Couldn't find the user you were looking for.

Search posterous

Search all posts and users. Type a name, type a favorite song title, whatever! See what comes up.
  

More posterous blogs











More recommended blogs »

Here are posterous posts filed under apple...

kielrene says...

Unfortunately not mine :( (I'm just preparing it). If I could afford it I'd instantly buy one for my fiancé (and me, maybe).

Sent from my Sony Ericsson C905

Filed under: Apple

mgebert says...

my iphone 3Gs has died instantly - but Apple protection Plan sends be a brand new replacement by UPS express ! - i like that

Filed under: Apple

manfred says...

great tutorial for windows and mac os

Filed under: apple

laurentb says...

Un peu de teasing par Apple pour le prochain Black Friday ce vendredi.

Au lendemain de Thanksgiving, le Black Friday marque le début de la période des achats des fêtes de fin d'année. De grosses promotions sont proposées par les enseignes... La France ne sera pas en reste cette année...

Filed under: apple

dcfemella says...

From article: http://gizmodo.com/5412869/every-mac-price+compared-across-retailers?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+gizmodo/full+(Gizmodo)

Filed under: apple

fmafra says...

Filed under: apple

becskr says...

I've decided it's about time I posted another email win or two - it can get a bit boring complaining, even for me!

I truly love the "accents of Christmas" that both of these emails reflect. Not full on in-your-face Christmas marketing. Just little subtletities. As we're not fully into Christmas season I don't feel annoyed they have been sent to me either!

Apple's is carefully laid out and designed - nice calls to action that don't demand that you "Buy it now", but learn more. After all, you might want to have a think about a purchasing a gift for someone, not necessarily purchase it there and then. I also love the benefits in the footer that suggest the convenience of online purchasing.

Tiffany & Co use classic curly fonts to give the email a Christmassy feel whilst maintaining their brand identity. Their emails are much more simplistic in style, but let's face it: jewellery is there to be looked at, much less described.

   

Filed under: apple

davidavidson says...

Yesterday I read an piece on the development of a magazine 'iTunes' by publishers by John Koblin in the New York Observer. Whilst this seems like an obvious and good idea, I can't help thinking they are trying to reinvent the wheel by introducing new digital formats and a new platform for people to get to grips with. The article points to this difficulty:

“It’s pretty complicated stuff,” said a source. “The really, really hard part is that you’ve got so many different kinds of devices running on different operating systems. And how do you handle that? The consortium provides one point of contact for the consumer. When you come to the main store, you can get the content any way you want.”


Why wouldn't they use or partner with an existing platform (iTunes/Amazon) but sign a long term agreement between publishers to leverage their power as a collective. It might be that the publishers are already speaking to Apple or Amazon and it is just not in a position to be announced. I understand that there may be dangers partnering with a provider and that it could cause speciifc publications to leavethe partnership and give power to that platform. However, they are split at the moment and they should negotiate with any partner to digitise their content

Would the quickest way to digitise a magazine not be to up the standard of their current websites?

I put together some brief slides on how the tablet might change this game. Please see below for my initial thoughts.

Apple Tablet

Filed under: apple

netgarden says...


  •  
    There's no doubt that Instant Approval is hugely powerful. But, as applied to iPhone, I would say that the concept is paradoxical. Apple is a governed platform, pure and simple. While the litmus test to gain access to App Store, and everything that entails (one click purchase, download, install, instant use), can yield simply wacky App acceptance/rejection outcomes, consumers by and large also don't have to worry about viruses, performance crushing apps and the like. That's all good, IMHO.

    The problem is that once you iterate that relatively high-touch process out to simple bug fixes, you have a deeply unfriendly scenario that is at odds with both consumers and developers. In the real world, every product has bugs, simple UI tweaks can materially enhance the experience and tiny feature adds can often materialize in a day or so that add real utility.

    In the iPhone world, the power of Instant Fix is lost, and you see this all of the time in App Store review comments where the developer is pleading for customers to not ding them for a bug fix submitted three weeks ago.

    A (seemingly) better approach would be to Fast Track 'right of decimal point' fixes/updates by known developers with some verified history in App Store (and some defined protocol on what constitutes 'right of decimal point' fixes/updates).

    The Instant Fix cases would and should be treated differently than New Developers and/or Major Updates.

    Even the grocery story differentiates between Full Cart shoppers and the Express Lane user (5 items or less). Apple should refine their approach accordingly.

  • i like this idea of express lane approval
  •  

    Filed under: Apple

    John says...

    Filed under: apple