Search posterous

Search all posts and users. Type a name, type a favorite song title, whatever! See what comes up.
  

More posterous blogs











More recommended blogs »

Here are posterous posts filed under christopherdodd...

Stephen says...

Christopher Dodd, chairman of the Senate banking committee, has proposed a overhaul of the country’s regulatory architecture that would strip the powers from the Federal Reserve and create a single banking regulator.

The proposal to consolidate regulators faces strident opposition from the Fed, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and smaller regulators.

Mr. Dodd said most institutions would benefit from a regulator that would provide "clarity, cut red tape and make it easier to compete," and banks would "no longer be able to shop for the weakest regulator."

The Senate draft legislation also creates an agency to oversee systemic risk, which could call for banks to be broken up if they threatened the entire financial system and impose tougher capital requirements.

Republicans declined to support the proposed legislation, with a proposed Consumer Financial Protection Agency, which Mr. Dodd said was vital to crack down on abusive selling of mortgages and credit cards.

Source.

Filed under: Christopher Dodd

dmgerbino says...

Published: October 19, 2009
In the latest attack on overdraft fees charged by banks, Christopher J. Dodd, the Connecticut Democrat who heads the Senate Banking Committee, introduced legislation on Monday to limit the number of fees charged to one per month, and to require a bank to seek consumers’ permission to cover debit card and check purchases that would push their bank balance below zero.

Read the rest of the article at the New York Times

Filed under: Christopher Dodd

dmgerbino says...

Head of Wrestling Empire Says She Wants Dodd’s Senate Seat
Published: September 17, 2009
Linda E. McMahon announced that she would seek the Republican nomination in the Connecticut Senate race. Linda E. McMahon, who has presided over the sprawling World Wrestling Entertainment empire as its chief executive, announced on Wednesday that she was seeking the Republican Party nomination to challenge Senator Christopher J. Dodd next year.
Rest off story at The New York Times

Filed under: Christopher Dodd

Below I have shared a terrific outline of the Democratic health care reform package, which has been dubbed the Kennedy-Dodd Health Care Reform Bill, as it currently reads. The outline was written by Keith Hennessey and makes several very excellent points about the truly disruptive nature of this legislation, which is supported by the president, were it to pass in its current form. I have also embedded the full text of the bill as it exists today for those of you who are interested.

KeithHennessey.com » Understanding the Kennedy health care bill

Here are 15 things to know about the draft Kennedy-Dodd health bill.

  1. The Kennedy-Dodd bill would create an individual mandate requiring
    you to buy a “qualified” health insurance plan, as defined by the
    government. If you don’t have “qualified” health insurance for a given
    month, you will pay a new Federal tax. Incredibly, the amount and
    structure of this new tax is left to the discretion of the Secretaries
    of Treasury and Health and Human Services (HHS), whose only guidance is
    “to establish the minimum practicable amount that can accomplish the
    goal of enhancing participation in qualifying coverage (as so
    defined).” The new Medical Advisory Council (see #3D) could
    exempt classes of people from this new tax. To avoid this tax, you
    would have to report your health insurance information for each month
    of the prior year to the Secretary of HHS, along with “any such other
    information as the Secretary may prescribe.”

  • The bill would also create an employer mandate. Employers would
    have to offer insurance to their employees. Employers would have to
    pay at least a certain percentage (TBD) of the premium, and at least a
    certain dollar amount (TBD). Any employer that did not would pay a new
    tax. Again, the amount and structure of the tax is left to the
    discretion of the Secretaries of Treasury and HHS. Small employers
    (TBD) would be exempt.
  • In the Kennedy-Dodd bill, the government would define a qualified plan:


    1. All health insurance would be required to have guaranteed issue and
      renewal, modified community rating, no exclusions for pre-existing
      conditions, no lifetime or annual limits on benefits, and family
      policies would have to cover “children” up to age 26.

  • A qualified plan would have to meet one of three levels of
    standardized cost-sharing defined by the government, “gold, silver, and
    bronze.” Details TBD.
  • Plans would be required to cover a list of preventive services approved by the Federal government.
  • A qualified plan would have to cover “essential health benefits,” as defined by a new Medical Advisory Council (MAC),
    appointed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services. The MAC would
    determine what items and services are “essential benefits.” The MAC
    would have to include items and services in at least the following
    categories: ambulatory patient services, emergency services,
    hospitalization, maternity and new born care, medical and surgical,
    mental health, prescription drugs, rehab and lab services,
    preventive/wellness services, pediatric services, and anything else the
    MAC thought appropriate.
  • The MAC would also define what “affordable and available coverage”
    is for different income levels, affecting who has to pay the tax if
    they don’t buy health insurance. The MAC’s rules would go into effect
    unless Congress passed a joint resolution (under a fast-track process)
    to turn them off.

