Search posterous

Search all posts and users. Type a name, type a favorite song title, whatever! See what comes up.
  

More posterous blogs











More recommended blogs »

Here are posterous posts filed under chromeos...

marcof says...

I'm pretty slow to catch on here, but it just occurred to me that tabs on top, like the Chrome browser has, are the best choice for people working on smaller (laptop) screens.

Usually I am working on a larger external monitor connected to my laptop. I never run the applications full-screen because the monitor has ample resolution. So then, the location of the tabs really don't matter mostly.

However, in the office they've introduced a "new way of working". Which means ditching all monitors, and have flexible work places. So I am now forced to work on my laptop screen. The screen has quite a bit of resolution: 1280x800. That's good in the horizontal area, but 800 pixels are too short vertically. The solution is to run everything fullscreen (hmm, DOS deja-vu) and use the screen as optimal as possible (auto-hiding start bar, no browser status bar, etc).

I'm a Safari person. I use it on my Mac all the time. Mainly because it is fast and I can sync my bookmarks. However, I didn't really get before what the fuss was about when those tabs moved around during the beta 4 period, but is starting to dawn on me now: Tabs on top are much more favorable than tabs "below". You won't notice this until you are using limited screen estate.

Look at the picture below. Both Chrome and Safari running fullscreen on my D630 laptop. Notice how much more content space you have with Chrome? And I think the title/tab bar and toolbar are quite bulky, so you can gain even more. That's not just a small gain, it is a huge increase!
Of course, if you see ChromeOS in this perspective, the tabs of Chrome being actual "task switchers" this all makes sense.

I'm still favoring Safari at the moment, because Chrome on Mac OS X does not yet have bookmark sync (don't start with comments like "use delicious" etc.. I won't). Once this is available, I may switch pretty quick. Unless Apple makes the tab position configurable in a new Safari drop. The old Safari 4 beta had a "tabs on top or not" tweak possibility but unfortunately this is gone in the final. I guess it's long forgotten now, but I was re-triggered by the attention chromeOS got and my personal experiences working on a vertical resolution challenged screen.

Filed under: chromeos

marcof says...

ChromeOS seems to be redefining computing for many users. The concept of a "cloud-only" environment is new and really takes some effort to understand. With ChromeOS, the user won't need to worry about files and folders anymore. Users only need to worry about content. Photos, Movies, Documents, etc. Hopefully with a sensible name.

I'm not sure how Google wants to go forward in managing this without the legacy concept of folders and files, but we'll see.
[edit] @luclodder indeed commented that Google is already doing this in gmail using tags and search.

Back in 1998, 1999 there was a small company called Be Inc. Their success on the desktop was not what they expected and Jean Louis Gassée, the CEO of Be came up with the "brilliant" idea to start making so-called internet devices. Lightweight devices running BeOS. The iPad, archived on Scot Hacker's site here: http://www.birdhouse.org/beos/byte/07-IPAD/ was one example. Be wanted to be inside every device. From your fridge (ordering milk if needed) to TV (web experience).

The idea never took off, and eventually Be Inc was bought by Palm and we never saw anything from BeOS or iPad again.

It does seem though that the time is now right for these devices. ChromeOS seems to be made for lightweight devices.

Most people now think that ChromeOS will be for lite netbooks, a laptop like computer that you carry around. But Google could take this much further. ChromeOS can essentially run in any device.
Imagine having a small touch-enabled screen in the kitchen. Connected to the internet, you are just a few clicks away from ordering groceries. Or check your email while waiting for the oven, or load that latest recipe from that cooking forum.

ChromeOS can run in your TV set. Streaming the latest movies. Playing the latest games. Chatting with friends and relatives. Or even in your car. Guiding you towards that new restaurant you want to try. Streaming your favorite radio channel.

Just regarding ChromeOS as a means for an even lighter netbook is shortsighted. It looks as if Google is reaching beyond this, it wants to be everywhere.

1984 and 1999 all over again?

Filed under: chromeos

IronHelixx says...

Excerpt

It was so close I could taste it. Two weeks ago we were ready to publicly launch theCrunchPad. The device was stable enough for a demo. It went hours without crashing. We could even let people play with the device themselves – the user interface was intuitive enough that people “got it” without any instructions. And the look of pure joy on the handful of outsiders who had used it made the nearly 1.5 year effort completely worth it.

