ly/5rw5gH
You can read more at http://craphound.com/makers/
Photo by Flickr/x-ray_delta_one
This talk from LSE, is an academic overview of the future design of cities in the context of climate change. The speakers include Saskia Sassen, Richard Sennet and Jonathon Porritt, each providing their own insights on the topic.
As cities contribute up to 75 percent of total carbon emissions, this is a talk we should all listen to. Saying that, I would save it for a time when you are highly alert (maybe even with a double espresso by your side!) as the speakers express themselves from a very theoretical point of view, sometimes lacking emotion. If you do manage to get to the end of the talk, you will be rewarded by having a better understanding of the complex problems at play within this subject.
LSE have a large archive of equally informative podcasts on critical topics, ranging from economics through to art and science.
Link to Podcast:
LSE Podcast: Cities, Design and Climate Change
Related Links:
Re-created by Claude Freise-Greene, this video shows us what London was really like 80 years ago, it's a strange thing to watch, amazing!
via Glue creative James Leigh and Andy Kinsella

"...one thing this massive failure has made possible is ability to come up with radical ideas for the city, and potentially to even implement some of them. Places like Flint and Youngstown might be attracting new ideas and moving forward, but it is big cities that inspire the big, audacious dreams. And that is Detroit. Its size, scale, and powerful brand image are attracting not just the region’s but the world’s attention."
Read the rest of this post (thanks to Matt Sicko for the find via Facebook)
http://www.newgeography.com/content/001171-detroit-urban-laboratory-and-new-american-frontier
With a blank canvas, and creative powerhouses like the College for Creative Studies in Detroit. I know we will be implementing radical, game changing ideas. Detroit is a city waiting for a catalyst.