  • Health insurance plans could not charge higher premiums for risky
    behaviors: “Such rate shall not vary by health status-related factors,
    … or any other factor not described in paragraph (1).” Smokers,
    drinkers, drug users, and those in terrible physical shape would all
    have their premiums subsidized by the healthy.
  • Guaranteed issue and renewal combined with modified community
    rating would dramatically increase premiums for the overwhelming
    majority of those Americans who now have private health insurance. New
    Jersey is the best example of health insurance mandates gone wild. In
    the name of protecting their citizens, premiums are extremely high to
    cover the cross-subsidization of those who are uninsurable.
  • The bill would expand Medicaid to cover everyone up to 150% of
    poverty, with the Federal government paying all incremental costs (no
    State share). This means adding childless adults with income below
    150% of the poverty line.
  • People from 150% of poverty up to 500% (!!) would get their health
    insurance subsidized (on a sliding scale). If this were in effect in
    2009, a family of four with income of $110,000 would get a small
    subsidy. The bill does not indicate the source of funds to finance
    these subsidies.
  • People in high cost areas (e.g., New York City, Boston, South
    Florida, Chicago, Los Angeles) would get much bigger subsidies than
    those in low cost areas (e.g., much of the rest of the country,
    especially in rural areas). The subsidies are calculated as a
    percentage of the “reference premium,” which is determined based on the
    cost of plans sold in that particular geographic area
  • There would be a “public plan option” of health insurance offered
    by the federal government. In this new government health plan, the
    federal government would pay health care providers Medicare rates +
    10%. The +10% is clearly intended to attract short-term legislative
    support from medical providers. I hope they are not so naive that they
    think that differential would last.
  • Group health plans with 250 or fewer members would be prohibited from self-insuring. ERISA would only be for big businesses.
  • States would have to set up “gateways” (health insurance exchanges)
    to market only qualified health insurance plans. If they don’t, the
    Feds will set up a gateway for them.
  • Health insurance plans in existence before the law would not have
    to meet the new insurance standards. This creates a weird bifurcated
    system and means you would (probably) be subject to a different set of
    rules when you change jobs.
  • The bill does not specify what spending will be cut or what taxes
    will be raised to pay for the increased spending. That is presumably
    for the Finance Committee to determine, since it’s their jurisdiction.
  • The bill defines an “eligible individual” as “a citizen or national
    of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted to the United States
    for permanent residence or an alien lawfully present in the United
    States.”
  • The bill would create a new pot of money for state gateways to pay
    “navigators” to educate people about the new bill, distribute
    information about health plans, and help people enroll. Navigators
    receiving federal funds “may include … unions, …”
  • This would have severe effects on the more than 100 million Americans who have private health insurance today:

    • The government would mandate not only that you must buy health insurance, but what health insurance counts as “qualifying.”

  • Health insurance premiums would rise as a result of the law, meaning lower wages.
  • A government-appointed board would determine what items and
    services are “essential benefits” that your qualifying plan must cover.
  • You would find a tremendous new disincentive to switch jobs,
    because your new health insurance may be subject to the new rules and
    would therefore be significantly more expensive.
  • Those who keep themselves healthy would be subsidizing premiums for those with risky or unhealthy behaviors.
  • Far more than half of all Americans would be eligible for subsidies, but we have not yet been told who would pay the bill.
  • The Secretaries of Treasury and HHS would have unlimited discretion
    to impose new taxes on individuals and employers who do not comply with
    the new mandates.
  • The Secretary of HHS could mandate that you provide him or her with “any such other information as [he/she] may prescribe.”
  • Kennedy-Dodd Health Care Reform Bill (First Draft)

    Powered by ScribeFire.

    Filed under: Christopher Dodd

    Stephen says...

    It didn't take long for liberals to come up with their preferred solution to political outrage over $165 million in bonuses passed out by insurance giant AIG: Tax the bonuses at a new top rate of 100%.