Our plan was to debut the CrunchPad on stage at the Real-Time Crunchup event on November 20, a little over a week ago. We even hoped to have devices hacked together withGoogle Chrome OS and Windows 7 to show people that you could hack this thing to run just about anything you want. We’d put 1,000 of the devices on pre-sale and take orders immediately. Larger scale production would begin early in 2010.

And then the entire project self destructed over nothing more than greed, jealousy and miscommunication.

...

Full Article: Tech Crunch

Filed under: Chrome OS

hdknr says...

Chrome OSのブート画面ではchromium osになっているが、これは開発用ビルドの名前だ。正しいGoogleアカウント情報を入力する。安全のためには、上で述べたように使い捨てのアカウントを作るといい。本誌でも、下の図でお分かりのように、そうしている。アカウントは、ここで作れる。

もうイメージできてたのか。

Filed under: ChromeOS

Adnan says...

The advertising revenue keeps Google’s stock high, and that allows the company to do whatever it feels like doing. In 2006, when Google’s stock was worth $132 billion, the company absorbed YouTube for $1.65 billion, almost with a shrug. “They can buy anything they want or lose money on anything they choose to,” Irwin Gotlieb, the chief of GroupM, one of Google’s biggest competitors in the media market, told Auletta. If Microsoft is courting DoubleClick, Google can swoop in and buy DoubleClick for $3.1 billion.

And yet when it comes to building an OS, they come up with that crap they call ChromeOS. Instead of working on a new OS. Or improving an existing one (haiku, syllable, etc.). Do they do the hard work of teaming with vendors to get driver support for new hardware. No, they take Linux and bastardize it and call it ChromeOS.

Filed under: chromeos

BUGabundo says...

Filed under: ChromeOS

countnazgul says...

Just spotted that in http://www.chromeextensions.org/ are available 2 new extensions for Google Crome - Facebook Chat and Gtalk Chat . And in the light of ChromeOS this is fantastic features. I hope so that before Chrome OS is out already Goole Chrome to have the panel functionality already. With panels chat inside the browser will be amazing. I already abandon desktop clients for chat with using of imo.im but i'm happy to use chats in extentions 

Filed under: chrome os

Buck says...

Filed under: chromeos

Jordi says...

Apple y Microsoft comenzaron hace décadas con el "PC", y están actualmente inmersos en el proceso lento y doloroso de tratar de estirar y empujar "el PC" hacia Internet y hacia una relación más útil y más integrada con la nube como un nuevo tipo de servidor. Google, por otra parte, comenzó con Internet, y presupone la nube en todo lo que hace. Con Chrome OS, la compañía está tratando de empujar Internet hacia el "PC" como uno más de una creciente gama de clientes de la nube.

Sacada directamente de Daring Fireball, esta cita plantea el choque de culturas que se produce cuando Google se mete de lleno en el negocio de los sistemas operativos.

Algunos ya dijimos que lo más complicado sería cambiar la mentalidad de los usuarios, porque el sistema operativo basado en "la nube" es perfectamente factible, tanto técnica como conceptualmente. Veremos quién gana la batalla, pero no descarto que en breve tanto los anuncios de Apple como Microsoft tengan un denominador común: lo bien que están tus datos guardaditos en tu disco duro, con las ochenta copias de seguridad derivadas de ello. :)

Filed under: chromeos

IronHelixx says...

Congratulations to Google on the open sourcing of Google Chrome OS

When Chrome OS was announced in June we saw this as a positive development, bringing choice to the consumer. We considered how open source development is as much about co-operation as it is about competition. Google have made it clear that they are keen to develop Chrome OS openly and we have had the pleasure of hosting a number of the Google team at the Ubuntu Developer Summit in Dallas over the last few days where we have been able to see that openness in action.

In the interest of transparency, we should declare that Canonical is contributing engineering to Google under contract.  In our discussions, Sundar Pichai and Linus Upson made it clear that they want , wherever feasible,  to build on existing components and tools from the open source community without unnecessary re-invention.   This clear focus should benefit a wide variety of existing projects and we welcome it.

On the consumer side, people will ask about the positioning of Chrome OS and Ubuntu. While the two operating systems share some core components, Google Chrome OS will provide a very different experience to Ubuntu.  Ubuntu will continue to be a general purpose OS running both web and native applications such as OpenOffice and will not require specialised hardware.

So 2010 looks set to be a very exciting year. In addition to delivering Ubuntu experiences with both existing and new OEM partners, we will be working with Google on Chrome OS based devices.

Chris Kenyon  VP of OEM Services, Canonical

From: http://blog.canonical.com/?p=294

Filed under: Chrome OS