    Senate Banking Chairman Christopher Dodd said yesterday that he and other lawmakers are preparing legislation that would tax away almost all of the bonus money. While President Obama says he hopes to "pursue every legal avenue to block" the payments, Mr. Dodd told reporters that Treasury lawyers don't think there is a way to overturn AIG's contract obligations.

    Rep. Carolyn Maloney, who represents Manhattan's Upper East Side, has done Mr. Dodd one better by introducing a bill to tax the bonuses at a full 100%.

    "This will allow AIG to continue to meet their 'contractual obligation' to pay these bonuses, but will ensure that the recipients are not allowed to keep this money," Rep. Maloney wrote to her colleagues yesterday.

    A slightly more sophisticated approach was touted by Rep. Gary Peters, a Michigan Democrat, whose bill would merely create a 60% surtax on bonuses over $10,000 to any employee of a company in which the U.S. government has a 79% or greater equity stake.

    AIG is the only company that currently meets that requirement. Mr. Peters calculates that, combined with the existing top federal income rate of 35% and state income tax levies, his surtax would leave the government sopping up all of the bonus money.

    All of this reads as if yanked from an Ayn Rand novel. The government, in a desperate attempt to avoid political pain caused by its own foolish economic mistakes and lax oversight, has poured billions into bankrupt companies.

    Then when those companies pass out bonuses they claim are necessary to retain qualified workers, the political firestorm leads government officials to propose tax rates that would make even British socialists of a half century ago blush. We are slipping into debates that have nothing to do with a free economy and everything to do with the government calibrating how to balance the favors it hands out with the inevitable moral outrage those favors engender.

    By John Fund, WSJ's Political Diary.

    Filed under: Christopher Dodd

    Stephen says...

    Bank of America Corp. Chairman and Chief Executive Kenneth Lewis purchased an additional 200,000 shares of the Charlotte, N.C., bank's common stock Wednesday, February 4, 2009, in his latest effort to convince employees, investors and the board that he and his management team can lead it out of its current crisis.

    The bank's shares fell on Thursday, February 5, 2009, to their lowest level since October 1984, before rebounding to close at $4.84, up 2.98%. Analysts attributed the volatility to concerns about how involved the U.S. government is in the affairs of the nation's largest bank by assets.

    Government officials played a heavy hand in Bank of America's acquisition of securities firm Merrill Lynch & Co., for which Mr. Lewis has been under fire. The stock's price improved once U.S. Sen. Christopher Dodd publicly dismissed speculation that the U.S. could soon nationalize Bank of America.

    Last week, Mr. Lewis went before his directors in Charlotte for "the longest board meeting in anyone's memory," he told employees in a memo. "The board unanimously endorsed our business model, strategic direction and the team. The burden of execution and accountability, as always, rests squarely on our shoulders to vindicate their confidence in us."

    He called the company's performance in January "encouraging." The "extreme dislocations in the capital markets we suffered last quarter seem to have moderated" but "credit costs continue to be a big issue."

    Mr. Lewis acknowledged that year-end bonuses were cut across the company, with higher-ranking managers taking the largest "hits." In some cases, according to people familiar with the situation, bonuses are being distributed in chunks of deferred cash during 2009, with the first amount paid in March and the rest coming in installments over the course of the year.

    The CEO's purchase of stock amounted to a payout of $958,340 and follows another pickup of 200,000 shares on Jan. 20. Mr. Lewis now owns more than 2.2 million Bank of America shares. Several other board members, including lead director Temple Sloan and retired U.S. Army General Tommy Franks, also picked up more than 216,000 additional shares in the last week.

    Analysts debated Thursday, February 5, 2009, whether the bank could in fact be a candidate for nationalization. Raymond James analyst Anthony Polini called concerns about nationalizing Bank of America absurd. The stock has been driven so low that "fear itself does the work for you," he said. "After a while, even the most rational, intelligent investor starts to think, 'I must be wrong, there must be some truth to this, the stock keeps going down.'"

    Fox-Pitt Kelton analyst Andrew Marquardt told clients that the bank's shares now reflect a worst-case scenario. He added that decisive actions are needed not only by the government, but also at Bank of America.

    Bank of America declined to comment on the stock price, the likely effect of a new rescue plan or calls for management changes. Stocks surged Friday, February 6, 2009, on expectations that Washington could soon unveil solutions for the troubled financial sector and despite a dismal reading on the jobs market. Bank of Amerca closed up 3.75%, up $0.23 to $6.36 on Friday, February 6, 2009.

    Source.

    Filed under: Christopher Dodd